Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

DaveS

Words fail me

Recommended Posts

On 15/08/2018 at 23:25, Floater said:

The only reason words fail you, Dave, is our Code of Conduct.

And, therefore, words fail me too. The emojis give only the slightest hint - ??? ?

Post of the week!

Olly

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, mikeDnight said:

I'm pretty certain you could find some words to fit the situation, if you were really pressed!

OK, let's try.

We British like to think that, at our most vulgar, we sink no lower than the trio of plaster ducks on the living room wall, the nodding dog in the back of the car or the ribald comedy on offer in Blackpool. However, a group of  Weymouth concillors plans to bury good taste in a deeper and more rancid mire than any might have thought possible.

This fortress built by nature for herself, 

Against infection and the hand of war

is to see her skies and shoreline stabbed, pierced and strafed by searing rays of laser light. Gone, the soft glow of moonlight on the waves. Gone, the starlight whose jounery over millions of years will be obliterated by the trash of light pollution. In an orgy of pure waste, precious energy will be squandered on the visual equivalent of truckloads of tinsel-tinted rubbish being dumped on the beach daily.

Olly

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Olly, you have done well.

The above will do for me.

And I guess I’ll have to hand back my ‘post of the week’ accolade. You have surpassed me. ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get off the fence and say what you mean Olly :grin:

Dave

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our local area is currently being bombarded by greedy developers with housing development planning applications to build on green belt agricultural land using some loophole called     " special circumstances " whatever that is.

Dave

Edited by Davey-T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Floater said:

Olly, you have done well.

The above will do for me.

And I guess I’ll have to hand back my ‘post of the week’ accolade. You have surpassed me. ?

I think we'd both have preferred a short salvo from the banned list!

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
Typo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Council leader Jeff Cant said: "We are trying to merge a 21st Century future for the town with the nostalgia for the past."”

And the definition of “cant” is: “Hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or political nature.”....

Nominative determinism in action.

As for “ nostalgia for the past”, how about turning the lights off altogether so we can enjoy the dark skies our great grandparents had?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hallingskies said:

“Council leader Jeff Cant said: "We are trying to merge a 21st Century future for the town with the nostalgia for the past."”

And the definition of “cant” is: “Hypocritical and sanctimonious talk, typically of a moral, religious, or political nature.”....

Nominative determinism in action.

As for “ nostalgia for the past”, how about turning the lights off altogether so we can enjoy the dark skies our great grandparents had?

My latest nomination for post of the week!

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was once a 60's TV series called "All Gas and Gaiters".... ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_Gas_and_Gaiters

The "Enthusiastic Curate" (Derek Nimmo) filled with "modernistic
zeal" (this was THEN still the 20th century"!) suggested that:
"We really must bring the CHURCH into the 19th (sic) century!"?

The Bishop replied:
"ONE century at a time, Dear Boy... One century at a time"! lol ?

Edited by Macavity
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, laser_jock99 said:

Now you see why I recomended Mid Wales- I have a 45,000 acre International Dark Sky Park due south of me. And a 320,000 acre Dark Sky Reserve due south of that!

Good heavens, my country seat has never particularly appealed to me before (to the extent that I have never bothered to take possession) but perhaps I should?

https://www.britainexpress.com/attractions.htm?attraction=505

?lly

Edited by ollypenrice
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

*Sigh*

For a long time I had a search area on Rightmove taking in the dark core of Ceridigion and Powys, with LP maps giving a lot of Bortle 3, and even some Bortle 2.

In the end I decided it was too far from family, and the climate was too wet.

Where I'm moving to (Touch wood) is at least in an AONB and a Conservation Area. Sky is the dark end of Bortle 4, very nearly Bortle 3, so acceptable. I was on holiday in that rough area in early July, and the sky was very dark, even without astro dark.

Just got to hope Weymouth don't trash it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually like the idea, great photographic opportunities perhaps every town and city should have then... 

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, DaveS said:

Just got to hope Weymouth don't trash it.

I'm sure it will be fine- these things are usually temporary fixtures. Hopefully common sense will prevail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, laser_jock99 said:

I'm sure it will be fine- these things are usually temporary fixtures. Hopefully common sense will prevail.

Don't think they're temporary, the lasers have been there since the Olympics and they're not being replaced just more lights added.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, laser_jock99 said:

I'm sure it will be fine- these things are usually temporary fixtures. Hopefully common sense will prevail.

Income tax was introduced as a “temporary measure”  ?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, johninderby said:

Income tax was introduced as a “temporary measure”  ?

At least they did away with the window tax :grin:

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

At least they did away with the window tax :grin:

Dave

No, it's just administered by Microsoft these days.

James

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, laser_jock99 said:

Hopefully common sense will prevail.

As a dear old lady said to me once: ‘Common sense? They’re breeding it out my dear!’

