Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

A 314 will be a good match for this telescope. Epicycle has had good results using his H9 camera (which has the same chip), and that was without extensive modification - but Im sure he had to drill & tap a third hole for another thumbscrew to ensure the coma corrector was seated correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Uranium235.

I have a third thumbscrew mod on my list of things to do anyway for my DSLR (thanks to your guidance :smiley:).

If I go for the 314L I might treat myself to a focuser upgrade and move my current one to the 200P if possible.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now completing my 1 year cyclus with AP in November. The most important i've learned is what not to do and what i need to make better astrophotos.

M_45_30_09_14_zpsd2530e79.png

M_33_30_09_14_zps11296c9c.png

NGC7000_30_09_14_zps6c6c7bb3.png

NGC6960_zps6f7323d0.png

M31_031014_zps531e16b9.png

Maringne_11_10_14_1024_zpse1a9eb28.png

Moon0001_111014_1_zps45432a6d.png

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on to that M45 data, its going to be around for a while yet so you could develop that one into something a bit special (given enough long subs).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on to that M45 data, its going to be around for a while yet so you could develop that one into something a bit special (given enough long subs).

You say that as if people actually delete files! [emoji46]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now completing my 1 year cyclus with AP in November. The most important i've learned is what not to do and what i need to make better astrophotos.

M_45_30_09_14_zpsd2530e79.png

M_33_30_09_14_zps11296c9c.png

NGC7000_30_09_14_zps6c6c7bb3.png

NGC6960_zps6f7323d0.png

M31_031014_zps531e16b9.png

Maringne_11_10_14_1024_zpse1a9eb28.png

Moon0001_111014_1_zps45432a6d.png

Excellent work! How do you get to put the time in? Between weather and kids...

Fair play to you, the effort has been worth it![emoji106]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that as if people actually delete files! [emoji46]

It does happen! ;)

And if youve already got good data, re-use, top-up, or use it as an RGB layer. Ive had some projects span three years (shows how often I dont change my gear...lol).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you keep stuff as a reminder of what Not to do... ;-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image Uranium235, good to see it finished :grin:

Question for anyone with a 314L+:

I'm purchasing a Atik 314L+ for use with this scope, will the Coma Correcter still be required in the imaging train?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent image Uranium235, good to see it finished :grin:

Question for anyone with a 314L+:

I'm purchasing a Atik 314L+ for use with this scope, will the Coma Correcter still be required in the imaging train?

oh yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought I might as well post another M31 -  19x8 min subs.  130 PDS and Canon 1100D using DSS, Pixinsight and Canon DPP.  Guided on a NEQ6 using ST80 and ASI120MC.  

I guess if I had put more thought into the camera rotation I may have captured it in its entirety perhaps next time !

post-36401-0-53364000-1416508576_thumb.j 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robp, on 17 Nov 2014 - 1:39 PM, said:

Excellent image Uranium235, good to see it finished :grin:

Question for anyone with a 314L+:

I'm purchasing a Atik 314L+ for use with this scope, will the Coma Correcter still be required in the imaging train?

Yes +1

I've been there (with a 314), tried it, and came to the conclusion a CC is definitely required.

PS: Get the Baader, it wont throw a fit (like the SW does) when you point it at a very bright star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At last a Clear crisp night, 8 hours of my life well spent under the night sky at my cabin. Haven't seen a single star since last time i visited this section:

M31_21_11_14_p3B_zps3dd783e2.png

IC_434_221114_1366_zpsb77e497d.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice images HenryW, having terrible luck with the clouds here as well (last night being the exception).

Yes +1

I've been there (with a 314), tried it, and came to the conclusion a CC is definitely required.

PS: Get the Baader, it wont throw a fit (like the SW does) when you point it at a very bright star.

Thanks Uranium235 & tingting44. I already have the Baader CC just waiting for the adapter to arrive to get the correct spacing now.

The 314L+, HA filter and filter wheel arrived at the weekend so I was able to get some test subs last night (albeit without the coma corrector).

I haven't processed anything yet but even just looking at the previews you can consider me a CCD convert!

Just need to find the time to mod the focuser now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first Ha image with my new camera :grin:

Bit of a learning curve last night as its a little different to using a DSLR.

post-11689-0-07417400-1416871097_thumb.j

Orion Nebula

7x600s Baader 7nm Ha

25x10s Baader 7nm Ha (for the core)

130PDS

HEQ5

No Coma Corrector

Processing is a little rough and with no calibration frames, need to figure out a workflow for processing Ha images.

With cloud scheduled for the rest of the week I guess it gives me plenty of time to learn :sad:

To say that I am happy with this first test image is a bit of an understatement.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A few more to keep it rolling....

