Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep14_banner.thumb.jpg.27eb9b06c9c8a1fe5ac3bae21c92743b.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

While I've been knocked out by Uranium's images for some time, and said so, I've missed this thread.

I don't see anything remotely 'entry level' about the best images posted here. If you want to image at this kind of focal length on a medium to small chip then this telescope clearly has a lot going for it. I think it will take on, quite literally, all comers at any price. It is fast enough to be fast but not so fast as to invite exasperating complications that will rob the imager of many good nights. In refractor terms it has a fair bit of aperture. Apart from the coma corrector it is inherently apochromatic - totally so.

What do you get with a car-priced Takahashi FSQ that you don't get with this scope? A vast flatfield circle which you only need with a big chip. Freedom from collimation. No diffraction spikes. These are not nothing, but, yikes, they come at a price...

Olly

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I've been knocked out by Uranium's images for some time, and said so, I've missed this thread.

I don't see anything remotely 'entry level' about the best images posted here. If you want to image at this kind of focal length on a medium to small chip then this telescope clearly has a lot going for it. I think it will take on, quite literally, all comers at any price. It is fast enough to be fast but not so fast as to invite exasperating complications that will rob the imager of many good nights. In refractor terms it has a fair bit of aperture. Apart from the coma corrector it is inherently apochromatic - totally so.

What do you get with a car-priced Takahashi FSQ that you don't get with this scope? A vast flatfield circle which you only need with a big chip. Freedom from collimation. No diffraction spikes. These are not nothing, but, yikes, they come at a price...

Olly

Based on this thread I wholeheartedly agree, Olly! It's certainly very good value for money!! I've had my 150pds for nearly a year now - still not had to collimate it! I probably should have got the 130pds - in fact, they are so cheap I might yet get one anyway :) Of course, it helps to like diffraction spikes :)

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

I don't suppose anyone has had any experience using a 130pds on a cg5 WITH an ED80 as a guide scope with dslr etc?

Cam

Unfortunately, with that mount its a case of either/or - not both, becuase that will far exceed the imaging payload for that mount (tried it and failed).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I've been knocked out by Uranium's images for some time, and said so, I've missed this thread.

I don't see anything remotely 'entry level' about the best images posted here. If you want to image at this kind of focal length on a medium to small chip then this telescope clearly has a lot going for it. I think it will take on, quite literally, all comers at any price. It is fast enough to be fast but not so fast as to invite exasperating complications that will rob the imager of many good nights. In refractor terms it has a fair bit of aperture. Apart from the coma corrector it is inherently apochromatic - totally so.

What do you get with a car-priced Takahashi FSQ that you don't get with this scope? A vast flatfield circle which you only need with a big chip. Freedom from collimation. No diffraction spikes. These are not nothing, but, yikes, they come at a price...

Olly

Kind words Olly, thank you :)

I must admit, I was jumping between the 80ED and 130pds for a while trying to decide what was better. While the 80ED can yield some pretty sharp results, I found the slight "fuzziness" I get with a reflector can be overcome by the depth of signal it provides - which allows for more sharpening and less noise reduction. Hmmm.... I havent used the 80ED for nearly a year now....blimey!

Im pretty sure the Baader MkIII corrector is apochomatic - since I dont have to refocus between Ha and OIII, which is something I cant get away with when using the Skywatcher corrector.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I've been knocked out by Uranium's images for some time, and said so, I've missed this thread.

I don't see anything remotely 'entry level' about the best images posted here. If you want to image at this kind of focal length on a medium to small chip then this telescope clearly has a lot going for it. I think it will take on, quite literally, all comers at any price. It is fast enough to be fast but not so fast as to invite exasperating complications that will rob the imager of many good nights. In refractor terms it has a fair bit of aperture. Apart from the coma corrector it is inherently apochromatic - totally so.

What do you get with a car-priced Takahashi FSQ that you don't get with this scope? A vast flatfield circle which you only need with a big chip. Freedom from collimation. No diffraction spikes. These are not nothing, but, yikes, they come at a price...

Olly

Never thought I'd hear Olly extolling the virtues of a humble Newt !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never thought I'd hear Olly extolling the virtues of a humble Newt !

lol yeah :)

For a moment I thought he was actually going to give one a go! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have hope for my growth as an APer then, if Olly is impressed with it!

One thing, it is a bit of a git to balance properly.

I guess it isn't so important with only a webcam or sub-minute DLSR subs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol yeah :)

For a moment I thought he was actually going to give one a go! :D

Hehheh, be fair, I've backed these little Newt images from the start. You don't have any choice, they are excellent. They really are.

I'm in a slightly different position in that I'm a provider, sometimes running around like a blue-posteriored fly and even with 'plug and play' I sometimes can't get it all working in time, so adding collimation tasks is not on my to do list. But, hats off, I think that bang for imaging buck I doubt that the 130 can be beaten.

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have hope for my growth as an APer then, if Olly is impressed with it!

One thing, it is a bit of a git to balance properly.

