Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_2018_sp_banner.thumb.jpg.a4fa178de7d36660e48f7eb1205319eb.jpg

Recommended Posts

I have seen a great local offer for a national geographics telescope 76/700,

but the catch is that the view finder is broken, is it possible to replace this?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These Nat Geo telescopes don't really have a good reputation. I wouldn't buy it, personally. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Depends what the price for it is but as stated above they aren't the best and not worth the trouble trying to fix it.

Edited by Olli
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Olli said:

Depends what the price for it is but as stated above they aren't the best and not worth the trouble trying to fix it.

It's about a £10

11 minutes ago, Stargazer33 said:

Ditto!

lol what does that mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Rashka said:

It's about a £10

lol what does that mean?

It means they agree with me not to buy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LukeSkywatcher said:

It means they agree with me not to buy. 

kk, I'll give this one a pass then, thnx guys

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Rashka said:

kk, I'll give this one a pass then, thnx guys

I mean if you desperately wanted a telescope then £10 wouldn't hurt i guess, but not sure how much it would cost to fix it. 

Edited by Olli

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Olli said:

I mean if you desperately wanted a telescope then £10 wouldn't hurt i guess, but not sure how much it would cost to fix it. 

From what I see here it isn't worth it even if the finder's scope was fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 quid? Get it. Look at the moon without a finder. Look at Jupiter too. Then get a cheap new finder. Or sell it for a tenner.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Rashka said:

From what I see here it isn't worth it even if the finder's scope was fine.

I'd say go for it personally knowing that its worth that much even if you do fix it and find the parts for cheap you could possibly make a profit out of it. And its better then not having a telescope at all. 

Edited by Olli
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

If it's just missing the finder scope then that isn't so bad. I thought you meant that the focuser was broken! If it's only a tenner and you can't afford anything more then it may be worth a punt. You can always get a finder from Astroboot for a few quid.

The thing with this quality of 'scope is that it may put you off astronomy as the views might not be as good as you expect. If you use the Astronomy Tools under the 'Resourses' tab at the top of the page, you can select a 'scope and eyepiece and it will give you an idea of what you are likely to see of a chosen target.

Edited by Stargazer33
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

£10 as a first telescope - go for it. Have fun learning about it, use it, take it to pieces and learn how it works, experiment at making it better. When you are are finished with it you will have learnt a heck of a lot and will be either sated or ready to move on to something better. Not difficult to make a finder and have some fun doing it, it will also give you a  sense of achievement :) 

 

Jim 

Edited by saac
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Stargazer33 said:

If it's just missing the finder scope then that isn't so bad. I thought you meant that the focuser was broken! If it's only a tenner and you can't afford anything more then it may be worth a punt. You can always get a finder from Astroboot for a few quid.

The thing with this quality of 'scope is that it may put you off astronomy as the views might not be as good as you expect. If you use the Astronomy Tools under the 'Resourses' tab at the top of the page, you can select a 'scope and eyepiece and it will give you an idea of what you are likely to see of a chosen target.

oh wow what a handy tool, cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the reputation, they're not that bad optically, specially on low power views. National Geographic don't make them, just badge them. The magnification is low enough to not particularly need a finder, just sight along the tube. You won't get entry into astronomy much cheaper!.  :icon_biggrin:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outnumbered here. I was basing my opinion on what ive read here about Nat Geo branded scopes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2018-05-12 at 15:51, LukeSkywatcher said:

Outnumbered here. I was basing my opinion on what ive read here about Nat Geo branded scopes.

My neighbour bought his daughter a Nat Geo scope, he knows nothing about scopes but somehow knew he should return it a few days later.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get yourself a reasonable pair of Binoculars. 10 x 50's would be Ideal for
sky surfing. They will satisfy you more than a suspect refractor that might well exasperate you.

There's never a need to rush into buying a telescope. There are so many types and prices.
Do some homework reading books, try to decide what you would like to use a telescope for, Stars Planets, Deep sky observing, 
Double star observing. and others. Work hard, and save hard, it will take time, but if you've done your homework, 
you will be well informed as to which direction you want to go in your astronomy.
Meanwhile, keep reading these forums, there is much you can glean from here.
Good Luck
 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat Geographic and other similarly marketed, so called, beginners telescopes are often sold in brightly coloured packages which appear to promise 'Hubble' quality views of night sky objects and are often supplied with low quality eyepieces of unsuitable magnification potential and with various 'accessories' like finders and Barlows that are often to 'plasticky' to make their use easy.  Many users therefore can get frustrated that they don't get what was promised on the box and this, coupled, with often poor quality images and difficulty of use this can put folks off telescopes for life. 

However, we are only talking a tenner here.  So you take a chance, but it with the knowledge of what is above and see if you can persuade it to give you a good look at the moon, which you might be OK with, but it probably won't be suitable for many of the smaller sky objects, or you invest your tenner with about 12 more and see if you can buy a smaller 'proper' telescope like a Skywatcher 100P or a Heritage 130P - see this page https://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians.html which both get good reviews and should produce more rewarding views - you many even pick one up second-hand for less.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thnx, anyone here ever heard about a philo 40x40 telescope btw?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 5/14/2018 at 13:42, Rashka said:

thnx, anyone here ever heard about a philo 40x40 telescope btw?

