Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_30_second_exp_2_winners.thumb.jpg.b5430b40547c40d344fd4493776ab99f.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

And a M92 field, taken the same day than NGC6823, some galaxies can be seen on the left.

60x60s subs with 30 darks and 30 bias, taken with the QHY168C at Gain 10, Offset 30, Temp =-10C from Brihuega, Spain at 997m high.

Cheers.

M92_v2_40.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear 130PDS addicts.

A suburban M7 surrounded by dark nebulae B283 and B287, also the tiny globular cluster NGC6453 can be seen. 20x180s subs + darks + bias with the usual equipment.

It is not easy to catch even here in spanish latitudes due to the LP mushroom, as the cluster does not climb so much over the horizon.

 

M7_V1_50.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Susaron said:

Dear 130PDS addicts.

A suburban M7 surrounded by dark nebulae B283 and B287, also the tiny globular cluster NGC6453 can be seen. 20x180s subs + darks + bias with the usual equipment.

It is not easy to catch even here in spanish latitudes due to the LP mushroom, as the cluster does not climb so much over the horizon.

 

M7_V1_50.jpg

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr? I too images the same object on 5th July this year through my RC and DSLR (135x30s, iso3200). The ISO was a mistake, should've kept it at 800, but regardless, theres a stark difference. Please can you help? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, astrosathya said:

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr? I too images the same object on 5th July this year through my RC and DSLR (135x30s, iso3200). The ISO was a mistake, should've kept it at 800, but regardless, theres a stark difference. Please can you help? 

Hi Sathya, perhaps it is a combination of factors mainly the camera and the scope. The camera is a QHY168C, contrary to a DLSR it does not have IR filter so you have the whole spectrum available, as filter I use an IDAS LPS D1, so I collect all the needed data discarding the LP. Moreover the SW130PDS is F5, so it is a fast scope, this allows along with a good camera, to reduce the time needed for your exposures, I have got even very good results with 60s exposures. If you dive a little in this thread you can see the differences got for the same objects taken with the same scope and different cameras.

The SW130PDS is a bargain imaging scope, so what you save in the scope can be used to couple a good camera, the QHY163M, 168C, 247C or the ASI071, 1600 or 294C are very good candidates, or any good CCD like the Atiks 460X or Horizon CMOS. The difference is huge really huge.

Also the postprocessing has something to say, with DBE tool from PixInsight you can extract the best from your pictures.

I attach just a frame, with the background removed and with the histogram streched.

 

L_2018_07_06_00_44_01_Bin1x1_180s__10C_FWHM_RGB_VNG.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, astrosathya said:

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr?

Hi everyone

@astrosathya: Your 150 RC will capture only a small section of what @susaron has captured with the 130 as your FOV is much smaller; you will be missing much of the surrounding milky way. It should be brighter in your RC (larger aperture) but up against modern cooled cmos, dslrs is not competing on the same terms.

But hey, getting in close on clusters is good too as you can record asterisms which are otherwise lost at shorter focal lengths.

HTH and keep going with the clusters!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Susaron said:

Hi Sathya, perhaps it is a combination of factors mainly the camera and the scope. The camera is a QHY168C, contrary to a DLSR it does not have IR filter so you have the whole spectrum available, as filter I use an IDAS LPS D1, so I collect all the needed data discarding the LP. Moreover the SW130PDS is F5, so it is a fast scope, this allows along with a good camera, to reduce the time needed for your exposures, I have got even very good results with 60s exposures. If you dive a little in this thread you can see the differences got for the same objects taken with the same scope and different cameras.

The SW130PDS is a bargain imaging scope, so what you save in the scope can be used to couple a good camera, the QHY163M, 168C, 247C or the ASI071, 1600 or 294C are very good candidates, or any good CCD like the Atiks 460X or Horizon CMOS. The difference is huge really huge.

Also the postprocessing has something to say, with DBE tool from PixInsight you can extract the best from your pictures.

I attach just a frame, with the background removed and with the histogram streched.

 

L_2018_07_06_00_44_01_Bin1x1_180s__10C_FWHM_RGB_VNG.jpg

Thanks for the reply Susaron. I actually have a 150mm F/ Newtonian as well as a QHY9M with 7x36mm HaOIIISIILRGB filters. ? The newt has a faulty secondary holder and its too much effort o setup the CCD in rainy season, hence the use of my Modified DSLR. I'll try the newt next time with a LP filter. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladies and Gents,

The picture of M7, first shared here, has been chosen by Sky and Telescope as the Editor´s Choice of the Week.

I guess Skywatcher should give us a gift or something by this promotion, don´t you think??

