Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Show us your Tak


Stu

Recommended Posts

Using this rainy Friday to mess about weighing eyepieces and fine tune balancing arrangements on the AZ100 - just dialling out minor irritations in my set-up basically to enjoy next time it's clear - anyway - here the TOA behaving itself with an EP at the heavier end of the scale.

JOEA4732.thumb.jpeg.a430cd76231d1efdb2050e4ed4552721.jpeg

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 31/03/2023 at 05:59, josefk said:

Using this rainy Friday to mess about weighing eyepieces and fine tune balancing arrangements on the AZ100 - just dialling out minor irritations in my set-up basically to enjoy next time it's clear - anyway - here the TOA behaving itself with an EP at the heavier end of the scale.

JOEA4732.thumb.jpeg.a430cd76231d1efdb2050e4ed4552721.jpeg

Beautiful setup, beautiful image!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SamAndrew said:

Well, it has happened, having had many different scopes over the years, I have finally joined the Tak owners club 😁

Picked up this FSQ-106ED over the weeked. Now a waiting game for some clear skies!

DSC_0762.thumb.JPG.218e14a973687b114c21cb0a9d6c1845.JPG

DSC_0761.thumb.JPG.845d692ea2192ab6d48795c719e7937b.JPG

Superb - for visual and the joy of a wide FOV without field curvature or for imaging? In either case a lovely scope!

Edited by josefk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Sunshine said:

Beautiful setup, beautiful image!

Thank you. It might even make it outside of the house tonight 🤣. Clear Outside forecasts clear outside for the first time in what feels like weeks and weeks...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SamAndrew said:

Well, it has happened, having had many different scopes over the years, I have finally joined the Tak owners club 😁

Picked up this FSQ-106ED over the weeked. Now a waiting game for some clear skies!

DSC_0762.thumb.JPG.218e14a973687b114c21cb0a9d6c1845.JPG

DSC_0761.thumb.JPG.845d692ea2192ab6d48795c719e7937b.JPG

Lovely. But tradition dictates we have a shot of the OG 😊

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, josefk said:

Superb - for visual and the joy of a wide FOV without field curvature or for imaging? In either case a lovely scope!

Thanks. It will mostly be for imaging, but it would be criminal not to look through it from time to time. Looking forward to visually testing it on the Moon to start with. 

Will post some more pics once it stops raining and I set it up outside.

Edited by SamAndrew
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've decided to bump this thread in appreciation of my FOA-60Q. I'll post a fresh picture of it soon.

The conditions in London this evening could hardly have been more lamentable - strong wind propelling thick blankets of clouds, accompanied by mushy seeing and a full moon. One massive cloud was receding to the east, and there was a strip of sky ahead of the next cloud wall arriving from the west. A 20-minute window... FOA-60 is on it, providing beautiful, crystal-clear views of Zet UMa, Eps Boo, Alp Her, Eps Lyr, and 61 Cyg. A night with brief glimpses of a few of your favorite double stars is better than a night of wishing you were looking at double stars.

I've read assessments of FOA-60/FOA-60Q that claim that you need excellent conditions to see how they outperform other 60mm refractors. I completely disagree. I've owned other fine 60mm refractors, and I am wowed every time I look through this scope.

Edited by The60mmKid
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just paying homage to a gorgeous little scope that I have had a lot of fun with recently, observing Venus . The Extender-Q gives it a bit of extra punch without the slightly extra hassle of fitting the CQ 1.7x Extender. The addition of an MEF3 micro focuser makes it even more of a pleasure to use.

Malcolm 

20230703_162006.thumb.jpg.a49ad7a28bcf83b3739f9b52e3041384.jpg

 

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr Spock said:

I have a couple of these things lurking around...

DSC_04582048.thumb.jpg.a65db1d28c2c563e1c156afaab896d3e.jpg

DSC_06062048.thumb.jpg.7541be67c19cc0f7085e284b0c853230.jpg

 

Very nice. What’s the 45 degree diagonal with the FS60 out of interest?
Going against the classic Tak grain, I also like the More Blue rings for the bigger scopes. They’re smart and well built. I think Tak has missed a trick not offering its own line of slightly more affordable rings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Highburymark said:

Very nice. What’s the 45 degree diagonal with the FS60 out of interest?
Going against the classic Tak grain, I also like the More Blue rings for the bigger scopes. They’re smart and well built. I think Tak has missed a trick not offering its own line of slightly more affordable rings.

