Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep24_banner.thumb.jpg.56e65b9c9549c15ed3f06e146fc5f5f1.jpg

Russe

Imaging with the 130pds

Recommended Posts

So near but so far last night...

I left my SD card at home which wasted half an hour fetching it. I also forgot my dewshield.

My shots of M81 and M82 were washed out by light pollution and moonlight, while my attempt at a faint nebula in Auriga lost to the moonlight and condensation

A final run on M42 as the moon was going down showed how close I was to decent data. This is just a screeen grab of a stack, crudely processed, you can see the promise ruined by the blur caused by condensation...

image.png.831f9dc19216f152120466305fb2eaad.png

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First of last nights efforts, not the best night to be out (moon and dodgy sky) - I guess thats alright for just over 1hr per panel (x2):

Taken with the QSI683 10x450 (L) x2

M45_PS.thumb.jpg.827f0df414ef46a1d62ae49622631cfb.jpg

 

  • Like 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reprocess to M7 with sharpest detail, maybe in north Europe (and UK) you have better weather than in the South these days.

 

60HT_40MS_HDR_curves_USM_crop_resamp50_wtmkr.jpg

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Susaron said:

Maybe in north Europe (and UK) you have better weather than in the South these days.

I think not. 

Really nice starfield there though! The Milky Way is so crowded. ?

John

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tarantula

249x60 sec lights, Bias, Flats, no Darks

ASI071MC Pro

130PDS/Skywatcher .9x Coma Corrector

Bortle 9 Zone (Red Zone), 1/4 Moon

cheers

Gary

249x60sec processed.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, gazza said:

Bortle 9 Zone (Red Zone), 1/4 Moon

? impressive for a bortle 9 sky. What filters did you use? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Atreta said:

? impressive for a bortle 9 sky. What filters did you use? 

Only an IR blocker...used Astropixel Processor for stacking and PI for processing - used ABE in PI to remove gradients - did a great job, other wise it was only stretched. No sharpening at all - the wavelet stuff in PI smoothed background , but reduced detail so I didn't use it in the final image.

My skies suck - I'm 1.5km from the Central Business District of a city of 250K + people, I can only image in the East which looks directly over the central city. I have nights where I can barely see 6-8 stars ?

This was a test of whether I could image with OSC here, as well as a test of the 130PDS.....

Gary

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, gazza said:

This was a test of whether I could image with OSC here, as well as a test of the 130PDS.....

That test went really well then,  looks like pixinsight did its magic :)

Could you post or pm me a picture of how it looks like without processing? 

Thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Atreta said:

That test went really well then,  looks like pixinsight did its magic :)

Could you post or pm me a picture of how it looks like without processing? 

Thanks 

PM'd you a Dropbox link to a calibrated only fits file - let me know what you think

cheers

Gary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A new one believer for the community. What a capable imager is the SW130PDS.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A reprocessed file from NGC6819 Foxhead cluster, it was taken beside Barajas Airport (Madrid) Bortle 9 or 10 but pointing outskirts the city and with 30 secs exposures you can deal with LP (also the IDAS helps). 100x30sec subs calibrated with darks and bias.

0p6MS_0p4HT_curves_usm_crop_resample_wtmrk.jpg

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

after looking at lots of the images in this thread, as well as my own test, I have to say who needs an FSQ106? ?

Gary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, gazza said:

after looking at lots of the images in this thread, as well as my own test, I have to say who needs an FSQ106? ?

Gary

People who cant colimate a newtonian and dont like diffraction spikes. Its got to be said thought that this is all without the use of even a premium 4 / 3 element coma corrector etc.  My personal thought on the matter is that a premium edition of the 130PDS with premium focuser and a carbon fiber tube would sell very well, I would buy one at any rate.

Edited by Adam J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Adam J said:

People who cant colimate a newtonian and dont like diffraction spikes. Its got to be said thought that this is all without the use of even a premium 4 / 3 element coma corrector etc.  My personal thought on the matter is that a premium edition of the 130PDS with premium focuser and a carbon fiber tube would sell very well, I would buy one at any rate.

As would I in a heartbeat!  I also wonder if it's worth an extra 4 and a half thousand quid to get rid of diffraction spikes  !!!

Gary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, gazza said:

As would I in a heartbeat!  I also wonder if it's worth an extra 4 and a half thousand quid to get rid of diffraction spikes  !!!

Gary

I think that the biggest factor is the larger flat field that can cover a full frame camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for the SW130PDS a premium focuser is available at FLO, that´s what I did when talking with Moonlite to design a specific adapter for this scope.

