Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Show us your Tak


Stu

Recommended Posts

On 01/11/2022 at 07:18, JeremyS said:

Yup, F15 rules 😊

If something dreadful happened and I had to shift my larger Tak scopes, I think I could be very happy with my FOA 60Q. Especially when I look at these drawings: https://www.fzu.cz/~kupco/astro/equipment/FOA60.html

perfect, I'll take your TSA120! I mean not if something dreadful happens, of course but if you'd be happy with the 60 I could find a use for the 120 🤣

Edited by Sunshine
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 31/08/2022 at 13:51, Telescope40 said:

Looking forward to looking thru this thread. Fraid I am a "lesser mortal " as a Tak is not in ownership and never has been. SW and Stellarvue ATM. Always nice to look at kit of all types. 

Thought crosses my mind here and there. 

Sell the 3 scopes I have and go Tak. TSA 120 seems like a nice number??   LOL  Time will tell. One day maybe.  

John 

John, 

Just 4 months back, and now you have a lovely FS128 of your own..kind of a prophetic post, eh?😉👍

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, F15Rules said:

John, 

Just 4 months back, and now you have a lovely FS128 of your own..kind of a prophetic post, eh?😉👍

Dave

Hey Dave. This post has gone thru my head more than a few times over the last few weeks. Talk about crystal ball dreaming and then. My SGL signature is somewhat shorter than it used to be.  The 3 scopes I had at the time have now been sold over the last couple of months. Still knocked out the 128 is in the conservatory.  Views have been just what I dreamed of.  I'm done but then I have seen the @mikeDnight ad for his SKY 90.  Burnley ain't that far away. I'm joking !!!    You cant look thru 2 scopes at once ( as my late Mum once said to me)  although it would not be for the lack of trying. 

Trust "Trinity" is in fine fettle  ??!! 

 

John  

Edited by Telescope40
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Telescope40 said:

Hey Dave. This post has gone thru my head more than a few times over the last few weeks. Talk about crystal ball dreaming and then. My SGL signature is somewhat shorter than it used to be.  The 3 scopes I had at the time have now been sold over the last couple of months. Still knocked out the 128 is in the conservatory.  Views have been just what I dreamed of.  I'm done but then I have seen the @mikeDnight ad for his SKY 90.  Burnley ain't that far away. I'm joking !!!    You cant look thru 2 scopes at once ( as my late Mum once said to me)  although it would not be for the lack of trying. 

Trust "Trinity" is in fine fettle  ??!! 

 

John  

Hi John,

Yes, Trinity is fine, thanks, am just keen to get her out more..the past two nights were pretty good, quite clear, but at minus 5 or worse it was just too cold to be comfortable. Tonight is shaping up the same, I'll have to see if I can bear it!❄️🤔😊..

Here's a couple of nice pics of her on the original Tak tripod from the  warm and sunny weather of summer a couple of years back.

0_IMG_20220318_130423238_HDR.thumb.jpg.7fff4298785b80558ae9ec71e7ce3044.jpg

 

0_IMG_20170430_181905376.thumb.jpg.a7653ea4ea79d1cf0fc03556c946a972.jpg.3c4b75686c1b0fd26ded14ee180a3792.jpg

I normally use my home built fixed height wooden tripod with Trinity (shown above carrying my then Moonraker 80mm F15 achromat)..it's shown below, this time carrying Trinity..

IMG_20220924_004609089.thumb.jpg.57b01d6c3f2c88ae7741aa5c41250638.jpg

The original tripod shown below is an extending hardwood Tak one, identical to the one which originally came with Trinity as a new scope in c 2000..it's very lovely to look at, but in truth, the big FS128 is happier on the more solid, less glamorous, fixed tripod.. it's quite a big tube (almost 6" diameter), but only 7.5kg in weight.

1935268749_TakTripod13.jpeg.48d4780f1bab41bafda28ab41f877fe0.jpeg

Here's another Tak library pic of the same Tak Tripod carrying an FS128 on an EM1 mount back in 1994..

