Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep34_banner.thumb.jpg.28dd32d9305c7de9b6591e6bf6600b27.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, astrosathya said:

How many hours is this? I too live in Bortle 8 skies, I have both the Baader 7/8.5 Ha-O3 filters.

It was  Ha / SII x 33, OIII x only 13 (around 40 OIII subs not used due to quality...), all 180sec, Total time 237min (4 hours - almost :) )

P.S.

I am really puzzled why Baader included OIII 8nm in their Bundle (probably simple pricing tactics)... I think OIII  should be around 6nm to match the Bundle...
but then, -  probably SII would be too week and etc.

So try using your OIII while Moon is not in the way or even better, then it completely hiding... in my case, Moonless nights are  always cloudy :)

Edited by RolandKol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RolandKol said:

It was  Ha / SII x 33, OIII x only 13 (around 40 OIII subs not used due to quality...), all 180sec, Total time 237min (4 hours - almost :) )

P.S.

I am really puzzled why Baader included OIII 8nm in their Bundle (probably simple pricing tactics)... I think OIII  should be around 6nm to match the Bundle...
but then, -  probably SII would be too week and etc.

So try using your OIII while Moon is not in the way or even better, then it completely hiding... in my case, Moonless nights are  always cloudy :)

For 4 hours you've got a lot of data. I must be missing something in myprocesing. I too got 4 hours on Rosette this season, but it hasn't turned out as vivid as yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, astrosathya said:

For 4 hours you've got a lot of data. I must be missing something in myprocesing. I too got 4 hours on Rosette this season, but it hasn't turned out as vivid as yours.

I used Pix to sort Images by quality and stack them based on quality, - maybe it was a trick.

Plus, in Light Polluted areas, it is difficult to compare the quality of the subs as if you have a direct light falling on, - yours will be worse...

I am lucky, my spot ended up in the shadow.... But trees limit my view very strongly, so I am not able to use optimal 300sec exposure.

P.S.

My subs are all on Unity gain, ASI1600MM-Pro

Edited by RolandKol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe this is my absolute favourite image I have taken so far! 

 

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters: Ha + R + G + B 

Total integration time: 14 hours 15 minutes
Exposure:
Ha:
32 X 512 sec
Red:
91 X 128 sec
Green:
91 X 128 sec
Blue
91 X 128 sec

+ Darks + Bias + Flats

Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

ngc2264 cone nebula.jpg

Edited by al-alami
  • Like 15

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, al-alami said:

I believe this is my absolute favourite image I have taken so far! 

 

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters: Ha + R + G + B 

Total integration time: 14 hours 15 minutes
Exposure:
Ha:
32 X 512 sec
Red:
91 X 128 sec
Green:
91 X 128 sec
Blue
91 X 128 sec

+ Darks + Bias + Flats

Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

ngc2264 cone nebula.jpg

Congratulations on this one really like it, very different from the normal pallet, especially like the contrast in the fox fur. Your imaging has really come on leaps and bounds in the last couple of years.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Adam J said:

Congratulations on this one really like it, very different from the normal pallet, especially like the contrast in the fox fur. Your imaging has really come on leaps and bounds in the last couple of years.

Thank you Adam.  It all began with this thread, and help and advice from people like you. :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, anyone knows if there is a difference if bahtinov mask is larger than the primary mirror? 

For example, 130PDS p.mirror is 130mm, but OTA is 150mm.

I want to make/3d print bahtinov with gaps covering full 150mm diameter, to allow more light in for focusing in HA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem. Bigger is better.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just finished checking/testing.

No difference... Almost.

But the larger gaps actually do allow to use shorter exposure on the same gain/iso, 

So a bit faster.

P.S.

"Perfect" (if such is possible) focus difference between 150mm and 130 was around 70microns.... PDS critical focus range is around 50... So .... Mathematically, should be a difference.

However,

Seeing is not perfect today.

Not yet sure.

But 5min stack with 150mm bahtinov focus looked just, just a bit better...

Again... Seeing could be a factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Thought I'd share my latest 130PDS image of M81/M82.

All captured 24/3 on a modified 1100d.

30 x 300 seconds lights plus  20 flat and 20 bias. Stacked in DSS and tweaked in PS

All comments/advice welcome

Many thanks

Vern

 

PS (Large).jpg

 

 

Anyone know what the fuzzy on the left hand edge is? Is it an artifact or a galaxy? It appears to have a spiral structure

 

PS (Large) - Copy.jpg

Edited by vernmid
Wrong image posted
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thats a really nice photo @vernmid! ?

The small fuzzy is UGC 5302, roughly magnitude 15.