But what I don´t see is the carbon fiber as material for it. The carbon fiber offers better strength as the diameter increases (related as well to the Inertia Moment of a cylinder of course). Maybe only a composite made of a sandwich structure with a core thickness of 10mm would be a good candidate in terms of structural performance.

PS: for the record I do work as composite manufacturing engineer in an aerospace company.

Edited by Susaron
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more reprocessing that could hurt your eyes....sorry for that.

 

M45_wtmkr.jpg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Susaron said:

Well for the SW130PDS a premium focuser is available at FLO, that´s what I did when talking with Moonlite to design a specific adapter for this scope.

But what I don´t see is the carbon fiber as material for it. The carbon fiber offers better strength as the diameter increases (related as well to the Inertia Moment of a cylinder of course). Maybe only a composite made of a sandwich structure with a core thickness of 10mm would be a good candidate in terms of structural performance.

PS: for the record I do work as composite manufacturing engineer in an aerospace company.

The carbon fiber is not for stiffness its for superior thermal expansion properties that means you hold focus better.

Many premium scopes use CF such as the ES Comet hunter.

Edited by Adam J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Adam J said:

The carbon fiber is not for stiffness its for superior thermal expansion properties that means you hold focus better.

Many premium scopes use CF such as the ES Comet hunter.

Well should it be for both characteristics. The problem is that in order to get the same stiffness from CF than for a 1mm thick stell tube, you need around 5-8mm, what means several CF layers with the appropiate fiber orientation.

Thermal properties and gradients are of course important, but I have been with the SW130PDS around -10C starting from 15C and if you use camping mat around the tube you won´t have to refocus in a 5h session. So invest 300 pounds in CF for a SW130PDS tube I think IMHO is useless, maybe a stronger spider with be a best improving opportunity with better collimation knobs etc..

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Susaron said:

Well should it be for both characteristics. The problem is that in order to get the same stiffness from CF than for a 1mm thick stell tube, you need around 5-8mm, what means several CF layers with the appropiate fiber orientation.

Thermal properties and gradients are of course important, but I have been with the SW130PDS around -10C starting from 15C and if you use camping mat around the tube you won´t have to refocus in a 5h session. So invest 300 pounds in CF for a SW130PDS tube I think IMHO is useless, maybe a stronger spider with be a best improving opportunity with better collimation knobs etc..

 

Ill disagree with you that you would not have to refocus a 130PDS between 15c and -10c insulation or not. In fact I would say that adding insulation to the tube will just prolong the cool down time of the scope something that is not desirable at all.  I see differences in focus over only 2-3 degrees of temperature drop. Hence why everyone purchases expensive auto focusers. 

I think that most of these CF tubes are around 5mm thick so there you go. 

Edited by Adam J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Susaron said:

Thermal properties and gradients are of course important, but I have been with the SW130PDS around -10C starting from 15C and if you use camping mat around the tube you won´t have to refocus in a 5h session. So invest 300 pounds in CF for a SW130PDS tube I think IMHO is useless, maybe a stronger spider with be a best improving opportunity with better collimation knobs etc..

 

If I have learnt anything from my dabbling in engineering, it is that if the best engineering solution is the one that maximises performance and reliability and minimises cost and complexity, it rarely satisfies the wants of upgraders.

The performance of the 130P-DS, like any newtonian, is down to the quality and design of its optics, the ability to collimate and focus it accurately and its stability (i.e. how well it keeps collimated and focused in use).

For me, the main improvements would be:

Making the collimation smoother by using a spring loaded arrangement.

A better focus lock screw (I plan to chop the end of the nylon button shorter as it seems to have bent slightly and can put focus out when tightened.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am Not very sure about differences in focus within 5C and even 10C....

I used SGP for a while (been testing it), and always used Image History, which gave image quality statistics like FHM and etc.

I tried to collect data for my future DIY autofocuser, so I will be able to automate the re-focus routine in relation to temp change...

And I have not noticed any radical change in the image quality during all nights.... and temp drop was around 10c.

 

The main problem I have, - focus shift while locking it... I Hate it sooo much as it makes focusing a guesswork... (offsetting focus, locking, Fail, un-lock (focus runs away somewhere unpredictably), re-focus with offset again, locking, focus shifts to opposite side than expected.... .... ... It takes ages...).

If someone has focus shift due to the temp, it will happen with CF body also. Less, but I am sure it will, - and that focusing headache will remain...

My inner "Scrooge McDuck" simply does not allow me to go and buy a better focuser which will cost more than OTA itself! Insane!...

So started DIY autofocuser project... (burned few parts, waiting for new... hope to get them soon).