I guess it isn't so important with only a webcam or sub-minute DLSR subs...

Mine is (very) camera heavy, so I had to strap x2 0.5kg leg weights to the bottom end to balance it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Am super excited - about to jump in at the deep end - hovering over the buy button for an ATIK 314L Plus...

Anyone here imaged with the 130pds and this ATIK CCD???

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Epicycle used an H9 (same chip as the 314) to great effect. Should be a good combination, a real Ha hoover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And another to keep it rolling.... y Cas nebula, taken under a full Moon - so not as good as it should be:

15780525727_3445cb23fb_c.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing! Which filter can you image with under full moon w/o problems? SII, OIII or Ha?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That will be Ha (and SII to some extent). However its not 100% immunity, you still need to be perferably pointing away from the Moon as targets near it will be prone to severe gradients (as I found out the other night!).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hehheh, be fair, I've backed these little Newt images from the start. You don't have any choice, they are excellent. They really are.

I'm in a slightly different position in that I'm a provider, sometimes running around like a blue-posteriored fly and even with 'plug and play' I sometimes can't get it all working in time, so adding collimation tasks is not on my to do list. But, hats off, I think that bang for imaging buck I doubt that the 130 can be beaten.

Olly

Newts are great IMHO- but there's no getting around the fact they need collimating before an imaging run. It needs to be do done but should not be more onerous a task than checking the focus with a Bahtinov mask for example,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130pds spanks IC1805: 

15783610848_f8f02bc610_c.jpg

15945272766_fa37db728c_c.jpg

Original scale images are located in deepsky subforum.

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which light pollution filter are you using?

Its all in narrowband mate, the best LP filters possible ;)

I dont think I could achieve this level in broadband, my local LP is just too much for any kind of serious depth (IFN etc...). But when I do use Lum, its always with the CCD CLS filter (2").

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all in narrowband mate, the best LP filters possible ;)

I dont think I could achieve this level in broadband, my local LP is just too much for any kind of serious depth (IFN etc...). But when I do use Lum, its always with the CCD CLS filter (2").

Lol - I got that NB part - what about your lights?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 130pds spanks IC1805: 

Beautiful images as always Uranium235 :)

Russe, I recently purchased a CCD camera for narrowband.

Before I was using a 450D and light pollution would saturate my image in 2-3 minutes even with a light pollution filter. I've done 15 min narrowband exposures with my CCD and it hasn't even broke a sweat.

I even managed a run of subs with the moon right next to my target, and also very close to a streetlamp and still get some nice results. My 450D would just give up and walk inside :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers :)

Just topped up the data, and done a cropped version (full image in deepsky section):

15793587139_fb93129a70_c.jpg

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beautiful images as always Uranium235 :)

:)

Can't wait for Christmas now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cedric Schweizer
      Hello community,
      Does anyone know if I can use a Skywatcher Explorer 130pds with a Sony alpha a7iii? I'm quite new to AP... I know that I need a T-Adapter but I'm a little concerned about the potential vignetting I could get...
      Thanks a lot for the help!
      Cédric
       
       
    • By Naveen
      Hi all - looking for some
      advice on eyepieces. I have seen beautiful views of Jupiter with its moons and Saturn and of course the moon. I have two extra 32mm and 10mm plossls but am looking for better lenses for planets which will show more detail? Which ones would you suggest? Many thanks in advance!
    • By deanchapman2705
      Hi,
      I'm relatively new to the whole telescope thing but have done my research and was fixed on getting the Orion skyquest XT8i or XT10i. By spending that much money, I didn't like the idea of purchasing it online from their website without seeing it in person (and not having the reassurance of being able to take it back) and looked for stores in the UK that would supply them. After plenty of research, it seems like they don't exist anymore and they are only in the US? Is this right or could anyone help me?
      (I've looked at the Sky-watcher 250PX/200PX flextube skyscan goto but it is significantly heavier and the noise of the goto mechanism sounds like a table saw so that's put me off of it...)
      Any help would be much appreciated,
      Thanks
    • By AstroMuni
      In my own journey while learning this process and seeing similar areas of confusion among others, I decided to compile this FAQ.
      This FAQ has been put together using a combination of information from SkyWatcher manuals, my own experience and suggestions by various contributors on the forums. As most of the confusion is around the newer reticle, this FAQ deals with this in detail.
      Q: What is Polar alignment and why is it needed?
      A: Polar alignment refers to the act of aligning the Polar axis of an Equatorial mount telescope, so that it is parallel with the axis that the Earth revolves around. It makes the job of following objects across the sky much easier.
      Its of minor benefit to the visual astronomer but a necessity to the astrophotographer who is trying to take images of the night sky. Once a telescope is polar aligned and an object centred in the eyepiece, then assuming an RA motor is attached to the telescope, the object will stay centred. The better the polar alignment, the longer it will stay there.
      If no motor is attached then simply nudging the telescope around one axis will bring the object back to the centre of the eyepiece again.
       
