Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep15_banner.thumb.jpg.34f8495864951c81ec35e285b4d7b2e0.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

Thank you, Louise

Didn't know they had different names. Gonna make a search fo it.

that brazilian site you gave me is the store i bought my current telescope and it's a very good store, i contacted them but they don't sell it and are not importing at the moment.

For the moment i think i'll pass on the coma corrector right now as i'm still learning, maybe later when i get more demanding :)

Yeah, I don't have a coma corrector for mine yet - not even tried it visually at night yet either! Weather looks like being cloudy for another week, at least. I fear February will be write-off just like January was :(

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Uranium. I have gone with the ST80 and dovetail so that I can use it with the LX200 when the target is appropriate (and my skill levels reach a suitable level!) Order placed with FLO so can now get excited! Thanks for your help of which I will no doubt be seeking more at some point!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was on the fence between 130p and 130 pds, but this has settled it for me. 130pds all the way as my first starter

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that Uranium has actually sawn of the ridge of the skywatcher coma corrector in order to put the whole camera setup further inside the focuser and thus reduce the length the focuser sticks into the actual tube. Would there be another coma corrector fitting the 130 pds where you wouldn't need to do that? Anyone has one?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a long abscence I've finally managed to start with NB imaging...

Moon was up - but with Ha you get quite a good result as opposed to my previous Canon attempts... lol

Anyway, judge kindly, I somehow need to figure out how to prevent stars from bloating. As well - On the stars right hand side I can see an indentation which I think stems from the focuser tube jutting forward into the scope tube.

Anyway - now I'm waiting for clear skies to add OIII and SII.

Oh, and I've realised that by imaging several nights and adding more images you de facto are making your final image smaller, because you will never be 100% spot on with your subsequent images, hence cutting off at the edges in stacking. So I guess - looooong exposures is the way forward to increase image size... sigh... On the bright side (even though this image below is 500s exposures) I did manage to do one night of 1000s for the first time with SII. With the moon nearly full, you couldn't really see anything unfortunately. And, now all these images are stuck on a USB stick that suddenly decided to pack it in... uff

get.jpg

Edited by Russe
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats on taking the plunge and going Narrowband. I've just hit the second stage in the prcess by modding my DSLR and using a UHC filter to cut down light pollution. Just trying the modded camera out tonight. Started with a few subs of the California neb to test out the Ha gathering capability and am currently imaging M101. Yet to process these.

Look forward to see your finished Elephants trunk - looks like a very good start - it must be quite exciting producing CCD images for the firsdt time ! The amount of detail revealed is amazing. Great to see you can use the technique to defeat moonshine - that really increases the time available to image DSOs ! Great way to fight the dreaded light pollution as well. Only disadvantage I guess is the length of time spent imaging by adding in the different wavelengths over a number of sessions. I use Astrotortilla to keep targets central although there must be an easy way of getting the camera in the same position every time to avoid too much cropping when stacking !

I feel I need to muck about some more to drag out the last dregs of performance from my DSLR now I've had it modded before I feel I would be ready to get a CCD - although hopefully not too long !

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use AstroTortilla too, but slight differences b/o movement or camera rotation already make a difference. In particular if you're stacking like 100 images...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, how do you process your stars? Mine seem to come out fuzzy??... Tried star masks but somehow it's not quite right and sharp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that Uranium has actually sawn of the ridge of the skywatcher coma corrector in order to put the whole camera setup further inside the focuser and thus reduce the length the focuser sticks into the actual tube. Would there be another coma corrector fitting the 130 pds where you wouldn't need to do that? Anyone has one?

The Baader MkIII will fit the bill. It all screws apart so you can break it down to an M48 thread, it offers no redcution factor - but the field is good.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bloomin 'eck Uranium....I hesitate to post, having seen that last image.

To hell with it....hello folks, this is my first attempt with a modded Canon 100D with Astronomik CLS clip filter, using the Skywatcher CC, sitting on the 130PDS, sitting on an EQ6 AZ GT.

27 x 210 seconds with darks, flats, bias and dark flats. Unguided.

Have managed 4 minutes unguided but playing safe. Totally incompetent but keen as mustard. Cheers.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, this is my 1st process of M81 & M82, i cant ever seem  to get to a place where i am happy with my images, im way too fussy....i know what i want to do, just my Pixinsight skills are not up to what i need to do, and i try to over think things in processing which really seems to bog me down, any way this is my 1st process of this target....


 


This was taken at Turf Hill on Saturday 21`st Feb, it was a good night collecting the photons, how ever i had quite a lot of problems lol, but hey ho it would not be astro imaging if there were no problems  :D


 


i ended up with.....


16 x 10min light subs @ ISO800


50 flats @ ISO800


50 darks @ ISO800 (taken from my darks library to match light temps)


140 bias @ ISO800


 


thanks for looking


 


clear skies


 


16461968597_a31a619369_c.jpg


M81 & M82 by tingting44, on Flickr


  • Like 18

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks very good tingting, really sharp detail and good colour balance. I'd be very very pleased if i had done it! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks very good tingting, really sharp detail and good colour balance. I'd be very very pleased if i had done it! 

Lovely image !

Thank you both :)

Edited by tingting44

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good. Both galaxies have high dynamic range with cores which eadily blow out but here they are nicely controlled.

Olly

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good. Both galaxies have high dynamic range with cores which eadily blow out but here they are nicely controlled.

