Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_celestial_motion.thumb.jpg.a9e9349c45f96ed7928eb32f1baf76ed.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

First post here, and I'm pretty new to AP, just picked up a Star Adventurer mount a couple months ago and have been happily playing around with it with DSLR and various lenses and a 72mm Sky-Watcher refractor.  I'm new to the whole setup process, and I'm trying to do a decent job of leveling the tripod/mount, polar alignment, and I should probably think more about balancing the weight of things.  I've gotten some decent shots, like 60-120 second subs with up to 300mm lens.  My last time out I was getting star trails at 200mm and 15 second exposures, which could have been just a sloppy polar alignment, but today out of curiosity I looked through the polar scope and rotated the RA axis 360 degrees, and I saw that the target circle jumped a few times.  I'm guessing that the target circle should appear not to move while the numbers 3, 6, 9, 12 would rotate around as I rotate the RA axis.  So my guess is that the polar scope would need to be calibrated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get the "Polar Align" app you will see a diagram for the SA.

It has reticules for all the major eq mounts including ours. I use it all the time to precisely align my mount. See if that works before making adjustments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, stevebeukema said:

I saw that the target circle jumped a few times

Hi. I don't have an SA but I do have an NEQ6Pro and I generally start an imaging session by placing the pole star at the crosshair interesection in the polarscope. I then rotate the RA axis and check it stays in the centre so I am reassured the polarscope is aligned correctly with the mount. I've never seen the phenomena you are describing. (The main reason I centre the pole star is to make sure it is also centred in my imaging scope/camera lens and everything is pointing in the same direction - one of the many disadvantages of having to set-up/strip-down for every imaging session!). Once I'm happy everything is aligned I then use an iPhone app to position the pole star in the correct position on the setting circle.

An SA expert is bound to pop up soon but I would suggest something is a little amiss with the mount :( .  I'm pretty sure the target circle should not jump around.

Adrian

Edited by Adreneline
Typo corrected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that sounds right - if you set up during the day on a distant object like a telegraph pole or chimney or pylon or something as a guide. Level the cross hairs in a target then slowly spin the reticule through 180 degrees - if it’s not bang on target then it needs adjusting fractionally. There’s a few good YouTube videos but the star Adventurer manual explains it pretty well actually.

the best piece of advice I can give is to use the optional counterweight shaft and arm - purely because it has a hole in the middle that allows you to recheck your alignment after you’ve added your equipment - mine had a tendency to “sag” slightly after I’d put my camera on. 

But don’t be disheartened- what you’re achieving already is pretty good without guiding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

Thanks for posting. As Adreneline mentions you will need to check the Star Adventurer (SA) reticule cross hair remains central while you rotate the RA axis, all this is explained in the manual. I found mine was fine out of the box. You may also be experiencing movement from your tripod set up. I first tried a heavy duty photographic tripod but it had some spring in use so now use an old Celestron Alt-Az mount with a 3kg house brick in the eyepiece tray to improve rigidity. Never got on with the wedge, very coarse and jumpy in operation. I'd have thought you should get more lengthy exposures from a 300mm lens, the maximum I've obtained has been three minutes. I find if you complete the polar alignment routine on either a division on the polar reticule, i.e. 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 minutes (or the half way point in between) improves the alignment. One of these-https://www.darkframeoptics.com/product/polarite-right-angled-polarscope which has a magnify capability allows the reticule to fill almost the entire view and so aid accuracy.

Many people experience some 'adjustment' of the polar alignment when loosening or tightening the clutch or tightening a ball head knob but as you gain experience you can do these tasks in the dark without affecting the polar alignment. There is a well known issue with the clutch seizing up and SkyWatcher have produced this helpful video in case it ever happens-

The SA is a cracking mount and I hope you get lots of enjoyment and good images from it.

Best Regards,
Steve

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, stevebeukema said:

I saw that the target circle jumped a few times.

Hi Steve and welcome to SGL, lots of SWSA users here.