      Q: Do I need to accurately do a Polar alignment?
      A: If you are a visual astronomer then its not that critical and you should be able to manage just doing a simple polar alignment by positioning the mount so that Polaris is in the centre of the reticle.
      But if you are doing astrophotography with long exposures then accurate polar alignment becomes critical to improve the quality of the images.
       
      Q: My reticle looks different to what is shown in the manual.
      A: There are 2 versions of this – the older one which has a bubble showing the location of Polaris Fig.1 and the newer one which has a clock face Fig.2.

      Figure 1
       

      Figure 2
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the new Reticle?
      A: As Polaris is not located exactly at the North Celestial Pole (NCP), we can see it orbit the North Celestial Pole in a polar scope. The large circle seen in the centre of the pattern in Fig.2 is a representation of the Polaris’ orbit around the North Celestial Pole. When performing the polar alignment process, it is necessary to determine the orientation of the Polaris on the circle. The reticle is marked like a clock face with 0 at the top. Imagine this is the 12 position in a traditional clock.
      At the end of the initialization of the SynScan hand control, after entering the proper local longitude, latitude, date, time, and daylight-saving time, the SynScan hand controller will display the message: “Polaris Position in P.Scope=HH:MM”. Imagine the larger circle in Fig.2 as a clock’s face with 12:00 at the top, with the current time pointing to the “HH:MM”. The orientation of the hour hand of the clock represents the orientation of Polaris in the polar scope. Put the Polaris to the same orientation on the large circle to finish the polar alignment.
      In case you don’t use the Synscan hand controller, there are several apps available on Android and IOS which give you the position of Polaris on the clock face (such as SynscanInit for Android and Polar Scope Align for IOS). Skwatcher has their own app as well called Synscan Pro which shows the position of Polaris in the new reticle.
      The Polaris position also changes as time passes. The reticle displays 3 circles to represent Polaris’s orbit in the year 2012, 2020 and 2028. It also gives sub-dials at 0, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock position for year 2016, 2024 and 2032. An engraving labeled with the above years is also displayed on the right of the FOV for memo purpose. When doing polar alignment in the Northern hemisphere, the user should put Polaris on the correct circle corresponding to the present year for better alignment precision.
      This reticle is also covered in the SW EQ6-R manual.
       
      Q: When I position my mount in the Home position with the counterweight at its lowest point, the 0 mark on the reticle is not at the top. Is this a fault and how can I fix it?
      A: There is nothing wrong with your mount You just need to rotate the mount in the RA axis till the 0 is at its highest position. Now lock the RA axis and continue with the alignment process.
       
      Q: How can I ensure that the 0 is accurately positioned at the very top?
      A: 1) Firstly, level the mount and set it up pointing north as if making it ready for polar alignment.
      2) Next use the Alt and Az bolts to centre Polaris in the reticle - i.e. put Polaris right in the centre of the cross-hairs, not on any circle. Be as accurate as you can. 
      3) Now using ONLY the Alt bolts, move Polaris vertically upward in the reticle from its central position until it reaches any of the circles.
      4) Because you started with Polaris dead centre and moved it only vertically, Polaris is now exactly in the zero (12 o’clock) position on the circle. Now rotate the RA axis to put the reticle zero mark in exactly the same position as Polaris. Again, be as accurate as you can.
      5) Lock the RA axis in this position and using a marker pen put alignment marks on the mount housing so that you can find this position again without the need to use Polaris.
      [Courtesy Jif001 on SGL]
       
      Q: How do I Polar align with the older reticle?
      A: Here is a good article http://www.astro-baby.com/astrobaby/help/polar-aligning-the-skywatcher-heq5orion-sirius-mount/
       
      Q: How can I check if my polarscope reticle is aligned with the RA axis of the mount?
      A: Before using the polar scope for polar alignment, the polar scope itself must be calibrated to ensure the pattern in the polar scope is aligned to the mount’s R.A. axis. The following steps will outline how to calibrate the polar scope:
      This process is best done during daytime. Choose a fixed object (eg. a faraway object such as the tip of a TV antenna). Centre the reticle on the object by adjusting the two azimuth adjustment knobs and the two elevation adjustment bolts. Rotate the mount in R.A. axis for half a turn (180 degrees). Tighten the R.A. clutch after the rotation. If the object remains at the centre of the reticle in the polar scope after the rotation, then it means the polar scope has been aligned to the R.A. axis and no calibration is needed. If its not aligned, read this article which explains how to recalibrate https://www.myastroscience.com/polarscopecalibration There are also videos on YouTube that explain this process.
      Hope this helps. 🙂
      Do let me know if you have other questions (and answers) and I can add to this.
       
    • By NallyFace
      Hello,
      Is anyone on here signed up for the SkySafari and SynScan beta testing to natively support IOS? If so how has it been going?
      https://support.simulationcurriculum.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360043282514-Beta-Testing-SkySafari-6-iOS-Only-SynScan-WiFi-Read-This-To-Participate-?page=2#community_comment_360012192693
      Its 2020.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.