Olly

wow thanks Olly, means a lot coming from you and the high quality work you produce! thank you ever so much :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd almost say thats your best image yet!

You've set the bar now, no going backwards  ;)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd almost say thats your best image yet!

You've set the bar now, no going backwards   ;)

Wow also Rob! thank you buddy :)

ohh noo lool, ive put the pressure on now looool :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be of no help and I don't do deep sky as I can't afford a proper camera so I just webcam planetary, I stuck some sticky back wheel balancing weights to my scope for when the webcam is in and the heavier eyepiece, I only have a beginner scope but they work pretty well. I guess you could put a few on a Velcro strip and put that on the scope so they come off easy.

The 130pds is a scope I hope to own one day and of course a camera that doesn't have (bridge) at the start aha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't wait for mine to arrive.

Hope it doesn't get stuck in customs here :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't wait for mine to arrive.

Hope it doesn't get stuck in customs here :)

I've had mine for nearly 6 weeks but not had a chance to use it yet!! :( I'm going to set it up with a solar filter tomorrow in preparation for the partial solar eclipse on the 20th March :) I'm sure you'll enjoy imaging with yours :)

Louise

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had mine for nearly 6 weeks but not had a chance to use it yet!! :( I'm going to set it up with a solar filter tomorrow in preparation for the partial solar eclipse on the 20th March :) I'm sure you'll enjoy imaging with yours :)

Louise

please post when you catch it, it won't be visible here.

the 130p-ds will be a great fun and i'll keep using the 114p for visual with my little niece, an astronomer in the making :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MattsGazingAgain
      Hi,
      I'm matt from the UK, essex to be more accurate. I had a skywatcher 150p around 8 years ago and had some amazing moments with it, Jupiter being one of the highlights despite the 150p's declination towards DSO's. Unfortunately due to some financial problems at the time I had to sell it. Astronomy was a hobby I locked away to a quiet corner of my brain until my very wise other half helped me realise how much I missed it. 
      We have just bought a skywatcher 150pds as i want to focus on astrophotography this time. Its currently on a eq3 pro mount with synscan. Not the ideal mount, i plan to upgrade to the heq5 as soon as possible, but its perfect for me to learn and practise on. 
      We bought the scope and mount second hand in an amazing deal, coming with the coma corrector, all 3 sky panorama uwa lenses, the canon t ring adaptors and a clubman flight case for £700. Everything in perfect condition, although the mount has some stickiness and i think maybe some binding in the gears, so I plan to strip it down, de and regrease and reassemble as soon as possible.
      Have only had the opportunity for a couple of hours viewing so far, during which I very unsuccessfully attempted to polar align and then 2 star align the mount, but loved seeing it slew. I did get some amazing manual visual observation on the moon, but was surprised that despite my previous experience with a very similar scope just how much I don't know. Am very eager to learn as much as I can and am very excited to be back in the hobby, as you can probably tell from my extracted and probably boring welcome message.
      Anyone with any experience of this scope or mount with any tips or little known tweaks I would be exceptionally grateful for any advice. Or any tips in regards to polar aligning and star aligning, especially in a class 6 bortle or similar. 
      One problem I struggled with was gaining any focus on any lens I have while using the barlow lens. Am sure it is either my error or cheap equipment but I gained a very nice focus with the 28mm supplied lens and the panorama range but struggled gaining focus with the barlow and said lenses.  After looking into this though I'm wondering if it was due to me not accounting for eye relief?
      I look forward to meeting like minded people on this forum.
       
      Many regards
      Matt
       
       
       
    • By JodieH
      Hey everyone 
      I have a Celestron Starsense Explorer DX 102AZ on the way. 
      https://www.celestron.com/products/starsense-explorer-dx-102az
      660mm
      F6.5
      I was wondering if someone could please recommend which size EP to buy for viewing planets and the moon? 
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/skywatcher-eyepieces/skywatcher-uwa-planetary-eyepieces.html#faq
      Sky watcher ULA Planetary (my budget is £40)
      I've read on another thread that sometimes 9mm can outperform a 4mm with a fast telescope as more magnification can make the viewing duller? I was hoping for the best magnification that is also crisp. 
      Thank you for your help. 
    • By Cedric Schweizer
      Hello community,
      Does anyone know if I can use a Skywatcher Explorer 130pds with a Sony alpha a7iii? I'm quite new to AP... I know that I need a T-Adapter but I'm a little concerned about the potential vignetting I could get...
      Thanks a lot for the help!
      Cédric
       
       
    • By Naveen
      Hi all - looking for some
      advice on eyepieces. I have seen beautiful views of Jupiter with its moons and Saturn and of course the moon. I have two extra 32mm and 10mm plossls but am looking for better lenses for planets which will show more detail? Which ones would you suggest? Many thanks in advance!
    • By deanchapman2705
      Hi,
      I'm relatively new to the whole telescope thing but have done my research and was fixed on getting the Orion skyquest XT8i or XT10i. By spending that much money, I didn't like the idea of purchasing it online from their website without seeing it in person (and not having the reassurance of being able to take it back) and looked for stores in the UK that would supply them. After plenty of research, it seems like they don't exist anymore and they are only in the US? Is this right or could anyone help me?
      (I've looked at the Sky-watcher 250PX/200PX flextube skyscan goto but it is significantly heavier and the noise of the goto mechanism sounds like a table saw so that's put me off of it...)
      Any help would be much appreciated,
      Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.