Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Imaging with the 130pds


Russe

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, alacant said:

Hi

No time to do it justice I'm afraid, but it looks fine to me. The flat frames are working perfectly:

But then if I abuse them (as I tend to by the time I am processing it, with the heavy stretching and bringing out of faint detail etc) it rears its head in at least some form!

Here's a stretch of the full master light (so multiple nights worth of lum data, all under a new moon so no interference there). It seems to manifest here in the form of a brightness plateau in the center of the screen. If I run DBE in pixinsight, the image is largely nicely flat but the central plateau is now almost pinched.

Screenshot_20220414_172456.thumb.png.45bf04d393861369e69221ef78c4ce87.pngScreenshot_20220414_173045.thumb.png.b5fb609f4018908bf1763fbfce0c320a.png

Now this could be boiled down to inconsistencies between nights perhaps, if it wasn't appearing in more of my images! this example is of only a single night.

Screenshot_20220414_173625.thumb.png.e20fec57c22aee82569c18f95bacfcc0.pngScreenshot_20220414_173700.thumb.png.9dc020ee20a3a81904add58d4ab929dc.png

I figure it's either reflections in the tube or the baader mpcc coma corrector?

I have no idea precisely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/04/2022 at 18:38, pipnina said:

But then if I abuse them (as I tend to by the time I am processing it, with the heavy stretching and bringing out of faint detail etc) it rears its head in at least some form!

Here's a stretch of the full master light (so multiple nights worth of lum data, all under a new moon so no interference there). It seems to manifest here in the form of a brightness plateau in the center of the screen. If I run DBE in pixinsight, the image is largely nicely flat but the central plateau is now almost pinched.

Screenshot_20220414_172456.thumb.png.45bf04d393861369e69221ef78c4ce87.pngScreenshot_20220414_173045.thumb.png.b5fb609f4018908bf1763fbfce0c320a.png

Now this could be boiled down to inconsistencies between nights perhaps, if it wasn't appearing in more of my images! this example is of only a single night.

Screenshot_20220414_173625.thumb.png.e20fec57c22aee82569c18f95bacfcc0.pngScreenshot_20220414_173700.thumb.png.9dc020ee20a3a81904add58d4ab929dc.png

I figure it's either reflections in the tube or the baader mpcc coma corrector?

I have no idea precisely.

Your flats are working nicely. Both of your image show a typical light pollution gradient coming from south direction.

I noticed that your single frame has only  little light pollution compared to my single frames. 

I dont know how much you stretched to make it so obvious. 

I also get this weird uneven background, when i stretch my final image too much after doing Background Extraction in Siril, but it doesnt look so strong line in your image. But maybe you just stretch differently.

 

1170859669_Screenshot(50).thumb.png.d981c0775c423f9ee6ee7d7a165595e7.png181048266_Screenshot(49).thumb.png.09428f8afe4e86fcc6e145f655cc1466.png

 

Edited by Bibabutzemann
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@pipnina could you solve your issue with the blotchy background? 

I started a new thread about this issue. To have some comparison, it would be awesome if you could stack your flats, but additive to enhance the problem.  If you send me that image i could compare it to mine and see if its the same problem. 

I found out that the shape of the that complex gradient changes when i move the focuser in or out.
Here is the gif which shows what happens when i move the focuser from all in to out. It contains 9 frames. Each fram is a additive stack of 20 flats and vignetting removed:

Gradientfocuschange.gif.e39fc40652a0a07a7045cce96dfb8b89.gif

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bibabutzemann said:

@pipnina could you solve your issue with the blotchy background? 

I started a new thread about this issue. To have some comparison, it would be awesome if you could stack your flats, but additive to enhance the problem.  If you send me that image i could compare it to mine and see if its the same problem. 

I found out that the shape of the that complex gradient changes when i move the focuser in or out.
Here is the gif which shows what happens when i move the focuser from all in to out. It contains 9 frames. Each fram is a additive stack of 20 flats and vignetting removed:

Gradientfocuschange.gif.e39fc40652a0a07a7045cce96dfb8b89.gif

 

 

I did not know of this effect! I will definitely have to start doing my flats properly (before not after imaging session) from now on, because while I don't touch the focus position before imaging, the scope probably warms rather considerably if i let it sit in the sun in the daytime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flaming Star Nebula captured in February.

I collected 12 hours of data with the L-Extreme Filter and only 1.5 hours of RGB for the stars.

Equipment: 130PDS+EOS1200D+MPCC3+EQ3 Pro

Processed in Siril+Photoshop

 

 

Flamingf22.jpg

Edited by Bibabutzemann
  • Like 13
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bibabutzemann said:

Flaming Star Nebula captured in February.

I collected 12 hours of data with the L-Extreme Filter and only 1.5 hours of RGB for the stars.

Equipment: 130PDS+EOS1200D+MPCC3+EQ3 Pro

Processed in Siril+Photoshop

 

 

Flamingf22.jpg

Very nice. 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

M94 

5.3 hours of Data, Bortle 5 sky

For background extraction i used a new tool. Its called Graxpert and is completely free. Works fantastic. German youtuber astrophotocologne initiated the project and he also published a tutorial in english just yesterday.

Equipment: 130PDS+MPCC3+EOS1200DA cooled+HEQ5

 

M94.2.thumb.jpg.05c48f426718e6a8d726b290be88bb96.jpg

Edited by Bibabutzemann
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 25/04/2022 at 17:42, Bibabutzemann said:

Flaming Star Nebula captured in February.

I collected 12 hours of data with the L-Extreme Filter and only 1.5 hours of RGB for the stars.

Equipment: 130PDS+EOS1200D+MPCC3+EQ3 Pro

Processed in Siril+Photoshop

 

 

Flamingf22.jpg

Very nice work!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jamgood said:

(I hadn't got the dew shield on for the photo but I do use one.)

Very nice set up 👌🏻

I leave mine on all the time as I do my flats with it in place.

I see you have one on the guidescope. Can they be bought?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pitch Black Skies said:

I see you have one on the guidescope. Can they be bought?

I honestly don't know. I made this one myself out of cardboard and gaffer tape but you probably can buy them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.