Agreed, I think the MoreBlue rings work really well, look good and are light but strong.

Strangely I’ve got MoreBlue on my three smaller Taks but have kept the clamp on the FS-128 as it seems to work very well, easy to loosen to move the scope of needed but very solid.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stu said:

Agreed, I think the MoreBlue rings work really well, look good and are light but strong.

Strangely I’ve got MoreBlue on my three smaller Taks but have kept the clamp on the FS-128 as it seems to work very well, easy to loosen to move the scope of needed but very solid.

For the FS-128 I think I’d have done the same Stu. More of a classic look.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Highburymark said:

Very nice. What’s the 45 degree diagonal with the FS60 out of interest?

It's for birding :wink2: Unfortunately given the 'awkward' focuser on the 60, this combination is all I can get to work. The diagonal has horrible CA at any decent magnification :sad2:

 

20 minutes ago, Highburymark said:

Going against the classic Tak grain, I also like the More Blue rings for the bigger scopes.

The MoreBlue rings are superb - as is the rest of their stuff. I got the MEF3 because it matched the scope but others say the MoreBlue fine focuser works better.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got a set of More Blue rings for one of my Tak refractors recently. I found them disappointing. The knobs were fiddly to loosen (I sometimes loosen to adjust balance by sliding the OTA - the Tak clamshell knob is easier to loosen and there is only one, not two as with More Blue rings). I wasn’t impressed by the finish either. 
They went back 😊

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big advantage of the Tak cradle from my point of view is the ease with which you can loosen the clamp a bit and slide the scope so easily to achieve balance. Great for swapping between mono and binoviewers. Looks great too in my opinion. I use them in all my Taks (Mewlon excepted)

Malcolm 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

My new FC100DZ, set up but no stars to be seen yet. I can’t wait to get it out for first light. I was so tempted to get the TSA120 instead but went with the DZ to get a bit of extra aperture but keep the portability that I like from the FC76. 
 

In a fit of frustration at the clouds, last night I ordered the Baader 2” BBHS mirror diagonal and the 41mm Panoptic for some widefield views if the weather ever improves. I’m a bit apprehensive about the size of the gigantic Panoptic but the 24mm is so much fun in the FC76, I thought the big brother in the DZ could be great. Let’s see if my mad plan works out!

IMG_7919.jpeg

IMG_7912.jpeg

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Nicola Fletcher said:

My new FC100DZ, set up but no stars to be seen yet. I can’t wait to get it out for first light. I was so tempted to get the TSA120 instead but went with the DZ to get a bit of extra aperture but keep the portability that I like from the FC76. 
 

In a fit of frustration at the clouds, last night I ordered the Baader 2” BBHS mirror diagonal and the 41mm Panoptic for some widefield views if the weather ever improves. I’m a bit apprehensive about the size of the gigantic Panoptic but the 24mm is so much fun in the FC76, I thought the big brother in the DZ could be great. Let’s see if my mad plan works out!

IMG_7919.jpeg

IMG_7912.jpeg

Looks like you've got it mounted on a Skywatcher AZ-EQ5, which should be more than adequate.

John 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, johnturley said:

Looks like you've got it mounted on a Skywatcher AZ-EQ5, which should be more than adequate.

I hope so - the AZ-EQ5 is a great mount and I think it should be able for the scope with a big EP. I was more worried about overloading the Tak focuser. The Scopeviews review for this scope says you can get slop with the use of heavy CCDs or binoviewers. I don’t think the 41 Pan will be as heavy as that though (1.4kg for both diagonal and EP 😬)

Edited by Nicola Fletcher
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nicola Fletcher said:

I hope so - the AZ-EQ5 is a great mount and I think it should be able for the scope with a big EP. I was more worried about overloading the Tak focuser. The Scopeviews review for this scope says you can get slop with the use of heavy CCDs or binoviewers. I don’t think the 41 Pan will be as heavy as that though (1.4kg for both diagonal and EP 😬)

I’m using a Baader MK V binoviewer in my DZ with no issues 👍

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.