Jump to content

sgl_imaging_challenge_2021_2.thumb.jpg.72789c04780d7659f5b63ea05534a956.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone I am new here, I live in Perth Western Australia (bottle class 5) and have just brought my new set up. There hasn’t been anyone in the area I can talk to about astrophotography so tried to do it all myself online and I fear I may have incorrectly purchased some things. (I tried to get things one at a time for budget purposes)

I have this set up

heq5, evostar ed80, .85reducer & corrector, evoguide 50ed, zwo 120mm mini for guiding and just my canon 200d mkii for the imaging. 

The telescope, I think I may have brought something that’s not great for imaging and that’s all I’ve wanted to do. 
can you please provide a better telescope alternative that would be suitable for all my other gear without having to buy like a new mount etc. I’m thinking just a slightly better scope not too heavy, opinions would be much appreciated 💖💖💖 xx

Edited by Soulitude
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to the SGL.

The Evostar ED80 with the 0.85 reducer/flattener should be a good scope for imaging of large nebula & galaxies and give good results. 

What are you wanting to image and what issues are you having with the ED80?

Also, is the ZWO ASI120MM Mini your imaging or guide camera? If it's your guide camera, what are you using as the imaging camera?

The good thing is, you have a good mount in the HEQ5 and it will take some bigger scopes but you can tell us more about your current kit and what you want to do then it maybe someone can make suggestions which mean you won't have to spend more money. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the scope isn’t as good (capture as much) as say the espirit 100 or 120 which I was kind of looking at, but they are a bit above my price range and weight for the heq5

so I was hoping for something in between the quality of the evostar ed80 and day the espirit triplet 100 or 120 telescope 🔭 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Soulitude said:

Well the scope isn’t as good (capture as much) as say the espirit 100 or 120 which I was kind of looking at, but they are a bit above my price range and weight for the heq5

so I was hoping for something in between the quality of the evostar ed80 and day the espirit triplet 100 or 120 telescope 🔭 

What exactly do you mean by "capture as much" - are you referring to F number?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ED80 is an excellent imaging scope and you only have to search on here to see that :D

Maybe a triplet would provide better colour correction, but you will be hard pushed to improve on the ED80 unless spending more.  I've just bought a SharpStar 94 to replace my ED80, I've not really had a lot of chance to use it and compare, but it does seem a step up.  It has a similar focal length, slightly faster, better correction of colour, but can illuminate a FF sensor.  However the difference isnt striking.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, PeterCPC said:

What exactly do you mean by "capture as much" - are you referring to F number?

Why do you keep Answering my questions with a question 😂 

im the one trying to get info here hhaha 🙃

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it helps there are quite a few imagers who use smaller apeture telescopes like the newer ED72 which gives a wider field of view needed to capure some of the DSO targets.  One of the reasons why ED80 users also have a reducer in their imaging train.  Other DSO targets are small and need better cameras and preferably more light so the exposure times are reduced.

Hence the question about capturing much - you could be referring to the field of view (distant DSO targets not filling your image) or you need to capture more light hence the larger scope part.

Your equipment is a good choice and in no way just a beginner setup - the weak link will probably be the imaging camera being a dslr but still a good starter to learn with and get some good images.

If you want to do the planets and moon you may want to look at an additonal scope and a planetay camera.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You’re a legend thank you, I’ll definitely give this set up a a red hot go, Astro camera might be on the cards in the future, if I succeed. I’ve read so many negative things about the Ed80 not being that great so it’s probably just throwing me off.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Soulitude said:

You’re a legend thank you, I’ll definitely give this set up a a red hot go, Astro camera might be on the cards in the future, if I succeed. I’ve read so many negative things about the Ed80 not being that great so it’s probably just throwing me off.

I have 2 of them still being used and like a good mainstream car they are upgradeable and have a lot of extras targetted at them so commonly have adapters etc for the ed80 as standard. If you go down the imaging line and opt for a focus motor (newer ones have a smaller case with embedded usb controller like the ZWO EAF or Deepskydad AF3) your current focuser may not even need to be upgraded.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, StevieDvd said:

One of the reasons why ED80 users also have a reducer in their imaging train

The scope is poorly corrected without it - the stars are horrible without the field flattener.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Great results are obtainable with an ED80.  It has a long pedigree at an affordable price particularly with those starting out in deep sky astrophotography and is perfectly suited to your HEQ5. Have you got some examples of the images you have captured so far that you could share?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have a pair of ED80s with the flattener/reducer and I share the opinion that they're very capable pieces of kit.  It may be helpful to provide some examples of what you've been achieving so far and explain why you're not happy with it so that people can try to point you in the right direction.

James

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Ande said:

He says he is using his Canon 200D ii for imaging.

What makes you think it's a he 😀
the op's first post makes me think it's a she 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Soulitude said:

The telescope, I think I may have brought something that’s not great for imaging and that’s all I’ve wanted to do. 

Have a look at this thread, it will give you some idea of what your telescope is capable of 🙂

 

Edited by JemC
add info
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, JemC said:

What makes you think it's a he 😀
the op's first post makes me think it's a she 😀

Whoops. Yep. All of the evidence is there.  Sorry OP 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Skywatcher is a very capable first imaging scope, many start with one, then they never move off of it. Good scope for the mount, well in weight considerations.

Often a good idea is to get the polar alignment done manually first, simply learn what you have to do. That would allow you to start getting a collection of images to stack (DSS I expect). You can get Darks and Flats fairly easily. Darks are in effect very simple to obtain. If you get say 50 exposures for stacking then get 25 Darks and 25 Flats. You add them in to directories on your PC. Say this as PC's seems to be hiding the internal directories now. If you are not familiar with the Windows Explorer structure maybe ask someone.