In this case, I totally agree with Neil.
I will make the collimation smoother (ordered bolts like BobKnobs for the secondary from China, coming in a week or so) not sure if I need springs, I simply tighten the primary bolts quite strongly and my setup is permanent most of the time.

Will deal with focuser's shift/locking problem using DIY autofocuser with a strong stepper motor, -  which is around 4 times cheaper than a Moonlite! :)

As I have lots of trees around in the garden....  unfortunately, I need to clean my Primary already (scope is 1 year old...)  I will use the cleaning day for Flocking.

Not sure if flocking the focuser's drawtube will cause any optical problems, but I will flock it also....

 

Edited by RolandKol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've not had too many problems with the focuser and mine seems to hold collimation pretty well- I check it most sessions and it's usually fine.

The thing I've always thought would be good was a shorter focal length f5 newt to go into the pds range, for a wider angle, so you can really go after some of those giant nebulas like the veil and the California. Wouldn't need to think so much about full frame then. I'd be more than happy to pay a similar price for that.

Sorry if this is getting off topic...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      For sale is my beloved but now superfluous to requirements HEQ5 Pro for £700
      It's in a used condition as you would imagine. I've had it for about 4 years and found great success with this mount. Ideal for those beginning astrophotography and also good for visual users.
      I'm calling it "deluxe" due to the upgrades I've had done.
      - It's belt modified
      - It's had brand new bearings and grease
      - The backlash has been expertly setup 
      - It has the latest polar scope
      - The power port has been replaced with an aviation style port which is a lot more secure
      It'll come with the hand controller and at least 1 counterweight (if I can find the second it'll come with both). The polar scope cover has been lost. The counterweight is rusty as always. There is some marring on the counterweight bar housing as shown in the photos.
      It also will come with the modified power cable required also.
      Note: the power LED sometimes doesn't illuminate but the mount is still powered (please see the photo with the hand controller).
      Collection or local delivery within Northampton







    • By Spacecake2
      Hello,
      I know you've seen these questions a lot (unless your new) but I'm struggling a lot on if I should buy a Skywatcher 250px (10") or 200px (8") (dobsonians). I have a 5 inch and i'm looking for a big step up for noticeable changes. 
      Thank you 
       
    • By Hoopla
      Hi All,
      im totally new to this and have been getting setup over the past 3 months. I’ve purchased a Skywatcher 150P on a EQ3 Pro mount. 
       
      I have a 2x and 3x Barlow with 10x and 20x eyepieces. I’m trying to view and photograph Mars as it’s so bright at present and easy to see however I’m really struggling to see anything more than a bright ball when viewing and when photographing it’s just a blurry ball. 
       
      I have a canon 700d DSLR with t ring and adaptors  
      can folk suggest what combination of Barlow / eyepiece would be required to view Mars in all its glory and possibly lens and iso/exposure settings to get some nice shots too please. I’m aware I may need to stack and am tech savvy so this bit should be ok. I just can’t seem to get anything at present to process.
      help!! 
    • By Astrid
      My 200P just arrived and oh my God... I have been trying to wrap my head around the mount for 4 hours.
      The manual didn't really help so I decided to go on youtube, but again, I didn't find any good and detailed videos so I decided to ask here if there is any video or perhaps blog post that might help me set up the mount. 
      Thank you very much! 
      *by the way, is the EQ5 supposed to have slow motion cables? I only got 2 knobs (not cables) and I'm not sure if there is something missing or not... sorry, this is the first time I've used a serious equatorial mount or telescope. 
      Thank you very much!
    • By Davehux
      There’s a new kid on the block now, so it’s time to move this brilliant scope onto another happy owner.
      Bought new from FLO just over 2 years age, it’s produced some awesome image - shown below - all taken with this scope and an ASI294 camera.
      I’ve upgraded the focuser to an OVL model, and the difference from the standard one is immense. Runs smooth from one end to the other, and has no problem holding a lump of a cooled camera or a DSLR without slipping. It also has a standard 2” connector.
      Also included is the Skywatcher 0.85 focal reducer/flattener with 2” adapter, so swapping out the camera for the eyepiece is a 2 second job.
      The optics are all clean, bright and scratch-free. There’s a piece of Velcro on the tube, where I used to have my ASIair V1 stuck on. Apart from the usual bite marks on the dovetail, it’s in excellent overall condition.
      The standard SW 9x50 finder scope, 28mm eyepiece, a couple of adapters, and diagonal are all included, also comes with the aluminium case.
      This whole outfit would cost you £842 plus delivery, to buy from FLO today. It’s yours for £525 delivered to a UK mainland address. 
       









×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.