159464091_FS128onEM1mount.jpg.cb27a28eae027a5574aa7add2c4d31fa.jpg

This Tak tripod would be just perfect for any 4" Tak, including the TSA102, and I may move mine on soon as I'm just not using it much.

Good to hear you're getting good observing with yours, John👍

Dave

Edited by F15Rules
Photo added
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, F15Rules said:

Hi John,

Yes, Trinity is fine, thanks, am just keen to get her out more..the past two nights were pretty good, quite clear, but at minus 5 or worse it was just too cold to be comfortable. Tonight is shaping up the same, I'll have to see if I can bear it!❄️🤔😊..

Here's a couple of nice pics of her on the original Tak tripod from the  warm and sunny weather of summer a couple of years back.

0_IMG_20220318_130423238_HDR.thumb.jpg.7fff4298785b80558ae9ec71e7ce3044.jpg

 

0_IMG_20170430_181905376.thumb.jpg.a7653ea4ea79d1cf0fc03556c946a972.jpg.3c4b75686c1b0fd26ded14ee180a3792.jpg

I normally use my home built fixed height wooden tripod with Trinity (shown above carrying my then Moonraker 80mm F15 achromat)..it's shown below, this time carrying Trinity..

IMG_20220924_004609089.thumb.jpg.57b01d6c3f2c88ae7741aa5c41250638.jpg

The original tripod shown below is an extending hardwood Tak one, identical to the one which originally came with Trinity as a new scope in c 2000..it's very lovely to look at, but in truth, the big FS128 is happier on the more solid, less glamorous, fixed tripod.. it's quite a big tube (almost 6" diameter), but only 7.5kg in weight.

1935268749_TakTripod13.jpeg.48d4780f1bab41bafda28ab41f877fe0.jpeg

Here's another Tak library pic of the same Tak Tripod carrying an FS128 on an EM1 mount back in 1994..

159464091_FS128onEM1mount.jpg.cb27a28eae027a5574aa7add2c4d31fa.jpg

This Tak tripod would be just perfect for any 4" Tak, including the TSA102, and I may move mine on soon as I'm just not using it much.

Good to hear you're getting good observing with yours, John👍

Dave

Dave. Some great pictures there.  Is the final one out of a Tak catalogue of some kind ?? 

Fraid I have to agree with you about the weather of late. I've cheated a little. Been going out shortly before sunset to view Jupiter and Saturn. Been rewarded with nice steady skies.  Was able to last for about 90 mins then the feet start to be the issue rather than any other part of the anatomy. Some of the detail on both planets have been a joy. 

I did a late session last week with Mars in my sights.  Still struggle with Mars. Mr Luna wasn't helping - LOL.  The conditions weren't the best. Thinking that the "seeing" will finally give me a good session before this opposition starts to wane. Time is with me so far. 

John 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telescope40 said:

Dave. Some great pictures there.  Is the final one out of a Tak catalogue of some kind ?? 

Fraid I have to agree with you about the weather of late. I've cheated a little. Been going out shortly before sunset to view Jupiter and Saturn. Been rewarded with nice steady skies.  Was able to last for about 90 mins then the feet start to be the issue rather than any other part of the anatomy. Some of the detail on both planets have been a joy. 

I did a late session last week with Mars in my sights.  Still struggle with Mars. Mr Luna wasn't helping - LOL.  The conditions weren't the best. Thinking that the "seeing" will finally give me a good session before this opposition starts to wane. Time is with me so far. 

John 

 

 I could be wrong but the Tak pic of the FS128 on an EM1 may have been one of the pic's I posted on SGL a few years ago. I have a collection of photo's showing the history of Tak scopes and their development over the years. I think i posted many of those pic's, so you should be able to search for them if you know how.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mikeDnight said:

 I could be wrong but the Tak pic of the FS128 on an EM1 may have been one of the pic's I posted on SGL a few years ago. I have a collection of photo's showing the history of Tak scopes and their development over the years. I think i posted many of those pic's, so you should be able to search for them if you know how.