You will have to spend some time Polar Aligning, we have a very convenient Polaris, you don't.

Maybe search Google for "astronomy clubs australia" should throw up something. Say this as a club is likely the best place to get information, pointers and help.

If you are using a DSLR, cannot remember, then set everything to Manual and set all inputs yourself. Also if a DSLR you are likely to need a simple Intervalometer to get a series of images. They will cycle round a specified number of cycles getting an exposure and doing a wait time between.A DSLR needs the wait time between each exposure to write the data and allow the sensor to cool a little. It is no longer click, click, click. Also disable any noise reduction feature.

Have fun.

Edited by PEMS
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you've got the perfect affordable DSO imaging kit. I don't know where you've read that ED80 isn't a good imaging scope. Care to share the links?

You may want to get your 200D astro modded if this is going to be your dedicated camera. While it's inferior to a proper astro camera with set point cooling, it is still capable of producing wonderful results.

Unlike dedicated astro cameras with set point cooling which can produce dark libraries for different temperatures and keep re-using them, you will need to plan in the time required to take darks at the end of each imaging session with your dslr. 

For polar alignment I'd strongly recommend sharpcap pro or polemaster.

Learning the capturing and post processing software is just as important as how to operate all these equipment. For Canon DSLRs, BYEOS is a wonderful piece of capturing software. But if you plan to switch to a dedicated astro camera, you may want to look into SGP or APT. All of them have built-in (or rather communicate directly) plate solver. Then it's PHD2 for guiding and dithering. Finally DSS and Photoshop for post processing, or PixInsight if you have the money and are serious with this hobby.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As a previous owner of an ED80, I regret letting mine go. I learnt a huge amount using it, and it would still find a place in my scope collection, despite costing less than a reducer for some of my other scopes...

Your Evo ED80 is certainly not something you need to upgrade first from the list of equipment you currently have. I would look at a mono cooled CMOS camera as the first step up upgrade. I still use my HEQ5 as well, over 5 years later...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JemC
      I have recently acquired a Vixen Polarie with the intension of doing some wide field imaging, 
      I will be using my modified Canon 600D with it, Currently the only lens i have are a standard kit Canon 18-55mm and a old carl Zeiss Jenna 50mm , so i am looking at purchasing alternative lens to use,
      The ones i am looking at for now are the following,
      Canon EF 135mm f/2 L USM
       Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM
       Samyang 135mm f2 ED UMC
       Samyang 14mm Ultra Wide-Angle f/2.8 IF ED UMC 
       Sigma 150mm f/2.8 APO EX DG HSM Macro
       Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro DX
      So my question is, has anyone used any of these ( other than the Samyang 135mm f2 ) for wide field and if so how did you find them, would you recommend any of them?
      from the ones listed (other than the Samyang 135mm f2 ) would you say there are better ones to look at or any other i should consider?
      Regards
      James
    • By guydive
      Hey all,
      I'm considering the 250PDS. The main use is visual, and the second is EAA (I currently use a zwo183mm). 
      What I'm hesitant about is the primary focus. since It's mostly for visual, I'm wondering on how much back focus it has compared to the standard Skywatcher 10" dobsonians? with the standard dobsonias with the same optics and focuser you already need an extension tube for most eyepieces...
      Also, there's probably a "bigger" obstruction (bigger shadow on primary)? 
    • By JemC
      Hi all,
      As i am soon to be the proud owner of a Vixen Polarie star tracker i am looking for some advice from the experts here on SGL with regards to widefield imaging with the Vixen Polarie.
      I will initially be using it with a modified Canon 600D so am looking for advice on which lens would be best suited to use with it, I have already been pointed in the direction of the Samyang 135mm which by all accounts is a pretty good contender, so aside from that particular lens what other/s would you recommend that are Canon fitting,
      Thanks in advance 🙂
    • By AngHor
      I have a SkyWatcher AZ-EQ5 mount. It’s all working fine, except I have an issue with alignment. This applies whether I’m in EQ or Alt-Az mode.
      I set it up using  one or two star align without problems.
      However if I use the handset to GoTo another object, I usually need to do fine tuning adjustments to centre on the new object. But the mount disregards these adjustments, so if I use the GoTo system to centre on a nearby object, or revisit the original object a second time, it’s still off by the same amount.
      How do I tell the mount that I have centred on the new object and that it should now be aligned with that object ? 
      My iOptron MiniTower has a feature that does exactly this – once set up correctly and aligned, for each new object I go to there is an “ALIGN” option, and if I use this it now knows the correct position. Can I do this with SkyWatcher and Synscan ?
      Thanks. Angelo
    • By DrummerSP
      Hi!
      Firstly apologies if this is in the wrong section (this is my first post on any kind of forum!) and I'm aware its a question thats probably been asked thousands of times. Please let me know if I should post elsewhere or anything...
      So I've made some progress with astrophotography but as much as I try I get so confused with lenses and the specifics so thought I'd ask people who understand them more. My setup so far is a Canon EOS 550d, with a 70-300mm f4-5.6 lens all on a Star Adventurer pro tracker (recently upgraded from an Omegon LX3 mini track). The camera and lens were both second hand and passed down to me so I dont really know how old they are now but I've been getting good results so far (uploaded one of my recent images, still using the minitrack for reference)
      Basically I dont know if I'm better off upgrading the camera and sticking with the telephoto lens (from what I can find its a good lens), or would changing to a small telescope be better. If I was to, from what I've found the Sharpstar 61EDPH II would be a good choice?
      I've researched a lot and just dont understand the technical side enough to know where I'm better off putting my money. My budget would be around £1000, maybe slightly more for a camera as I do use it for other photography too. Any advice would be very appreciated, sorry for the long post!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.