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really happy with this result ... well so far :p

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters:Ha + O III + S II (Hubble Palette)
Total integration time: 12 hours 45 minutes
Exposure:
Ha (green channel):
77 X 300 sec
O III (blue channel):
39 X 300 sec
S II (red channel)
37 X 300 sec

Processed in DSS, Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

NGC 7000 Hubble orreted.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding this thread just makes me more excited for the coming darkness! I got to do a few tests with my 130-PDS (hopefully I've got the hang of it all now!) during and just before summer twilight. Not sure what I'm going to photograph first though. My camera has pitiful Ha response (One day I'll complete the build with OAG and a cooled CMOS...) and the central milky way nebulae (M8, M16 etc) are too low down for me to image (without exposing the precious to the road and pavement... and street lamp glare!)

On a side note, has anyone else found the 130-PDS prone to stray light? In an image I took recently I noticed a gradient in the image that seemed too "sharp" to be vignetting or sky gradients. (The glowing pale lobe to the left hand side)

Are there measures that can be taken to prevent this?

NGC6992-small.thumb.jpg.121ffb86ab4fc59a3116143856560af0.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pipnina said:

Finding this thread just makes me more excited for the coming darkness! I got to do a few tests with my 130-PDS (hopefully I've got the hang of it all now!) during and just before summer twilight. Not sure what I'm going to photograph first though. My camera has pitiful Ha response (One day I'll complete the build with OAG and a cooled CMOS...) and the central milky way nebulae (M8, M16 etc) are too low down for me to image (without exposing the precious to the road and pavement... and street lamp glare!)

On a side note, has anyone else found the 130-PDS prone to stray light? In an image I took recently I noticed a gradient in the image that seemed too "sharp" to be vignetting or sky gradients. (The glowing pale lobe to the left hand side)

Are there measures that can be taken to prevent this?

NGC6992-small.thumb.jpg.121ffb86ab4fc59a3116143856560af0.jpg

I think gradients go hand in hand with any degree of light pollution, even a nearby bright star combined with some light, high haze can put a gradient across your images.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last one, the good old m8 lagoom nebula 

I'm focusing :D more on this is target to see how much detail i cam get out of it.

This is about 5 hours of integration time from different nights taken with iso 400 and 4 minute exposure and with flats. I found that iso 400 works best for me. 

The camera is a t5i unmodded and i still can't use the coma corrector,  I'll try to have a friend to help me with it. 

1013505766_m84hrseditada.thumb.jpg.df1d139aa43f3e7423a4b6767da2ed68.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Atreta said:

Last one, the good old m8 lagoom nebula 

I'm focusing :D more on this is target to see how much detail i cam get out of it.

This is about 5 hours of integration time from different nights taken with iso 400 and 4 minute exposure and with flats. I found that iso 400 works best for me. 

The camera is a t5i unmodded and i still can't use the coma corrector,  I'll try to have a friend to help me with it. 

1013505766_m84hrseditada.thumb.jpg.df1d139aa43f3e7423a4b6767da2ed68.jpg

Great shot. Here is mine on my T2 unmodified last year. Mine has even worse HA than yours!

Lagoon_using_Average_SK_Flat_Bias_2_WA.thumb.jpg.534932ba82b9a5f03df09a459e8d3051.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

You won't get problems if you use collimation screws on the secondary (7 pounds 3 of them), and a good laser collimation tool like the hotech sca laser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Gerry Casa Christiana said:

Great shot. Here is mine on my T2 unmodified last year. Mine has even worse HA than yours!

Lagoon_using_Average_SK_Flat_Bias_2_WA.thumb.jpg.534932ba82b9a5f03df09a459e8d3051.jpg

You got a lot of Ha too, great image.

i'm considering to mod mine, but i don't like red overwhelming the entire picture. 

14 hours ago, Susaron said:

I go for M8 this night, let's see what I can get

Hope you can get it. I wanna see :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

i think mine is out of collimation, my copy of ccd inspector expired and can't check it anymore.  it would be nice if someone could analyze it for me :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first proper use of ASI1600MM on Veil Nebula [Back Garden, Woolwich, UK, 11/07/2018- 29x300s HA Bin x1, 27x25Os OIII Binx2], stacked in ASTAP, processed in PI. 

849565128_VeilNebula-ASTAP3.thumb.jpg.ea307b0af98c44bb786c96530fdf69a5.jpg

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear friends,

A Cocoon nebula from yesterday`s evening near Toledo, Spain. 34x180 subs plus darks and flats. QHY168C at Gain 10, Offset 30 Temp= -10ºC, taken with APT.