Sounds to me like a 40mm-aperture telescope with a maximum magnification of 40x, made in Japan possibly, and a zoom-'scope to boot; a bit vintage.  I take it you've seen one advertised.  You'd see even less with it than you would with the National Geographic 76/700.

How much have you budgeted for your introduction to astronomy?

Edited by Alan64

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you go into it knowing the results will be extremely limited, it's only £10. I have never used one myself, but I would expect that you would be able to see the rings of Saturn. If so, that would certainly fire you up to get something bigger & better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alan64 said:

Sounds to me like a 40mm-aperture telescope with a maximum magnification of 40x, made in Japan possibly, and a zoom-'scope to boot; a bit vintage.  I take it you've seen one advertised.  You'd see even less with it than you would with the National Geographic 76/700.

How much have you budgeted for your introduction to astronomy?

 

31 minutes ago, Demonperformer said:

As long as you go into it knowing the results will be extremely limited, it's only £10. I have never used one myself, but I would expect that you would be able to see the rings of Saturn. If so, that would certainly fire you up to get something bigger & better.

 I've decided to not get a telescope at the moment, I'll just use my binos until I got a bigger budget so I can buy a proper one.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a winner, tiger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/05/2018 at 09:14, Rashka said:

 

 I've decided to not get a telescope at the moment, I'll just use my binos until I got a bigger budget so I can buy a proper one.

And a very sensible decision too. You'll do well young man, you have patience,
which can be a prime requirement in Astronomy. You will learn to study,
not just give a cursory glance to your observed targets.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By JohnSadlerAstro
      Hi,
      I've been into astrophotography for several years now, but I can't seem to make much improvement between images. Looking at the images in the Deep-Sky section with clean, white galaxies and perfect smooth backgrounds has got me thinking about what I'm doing wrong.
      I know I can achieve better images with the setup I've got, and I really want to improve in time for the summer nebulae. Is there any advice anyone can give?
      This is a diagram of my setup. My 1000d is modded. I use PHD drift align, and with that running my guiding is to within 2 seconds. I use APT for dithering and image collection, DSS for stacking, and GIMP 16-Bit for processing. A quick note at this point -- ive heard lots about StarTools and other programs, what is the best choice program which wont cost a few hundred pounds?
      Collimation has always been a bit of a difficult one for me, I've tried using both a Cheshire and a laser, but I never seem to get properly coma or gradient free images.

       
      These are the kind of results I'm getting--the main issues I can see are horrible backgrounds (dithering doesn't seem to be able to remove the dark frame scratches) and really grimy colour, but there is also coma and gradient/vignette which refuses to be corrected by flats. (I take my flats through some white fabric pointing at notepad open on my laptop.)

      A big issue for me has always been imaging time--where I live the council turns off the lights each night at midnight. For some reason, although I will often have the setup running from midnight until 3 in the morning, everything seems to go wrong after an hour. For example, the guiding crashes, or a glow appears in the images and wont go away, or hundreds of aircraft seem to pass overhead and streak everything . 
      As the setup became more and more complicated, it began to take more and more time to set up: last imaging session it took 2.5 hours from opening the garage door to starting the first proper exposure. This makes everything far more difficult and time-consuming.
      Does anyone have any tips or suggestions on how I can solve these issues, or just improve my imaging in general?
      Thanks for looking
      John
    • By Mendrinos
      My Orion Starseeker IV mount has recently started acting weirdly in that it will continue to spew even after the movement buttons have been released, this will then render all buttons on the handset useless as nothing will work until it is switched off and on again. I contacted Orion and they claimed it may be faulty optical encoders but they haven’t yet replied on how I can fix it and I don’t really want to pay too much to fix it. Does anyone have any ideas on how I could fix it myself?
    • By Roger2525
      Hi I'm in desperate need of help! I have just brought a 2nd hand Skywatcher 127 mak. Have checked the collimation and it appears ok, have left the telescope out in the open for an hour and have a nice dew cover for it. 
      However I can't get the tracking sorted, the view finder is a nightmare and overhead objects I'm almost on my back, but worse of all I've just had a look at Jupiter which admittedly is low down in the sky but I can't get it to look more than a bright star. I have tried 10,15,25mm lenses and a Barlow but it just appears as a bright dot. When I do increase the size it goes out of focus and you get a circle with the black dot in the centre.
      I have read great things about this scope but it's hopeless for dso cos you can't find them and I fear the planets will be hopeless as well given what I've experienced with Jupiter. How on earth do you get planets large enough to see a bit more detail other than a dot of light?
      I think I will sell the scope on and just get a good pair of binoculars. Any advice?
       
       
       
    • By beni
      All I have with my celestron c102-AZ is a finderscope and a 20mm lense. What are a few barlows/ lenses/ accessories that I need or should have. My budget is about 500$ or less.
      The c102-AZ takes 1.25" lenses/ barlows.
    • By Swoop1
      At 22:15 BST  this evening I was taking a tour of the terminator and, as I was studying the vicinity of what I think was Sinus Iridium I saw a very bright smudge to its North West. I managed quite sharp focus on the crater edges but the bright smudge woukd not resolve.
      Studying my lunar map I beleieve the smudge was either on the edge of Foucault or Hacpalus (Foucault if Hacpalus was disected by the terminator).
      I have no idea what I was looking at but, it looked almost like ejecta catching the sun as it settled back to the lunar surface.
      Madness I know but.........
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.