Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep14_banner.thumb.jpg.27eb9b06c9c8a1fe5ac3bae21c92743b.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

I had first light with my 130 P-DS last night, but nothing to write home about, just getting focus and stuff. Did get an image of the moon, but so near full it's not worth posting.

May have another go tonight if it holds clear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real First Light!

After much faffing around I managed 12 x 240 sec subs of M42 through 3 nm Ha

post-3064-0-81074700-1425586681_thumb.jp

Unfortunately the focus was a bit off, probably in my haste as my imaging time was slipping away and didn't take time to slew to Betelgeuse and refine focus with the Bahtinov mask. The stars are a bit soft and I see some doubled diffraction spikes.

When the moon moves out of the way I'll be having a go at some of the brighter galaxies, ones that I might stand a chance of imaging through this horrid orange murk.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A good start, not sure whats going on in the bottom right (caused by off focus or misalignment in stacking?). But I do need to mention that you have to be pretty good with your focus to get the best out of the 130, especially if its coming out "hot" - you cant get a reliable focus for about 30min. But, once its settled, focused and locked you dont need to touch it again until you change filter (ive been able to do three nights straight without touching the focus).

Btw, did you get a CC?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm using a Baader MPCC. I think part of the problem was down to my haste and, yes, laziness. I'd been using the Baader L filter for my first trials the previous night, then switched to the Astrodon Ha for this image. The first trial exposure had looked OK so I went ahead with this run. In hindsight I should have slewed to Betelgeuse and touched up the focus with my Bahtinov mask, but I'd been faffing around so much and I wanted to get this run in and the kit put away before turning in myself that I skimped the final touch.

I set up not long after I got home from work about 5.30 or so but it was turned 9 o/c before I had M42 in the field and was ready to start imaging. Most of this delay was due to actually finding my target what with meridian reversals and not having any kind of finder on the 'scope. I think a few more adjustments need to be made, along with fitting a finder. If I do fit a finder I'll also need to add some counterweights to the tube to balance the camera and filterwheel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey, you need a finder! :)

Im using the Baader sky surfer (RDF), it came with the telescope as a freebie and it helps a lot with those initial calibration stars that have you doing a limbo dance under the telescope. But normally, after the first star is done, the following two always land fairly close to the centre of the CCD chip (I use the crosshairs in Artemis to calibrate the mount).

For your next test, try to find something in a good starfield and take a few subs for inspection of the corners. Youre using a nice camera, so you want to make sure you can use every last pixel (just in case you start getting into mosaics).

To get better balance, leg weights are pretty good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, got a lot of work to do. I've a RDF on my Megrez but it won't fit the 130 unfortunately, something more to buy. I'd hoped to get away without adding counterweights, but I guess I'll just have to bite the bullet and put some lead on the rig. Something like M44 has a nice field of stars and is well placed ATM so might make a good target for testing flatness of field.

The PA could do with a tweak I think as the guide graph looked pretty horrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey, you need a finder! :)

finder.....whats that? lol

my finder is astrotorllia/EQMOD :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'll have a look at Astrotortilla, though AA5 is supposed to do plate-solving, if only I could find a star-map for it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much endorse the Astrotortilla/Eqmod solution: no need for finder. Getting the focus tight is the key with 130pds: I agree with Rob, need at least 30m

to cool down and stabilize. Fitting the inexpensive skywatcher motor focuser is one very efficient way to get the focus tight remotly from a warm room,

cheers

E.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much endorse the Astrotortilla/Eqmod solution: no need for finder. Getting the focus tight is the key with 130pds: I agree with Rob, need at least 30m

to cool down and stabilize. Fitting the inexpensive skywatcher motor focuser is one very efficient way to get the focus tight remotly from a warm room,

cheers

E.

Hmm... wonder how the 130pds compares to the 150pds. I fitted a SW 'autofocuser' to the 150pds not so long ago. It's made focusing much easier and once focused, keeps it quite well. I'm going to do the same with the 130pds once I have it set up properly :)

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've downloaded and installed Astrotortilla. Now to work out how to use it  :eek:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I've downloaded and installed Astrotortilla. Now to work out how to use it  :eek:

Hi Dave

The lightvortex guide combined with the AT faqs is useful and fairly straightforward :)

Good luck!

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Louise.

It's looking as though it'll be a while till the next clear night. Hopefully I'll have time to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much endorse the Astrotortilla/Eqmod solution: no need for finder. Getting the focus tight is the key with 130pds: I agree with Rob, need at least 30m

to cool down and stabilize. Fitting the inexpensive skywatcher motor focuser is one very efficient way to get the focus tight remotly from a warm room,

cheers

E.