Cheers.

Mario.

int_IC5196_crop_30.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Atreta said:

You got a lot of Ha too, great image.

i'm considering to mod mine, but i don't like red overwhelming the entire picture. 

Hope you can get it. I wanna see :)

I have already modified the same camera. Huge difference! Wouldn't go back. Couple of comparisons below but the also guiding was added as I didn't have that before  

 

IMG_4180.jpg

HH_revision_1.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gerry Casa Christiana said:

.Couple of comparisons below but the also guiding was added as I didn't have that before  

 

Huge difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M8 Lagoon Nebula and GC NGC6544. I don´t know if it was a flexure or a guiding problem but only the stars on the upper rear square show some trails. The picture is a stack of only 15x180subs. The QHY parameters are the same than in the Cocoon.

M8.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Susaron said:

M8 Lagoon Nebula

Tremendous shot. It's really low here in Alicante and the haze and atmospheric turbulence near the southern horizon usually tell us to stay away. But now we're inspired. Hope you don't mind, we had a play with the decon and colour. Yeah, now it's too green!

m8.thumb.jpg.27371a8ad77ca1793f31751fe5e63ede.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alacant said:

Tremendous shot. It's really low here in Alicante and the haze and atmospheric turbulence near the southern horizon usually tell us to stay away. But now we're inspired. Hope you don't mind, we had a play with the decon and colour. Yeah, now it's too green!

m8.thumb.jpg.27371a8ad77ca1793f31751fe5e63ede.jpg

I tried deconvolution but it is not easy. Perhaps I should tune the color saturation and balance a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By merlin100
      I'm tempted to go down the route of getting myself a brand new reflector...  My friend's old Meade 114/900 is a good telescope, but I want something of my own and with a bit more light gathering power.  To this end, I've been looking at a couple of different models and manufactures.  
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/beginner-telescopes/skywatcher-explorer-130p.html
      https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reflectors/skywatcher-explorer-130m.html
      https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meade-Instruments-Polaris-Reflector-Telescope/dp/B01FG8JEGG
      I must admit, the Skywatcher Explorer 130M floats my boat, as it's motorised with a speed controller.
      Any thoughts or observations?🤔
    • By stevebb
      Celestron C8 XLT + extras and SkyWatcher Star Travel 80 (ST80)
      I have a Celestron C8 with XLT Starbrite coatings. Will include the full length base plate, both visual and imaging backs, scope rings, front 8" end cap and the finder scope with it. No box I'm afraid. Optics are good and clean, focal length is huge - 2300mm from memory. This lot would cost close to £1300 new and one with less spec went for £750 on fleabay recently. Might be interested in a part exchange or will let it go for £450 collection only.
      Also, I have a SkyWatcher Star Traveler 80 - good optics, used as a guide scope - just the scope itself (does not include the barlow in the photo) - now including dovetail bar and scope rings looking at around £50 for it.
      I have decided to save up for another refractor, WO, Equinox or even toward an Esprit. However, I would also consider p/ex for an Intel NUC and/or Pegasus Astro Pocket Powerbox.
      Please excuse some of the colours - I used my astro modded 6D which was in the observatory so the "nice" purple is actually black !!
      Both these are collection only.




    • By Clear Skies!
      I am going to buy Skywatcher EQ5 Pro Go-To mount. But, unfortunately, I am low on budget.
      So, does someone know where can I buy the cheapest EQ5 pro mount?
      Yesterday there was a low price for it (350 €), but they changed it.
      Thank you for your time!
    • By Bruno Marin
      I found this setup in internet and make me think, with AZEQ6 GT and 2 scopes, different weights and size, without counterweight in AZ mode! 
      - I can put a MAK100mm 3kg +- and a OO VX10l  12kg +- without counterweight?
       
      Does anyone have this setup mount and already used without counterweight with two telescopes of different weights? Is it really necessary to have a balance using in AZ mode?
      The problem to centralize the object with both scopes is true? With the SW AZEQ6 GT?
      Follow the images
      a TSA-120 with 6.5 kg i think and the other with 22kg i forgot the brand hehe you can help me?
       


    • By AstroRuz
      £180
      Selling a nice portable wide telescope with great glass and a great field of view
      I have two telescopes and I'm using the 80ED more currently and so this Telescope just isn't getting used anymore
      It has a longer dovetail (originally from the 80ED) so declination balance can be reached.
      Great performer for the price
      Collection only as P&P is like £40 (Northamptonshire - UK)
      Selling to fund a scope or mount upgrade.🤔
      Selling





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.