Did you buy the mount new ? as someone may have tried to adjust it previously.

The problem is if you try to use Polaris to align the reticle and loosen all the screws at the same time the reticle can fall backwards out of the screws it then needs disassembling to fix it.

I fitted an O ring behind mine to keep it held forward when adjusting.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your responses!  I bought the SA brand new a couple months ago, and overall it's been great.  I haven't tried any calibration of the polar scope yet, but I rotated the RA axis a bunch of times yesterday and I noticed that during part of the rotation it moves smoothly, and during another part of the rotation it's a little harder to rotate, and it's consistently at the same spot in the rotation.  I also saw the target scope in the polar finder "jump" a few times as I rotated the RA axis.  I shot a brief video (link below) showing the jumping phenomenon during a 180 degree rotation.  The video was shot with a small refractor and a counterweight and pretty well balanced.   Hopefully calibration will clear this up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9Pa9-Wq7xA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Check that the three little grub screws are tweaked up.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses, everyone, my problem is solved!  Actually, I Googled around, checked forums, and even emailed Sky-Watcher, and I couldn't find anything about my specific problem, and Sky-Watcher said they had never seen this phenomenon before.  The impressive thing about Sky-Watcher, is that a real person responded to my email within 5 minutes of me sending it!

Ok, so here's what I did.  I unscrewed the eyepiece of the polar scope, observed the 3 alignment screws, which seemed to be tight, and then I rotated the RA axis, and I saw a piece inside the polar scope move.  There appears to be another piece/lens thingy connected (is this the reticule?) and it appears to screw in, and it wasn't tightly connected.  I took an alan wrench and put it in a notch (that you can see at around the 12:00 position in the photo), and tightened it.  I put everything back together, and now there is no longer a "jumping" motion when I rotate the RA.  I still need to calibrate the polar scope, but at least I'll be able to do it without the reticule jumping when I rotate it.IMG_0934.thumb.jpg.8749dd3db59049a836f546fa8bb83f7c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't screw in it's just held by the three grub screws, beware if you aim at Polaris to calibrate it as it can fall back and become loose again when you loosen the screws, I fitted an O ring behind the reticle, this stops it falling out of position and makes aligning it much easier.

Dave

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll certainly keep an eye on it.  Sky-Watcher called it a retaining ring, and the support guy said he’s never heard of one coming loose before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hang on... you got an email response from Sky-Watcher????? I have honestly never heard of that happening to anyone ever, and I mean ever ever.

glad it’s sorted though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By FileraBe
      Hi,
      sorry if this was already posted, i'm looking for a flattener/reducer for my William Optics Zenithstar 66 SD (already asked WO by email) they reply me that since this product is discontinued over 10 years ago, i need to look for 
      FlatII, FlatIII - with 2"sct thread
      Flat6a with 2"SCT adapter
      and i saw this one https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reducersflatteners/william-optics-adjustable-flat6a-iii-08x-reducer-flattener.html
      and this one https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32917167365.html but i'm not very sure, so i'll ask before buying anything
      i will use it on my recently buyed star adventurer classic (buyed on FLO)

