Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

Very interesting info on the 130PDS.

Does anyone have any images taken using the longer 130/900?

We're in the process of butchering one that had a broken focuser, to see what can be achieved using a 450D on a motorised EQ2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can attach SW auto focuser, no modification needed

Cheers Martin - I think I'll definitely get one then! :D I'm still writing the software for my diy usb autofocuser and it deserves something better than the ST-80! :)

Louise

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Martin - I think I'll definitely get one then! :D I'm still writing the software for my diy usb autofocuser and it deserves something better than the ST-80! :)

Louise

no problem :)

i love mine, it works fab for me with FWHM too :)

for the money you can not go wrong

writing software that is past me, fair play!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jonk, on 14 Jan 2015 - 4:16 PM, said:Jonk, on 14 Jan 2015 - 4:16 PM, said:

Very interesting info on the 130PDS.

Does anyone have any images taken using the longer 130/900?

We're in the process of butchering one that had a broken focuser, to see what can be achieved using a 450D on a motorised EQ2.

Im not sure if a DSLR will come to focus on the 130/900, the only images i've found are taken with a modified webcam (google search).... but type "skywatcher 130pds" into google, and you get a torrent of images :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure if a DSLR will come to focus on the 130/900, the only images i've found are taken with a modified webcam (google search).... but type "skywatcher 130pds" into google, and you get a torrent of images :D

Barlow required, unless there are mods happening...

Fairly drastic ones!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for confirming that, I thought it might not work.

I have been able to take frames with a DSLR this way on a SkyHawk 4.5".

They were rubbish, but it is doable...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Barlow required, unless there are mods happening...

Fairly drastic ones!

Exactly...The Dremmel has been in action!

It had a broken focuser so that was sacrificed and is now half the height it was.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell how you did? i'm considering to have some machine shop to cut a few mm of mine focuser, but i'm yet to decide if it's worth it,

my heart aches with the idea of destroying my little newt :p

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely it is less destructive to either use a barlow or fit longer bolts to support the primary mirror higher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, it had a broken focuser so we chopped half the height off and ground off the plastic teeth (these were mashed). I also removed half of the focuser tube so it didn't protrude into the light path.

The focuser just slides up and down and I've fitted a securing screw to lock it. Not the easiest to focus, but it's only a test really.

A barlow wasn't wanted as it reduces the amount of light and the scope is slow as it is.

We'll be lucky to get more than a minute per sub on it I reckon.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said, it had a broken focuser so we chopped half the height off and ground off the plastic teeth (these were mashed). I also removed half of the focuser tube so it didn't protrude into the light path.

The focuser just slides up and down and I've fitted a securing screw to lock it. Not the easiest to focus, but it's only a test really.

A barlow wasn't wanted as it reduces the amount of light and the scope is slow as it is.

We'll be lucky to get more than a minute per sub on it I reckon.

The mount will probably give you a bigger headache, but its fun to try these things, good luck :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, some stunning work done with this scope!

I've had the 150p for some time now and recently bought a SXVR-H18 (KAF-8300 chip). After doing some research I thought that binning was out of the question with the 2,97"/pixel resolution (2x2), but seeing Uranium235's images gives me hope :)

/Patrik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2.97" p/p aint bad! I usually reserve binning for mosaics, as it allows me to quickly build something under tricky conditions - albeit at the price of resolution. Think of it this way, its like transforming your 750mm of focal length into 375mm, except without the increase in FOV. Which is only 25mm less than Espirit 80 (2.78" p/p), and 25 more than the Star71 (3.18" p/p)  - but im just comparing resolution here nothing else.

Its probably worth measuring your gain between 1x1 and 2x2 first. Take some flats at 2x2 (using a Ha filter) and achieve a target ADU of something like 24000 - make a note of the time, now switch to 1x1 and see how long it takes to get the same level, then divide one by the other to get your (rough) gain.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely it is less destructive to either use a barlow or fit longer bolts to support the primary mirror higher.

Looks like the 114p is fixed mirror or something, can it still be moved up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, this is very offtopic as this is the 130pds imaging topic, please delete my post. i'll make a new one later

thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2.97" p/p aint bad! I usually reserve binning for mosaics, as it allows me to quickly build something under tricky conditions - albeit at the price of resolution. Think of it this way, its like transforming your 750mm of focal length into 375mm, except without the increase in FOV. Which is only 25mm less than Espirit 80 (2.78" p/p), and 25 more than the Star71 (3.18" p/p)  - but im just comparing resolution here nothing else.

Its probably worth measuring your gain between 1x1 and 2x2 first. Take some flats at 2x2 (using a Ha filter) and achieve a target ADU of something like 24000 - make a note of the time, now switch to 1x1 and see how long it takes to get the same level, then divide one by the other to get your (rough) gain.