Mike. Thanks for your update. I’ll take a look around the site as you suggest. 
 

John

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, mikeDnight said:

 I could be wrong but the Tak pic of the FS128 on an EM1 may have been one of the pic's I posted on SGL a few years ago. I have a collection of photo's showing the history of Tak scopes and their development over the years. I think i posted many of those pic's, so you should be able to search for them if you know how.

That's quite possible Mike, I found the image with a Google search a good while back..

John, the pic of the FS128 with piggybacked Sky 90 in a dome was posted by Roger Vine on his scopereviews.co.uk site - which has some fine reviews of many scopes, not just Taks..you can find it here:

http://www.scopeviews.co.uk/

Ref Mars, I tried an orange/red filter last week in poor seeing, and it definitely improved contrast and brought out a large land mass clearer than the unfiltered view..

HTH,

Dave

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikeDnight said:

 I could be wrong but the Tak pic of the FS128 on an EM1 may have been one of the pic's I posted on SGL a few years ago. I have a collection of photo's showing the history of Tak scopes and their development over the years. I think i posted many of those pic's, so you should be able to search for them if you know how.

Your album is here Mike. I look at it every night before I go to bed. Then I thumb the Tak catalogue 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, JeremyS said:

Your album is here Mike. I look at it every night before I go to bed. Then I thumb the Tak catalogue 

 

That's brilliant Jeremy. And I believe you when you say you look at it every night before bed. :laugh2:

It's difficult to turn away once you start looking at those images. I'd forgot I'd posted some photo's of my friend Derek with his, now my Sky 90. Happy memories! Perhaps I should keep it!!??

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, F15Rules said:

Hi John,

Yes, Trinity is fine, thanks, am just keen to get her out more..the past two nights were pretty good, quite clear, but at minus 5 or worse it was just too cold to be comfortable. Tonight is shaping up the same, I'll have to see if I can bear it!❄️🤔😊..

Here's a couple of nice pics of her on the original Tak tripod from the  warm and sunny weather of summer a couple of years back.

0_IMG_20220318_130423238_HDR.thumb.jpg.7fff4298785b80558ae9ec71e7ce3044.jpg

 

0_IMG_20170430_181905376.thumb.jpg.a7653ea4ea79d1cf0fc03556c946a972.jpg.3c4b75686c1b0fd26ded14ee180a3792.jpg

I normally use my home built fixed height wooden tripod with Trinity (shown above carrying my then Moonraker 80mm F15 achromat)..it's shown below, this time carrying Trinity..

IMG_20220924_004609089.thumb.jpg.57b01d6c3f2c88ae7741aa5c41250638.jpg

The original tripod shown below is an extending hardwood Tak one, identical to the one which originally came with Trinity as a new scope in c 2000..it's very lovely to look at, but in truth, the big FS128 is happier on the more solid, less glamorous, fixed tripod.. it's quite a big tube (almost 6" diameter), but only 7.5kg in weight.

1935268749_TakTripod13.jpeg.48d4780f1bab41bafda28ab41f877fe0.jpeg

Here's another Tak library pic of the same Tak Tripod carrying an FS128 on an EM1 mount back in 1994..

159464091_FS128onEM1mount.jpg.cb27a28eae027a5574aa7add2c4d31fa.jpg

This Tak tripod would be just perfect for any 4" Tak, including the TSA102, and I may move mine on soon as I'm just not using it much.

Good to hear you're getting good observing with yours, John👍

Dave

Hi Dave, agree your wooden Tak tripod looks really nice compared to my rather mundane AZ4 steel leg tripod.
You mentioned about the stability of it compared to your fixed leg tripod, what about adding a lightweight extension tube and leave the legs up or not fully extended?
That’s what I’ve done with my setup and it’s rock solid with virtually no vibrations.

Cheers Iain 

Edited by jock1958
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, F15Rules said:

Hi John,

Yes, Trinity is fine, thanks, am just keen to get her out more..the past two nights were pretty good, quite clear, but at minus 5 or worse it was just too cold to be comfortable. Tonight is shaping up the same, I'll have to see if I can bear it!❄️🤔😊..