      Thanks in advance
    • By antariksha
      Abstract :
      The topic of Polar Alignment is not at all new. Lot of approaches, automation tools are available. Yet, some aspects in all the current approaches drove me towards doing some more work. The key aspects of this approach are as follows.
      Ability to do the Polar alignment without polaris sited Relatively less complexity than drift alignment Ability to address to a good extent the atmospheric refraction to finally locate correct NCP / SCP position A good starting point for amateurs who wish to graduate towards sophisticated tools and techniques Ability to quickly verify if the polar alignment is intact after one object photographed or viewed, and the equipment is being pointed to another object. This point is mentioned in light of the fact that sometimes the polar alignment gets disturbed and the next object photographed shows star trails. This is especially true if payload is tweaked for next photo imaging. What is required?
      One should have a good understanding of the sky and ability to identify stars upto Mag 4.5 using star maps and basic concepts of RA and Dec. One should have Equatorial mount with ability to fine tune Azimuth and Alt adjustments. Availability of cross hair eye piece for the ability to locate the star exactly at the cross hair point. It is good to have finder scope attached and the finder cross hair is aligned with the main telescope eye piece cross hair. Please note this technique is not for the GoTo mounts which many times have Alt-Az mounts fitted with tracking motors. The GoTo alignment is done using 3 Star method.
      However, there are a few mounts which are equatorial design and also have GoTo tracking capabilities with RA and Dec motors. For these mounts, it is preferred to carry out polar alignment. The only point about these mounts, is that GoTo should have ability to start the RA motor ( tracking) without doing the 3 Star alignment, in other words, bypassing the steps for 3 Star alignment.
      The technique is based on the mathematics around the stellar current positions precisely computed. The technique suggests NCP or SCP alignment using specific pointing stars.
      Method
      The technique relies upon pairs of stars identified such that pair has same RA or same Dec. The details about finding such pairs, are given in the next section ( Mathematics).
      Step 1
      Try to do a very coarse polar alignment using your latitude and pointing the equatorial axis approximately towards a possible Polaris direction. This is only to reduce the iterations in the method below. There is no dependency to visually site Polaris. Step 2
      Select the pair of stars of the same RA from the table 1 below. Now, while choosing the pair, please select that pair which is closest to the zenith. This will reduce the error due to atmospheric refraction of siting those stars. Choosing such pair, will get better alignment. Note that the NCP and SCP lie on the same RA contour of the pair, you have just chosen. Locate the first star of the pair in the cross hair eye piece. Loosen the DEC knob of your Eq mount. Let the RA axis not to be loosened. Further, please start the RA motor and hence the tracking. In case of GoTo capability, please ensure the tracking is On, while the 3 Star alignment being bypassed. Rotate the telescope around DEC axis such that the second star of the pair is in the Cross hair eye piece. In the first attempt, the second star almost certainly will not be at the center of cross hair eye piece. And you need corrections. At this point, take the help of the finder with its wider field of view. Identify the position of the second star whether it is below or above the finder cross hair. Adjust the Azimuth of the mount through the coarse or fine depending on how off the second star has been. o   Tip : In case, someone is facing difficulty in finding which direction to move Azimuth of the mount for correction, the following tips may be of use. A simple way to determine is to locate where the second star lies with respect to cross hair. Assume it is on the lower side of cross hair. Then the correction in the Azimuth of the mount should be such that the star is moved upward. It may be noted that your finder can be either inverting or non-inverting. Now, to determine the movement, please hold the finger on the lower side in front of the primary of the finder. And slowly lift the finger towards the center of the primary to obstruct it and continue moving upward. While doing so, please observe from the eyepiece. The blackish ghost image of finger will be seen moving. If movement is lower to upward, the optics is non-inverting. If ghost image moves from up to down, it is inverting. With this small trick, you would know how to apply correction. Once the correction is done, please point the finder to the first and then second star alternately simply by rotating around Dec axis of the mount. Both stars will be seen at the cross hair. At this point, coarse polar alignment is done. Now, please use the main telescope cross hair to locate the first and then second star using Dec axis movement. If required, please carry out the necessary Azimuth correction. Again, please use the above small trick to find out more on how to apply correction. At this point, please note that at the telescope’s high power ( with cross hair eyepiece), the Dec axis is correctly tracing two stars in your pair. Note that NCP/SCP lie on the same Dec axis. The Azimuth alignment of NCP/SCP is achieved. No more touching of azimuth knob of your Equatorial mount now. Step 3
      Site the pair of stars of the same Dec from the table 2 below. Now, while choosing the pair, please identify roughly the midpoint of them. Now, select that pair whose midpoint is relatively closest to the Zenith. With this, one star is relatively East ward and other one almost at a same distance but Westward. This will reduce the error due to atmospheric refraction of siting those stars. Choosing such pair, will get better alignment In case you are unable to select a pair, please read Step 4. Note that the NCP and SCP lie on the centre of the Dec circle which the above pair inscribes. Locate the first star in the cross hair of finder. To locate the second star, please lock Dec axis. But loosen the Eq axis and rotate the telescope around Eq axis. Please carry out Alt adjustments of the mount. Please use similar procedure and tricks as in the step 2. Once the two stars are in the cross hair positions of the telescope, the polar alignment is completed. Step 4 ( only if you could not carry out Step 3)
      Site the pair of stars of the same RA from the table 1 below. Now, while choosing the pair, please select another pair which is off zenith. Please try to select such pair which has both stars approx same elevation from horizon, so that their atmospheric refraction is almost same. Effectively, we cancel the atmospheric refraction influence. Please note that in step 2, NCP/SCP is located to be on one of the RA lines. Now, we use another RA line with this newly selected pair. Again, for these stars to be centred, please keep Eq axis fixed and only move Dec axis ( similar to step 2). However this time, the mount corrections to be done are using Alt adjustments. Once the two stars are in the cross hair positions of the telescope, the polar alignment is completed. Mathematics
       