Im still a bit old-skool when it comes to calibration and pointing, prefering to separate tasks out (netbook imaging, mount pointing). However, I do use Stellarium mount control from time to time (depends if I have a USB socket free), especially if im going off the beaten track. To take images over subsquent nights, I use the markers function in Artemis - which always gets me quite close. Low tech, but it works :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm... wonder how the 130pds compares to the 150pds. I fitted a SW 'autofocuser' to the 150pds not so long ago. It's made focusing much easier and once focused, keeps it quite well. I'm going to do the same with the 130pds once I have it set up properly :)

Louise

Hi Louise,

It should be quite similar to fitting it to the 150pds, and as you say it holds focus pretty well for a few hours,

E.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Louise,

It should be quite similar to fitting it to the 150pds, and as you say it holds focus pretty well for a few hours,

E.

Hi

Oh, yes, fitting the autofocuser won't be a problem. I was just wondering how critical the 130pds focus will be, as people were saying... Of course I'll find out - eventually! Coma corrector (and filter drawer) are on their way! :)

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally i mine 130pds arrived.

But as always sky is cloudy and a bit of rain too.

can't wait to try it out.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i join this club, yes i own a 130p ds  :grin:

Right, i am NOT a deep sky imager but the plan is........i can see you all wincing at this,...........130p ds, 1000d un modded and ...............8SE alt az mount  (runs for cover)

The main reason i got the 130 is to use as a widefield visual scope on the goto se mount but nothing wrong with putting the camera on it and shooting some rough and ready images of things like the ring neb, M42, M45 and maybe a few brighter globs, if this does not work i will still have a good visual scope on goto, oh and i can image the moon with it, my fav subject :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to club 130 :)

Ok, the mount isnt ideal, but there is still stuff to be had - plenty of givers (M27, globs etc). Im not sure how long your max sub length will be before field rotation kicks in, but just give it a go and find the limit.

Ive got a couple more snaps to process from SGLX, but its just clouded over so im going to take the kit apart now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to club 130 :)

Ok, the mount isnt ideal, but there is still stuff to be had - plenty of givers (M27, globs etc). Im not sure how long your max sub length will be before field rotation kicks in, but just give it a go and find the limit.

Ive got a couple more snaps to process from SGLX, but its just clouded over so im going to take the kit apart now.

Cheers Rob, subs will be 30 secs to 1 minute max, im thinking 1000d with 2" nose piece direct into focuser and 2" lp filter. No point in even trying for  few weeks till i move to new house. By the way your images are top notch, very good indeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just another thought, could a 130p ds owner post a pic of the focuser showing the 1.25 adapter fitted, as i feel my one from the used market has the wrong adapter 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jules,

Here it is

attachicon.gifIMG_20150322_135923251_HDR.jpg

Is yours different?

Cheers for the picture, i bought mine used and its ended up with a very low profile generic 1.25 reducer, i strongly feel i will struggle to get focus with 1.25 ep`s, i have sourced a higher profile reducer that slips into the 2" focuser and should be about right height

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave the scope a try today with a nearby mountain here but i couldn't focus with the supplied 28mm 2" eyepiece

With the 1.25" eyepieces i had i was able to focus easily, could it be because of the distance of be subject?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cedric Schweizer
      Hello community,
      Does anyone know if I can use a Skywatcher Explorer 130pds with a Sony alpha a7iii? I'm quite new to AP... I know that I need a T-Adapter but I'm a little concerned about the potential vignetting I could get...
      Thanks a lot for the help!
      Cédric
       
       
    • By Naveen
      Hi all - looking for some
      advice on eyepieces. I have seen beautiful views of Jupiter with its moons and Saturn and of course the moon. I have two extra 32mm and 10mm plossls but am looking for better lenses for planets which will show more detail? Which ones would you suggest? Many thanks in advance!
    • By deanchapman2705
      Hi,
      I'm relatively new to the whole telescope thing but have done my research and was fixed on getting the Orion skyquest XT8i or XT10i. By spending that much money, I didn't like the idea of purchasing it online from their website without seeing it in person (and not having the reassurance of being able to take it back) and looked for stores in the UK that would supply them. After plenty of research, it seems like they don't exist anymore and they are only in the US? Is this right or could anyone help me?
      (I've looked at the Sky-watcher 250PX/200PX flextube skyscan goto but it is significantly heavier and the noise of the goto mechanism sounds like a table saw so that's put me off of it...)
      Any help would be much appreciated,
      Thanks
    • By AstroMuni
      In my own journey while learning this process and seeing similar areas of confusion among others, I decided to compile this FAQ.
      This FAQ has been put together using a combination of information from SkyWatcher manuals, my own experience and suggestions by various contributors on the forums. As most of the confusion is around the newer reticle, this FAQ deals with this in detail.
      Q: What is Polar alignment and why is it needed?
      A: Polar alignment refers to the act of aligning the Polar axis of an Equatorial mount telescope, so that it is parallel with the axis that the Earth revolves around. It makes the job of following objects across the sky much easier.
      Its of minor benefit to the visual astronomer but a necessity to the astrophotographer who is trying to take images of the night sky. Once a telescope is polar aligned and an object centred in the eyepiece, then assuming an RA motor is attached to the telescope, the object will stay centred. The better the polar alignment, the longer it will stay there.
      If no motor is attached then simply nudging the telescope around one axis will bring the object back to the centre of the eyepiece again.
       