Here's its simbad page: UGC 5302

Ive found colour balance is very difficult on M81 and 82, you could try reducing the blue saturation in the background, though? I love the stars--what Coma Corrector are you using?

John

Edited by JohnSadlerAstro
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Hi,

Thats a really nice photo @vernmid! ?

The small fuzzy is UGC 5302, roughly magnitude 15.

Thanks John,

Amazed to have captured UGC 5302.

Coma corrector is a badder mpcc.

Will have another crack at processing  to improve background. 

Thanks again 

Vern 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 13/03/2019 at 22:30, al-alami said:

I believe this is my absolute favourite image I have taken so far! 

 

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters: Ha + R + G + B 

Total integration time: 14 hours 15 minutes
Exposure:
Ha:
32 X 512 sec
Red:
91 X 128 sec
Green:
91 X 128 sec
Blue
91 X 128 sec

+ Darks + Bias + Flats

Processed in Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

ngc2264 cone nebula.jpg

Wow!. You always take absolutely awesome and stunning pictures!!!

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, took this image last night of M101 but it is in dire need of some flats as you can see.

image.png.469442387aaa82d652bde93b0a1a2294.png

What method do you guys use to take flats with the 130-PDS that minimises adding more tray light than you started with? last time I tried I got a gradient from one side of the image to the other...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pipnina said:

What method do you guys use to take flats with the 130-PDS that minimises adding more tray light than you started with? last time I tried I got a gradient from one side of the image to the other...

I use a cheap LED flat panel with a sheet of A4 taped over it and along enough lead so I can take 3 photos at each of eight positions. By rotating it any gradient is 'neutralised' and I find this works very well.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea to rotate the light source. 

But if anyone is using a laptop or monitor for flats, it's worth making sure that it is square on to the OTA. Purely because computer displays don't do so well off axis (like trying to view a monitor from an angle isn't as good as being directly in front of it).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Being as galaxy season is here, I've switched to the ASI178 Cool, which turns the 130 into something of a galaxy hoover :) 

Leo Quartet - ARP316 (usually overlooked for the triplet), 30x180 - only darks applied. Needs probably 100+ subs and proper calibration to make it decent:

Leo-Quintet_PSDBE.thumb.jpg.e11740fc1d619e7afa5447b4202d1ecd.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

proper calibration to make it decent:

Hi,

I'd say it looks pretty decent already! ;) Really nice photo, I'm a fan of mono fuzzies.

Sadly these galaxies are just a little to small to be a realistic target with big 1000d pixels, but in my opinion they look better than the trio. :)

John

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

Being as galaxy season is here, I've switched to the ASI178 Cool, which turns the 130 into something of a galaxy hoover :) 

Leo Quartet - ARP316 (usually overlooked for the triplet), 30x180 - only darks applied. Needs probably 100+ subs and proper calibration to make it decent:

Its a real shame ASI have stopped making this camera as I have always wanted one for a dedicated galaxy camera. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Adam J said:

Its a real shame ASI have stopped making this camera as I have always wanted one for a dedicated galaxy camera. 

Stopped making it? Thats a shame.... well, I suppose there would be the QHY equivalent if youre stuck for finding one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Uranium235 said:

Stopped making it? Thats a shame.... well, I suppose there would be the QHY equivalent if youre stuck for finding one.

Yes. Although I did think about uncooled and using the short exposure high gain technique to try and get increased resolution by being under some of the seeing. 

Have you tried 1000's of 5-10 second exposures at high gain with this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Adam J said:

Its a real shame ASI have stopped making this camera as I have always wanted one for a dedicated galaxy camera. 

According to TS, it looks like they will be getting one batch in a few days?

https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p8515_ASI178MMC-Cooled-Mono-CMOS-Camera---Chip-D-8-82-mm.html

image.png.3f1d7905fa8d7e3f3fea1bf478ed1d49.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

Not sure about that but ZWO no longer list it on their own web page. 

https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com/product-category/dso-cameras

If you click on discontinued cameras then it is listed. 

Edited by Adam J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Adam J said:

Not sure about that but ZWO no longer list it on their own web page. 

https://astronomy-imaging-camera.com/product-category/dso-cameras

Could be that ZWO is no longer accepting customer orders because they stopped production, and above batch was ordered by TS some time ago.