      The starting point was the star catalog where the Epoch 2000 is taken as baseline. Then I selected the stars brighter than mag 4.5. I applied the corrections due to Earth Precession and also the individual star’s proper motion. With the base data was ready for today's’ star positions. Then I programmatically picked up all pairs for same RA (within 0.001 difference) and later all pairs with same Dec (within 0.001 difference).
      I found mag 4.5 to be heuristically optimal. This magnitude is sufficient for visual locating these stars. Also, the number stars shortlisted from the main catalog is good enough to give sufficient number of required pairs.
      The pairs located today may not be valid after say couple of years due to Earth Precession and stellar proper motion. The below two tables will need fresh computation then.
      Disclaimer: I have tried few of the above mathematically found pairs from my location 19 Lat 73 Log. I use Bresser ExOS 2 mount. After the polar alignment, the tracking was tested for 10 min which was adequate for my current level of astrophotography.
      At different altitudes, different latitudes, this is not tested. I believe, the method will definitely work for small exposures. It is to be validated if this method works for very long exposures.
      Star Pairs
      Table 1 : Star pairs with same RA ( useful for Step 2 and 4)
       
      Sr No
      First star  (name)
      First star HD Id
      Second star ( name)
      Second star HD Id
      1
      Gam Cas
      5394
      37 And
      5448
      2
      Nu Per
      23230
      19 Tau
      23338
      3
      Ups Tau
      28024
      71 Tau
      28052
      4
      90 Tau
      29388
      53 Eri
      29503
      5
      Kap Lep
      33949
      Rho Ori
      33856
      6
      The Aur
      40312
      Del Aur
      40035
      7
      Gam Mon
      43232
      Eta Gem
      42995
      8
      Eps Gem
      48329
      30 Gem
      48433
      9
      13 CMa
      50013
      V0415 Car
      50337
      10
      Omi CMa
      50877
      The CMa
      50778
      11
      P Pup
      63922
      Xi Pup
      63700
      12
      Chi Car
      65575
      11 Pup
      65228
      13
      Del Hyd
      73262
      E Vel
      73634
      14
      B Vel
      74180
      V343 Car
      74375
      15
      Iot Cnc
      74739
      Eps Hyd
      74874
      16
      31 Leo
      87837
      Alp Sex
      87887
      17
      Pi Cen
      98718
      Sig Leo
      98664
      18
      Lam Mus
      102249
      Nu Vir
      102212
      19
      Alp Crv
      105452
      Del Cen
      105435
      20
      Gam Cen
      110304
      Gam Vir
      110380
      21
      5 Boo
      120477
      2 Cen
      120323
      22
      SHT 56
      129116
      Alp Lup
      129056
      23
      Del Her
      156164
      Pi Her
      156283
      24
      102 Her
      166182
      Pi Pav
      165040
      25
      110 Her
      173667
      Phi Sgr
      173300
      26
      Zet Cap
      204075
      Gam Pav
      203608
      27
      Del Gru
      213009
      Del Cep
      213306
      28
      Iot Cep
      216228
      Mu Peg
      216131
      29
      Bet Peg
      217906
      Bet Psc
      217891
       