 

7 hours ago, Gina said:

Well maybe but I doubt it!!!

We have a consensus! ?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Scooot
      I was told by a friend who has close ties with the council that Basildon District are abandoning their part-night lighting in a few weeks. Apparently the street lights which currently go off at 1am are going to be left on at cost of circa £275,000 per year. They are supposedly going to fund this from reserves.
      Anyway, did a bit of googling and found this  https://www.basildon.gov.uk/article/7711/In-the-news-Councillors-united-behind-plan-to-switch-street-lights-back-on-through-night
      I wonder how many people will notice!
    • By Asghar
      Hey guys,
       
      I'm new here and thus question has been on my head all day. Tell me your thoughts! The light pollution is p******* me off!
    • By Phillips6549
      Just found this.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/amp/49836623
      Let's hope it is a success and the good folk of Switzerland enjoy some clear dark skies. 
    • By Captain Magenta
      Last year I was given a Unihedron SQM-L, the narrow field of view version of their gadget for measuring night-sky brightness. Since then, I’ve nipped outside to take zenith readings whenever I’ve been able, often a few times per night. As a result I now have 85 data-points, all from my back garden in Sunbury on Thames which rates a 19.04 on www.lightpollutionmap.info . As it turns out, this agrees well with the data I’ve collected.
      The darkest I’ve measured at this location has been 19.13, with 4 records better than 19.05 and 10 better than 19.00.
      Plotted against Moon altitude, it looks like:

      One thing I noticed very early on was that the reading generally gets darker and darker as the night goes on. The chart below suggests the data agrees, but how strongly I’m not adept enough yet with my statistics to work out. If anyone fancies doing this for me, I’d be grateful, I’ve attached the data .csv file I think to the end of this post.

      The data itself: each record contains date, time[GMT], SQM value, Moon phase, Moon altitude . For the purposes of my analysis, I’ve converted the time value into hoursafter6pm, which allows the intercept of the regression solution to be loosely considered as the “6pm starting point” for the darkness estimation, which is OK for this dataset as my data is all from this latest Autumn/Winter.
      I’ve done an “ordinary least-squares” regression with multiple input variables. At first glance it seems to me that the SQ vs altitude chart above should not behave well with that: there’s a clear kink, intuitively obvious I guess, at the point the Moon altitude goes negative.
      To cope with that, I divided my data into two and did three separate regressions: “Moon up” data, “Moon down”, and “All data” but treating phase and altitude as zero if the Moon is below -5 degrees (I chose -5 degrees arbitrarily).
      With Moon up, I decided the SQM value will depend on Time of Night, Moon Altitude and Phase. With Moon down, it only needs to depend on time of night.
      Thus my regression model is:
      SkyQual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude + residual
      or rearranged
      residual = a + b.timeafter6pm + c.phase + d.altitude – SkyQual
      The analysis involves minimizing the sum of (the squares of the) residuals, by hunting around for the appropriate values of a, b, c & d which yields this minimum. I used MS Excel’s built-in Solver to do the “hunting around”.
      The following table summarizes the results:

      In words, using “Moon Up” as my subject, my Sky Quality, in magnitudes per arc-second, can be estimated as
      19.28 mags/arc-sec
      plus 0.0314 /hour
      minus 0.864 /full-phase (or 0.216 /quarter)
      minus 0.0186 /degree above horizon (or 0.186 /10 degrees).
      This is a pretty simple analysis. I’m sure there’s theory and formulae available relating Moon-altitude and -phase to extra sky brightness, but I haven’t used any of that here. And the “error model” I’ve used implicitly assumes that the relationships between SQM-reading and the variables are linear.
      If anyone is curious and wishes to do their own analysis, my raw-ish data is available as a .csv file attachment at the end of this post.
      Cheers,
      Magnus
       
      A note about the data collection: each reading is an average of a few readings at a given time, with outliers rejected. For instance, often the first press yields an outlier, and over the following few seconds subsequent ones tend to settle down. So the series of readings 19.05 (me getting excited), 18.85, 18.86, 18.86 , which is a quite typical pattern, would cause me to record 18.86. My highest recorded reading, 19.13, was indeed where it settled down.
      Other “one-on-one” charts:
         
      SQMLdata201903.csv
    • By Gfamily
      I gave a demonstration/workshop at my local Astro Group* about a simple way of removing light pollution from an Astro Photo. 
      The description I gave was deliberately for beginners, using a wide angle tripod shot photo and using one of the easiest packages to get to grips with (Paint.net). 
      The attached pdf covers the basic technique. 
      I'd appreciate any feedback on it. 
       
       
       
      * The Mid Cheshire Astronomical Group - all welcome, we meet on the last Friday of the Month.
      LP MCAG.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.