Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

Show us your Tak


Stu

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Nicola Fletcher said:

My new Mewlon 180C double mounted with an FC100DZ on an AZ-EQ5. I’m still not sure if I like this mount. I’ve started using it in tracking only mode rather than GoTo which is better. The very quick session with the Mewlon was fantastic though - barely first light as the clouds rolled in but M42 and the Pleiades looked fantastic, and the double cluster with the 41mm Panoptic was the best view I’ve ever had of this target. I’m looking forward to getting to know this beautiful scope a lot better!

IMG_9771.jpeg

IMG_9764.jpeg

Fabulous!

Malcolm 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps this should be in a different thread, but has anyone used both 180 and 210 Mewlons? Any views on the relative merits? I’m tempted at some point (when I’ve sold a few scopes and have some money 🤪) to buy another having had a 210 before. Cooling was always a challenge on the 210, not sure I ever got it right, and there is something that might make me prefer the lighter, faster cooling 180. 6 smaller diffraction spikes may be nicer too?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stu said:

Perhaps this should be in a different thread, but has anyone used both 180 and 210 Mewlons? Any views on the relative merits? I’m tempted at some point (when I’ve sold a few scopes and have some money 🤪) to buy another having had a 210 before. Cooling was always a challenge on the 210, not sure I ever got it right, and there is something that might make me prefer the lighter, faster cooling 180. 6 smaller diffraction spikes may be nicer too?

I have had both, the extra mass of the 210 made it harder to cool down and keep up to dropping evening temperatures in the evening. 
Even with active cooling the M180 can take 90 minutes to fully cool down but when it does it matches the planetary performance of the FS128.
A fully cooled M210 will probably be close to a 140 APO on the planets and deep sky will be better than the M180.
I prefer the 6 spikes as they are much less noticeable.

Overall I did not like the M210 as much as the M180 as it was frustrating to use.

Edited by dweller25
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forecast was not promising last night for the monthly Baker Street Irregular Astronomers star party in Regent’s Park so I decided to just take the baby. And then loaded him up with an eyepiece that weighs almost as much as he does….

IMG_4736.thumb.jpeg.610813c957c0610c10721627a82a3633.jpeg

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DirkSteele said:

Forecast was not promising last night for the monthly Baker Street Irregular Astronomers star party in Regent’s Park so I decided to just take the baby. And then loaded him up with an eyepiece that weighs almost as much as he does….

IMG_4736.thumb.jpeg.610813c957c0610c10721627a82a3633.jpeg

That’s absolutely brilliant 😂 talk about confusing members of the public - ‘Where do I look?’ Is a valid question! 

 

11 hours ago, dweller25 said:

Overall I did not like the M210 as much as the M180 as it was frustrating to use.

I’m glad you think that @dweller25. I had a hard time choosing between the two. I read everything online that I could and went for the 180. Cool-down time and mounting requirements were my biggest concerns. I got a clear plastic box for the scope and I just put it outside a few hours before use. I really like the fan on the front of it too and will get one for it. In the end, it would be ideal to try these scopes before you buy one but unfortunately I don’t have any neighbours that have both a 180’ and 210! 🙄58F9213F-79C0-49A1-A557-F71D991203BC.thumb.jpeg.926c5f4f984114510aad92f17813c640.jpeg

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 14/03/2024 at 08:34, Nicola Fletcher said:

That’s absolutely brilliant 😂 talk about confusing members of the public - ‘Where do I look?’ Is a valid question! 

 

I’m glad you think that @dweller25. I had a hard time choosing between the two. I read everything online that I could and went for the 180. Cool-down time and mounting requirements were my biggest concerns. I got a clear plastic box for the scope and I just put it outside a few hours before use. I really like the fan on the front of it too and will get one for it. In the end, it would be ideal to try these scopes before you buy one but unfortunately I don’t have any neighbours that have both a 180’ and 210! 🙄58F9213F-79C0-49A1-A557-F71D991203BC.thumb.jpeg.926c5f4f984114510aad92f17813c640.jpeg

Thats a good solution to cool down.

And I already have the clear plastic box ......... 🤔

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/04/2024 at 09:52, John said:

Thats a good solution to cool down.

And I already have the clear plastic box ......... 🤔

 

I have a plastic box too now 🙂

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrific lunar session last night. I was at it for hours. Stopped half way to take in a few doubles.

D5H_1340_DxO1200.jpg.6a739090bca3d356209996d6dc171a8b.jpg

Views through the 3.5mm LVW were magical - x211.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.