      Table 2 : Star pairs with same Dec ( useful for Step 3)
       
      Sr No
      First star  (name)
      First star HD
      Second star ( name)
      Second star HD
      1
      7 Cam
      31278
      Gam UMaj
      103287
      2
      Iot Cyg
      184006
      The Boo
      126660
      3
      H Persi
      26630
      Dmi?? Cass
      4180
      4
      Pi Aur
      40239
      Iot Her
      160762
      5
      39 Cyg
      194317
      Omi Persi
      23180
      6
      Eta Peg
      215182
      Zet Cyg
      202109
      7
      Iot Cnc
      74739
      Bet Tau
      35497
      8
      Bet Peg
      217906
      Vet Cyg
      183912
      9
      54 Leo
      94601
      Alp Vul
      183439
      10
      Alp Tau
      29139
      Gam Gem
      47105
      11
      Mu Ceti
      17094
      Lam Ori
      36861
      12
      Omi Psc
      10761
      Bet Cnc
      69267
      13
      Pi Ori
      30836
      Del Hyd
      73262
      14
      3 Agr
      198026
      Lam Agr
      177756
      15
      Iot Ori
      37043
      Iot Vir
      124850
      16
      Lam Eri
      33328
      Eta Eri
      18322
      17
      The Lib
      142198
      Del Crv
      108767
      18
      Bet Cet
      4128
      Bet CMaj
      44743
      19
      88 Aqr
      218594
      Pi Sgr
      178524
      20
      88 Aqr
      218594
      Xi Oph
      156897
      21
      4 Xi CMaj
      46328
      3 Eri???
      18978
      22
      Rho Pup
      67523
      Omi CMaj
      50877
      23
      Omc Cau???
      56139
       
      61555
      24
      Bet Hyd
      103192
      43 Eri
      28028
      25
      2 Cen
      120323
      Eps Sgr
      169022
      26
      Alp CrA
      178253
      Mu Seo
      151890
      27
      Bet CrA
      178345
      Lam Gru
      209688
      28
      Phi Cen
      121743
      Eta Cen
      127972
      29
      Eta Col
      40808
       
      73634
      30
      Vel
      78647
      Gam Phe
      9053
       
      Good luck
      Ashirwad Tillu ( ashirwadtillu@gmail.com), user name ( antariksha)
    • By Ken Mitchell
      As the title says
      I've finally, after owning a 7nm Baader Ha filter for more than a half year, did my first imaging session in Ha.  My target was the Lagoon Nebula because the weekend before I captured 4.5 hours on it and wanted to see what difference it would make. It's also very bright so easy to locate and it helped my getting focus as well.
      Focus was kind of a challenge as I had to locate the nebula without the filter first ( the Star Adventurer has no GoTo), screw on the filter and take numerous amounts of test shots (max iso at 30sec) to finally get the focus right. Though I still think the focus was a bit off. For some reasons I had problems with the B-mask and focusing will have to do more tests in the future on this.
      That said and done I was ready to start clicking, used settings of iso 1600 and 180sec subs. This was what I saw on the back of the camera after 3 minutes.

      Pretty exited! Just the fact that I had something showing up amazed me. Decided to keep the exposure at 3minutes and planned on getting 1 hour of data at least before calling it a night.
       