Thanks! What do I do with the measured gain? :)

Is the gain camera or chip dependent?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! What do I do with the measured gain? :)

Is the gain camera or chip dependent?

You can use that figure to work out how much time you need for each sub, I find that 600s binned @ f4.4 gives a signal three times cleaner than 600s on my 80ED. So, I can get away with using less - ie: 2 hours binned is normally enough for a clean(ish) pic, and to do it unbinned would take roughly double the time (4 hours).

Im not sure whether the binning gain is chip or camera electronics based (probably both), and will more than likely differ from camera to camera. Thats why you need to check it out for yourself, but theres probably someone better qualified than me to give stats on the internal gubbins of CCD cameras. I just go on real-world observations (which dont always follow whats on paper).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to make an introductory post here, I have just "upgraded" from a 10" Dob to the 130 PDS on the EQ6 AZ GT mount. I've a lot to learn but looking forward to much heartache and joy, probably not in equal proportions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just joined the club! Have taken delivery of a 130pds :laugh: Looking forward to first light - whenever that will be! Have to set it up on the AVX first of course - at least I can do that during the day :)

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news Thalestris24.

I hope it performs as well for you as it has for me :smiley:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey, got a few people jumping on the bandwagon now :)

Just be prepared to find a way of balancing out the primary (I used 0.5kg leg weights), these little newts hardly weigh anything so they end up going camera heavy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sold one of these little beauties about a year ago and had little luck with imaging ever since! I rejoined the club a couple of weeks ago :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob

Well I did say a while ago I was thinking of getting one :). It's actually not that much smaller than my 150pds - unsurprisingly! I'll probably only be putting a dslr on - plus maybe a filter wheel and definitely the autofocuser, of course. I actually do have some ankle weights though they are 1kg ones. I don't see an easy way of fitting one to the tube except by maybe using tape?

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thalestris24, on 22 Jan 2015 - 1:28 PM, said:

Hi Rob

Well I did say a while ago I was thinking of getting one :). It's actually not that much smaller than my 150pds - unsurprisingly! I'll probably only be putting a dslr on - plus maybe a filter wheel and definitely the autofocuser, of course. I actually do have some ankle weights though they are 1kg ones. I don't see an easy way of fitting one to the tube except by maybe using tape?

Louise

My leg weights are held on with a combination of velcro straps (to hold it roughly in place), then backed up with a load of elastic bands to make it a snug fit. That makes it easier to remove if you need to... tape would be a bit of a one-way process (and leaves residue on you nice new shiny OTA if left for too long).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By stevebb
      Celestron C8 XLT + extras and SkyWatcher Star Travel 80 (ST80)
      I have a Celestron C8 with XLT Starbrite coatings. Will include the full length base plate, both visual and imaging backs, scope rings, front 8" end cap and the finder scope with it. No box I'm afraid. Optics are good and clean, focal length is huge - 2300mm from memory. This lot would cost close to £1300 new and one with less spec went for £750 on fleabay recently. Might be interested in a part exchange or will let it go for £450 collection only.
      Also, I have a SkyWatcher Star Traveler 80 - good optics, used as a guide scope - just the scope itself (does not include the barlow in the photo) looking at around £50 for it.
      I have decided to save up for another Equinox or even an Esprit.
      Please excuse some of the colours - I used my astro modded 6D which was in the observatory so the "nice" purple is actually black !!
      Both these are collection only.




    • By Clear Skies!
      I am going to buy Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Go-To mount. But, unfortunately, I am low on budget.
      So, does someone know where can I buy the cheapest EQ5 pro mount?
      Yesterday there was a low price for it (350 €), but they changed it.
      Thank you for your time!
    • By Bruno Marin
      I found this setup in internet and make me think, with AZEQ6 GT and 2 scopes, different weights and size, without counterweight in AZ mode! 
      - I can put a MAK100mm 3kg +- and a OO VX10l  12kg +- without counterweight?
       
      Does anyone have this setup mount and already used without counterweight with two telescopes of different weights? Is it really necessary to have a balance using in AZ mode?
      The problem to centralize the object with both scopes is true? With the SW AZEQ6 GT?
      Follow the images
      a TSA-120 with 6.5 kg i think and the other with 22kg i forgot the brand hehe you can help me?
       


    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





    • By AstroRuz
      Skywatcher 150/1200 f8 planetary Newtonian.
      Bought this originally intending to set up a planetary rig but circumstances call for sale.
      Will come with eyepieces and a collimation eyepiece. Not used by myself and has seen very little use. Mirrors in good condition
      Collection only
      £50



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.