Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_the_milky_way.thumb.jpg.dbd8b15e81d11e9303c8d6ef1898ac08.jpg

Recommended Posts

I have seen a great local offer for a national geographics telescope 76/700,

but the catch is that the view finder is broken, is it possible to replace this?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These Nat Geo telescopes don't really have a good reputation. I wouldn't buy it, personally. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Depends what the price for it is but as stated above they aren't the best and not worth the trouble trying to fix it.

Edited by Olli
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Olli said:

Depends what the price for it is but as stated above they aren't the best and not worth the trouble trying to fix it.

It's about a £10

11 minutes ago, Stargazer33 said:

Ditto!

lol what does that mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Rashka said:

It's about a £10

lol what does that mean?

It means they agree with me not to buy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, LukeSkywatcher said:

It means they agree with me not to buy. 

kk, I'll give this one a pass then, thnx guys

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Rashka said:

kk, I'll give this one a pass then, thnx guys

I mean if you desperately wanted a telescope then £10 wouldn't hurt i guess, but not sure how much it would cost to fix it. 

Edited by Olli

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Olli said:

I mean if you desperately wanted a telescope then £10 wouldn't hurt i guess, but not sure how much it would cost to fix it. 

From what I see here it isn't worth it even if the finder's scope was fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 quid? Get it. Look at the moon without a finder. Look at Jupiter too. Then get a cheap new finder. Or sell it for a tenner.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Rashka said:

From what I see here it isn't worth it even if the finder's scope was fine.

I'd say go for it personally knowing that its worth that much even if you do fix it and find the parts for cheap you could possibly make a profit out of it. And its better then not having a telescope at all. 

Edited by Olli
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

If it's just missing the finder scope then that isn't so bad. I thought you meant that the focuser was broken! If it's only a tenner and you can't afford anything more then it may be worth a punt. You can always get a finder from Astroboot for a few quid.

The thing with this quality of 'scope is that it may put you off astronomy as the views might not be as good as you expect. If you use the Astronomy Tools under the 'Resourses' tab at the top of the page, you can select a 'scope and eyepiece and it will give you an idea of what you are likely to see of a chosen target.

Edited by Stargazer33
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

£10 as a first telescope - go for it. Have fun learning about it, use it, take it to pieces and learn how it works, experiment at making it better. When you are are finished with it you will have learnt a heck of a lot and will be either sated or ready to move on to something better. Not difficult to make a finder and have some fun doing it, it will also give you a  sense of achievement :) 

 

Jim 

Edited by saac
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Stargazer33 said:

If it's just missing the finder scope then that isn't so bad. I thought you meant that the focuser was broken! If it's only a tenner and you can't afford anything more then it may be worth a punt. You can always get a finder from Astroboot for a few quid.

The thing with this quality of 'scope is that it may put you off astronomy as the views might not be as good as you expect. If you use the Astronomy Tools under the 'Resourses' tab at the top of the page, you can select a 'scope and eyepiece and it will give you an idea of what you are likely to see of a chosen target.

oh wow what a handy tool, cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite the reputation, they're not that bad optically, specially on low power views. National Geographic don't make them, just badge them. The magnification is low enough to not particularly need a finder, just sight along the tube. You won't get entry into astronomy much cheaper!.  :icon_biggrin:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outnumbered here. I was basing my opinion on what ive read here about Nat Geo branded scopes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2018-05-12 at 15:51, LukeSkywatcher said:

Outnumbered here. I was basing my opinion on what ive read here about Nat Geo branded scopes.

My neighbour bought his daughter a Nat Geo scope, he knows nothing about scopes but somehow knew he should return it a few days later.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get yourself a reasonable pair of Binoculars. 10 x 50's would be Ideal for
sky surfing. They will satisfy you more than a suspect refractor that might well exasperate you.

There's never a need to rush into buying a telescope. There are so many types and prices.
Do some homework reading books, try to decide what you would like to use a telescope for, Stars Planets, Deep sky observing, 
Double star observing. and others. Work hard, and save hard, it will take time, but if you've done your homework, 
you will be well informed as to which direction you want to go in your astronomy.
Meanwhile, keep reading these forums, there is much you can glean from here.
Good Luck
 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nat Geographic and other similarly marketed, so called, beginners telescopes are often sold in brightly coloured packages which appear to promise 'Hubble' quality views of night sky objects and are often supplied with low quality eyepieces of unsuitable magnification potential and with various 'accessories' like finders and Barlows that are often to 'plasticky' to make their use easy.  Many users therefore can get frustrated that they don't get what was promised on the box and this, coupled, with often poor quality images and difficulty of use this can put folks off telescopes for life. 

However, we are only talking a tenner here.  So you take a chance, but it with the knowledge of what is above and see if you can persuade it to give you a good look at the moon, which you might be OK with, but it probably won't be suitable for many of the smaller sky objects, or you invest your tenner with about 12 more and see if you can buy a smaller 'proper' telescope like a Skywatcher 100P or a Heritage 130P - see this page https://www.firstlightoptics.com/dobsonians.html which both get good reviews and should produce more rewarding views - you many even pick one up second-hand for less.

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thnx, anyone here ever heard about a philo 40x40 telescope btw?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 5/14/2018 at 13:42, Rashka said:

thnx, anyone here ever heard about a philo 40x40 telescope btw?