      Quick info on the gear used here: 
      -Camera: self modded Nikon d90(Ha data), Nikon d610(RGb data)
      -Optics: TS-Optics Photoline 72mm f/6 FPL53+TSflat72
      -Mount: Skywatcher Star Adventurer
      -Guidescope: TS-Optics Optics 50 mm DeLuxe Mini 
      -Guidecamera:  ZWO ASI120MC-S
      -Filters: Baader 7nm 2" Ha 
       
      Back on imaging. After 1hour and 18min I stopped the session, took 10 flats, 10 darks and 20 bias frames and called it a night.
      The day after loaded everything in DSS, imported the stack in Photoshop and did a little stretch on the red channel. This was the result (1hr 18min at iso 1600).

      First there is so so much more data than I'd captured the weekend before with my unmodded Nikon d610 and almost x4 as much integration. That was a real excitement!
      Second is a question(s), the diagonal pattern you see is this walking noise? Will dithering remove these lines? and is it even possible to dither with the SA? I've seen the dithering option in PHD2 but not sure if the combination with the Sa works.
      So I've left the noise ,to be hopefully resolved in the future, and tried to combine the Ha with the previous captured RGB.
      The RGB data ,as said before, was captured using a full frame Nikon d610. Aligning the two was kind of a challenge but eventually with all the twisting and turning managed to get it almost perfect.
      This is the fully processed image from ONLY the RGB data the week before. 4.5hrs of data with the unmodded d610.
       
       
      Combining the datasets I decided to re-edit the RGB set with just a curves and levels stretch and some minor tweaks in Adobe raw. Followed a simple tutorial of changing the red channel of the RGB set with the red channel of the Ha set and adding another Ha layer on top to use as a luminance layer. The result was a bit weird to be honest, green in the background and pretty ugly colors in the nebula. ( I didn't had the original to show so just now I made a quick alignment just to show more or less the results. 

      Should it look like this? Hope to find out what caused this.
      Made some tweaks in the channel color mixer in Ps to get rid of the odd colors(in my eyes at least) and did more editing to get a final image. Besides some tweaks here and there I added an extra layer from the RGB set and used 'color' as blending mode.
      This is the result I came up with.

      Apart from perfect alignment of both data sets and maybe a better color balance I'd have to say the image itself looks a lot cleaner and more pleasant to the eye.
      Though it seems the image is not as sharp as just the RGB image, maybe that's because it has less stars and it only appears to be more fuzzy?
      Hope to get some input and cc on my workflow and/or the images to improve my results.
       
      Thank you,
      Ken Mitchell
       
       
      PS. For those interested I've also did some imaging with the unmodded d610 + Ha filter to show the differences and if it is worth it to use a Ha filter with an unmodded dslr. 
      I'll see if I can make a separate thread for this.
       
       
       
       
    • By Astrofriend
      I have used my Star Adventurer for a while now and is very satisfaid with it. But it could be improved and I have installed an angled viewfinder to the polar telescope, rebuilt the wedge, etc.
      But there is also the tripod, the one I have now is stable but very big, nothing that I could take with me when traveling. All photagraphy tripods I have looked at that is maximum 0.5 meter long folded look a bit weak or are very expensive. Now I have bought an used Manfrotto model 144, very stable but too long folded. This weekend I cut off the legs to make it shorter. I don't need very high tripod now when using the angled viewfinder.
      Here is my tripod project:
      http://www.astrofriend.eu/astronomy/projects/project-star-adventurer-tripod/01-project-star-adventurer-tripod.html
      /Lars
    • By Phillips6549
      Hi All
      When I use SynscanInit to help me to Polar Align, it shows me an image of Polaris against an Octans reticle (as fitted in my Polar Alignment Scope) as follows:

       
      However, when I look through my Polar Alignment Scope, the image I see is like this:

      It's upside down with respect to the SynscanInit view. 
      So my questions are:
      1. Is my Polar Alignment Scope fitted upside down in my mount (SW EQ3-Pro)? 
      2. If not, How do I read the information from SynscanInit?  Should I position Polaris in the corresponding position, ie at the top of my view?
       
      Thanks in advance
      Mark
      P.S. Sorry for the huge pictures.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.