Here's a couple of nice pics of her on the original Tak tripod from the  warm and sunny weather of summer a couple of years back.

0_IMG_20220318_130423238_HDR.thumb.jpg.7fff4298785b80558ae9ec71e7ce3044.jpg

 

0_IMG_20170430_181905376.thumb.jpg.a7653ea4ea79d1cf0fc03556c946a972.jpg.3c4b75686c1b0fd26ded14ee180a3792.jpg

I normally use my home built fixed height wooden tripod with Trinity (shown above carrying my then Moonraker 80mm F15 achromat)..it's shown below, this time carrying Trinity..

IMG_20220924_004609089.thumb.jpg.57b01d6c3f2c88ae7741aa5c41250638.jpg

The original tripod shown below is an extending hardwood Tak one, identical to the one which originally came with Trinity as a new scope in c 2000..it's very lovely to look at, but in truth, the big FS128 is happier on the more solid, less glamorous, fixed tripod.. it's quite a big tube (almost 6" diameter), but only 7.5kg in weight.

1935268749_TakTripod13.jpeg.48d4780f1bab41bafda28ab41f877fe0.jpeg

Here's another Tak library pic of the same Tak Tripod carrying an FS128 on an EM1 mount back in 1994..

159464091_FS128onEM1mount.jpg.cb27a28eae027a5574aa7add2c4d31fa.jpg

This Tak tripod would be just perfect for any 4" Tak, including the TSA102, and I may move mine on soon as I'm just not using it much.

Good to hear you're getting good observing with yours, John👍

Dave

Nice pics, Dave. But they seem to have something missing…though I can’t quite put my handle on it 🤔

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twotaks this morning on the moon. Mewlon, Maxbrights and 28mm Erfles is a wonderful combination. Very relaxing viewing. Took my best yet phone moon pics, hovering the phone over one of the eyepieces. No post processing. No idea why the colour differences but very pleased regardless!

Malcolm 

IMG_20221215_084134221.thumb.jpg.9e4c69b56bf2ddaf23e201e67a85b32a.jpgIMG_20221215_083912906.thumb.jpg.7e29690afc9b03b1a47277f09c74e2d4.jpgIMG_20221215_083703698.thumb.jpg.baab60167bf19c22369843f886f727f1.jpg

 

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JeremyS said:

Getting the Mewlon ready for Jupiter tonight, whilst the C11 is gathering photometry on variable stars

9E2B33DF-2736-44F7-83AD-29186712B98B.thumb.jpeg.a2b20be5915509adc21bceced2305ad2.jpeg

C1941116-9020-4F18-9C41-1A360412AF6E.thumb.jpeg.8046a04febfc99db4438dcda9b35e07c.jpeg

Ha ha... snap, I've just popped the Mewlon (with MaxBright binoviewer) and DZ out on the AZ100 for Jupiter, Mars and some other stuff later this evening... Had a quick look at Jupiter now with the DZ, but left them both outside for the Mewlon to properly cool 😁

Good luck and stay warm 🤞

Edited by HollyHound
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JeremyS said:

Getting the Mewlon ready for Jupiter tonight, whilst the C11 is gathering photometry on variable stars

9E2B33DF-2736-44F7-83AD-29186712B98B.thumb.jpeg.a2b20be5915509adc21bceced2305ad2.jpeg

C1941116-9020-4F18-9C41-1A360412AF6E.thumb.jpeg.8046a04febfc99db4438dcda9b35e07c.jpeg

Beautiful scope! I take it you are warming up to the mewlon, are the planetary views impressive? and what's with the palm tree in England? 😂

Edited by Sunshine
  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Franklin said:

It's a Yucca tree.

Thanks. I wondered what it was. I cut it down a few years ago.it then sulked for a few years, then shot up again. Its days might be numbered. Very difficult to cut with a saw as it’s more fibrous than woody.

Edited by JeremyS
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.