Sounds to me like a 40mm-aperture telescope with a maximum magnification of 40x, made in Japan possibly, and a zoom-'scope to boot; a bit vintage.  I take it you've seen one advertised.  You'd see even less with it than you would with the National Geographic 76/700.

How much have you budgeted for your introduction to astronomy?

Edited by Alan64

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you go into it knowing the results will be extremely limited, it's only £10. I have never used one myself, but I would expect that you would be able to see the rings of Saturn. If so, that would certainly fire you up to get something bigger & better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alan64 said:

Sounds to me like a 40mm-aperture telescope with a maximum magnification of 40x, made in Japan possibly, and a zoom-'scope to boot; a bit vintage.  I take it you've seen one advertised.  You'd see even less with it than you would with the National Geographic 76/700.

How much have you budgeted for your introduction to astronomy?

 

31 minutes ago, Demonperformer said:

As long as you go into it knowing the results will be extremely limited, it's only £10. I have never used one myself, but I would expect that you would be able to see the rings of Saturn. If so, that would certainly fire you up to get something bigger & better.

 I've decided to not get a telescope at the moment, I'll just use my binos until I got a bigger budget so I can buy a proper one.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like a winner, tiger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/05/2018 at 09:14, Rashka said:

 

 I've decided to not get a telescope at the moment, I'll just use my binos until I got a bigger budget so I can buy a proper one.

And a very sensible decision too. You'll do well young man, you have patience,
which can be a prime requirement in Astronomy. You will learn to study,
not just give a cursory glance to your observed targets.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By arsxenic
      Okay so I chose to take a year to decide which career to study, I've always been interested in physics and astronomy but I think I will go on and pick Chemistry. Any tips or ideas on what to do after?
    • By JAFULTON
      Hi guys and gals,
      I recently purchased a pair of Nikon Aculon 10-22×50 Zoom binoculars for around $179 and I'm pretty disappointed with them.  I live in Semi-rural northeast Texas and was looking for a good pair of binoculars for a casual stargazer like myself.  I thought these would be the perfect pair, I was wrong. The field of view is pretty small and the focus is annoying.  The view is like tunnel vision at 10× and too dark at 22×. 
      Do any of you individuals have any helpful suggestions on what exactly I should get that suites my individual needs?
      I am looking for something that won't break the bank (under $300), has a large field of view, would allow me to see the moons of Jupiter, the Andromeda Galaxy, starclusters, nebulae, and maybe some of the Messier Objects?  Also, without a tripod needed. I would like something  that is comfortable on the eye and easy to hold.
      Its asking a lot, I know. But I'm hoping some of you who are more knowledgeable on the subject would be able to help me out?
      Thanks.
       
    • By azathoth
      Hello, I'm very new to the practice of astronomy and my interest is with deep sky objects, I very much prefer "goto" type telescopes. Im just looking for a decent set up for visual observations of dso's and I have no idea where to start to look, please help!  
       
      ( 500$ budget )
    • By Ardoamros
      Greetings stargazers,
       I'm considering buying a new telescope (my first telescope) for astrophotography, and some visual astronomy. 
       But I can't decide which type should I get. I mainly want to photograph deep sky objects. After testing some variations in Stellarium I am worried that some deep sky objects won't fit into the aperture of an 8" reflector.
      I'm wondering which type should I get. And also I'm worried that I won't be able to photograph anything with a small refractor because I live near a city. 
      I am also open to any suggestions for a beginner astrophotography telescope. (around 800$ would be perfect)
      Thank you:)
      I apologise if I made any writing mistakes.
      Edit: I'm considering buying a Bresser Messier 203/800 or a William Optics Zenithstar 61 but I'm still open to any suggestions.
       
       
       
    • By JohnSadlerAstro
      Hi,
      I've been into astrophotography for several years now, but I can't seem to make much improvement between images. Looking at the images in the Deep-Sky section with clean, white galaxies and perfect smooth backgrounds has got me thinking about what I'm doing wrong.
      I know I can achieve better images with the setup I've got, and I really want to improve in time for the summer nebulae. Is there any advice anyone can give?
      This is a diagram of my setup. My 1000d is modded. I use PHD drift align, and with that running my guiding is to within 2 seconds. I use APT for dithering and image collection, DSS for stacking, and GIMP 16-Bit for processing. A quick note at this point -- ive heard lots about StarTools and other programs, what is the best choice program which wont cost a few hundred pounds?
      Collimation has always been a bit of a difficult one for me, I've tried using both a Cheshire and a laser, but I never seem to get properly coma or gradient free images.

       
      These are the kind of results I'm getting--the main issues I can see are horrible backgrounds (dithering doesn't seem to be able to remove the dark frame scratches) and really grimy colour, but there is also coma and gradient/vignette which refuses to be corrected by flats. (I take my flats through some white fabric pointing at notepad open on my laptop.)

      A big issue for me has always been imaging time--where I live the council turns off the lights each night at midnight. For some reason, although I will often have the setup running from midnight until 3 in the morning, everything seems to go wrong after an hour. For example, the guiding crashes, or a glow appears in the images and wont go away, or hundreds of aircraft seem to pass overhead and streak everything . 
      As the setup became more and more complicated, it began to take more and more time to set up: last imaging session it took 2.5 hours from opening the garage door to starting the first proper exposure. This makes everything far more difficult and time-consuming.
      Does anyone have any tips or suggestions on how I can solve these issues, or just improve my imaging in general?
      Thanks for looking
      John
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.