Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep24_banner.thumb.jpg.56e65b9c9549c15ed3f06e146fc5f5f1.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

And a M92 field, taken the same day than NGC6823, some galaxies can be seen on the left.

60x60s subs with 30 darks and 30 bias, taken with the QHY168C at Gain 10, Offset 30, Temp =-10C from Brihuega, Spain at 997m high.

Cheers.

M92_v2_40.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear 130PDS addicts.

A suburban M7 surrounded by dark nebulae B283 and B287, also the tiny globular cluster NGC6453 can be seen. 20x180s subs + darks + bias with the usual equipment.

It is not easy to catch even here in spanish latitudes due to the LP mushroom, as the cluster does not climb so much over the horizon.

 

M7_V1_50.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Susaron said:

Dear 130PDS addicts.

A suburban M7 surrounded by dark nebulae B283 and B287, also the tiny globular cluster NGC6453 can be seen. 20x180s subs + darks + bias with the usual equipment.

It is not easy to catch even here in spanish latitudes due to the LP mushroom, as the cluster does not climb so much over the horizon.

 

M7_V1_50.jpg

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr? I too images the same object on 5th July this year through my RC and DSLR (135x30s, iso3200). The ISO was a mistake, should've kept it at 800, but regardless, theres a stark difference. Please can you help? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, astrosathya said:

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr? I too images the same object on 5th July this year through my RC and DSLR (135x30s, iso3200). The ISO was a mistake, should've kept it at 800, but regardless, theres a stark difference. Please can you help? 

Hi Sathya, perhaps it is a combination of factors mainly the camera and the scope. The camera is a QHY168C, contrary to a DLSR it does not have IR filter so you have the whole spectrum available, as filter I use an IDAS LPS D1, so I collect all the needed data discarding the LP. Moreover the SW130PDS is F5, so it is a fast scope, this allows along with a good camera, to reduce the time needed for your exposures, I have got even very good results with 60s exposures. If you dive a little in this thread you can see the differences got for the same objects taken with the same scope and different cameras.

The SW130PDS is a bargain imaging scope, so what you save in the scope can be used to couple a good camera, the QHY163M, 168C, 247C or the ASI071, 1600 or 294C are very good candidates, or any good CCD like the Atiks 460X or Horizon CMOS. The difference is huge really huge.

Also the postprocessing has something to say, with DBE tool from PixInsight you can extract the best from your pictures.

I attach just a frame, with the background removed and with the histogram streched.

 

L_2018_07_06_00_44_01_Bin1x1_180s__10C_FWHM_RGB_VNG.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, astrosathya said:

How did you manage to record so much data in 1hr?

Hi everyone

@astrosathya: Your 150 RC will capture only a small section of what @susaron has captured with the 130 as your FOV is much smaller; you will be missing much of the surrounding milky way. It should be brighter in your RC (larger aperture) but up against modern cooled cmos, dslrs is not competing on the same terms.

But hey, getting in close on clusters is good too as you can record asterisms which are otherwise lost at shorter focal lengths.

HTH and keep going with the clusters!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Susaron said:

Hi Sathya, perhaps it is a combination of factors mainly the camera and the scope. The camera is a QHY168C, contrary to a DLSR it does not have IR filter so you have the whole spectrum available, as filter I use an IDAS LPS D1, so I collect all the needed data discarding the LP. Moreover the SW130PDS is F5, so it is a fast scope, this allows along with a good camera, to reduce the time needed for your exposures, I have got even very good results with 60s exposures. If you dive a little in this thread you can see the differences got for the same objects taken with the same scope and different cameras.

The SW130PDS is a bargain imaging scope, so what you save in the scope can be used to couple a good camera, the QHY163M, 168C, 247C or the ASI071, 1600 or 294C are very good candidates, or any good CCD like the Atiks 460X or Horizon CMOS. The difference is huge really huge.

Also the postprocessing has something to say, with DBE tool from PixInsight you can extract the best from your pictures.

I attach just a frame, with the background removed and with the histogram streched.

 

L_2018_07_06_00_44_01_Bin1x1_180s__10C_FWHM_RGB_VNG.jpg

Thanks for the reply Susaron. I actually have a 150mm F/ Newtonian as well as a QHY9M with 7x36mm HaOIIISIILRGB filters. ? The newt has a faulty secondary holder and its too much effort o setup the CCD in rainy season, hence the use of my Modified DSLR. I'll try the newt next time with a LP filter. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladies and Gents,

The picture of M7, first shared here, has been chosen by Sky and Telescope as the Editor´s Choice of the Week.

I guess Skywatcher should give us a gift or something by this promotion, don´t you think??