Anyway, if you want that camera, I guess it's worth checking again after 9 days if it's in stock, or as suggested above - look at other vendors offerings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Planetarian
      Hi, I've got a Skywatcher Heritage 130p reflector, and if i insert anything less than 10mm eyepiece, the image won't get crisp. I guess it's normal, but as I'm very new to astronomy, I'd like to know what the sharpness depends on exactly. 
      Is that the focal length (how fast the telescope is? ) or the size of the mirror and how much light it gathers? Or both affect it the same way?  
      Are things the same with refractors in this regard? Thanks. 
    • By ThadeusB
      I have for sale my Skywatcher Startravel 120. Objective lens 120mm; Focal length . It is in excellent condition, clean and only very minor marks. Clean optics, no fungus. The focusser is the original one and works smoothly; 1.25" and 2" adaptors. With both caps.
      A very good starter scope, or good as a portable scope.
      Included accessories: red dot finder; 90 degree star diagonal; 10mm & 25mm EPs; mobile phone adaptor. All in as new condition.
      Please don't ask me to split this package.
      Price £140.00 no offers.
      It will be very well packed.
      Payment: paypal or bank transfer
      I can deliver by Hermes; I can get a quotation for this if you wish. Or you can make your own courier arrangement, or collect in person.
      Please PM me if you would like more information.









    • By Quentent
      Hi,
       
      So just today i got my new EQ3 mount and tripod delivered.
      Brought it out, balanced it leveled it etc etc.
      So i polar aligned it,  and selected 2 Star Alignment.
      1st star to align to: Betelgeuse.
      As soon as i hit confirm align the motors kick in but as soon as the mount starts to rotate the motors stop and the hand controller resets itself immediatly and starts initializing all over again.
      I discovered that moving Ra on its own works just fine as does moving Dec on its own but whenever i press for example the left and Up arrows at the same time the mount stops and the hand controller resets.
      Could this just be a problem with power draw? The Synpro box takes 12V DC and is supplied by a 12V DC car outlet type power source. However i changed this to a 3 Pin UK 12V 1A DC & AC plug.
       
      Im hoping the power supply is the issue and not something else.
    • By Soulitude
      Hi everyone I am new here, I live in Perth Western Australia (bottle class 5) and have just brought my new set up. There hasn’t been anyone in the area I can talk to about astrophotography so tried to do it all myself online and I fear I may have incorrectly purchased some things. (I tried to get things one at a time for budget purposes)
      I have this set up
      heq5, evostar ed80, .85reducer & corrector, evoguide 50ed, zwo 120mm mini for guiding and just my canon 200d mkii for the imaging. 
      The telescope, I think I may have brought something that’s not great for imaging and that’s all I’ve wanted to do. 
      can you please provide a better telescope alternative that would be suitable for all my other gear without having to buy like a new mount etc. I’m thinking just a slightly better scope not too heavy, opinions would be much appreciated 💖💖💖 xx
    • By Tonny
      Hello guys  I am an absolute amateur buying his first telescope... and I am desperate, please help.
      My budget is around 1300 euro (1600$). I am interested mostly in DSO... astrophotography, but observing as well. 

      So refractors are better for astrophotography, crisp clear views, plus they are low maintenance... but refractors with big aperture are too expensive, apo refractors even more... and I think that I want big aperture, because I am interested in observing as well, not only astrophotography. Sooo more light, more details, more magnification. Please correct me, if I am mistaken.
      Also, I know the mount is really important for photography, but these scopes comes with mounts that maybe are not the best, but are they good enough? 

      I am considering these three options now:
      1. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/skywatcher-telescope-n-200-1000-explorer-bd-neq-5-pro-synscan-goto/p,20291#tab_bar_1_select 
      2. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/bresser-telescope-ac-152-760-ar-152s-messier-hexafoc-exos-2-goto/p,14209#tab_bar_2_select 
      3. https://www.astroshop.eu/telescopes/bresser-telescope-ac-127l-1200-messier-hexafoc-exos-2-goto/p,14206

      Bresser 127 have smaller aperture, but very good reviews... on the other hand Skywatcher have nice reviews as well and bigger aperture.
      Bresser 152 sounds really nice, but is a bit expensive, and as long as I have to buy an eyepiece, nebula filter, adapter for my DSLR, maybe this CA correcting filter... it will goes above my budget and I don't know if it deserve it, and again - Skywatcher wouldn't be better?
      The only thing that censers me about the Skywatcher is that collimation thing every time and that it could be too complicated for a newbie (that is what I read about big reflectors)... usually this kind of things wouldn't scare me, I mean how complicated it can be... If it is the better telescope than it deserve a little more maintenance?

      Since I am not going to be a professional, I want to observe and take photos just for fun - I know I have to compromise with something for this price... I am just very confused after all I read.... And as I said, I am a newbie never took a look trough a telescope, so I trust Internet and I am ready to buy the first telescope someone advise me  
      I don't thing I could afford buying telescope again any time soon, that is why I want something good, that I wouldn't need to change and be happy with it for maaany years.
      Please correct me, if I am wrong with all these and if there is a better telescope for me?

      Thanks in advance!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.