Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_31.thumb.jpg.b7a41d6a0fa4e315f57ea3e240acf140.jpg

RogerOfHeaton

Members
  • Content Count

    26
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

21 Excellent

About RogerOfHeaton

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne

Recent Profile Visitors

535 profile views
  1. Hi Folks, I know this is an old thread but anyway....I got my 250PX back in March 2014, and then "graduated" (yeah right) to an equatorial platform bbut was not satisfactory. I finally made the move to an AZ EQ6 GT mount in January 2015, and it has worked well for imaging. Two provisos - get a coma corrector - I use both a Skywatcher 0.9x coma corrector and also a Baader MPCC III - and only image when windspeed drops below 12-13mph.
  2. Thanks for responding, StamosP. My understanding was that if it was just the focuser protrusion, the Baader and GSO would give a similar effect. My understanding from folks like Louise in Glasgow, who has the GSO, and the guys who started this thread on pages 1-3 like Uranium, who has had both Skywatcher and Baader types, that they don't have the same effect. If I'm wrong, then OK. If so, then I'll give serious consideration to the MN 190 DS Pro, which is coma-free apparently, and needs no corrector.
  3. Hello Folks, I run a 130 PDS and tube-ring converted 250PX ex-Dob newt on an AZ EQ6 GT mount, using the Skywatcher 0.9 coma corrector. This is with a modded DSLR On the 250PX, the bright star shapes are good and the coma corrector is fine. On the 130 PDS, no matter how I set up with the Skywatcher CC, the bright stars in the image are flattened on one side. It has begun to cheese me off somewhat, and so I'm considering a second CC alternative for the 130 PDS. I've attached a cocoon nebula image to show the effect. I've read this thread back to front, and I guess the Baader MPCC II
  4. Hi TingTing, My imaging train is a modded Canon 100D, a relatively light DSLR, fitted with a Skywatcher coma corrector. Also using an Astronomik CLS clip LP filter. Thinking of switching this to a Hutech IDAS P2. The thing is.......the filter is about the same price as the 130 PDS......seems the wrong way round but there you go. As you can see, I am still plagued with gradient and focus hassles. I've been using DSS and Photoshop CS2 and running the Gradient Xterminator trial. For galaxies and clusters it works reasonably well but for nebulae I seem to fall into deep kimshee. Star colours are
  5. Hi Folks, I'm still learning both my mount (EQ6 AZ GT) and the 130 PDS. Here is my March work in progress:
  6. Bloomin 'eck Uranium....I hesitate to post, having seen that last image. To hell with it....hello folks, this is my first attempt with a modded Canon 100D with Astronomik CLS clip filter, using the Skywatcher CC, sitting on the 130PDS, sitting on an EQ6 AZ GT. 27 x 210 seconds with darks, flats, bias and dark flats. Unguided. Have managed 4 minutes unguided but playing safe. Totally incompetent but keen as mustard. Cheers.
  7. RogerOfHeaton

    Alnitak Region

    My first attempts at modded Canon 100D on the 130PDS, sitting on the EQ6 AZ GT.
  8. I just want to say thanks to the contributors on this topic. I have finally.....finally....finally....got good balancing with the 130 PDS with my imaging train (100D + cc). I was going daft but then I read the posts.....and then made up 2 x 500g home-made counterweights, secured them to a spare large dog collar (literally), and velcroed them to the mirror end. It has worked like a dream. Thank you folks. Now happy to recommence imaging with my EQ6 AZ GT. Cheers.
  9. Just to add some input, I've had the EQ6 AZ GT for a couple of weeks now, and am admiring it more and more. The Dec and R.A. clutches are really cool. I've got PA pretty much ok now but my goto alignment has had me climbing the wall until I read the various threads and also the Sky at Night review. After PA I kept getting the mount slewing to the wrong part of the sky for the first alignment star. Finally realised that after PA I have to return the mount to the Home position, turn off, turn on, then start the goto alignment. After that, all the alignment stars popped into finder fov, just so
  10. Just to make an introductory post here, I have just "upgraded" from a 10" Dob to the 130 PDS on the EQ6 AZ GT mount. I've a lot to learn but looking forward to much heartache and joy, probably not in equal proportions.
  11. Just to finish my modest input. I finally went for the EQ6 AZ GT with the 130 PDS newt, plus a 0.9 skywatcher coma corrector. Got the EQDIR adaptor. A lot to learn but have a good feeling about it. Awaiting a Maplin power supply to use with Astromiser cigar lighter adaptor. Swapped the mounting around by 180 degrees to give me a north pointing tripod leg, plus a comfortable position for the polarscope, as suggested in the Steve Richards FLO review of the mount.
  12. Many thanks folks for responding. It is looking like February-March '15 for pulling the trigger. In terms of bangs per buck, my impression is that I either plump for maximum stability and better load capacity using the EQ6 AZ GT at £1300 from FLO or perhaps less stability (perhaps) and less load capacity using the Advanced VX but have £600 left over to get an autoguiding system and or GPS plus more mobility with the lighter weight. Totally perplexed at the moment. Hope I make my mind up by February. Also perplexed over Celestron emphasis upon ASPA - shows great confidence - they don't even inc
  13. Hi Folks, Newbie question I'm afraid. Looking to get my first EQ mount for imaging using a 130PDS newt initially. Looking at Advanced VX, NEQ6 Pro Synscan and the EQ6 AZ GT. I think I may also be using a 200 PDS as well. My simple question is - Would the EQ6 AZ GT be too much of a steep learning curve for a newbie like me. I currently run a 254mm Dobson on an Eq Platform. I do some astrophotography but obviously, the Dobson is more of an viewing light bucket. The price range for these 3 mounts is roughly £750 - £1400. Capacity, mount weight and "you get what you pay for" suggest EQ6 AZ GT. I j
  14. Thanks for the feedback folks.Much appreciated, both. I of course, have no experience of the AVX. I do however have a little experience on power supplies, in particular ccd video cameras. Cheap, underspecced power supplies are frequently responsible for video camera under-performance, due to inadequate consistency of power supplied, particularly with varying ambient temperature. Users generally overlook this and blame the camera quality or some environmental factor. That's what warmed me to the Baader unit, in that the general description highlighted those aspects, which mirror my experience.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.