      Q: Do I need to accurately do a Polar alignment?
      A: If you are a visual astronomer then its not that critical and you should be able to manage just doing a simple polar alignment by positioning the mount so that Polaris is in the centre of the reticle.
      But if you are doing astrophotography with long exposures then accurate polar alignment becomes critical to improve the quality of the images.
       
      Q: My reticle looks different to what is shown in the manual.
      A: There are 2 versions of this – the older one which has a bubble showing the location of Polaris Fig.1 and the newer one which has a clock face Fig.2.

      Figure 1
       

      Figure 2
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the new Reticle?
      A: As Polaris is not located exactly at the North Celestial Pole (NCP), we can see it orbit the North Celestial Pole in a polar scope. The large circle seen in the centre of the pattern in Fig.2 is a representation of the Polaris’ orbit around the North Celestial Pole. When performing the polar alignment process, it is necessary to determine the orientation of the Polaris on the circle. The reticle is marked like a clock face with 0 at the top. Imagine this is the 12 position in a traditional clock.
      At the end of the initialization of the SynScan hand control, after entering the proper local longitude, latitude, date, time, and daylight-saving time, the SynScan hand controller will display the message: “Polaris Position in P.Scope=HH:MM”. Imagine the larger circle in Fig.2 as a clock’s face with 12:00 at the top, with the current time pointing to the “HH:MM”. The orientation of the hour hand of the clock represents the orientation of Polaris in the polar scope. Put the Polaris to the same orientation on the large circle to finish the polar alignment.
      In case you don’t use the Synscan hand controller, there are several apps available on Android and IOS which give you the position of Polaris on the clock face (such as SynscanInit for Android and Polar Scope Align for IOS). Skwatcher has their own app as well called Synscan Pro which shows the position of Polaris in the new reticle.
      The Polaris position also changes as time passes. The reticle displays 3 circles to represent Polaris’s orbit in the year 2012, 2020 and 2028. It also gives sub-dials at 0, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock position for year 2016, 2024 and 2032. An engraving labeled with the above years is also displayed on the right of the FOV for memo purpose. When doing polar alignment in the Northern hemisphere, the user should put Polaris on the correct circle corresponding to the present year for better alignment precision.
      This reticle is also covered in the SW EQ6-R manual.
       
      Q: When I position my mount in the Home position with the counterweight at its lowest point, the 0 mark on the reticle is not at the top. Is this a fault and how can I fix it?
      A: There is nothing wrong with your mount You just need to rotate the mount in the RA axis till the 0 is at its highest position. Now lock the RA axis and continue with the alignment process.
       
      Q: How can I ensure that the 0 is accurately positioned at the very top?
      A: 1) Firstly, level the mount and set it up pointing north as if making it ready for polar alignment.
      2) Next use the Alt and Az bolts to centre Polaris in the reticle - i.e. put Polaris right in the centre of the cross-hairs, not on any circle. Be as accurate as you can. 
      3) Now using ONLY the Alt bolts, move Polaris vertically upward in the reticle from its central position until it reaches any of the circles.
      4) Because you started with Polaris dead centre and moved it only vertically, Polaris is now exactly in the zero (12 o’clock) position on the circle. Now rotate the RA axis to put the reticle zero mark in exactly the same position as Polaris. Again, be as accurate as you can.
      5) Lock the RA axis in this position and using a marker pen put alignment marks on the mount housing so that you can find this position again without the need to use Polaris.
      [Courtesy Jif001 on SGL]
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the older reticle?
      A: Here is a good article http://www.astro-baby.com/astrobaby/help/polar-aligning-the-skywatcher-heq5orion-sirius-mount/
       
      Q: How can I check if my polarscope reticle is aligned with the RA axis of the mount?
      A: Before using the polar scope for polar alignment, the polar scope itself must be calibrated to ensure the pattern in the polar scope is aligned to the mount’s R.A. axis. The following steps will outline how to calibrate the polar scope:
      This process is best done during daytime. Choose a fixed object (eg. a faraway object such as the tip of a TV antenna). Centre the reticle on the object by adjusting the two azimuth adjustment knobs and the two elevation adjustment bolts. Rotate the mount in R.A. axis for half a turn (180 degrees). Tighten the R.A. clutch after the rotation. If the object remains at the centre of the reticle in the polar scope after the rotation, then it means the polar scope has been aligned to the R.A. axis and no calibration is needed. If its not aligned, read this article which explains how to recalibrate https://www.myastroscience.com/polarscopecalibration There are also videos on YouTube that explain this process.
      Hope this helps. 🙂
      Do let me know if you have other questions (and answers) and I can add to this.
       
    • By NallyFace
      Hello,
      Is anyone on here signed up for the SkySafari and SynScan beta testing to natively support IOS? If so how has it been going?
      https://support.simulationcurriculum.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360043282514-Beta-Testing-SkySafari-6-iOS-Only-SynScan-WiFi-Read-This-To-Participate-?page=2#community_comment_360012192693
      Its 2020.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.