15886576602_62c7b771c3_c.jpg

15684399088_bb46f910dc_c.jpg

15684376928_617f162210_c.jpg

Original sized images can be found in the original thread (deepsky section).

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first Ha image with my new camera :grin:

Bit of a learning curve last night as its a little different to using a DSLR.

attachicon.gifOrionNebula_314L_HAtest.jpg

Orion Nebula

7x600s Baader 7nm Ha

25x10s Baader 7nm Ha (for the core)

130PDS

HEQ5

No Coma Corrector

Processing is a little rough and with no calibration frames, need to figure out a workflow for processing Ha images.

With cloud scheduled for the rest of the week I guess it gives me plenty of time to learn :sad:

To say that I am happy with this first test image is a bit of an understatement.

Wow! [emoji16]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my 1st real go at stacking and processing an image completely with PI, ive had it must be about 2 weeks now, i think im improving with my processing side of things

This is only a re-process of the 4 hours worth of subs grabbed on the 29th of September would you believe it! that was the last time i had clear skies with no moon :(

Pixinsight process

15728554748_e114a7aa72_c.jpg

M31 (Pixinsight) by tingting44, on Flickr

 

Photoshop process

15147531728_ebb0956971_c.jpg

M31 - WIP by tingting44, on Flickr

 

Single 10 min sub

15730354617_f0f4164066_c.jpg

M31  (single 10min sub) by tingting44, on Flickr

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow what a difference between the 2 they are both nice, have you tried to combine both images.

i hope you do'nt mind i had a go but could only use a copy from your posted images.

60/40 combine 

Tingtings-M31.tif post-12098-0-69396800-1417447119.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my 1st real go at stacking and processing an image completely with PI, ive had it must be about 2 weeks now, i think im improving with my processing side of things

I really like both versions. The PI one is more conventional but the Photoshop one has more of your own stamp on it. It's nice to see them both side-by-side.

As toxic suggests, blending the two is an option.

Edited by Knight of Clear Skies
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind comments guys, 

of course not toxic i do not mind...... i never thought of combining the PI & PS versions together, i might have to have a play with that tomorrow :) i am really liking the more softer image compared to the more sharpened images as i progress tho... :)

well im never going to get my planned 30 hours for M31 by the looks of it, still a good blue print to build upod in the future years to come :)

Edited by tingting44
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

I don't suppose anyone has had any experience using a 130pds on a cg5 WITH an ED80 as a guide scope with dslr etc?

Cam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By merlin100
      I'm tempted to go down the route of getting myself a brand new reflector...  My friend's old Meade 114/900 is a good telescope, but I want something of my own and with a bit more light gathering power.  To this end, I've been looking at a couple of different models and manufactures.  
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130p.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reflectors/skywatcher-explorer-130m.html
      https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meade-Instruments-Polaris-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B01FG8JEGG
      I must admit, the Skywatcher Explorer 130M floats my boat, as it's motorised with a speed controller.
      Any thoughts or observations?🤔
    • By stevebb
      Celestron C8 XLT + extras and SkyWatcher Star Travel 80 (ST80)
      I have a Celestron C8 with XLT Starbrite coatings. Will include the full length base plate, both visual and imaging backs, scope rings, front 8" end cap and the finder scope with it. No box I'm afraid. Optics are good and clean, focal length is huge - 2300mm from memory. This lot would cost close to £1300 new and one with less spec went for £750 on fleabay recently. Might be interested in a part exchange or will let it go for £450 collection only.
      Also, I have a SkyWatcher Star Traveler 80 - good optics, used as a guide scope - just the scope itself (does not include the barlow in the photo) - now including dovetail bar and scope rings looking at around £50 for it.
      I have decided to save up for another refractor, WO, Equinox or even toward an Esprit. However, I would also consider p/ex for an Intel NUC and/or Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox.
      Please excuse some of the colours - I used my astro modded 6D which was in the observatory so the "nice" purple is actually black !!
      Both these are collection only.




    • By Clear Skies!
      I am going to buy Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Go-To mount. But, unfortunately, I am low on budget.
      So, does someone know where can I buy the cheapest EQ5 pro mount?
      Yesterday there was a low price for it (350 €), but they changed it.
      Thank you for your time!
    • By Bruno Marin
      I found this setup in internet and make me think, with AZEQ6 GT and 2 scopes, different weights and size, without counterweight in AZ mode! 
      - I can put a MAK100mm 3kg +- and a OO VX10l  12kg +- without counterweight?
       
      Does anyone have this setup mount and already used without counterweight with two telescopes of different weights? Is it really necessary to have a balance using in AZ mode?
      The problem to centralize the object with both scopes is true? With the SW AZEQ6 GT?
      Follow the images
      a TSA-120 with 6.5 kg i think and the other with 22kg i forgot the brand hehe you can help me?
       


    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.