Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements

    SGL 2017 SP

MattJenko

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    2,026
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2,203 Excellent

About MattJenko

  • Rank
    Master of none.

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Cotswolds

Recent Profile Visitors

2,659 profile views
  1. Fireworks Galaxy

    I found that binning RGB with my 414ex never seemed to work well either, albeit at a shorter focal length than you. This is a fine effort though all the same and you have avoided the temptation to push the colours, which is nice. I really struggled when I had a go at this target.
  2. What could be causing this?

    I don't think avoiding using darks is an option for you, given the ASI1600 amp glow you get in the right (same as my ASI1600), so it is a question of getting them right, which can be done. I had a play with the images you posted and can see some diagonal bottom left to middle right type dark lines in the darker areas but I tried various levels of aggression in stacking pixel rejection (used a Linear Fit approach in PixInsight with various rejection settings ) and found that this helped a lot. I would also recommend not binning in future, as I found it does not help with this CMOS, and the only benefit is reduced file sizes. With the short focal lengths on your Star71 and the mini pixels of this camera, you are imaging at 5-6 "/pixel when binning, which ends up with blocky stars and no real benefit I found, which may also we contributing to the artifacts. I use a reduced TS60 which is similar in FL and binning was an experiment I did once, and decided never to do so again.
  3. Some widefield clusters

    Been so long since I used my kit in anger, and only have my little TS60ED to hand at the moment from a town center location. With the ASI at unity, anything over 40 seconds was saturated with the Moon out as well, so far from ideal conditions. 50 blasted out 30 second R,G,B subs though. Just glad to be back out there!!
  4. 3ms is not going to result in a whole lot of light captured per frame. What kind of image of the pulsar do you want to get?
  5. Osc binning

    CCD OSC cameras are still CCD cameras and can perfectly happily hardware bin just like mono ones. You just end up limiting the total light falling on the binned pixel because of the matrix. CMOS chips - different matter altogether.
  6. One consideration is how will you control it all in that dithering is going to be extremely tricky unless you just don't dither, just guide and take images independently.
  7. A surprise 800 for a totally unneeded astro luxury would be the Primaluce Eagle, so I could setup up way quicker and simply attach a battery to a setup and be done with it and not leave my laptop outside
  8. Agree with Freddie. Hyperstar is not a planetary bit of kit, more a tough DSO ask. As for camera choice, the DVDs will make things a lot clearer in terms of what you need for that kind of imaging. Matt
  9. SCT/Mak as a guidescope?

    The other consideration is the finding and retaining of a guide star. Fast short focal length scopes end up with wide fields of view with plenty of stars. Not so with longer focal length slower scopes.
  10. Hi Chris, I am going to find this far too hard to turn down. I'm in. PM sent. Matt
  11. For the Solar System high resolution goals you stated, I would be more inclined to watch the Damian Peach DVDs rather than read Every Photon Counts as the latter is a DSO imaging intro, the former aimed around planetary imaging. Kit wise, you will need a sturdy EQ and a large aperture, long focal length system. Given the location, you would not go wrong with a C11 (Edge or not, don't think it would matter a great deal) and the new Skywatcher EQ6-Pro, which can be used down to 5degree latitude, which is important, as some mounts can't go that low. A camera would need to be a fast framerate USB3 camera, and there are many to choose from - ZWO and the Altair ones are very nice. For Solar - hmm, different kettle of fish. Expensive as well, but a Quark and a piggybacked refractor along the lines Charl mentioned would work very well and not blow the budget.
  12. I have the ZWO filter wheel and have both Baader LRGB and the ZWO LRGB filter sets and I don't worry about which filters I use in a given setup. I prefer the ZWO 7 pos filter wheel to my SX one. Lighter, thinner, quieter and more reliable.
  13. Baby WO at FLO

    This looks a lovely little scope. If the upcoming reducer works well, then this can be an awesome travel imaging scope when combined with a little pixel camera, be it a cooled CMOS or DSLR. Enormous field of view at a fast ratio and lightweight rig, making it easy for tracking. Bravo! I have a TS60 and the TS x0.79, otherwise I would have one of these without thinking about it for more than a second.
  14. Looks like you could choose a target and just continuously image for weeks on end and just discard the subs taken through the Earth!
  15. Now THAT'S one-shot colour

    Looks much like a less substantial version of the JTW version, the Predator: http://www.jtwastronomy.com/products/predator.html
×