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really happy with this result ... well so far :p

Telescope: Skywatcher 130PDS
Mount: Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro
Camera: QHY 163M
Filters:Ha + O III + S II (Hubble Palette)
Total integration time: 12 hours 45 minutes
Exposure:
Ha (green channel):
77 X 300 sec
O III (blue channel):
39 X 300 sec
S II (red channel)
37 X 300 sec

Processed in DSS, Pixinsight and Photoshop CC

NGC 7000 Hubble orreted.jpg

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding this thread just makes me more excited for the coming darkness! I got to do a few tests with my 130-PDS (hopefully I've got the hang of it all now!) during and just before summer twilight. Not sure what I'm going to photograph first though. My camera has pitiful Ha response (One day I'll complete the build with OAG and a cooled CMOS...) and the central milky way nebulae (M8, M16 etc) are too low down for me to image (without exposing the precious to the road and pavement... and street lamp glare!)

On a side note, has anyone else found the 130-PDS prone to stray light? In an image I took recently I noticed a gradient in the image that seemed too "sharp" to be vignetting or sky gradients. (The glowing pale lobe to the left hand side)

Are there measures that can be taken to prevent this?

NGC6992-small.thumb.jpg.121ffb86ab4fc59a3116143856560af0.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pipnina said:

Finding this thread just makes me more excited for the coming darkness! I got to do a few tests with my 130-PDS (hopefully I've got the hang of it all now!) during and just before summer twilight. Not sure what I'm going to photograph first though. My camera has pitiful Ha response (One day I'll complete the build with OAG and a cooled CMOS...) and the central milky way nebulae (M8, M16 etc) are too low down for me to image (without exposing the precious to the road and pavement... and street lamp glare!)

On a side note, has anyone else found the 130-PDS prone to stray light? In an image I took recently I noticed a gradient in the image that seemed too "sharp" to be vignetting or sky gradients. (The glowing pale lobe to the left hand side)

Are there measures that can be taken to prevent this?

NGC6992-small.thumb.jpg.121ffb86ab4fc59a3116143856560af0.jpg

I think gradients go hand in hand with any degree of light pollution, even a nearby bright star combined with some light, high haze can put a gradient across your images.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last one, the good old m8 lagoom nebula 

I'm focusing :D more on this is target to see how much detail i cam get out of it.

This is about 5 hours of integration time from different nights taken with iso 400 and 4 minute exposure and with flats. I found that iso 400 works best for me. 

The camera is a t5i unmodded and i still can't use the coma corrector,  I'll try to have a friend to help me with it. 

1013505766_m84hrseditada.thumb.jpg.df1d139aa43f3e7423a4b6767da2ed68.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Atreta said:

Last one, the good old m8 lagoom nebula 

I'm focusing :D more on this is target to see how much detail i cam get out of it.

This is about 5 hours of integration time from different nights taken with iso 400 and 4 minute exposure and with flats. I found that iso 400 works best for me. 

The camera is a t5i unmodded and i still can't use the coma corrector,  I'll try to have a friend to help me with it. 

1013505766_m84hrseditada.thumb.jpg.df1d139aa43f3e7423a4b6767da2ed68.jpg

Great shot. Here is mine on my T2 unmodified last year. Mine has even worse HA than yours!

Lagoon_using_Average_SK_Flat_Bias_2_WA.thumb.jpg.534932ba82b9a5f03df09a459e8d3051.jpg

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I go for M8 this night, let's see what I can get

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

You won't get problems if you use collimation screws on the secondary (7 pounds 3 of them), and a good laser collimation tool like the hotech sca laser

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Gerry Casa Christiana said:

Great shot. Here is mine on my T2 unmodified last year. Mine has even worse HA than yours!

Lagoon_using_Average_SK_Flat_Bias_2_WA.thumb.jpg.534932ba82b9a5f03df09a459e8d3051.jpg

You got a lot of Ha too, great image.

i'm considering to mod mine, but i don't like red overwhelming the entire picture. 

14 hours ago, Susaron said:

I go for M8 this night, let's see what I can get

Hope you can get it. I wanna see :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, JohnSadlerAstro said:

Wow those images are amazing! I'm really looking forward  to the nights coming back. One annoying thing with the 130 is collimation. For some reason I can only get the secondary centred if I off centre the front vanes quite a lot. :(

I guess I'll just have to get some test shots in and see how it does. :)

John

i think mine is out of collimation, my copy of ccd inspector expired and can't check it anymore.  it would be nice if someone could analyze it for me :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first proper use of ASI1600MM on Veil Nebula [Back Garden, Woolwich, UK, 11/07/2018- 29x300s HA Bin x1, 27x25Os OIII Binx2], stacked in ASTAP, processed in PI. 

849565128_VeilNebula-ASTAP3.thumb.jpg.ea307b0af98c44bb786c96530fdf69a5.jpg

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear friends,

A Cocoon nebula from yesterday`s evening near Toledo, Spain. 34x180 subs plus darks and flats. QHY168C at Gain 10, Offset 30 Temp= -10ºC, taken with APT.

Cheers.

Mario.

int_IC5196_crop_30.png

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Atreta said:

You got a lot of Ha too, great image.

i'm considering to mod mine, but i don't like red overwhelming the entire picture. 

