Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

303 Excellent

1 Follower

About Dazzyt66

  • Rank
    Star Forming

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    South Yorkshire
  1. Hey, Thats ok, if you are only doing visual stuff, just do a rough alignment north using a compass and set your elevation. The alignment process after that should get you pretty much bang on. HTH.
  2. I dunno Des, I have no knowledge of AVX but the Synscan app is designed to be used with Synscan compatible mounts (either EQ or Alt/Az)...
  3. Hi @TPF Glad you found the guide useful. You will need to do a rough polar alignment (unless you are doing photography which will need an accurate setup). Search YouTube on polar alignment if you need help on this - there are some simple guides there. So, for rough, just point the scope north, at the approximate elevation, unless at night and you can see Polaris and do it properly. If doing it in daylight just point north at approximate elevation. You should then be able to test the setup with a ‘single star’ alignment using either the moon or Venus (depending on time of day and visibility obvs). Hope that helps! Stellarium is a great addition to have, it’s more than just an app, it’s a great way to explore the sky virtually as well as using it to control your nights out - but it takes a bit of additional setup. Daz
  4. To get that message may be because I always ‘park’ mine at the end of a session. Under utilities I think...
  5. On mine when It starts it says something like: ‘start from saved settings’ or something like that. I always hit ‘no’ cos I always have my mount and scope in different places when I start. I haven’t had any problems so far. Well done for sticking with it. It can be a pain when things don’t go right. I haven’t managed to see Jupiter yet this year as it’s always benn in wrong position (I have limited views south) or the weather gets in the way. I’ll keep trying though ?
  6. You know what, I did, and it now works fine! Well, on initial look it works better than before and it keeps the TIF at the level it was saved! More experimenting for me now then... although I do think I’ll get StarTools too! ?
  7. Thanks for these. I have indeed (for now) given up on GIMP. My future spend goes on StarTools. Although I might get BYE first... I’ve indeed had some promising widefield practice shots with Stacey and she defo has potential... I’m gonna do a Mak comparison against M101 and see how they stack up (no pun intended) lol... ok, maybe there was... ? I just need two clear nights....
  8. Thanks Louise. Have tried all combinations now with GIMP and it either: Keeps the image at 8 bit initially, although you can convert it, the quality is still shocking, or If I edit import preferences to promote to floating point, it will open most TIF versions, keeps them at 32 bit but quality looks similar to 8 bit... So, I think StarTools is the winner come next months spending money...
  9. Oooooh, OK, so it leaves it at 8 bit initially, but what should I be setting it to? I’m using a TIF from DSS so 16 bit? And then it asks: integer or floating point and Perceptual gamma or linear light? #confused.com
  10. Yep, have had a good result with both FITS and TIF in ST ?
  11. I’m using someone else’s raw data which I know will give good results. I can get a great image when using StarTools following a guide I found, I just can’t seem to even get close to something similar in GIMP although I have seen others have. I’m rechecking all settings now to check it’s not user error... which it very well could be... lol
  12. Hi, I’ve been experimenting processing stacked .tif images from DSS. Whilst I can get fairly decent processing done in StarTools from the output tif of DSS, if I use GIMP to try and do anything, even basic levelling, it just looks ‘blocky’ i.e. far less initial image quality. Even if I just mess around with windows picture editor I get better results than GIMP v 2.10. Surely this can’t be right for something that’s meant to be a rival to PS? The reason I am asking is before I get a license for StarTools can GIMP do similar for free?
  13. Are you doing any kind of polar alignment before you start. Doesn’t need to be accurate if you are only observing but needs to be roughly aligned north even just with a compass? I did this the other evening with a single star alignment on Venus before it even went dark and it was still accurate enough to get other bright stars and the moon almost central to the finder every time? You say you have to ‘shove it’ to bring it into view - you are doing this using the app and slewing rather than just moving the mount manually?
  14. My experience with LED has been good to date. In my old village they replaced the sodium with LED and it made an immediate improvement to the general darkness because of the light being directed downwards more effectively. That said, I didn’t have any in really close proximity to my back garden (as we backed on to a railway track). We’ve just moved to a new estate, closer to town, but all with LED. Again, nothing overlooking my garden directly atm. However, several new houses have gone up around us where (in)security lights have been fitted so time will tell if I’m affected by those during the nights...
  15. I’ve had one for a few weeks now and found it brilliant. Have used it with iPhone and iPad using sky safari and the app together as well as using it with Stellarium. I did two ‘guides’ in the reviews section on how I set mine up. Link to iPhone one below... In both cases I had the initial testing done during the day to make sure everything worked, then at night you aren’t wasting any precious viewing time (especially in cloud ridden UK!). HTH ?
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.