Hope you can get it. I wanna see :)

I have already modified the same camera. Huge difference! Wouldn't go back. Couple of comparisons below but the also guiding was added as I didn't have that before  

 

IMG_4180.jpg

HH_revision_1.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Gerry Casa Christiana said:

.Couple of comparisons below but the also guiding was added as I didn't have that before  

 

Huge difference

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

M8 Lagoon Nebula and GC NGC6544. I don´t know if it was a flexure or a guiding problem but only the stars on the upper rear square show some trails. The picture is a stack of only 15x180subs. The QHY parameters are the same than in the Cocoon.

M8.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Susaron said:

M8 Lagoon Nebula

Tremendous shot. It's really low here in Alicante and the haze and atmospheric turbulence near the southern horizon usually tell us to stay away. But now we're inspired. Hope you don't mind, we had a play with the decon and colour. Yeah, now it's too green!

m8.thumb.jpg.27371a8ad77ca1793f31751fe5e63ede.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alacant said:

Tremendous shot. It's really low here in Alicante and the haze and atmospheric turbulence near the southern horizon usually tell us to stay away. But now we're inspired. Hope you don't mind, we had a play with the decon and colour. Yeah, now it's too green!

m8.thumb.jpg.27371a8ad77ca1793f31751fe5e63ede.jpg

I tried deconvolution but it is not easy. Perhaps I should tune the color saturation and balance a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      For sale is my beloved but now superfluous to requirements HEQ5 Pro for £700
      It's in a used condition as you would imagine. I've had it for about 4 years and found great success with this mount. Ideal for those beginning astrophotography and also good for visual users.
      I'm calling it "deluxe" due to the upgrades I've had done.
      - It's belt modified
      - It's had brand new bearings and grease
      - The backlash has been expertly setup 
      - It has the latest polar scope
      - The power port has been replaced with an aviation style port which is a lot more secure
      It'll come with the hand controller and at least 1 counterweight (if I can find the second it'll come with both). The polar scope cover has been lost. The counterweight is rusty as always. There is some marring on the counterweight bar housing as shown in the photos.
      It also will come with the modified power cable required also.
      Note: the power LED sometimes doesn't illuminate but the mount is still powered (please see the photo with the hand controller).
      Collection or local delivery within Northampton







    • By Spacecake2
      Hello,
      I know you've seen these questions a lot (unless your new) but I'm struggling a lot on if I should buy a Skywatcher 250px (10") or 200px (8") (dobsonians). I have a 5 inch and i'm looking for a big step up for noticeable changes. 
      Thank you 
       
    • By Hoopla
      Hi All,
      im totally new to this and have been getting setup over the past 3 months. I’ve purchased a Skywatcher 150P on a EQ3 Pro mount. 
       
      I have a 2x and 3x Barlow with 10x and 20x eyepieces. I’m trying to view and photograph Mars as it’s so bright at present and easy to see however I’m really struggling to see anything more than a bright ball when viewing and when photographing it’s just a blurry ball. 
       
      I have a canon 700d DSLR with t ring and adaptors  
      can folk suggest what combination of Barlow / eyepiece would be required to view Mars in all its glory and possibly lens and iso/exposure settings to get some nice shots too please. I’m aware I may need to stack and am tech savvy so this bit should be ok. I just can’t seem to get anything at present to process.
      help!! 
    • By Astrid
      My 200P just arrived and oh my God... I have been trying to wrap my head around the mount for 4 hours.
      The manual didn't really help so I decided to go on youtube, but again, I didn't find any good and detailed videos so I decided to ask here if there is any video or perhaps blog post that might help me set up the mount. 
      Thank you very much! 
      *by the way, is the EQ5 supposed to have slow motion cables? I only got 2 knobs (not cables) and I'm not sure if there is something missing or not... sorry, this is the first time I've used a serious equatorial mount or telescope. 
      Thank you very much!
    • By Davehux
      There’s a new kid on the block now, so it’s time to move this brilliant scope onto another happy owner.
      Bought new from FLO just over 2 years age, it’s produced some awesome image - shown below - all taken with this scope and an ASI294 camera.
      I’ve upgraded the focuser to an OVL model, and the difference from the standard one is immense. Runs smooth from one end to the other, and has no problem holding a lump of a cooled camera or a DSLR without slipping. It also has a standard 2” connector.
      Also included is the Skywatcher 0.85 focal reducer/flattener with 2” adapter, so swapping out the camera for the eyepiece is a 2 second job.
      The optics are all clean, bright and scratch-free. There’s a piece of Velcro on the tube, where I used to have my ASIair V1 stuck on. Apart from the usual bite marks on the dovetail, it’s in excellent overall condition.
      The standard SW 9x50 finder scope, 28mm eyepiece, a couple of adapters, and diagonal are all included, also comes with the aluminium case.
      This whole outfit would cost you £842 plus delivery, to buy from FLO today. It’s yours for £525 delivered to a UK mainland address. 
       









×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.