Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is an amazing post, Acey. Well written and extremely informative. Thank you for taking the time to write it up :grin:

  • Like 4
Posted

Agreed, a first class account. We don't often read what you say in your opening paragraph - that a dark site is not apparently dark at all. The more you adapt, the easier it is to move around. We have even debated whether or not Jupiter casts a shadow. What makes moving around impossible is the arrival of mist. Living at 900 metres (3000 feet in old money) we are sometimes cut short by rising valley mist from temperature inversion and at this point finding anything, even at arm's length, becomes near impossible.

When imaging, one problem is assessing the sky, which you cannot usefully do withing ten minutes of looking at a screen. This is whee a sky quality metre comes in. We are usually between 21.6 and 21.9 on clear nights here. In the outback I gather that you can hit the low twenty-twos.

Olly

  • Like 1
Posted

Ah 'mist' rolling in, can rapidly reduce unlit visibility to zero. But I still prefer this problem to having a large warm lit town anywhere near by.

  • Like 1
Posted

Its quite freaky when the mist rolls in or a layer of cloud pops over ... If its really dark you don't notice the clouds at first ... Then out the corner if your eye its like someone's turned the stars off

  • Like 3
Posted

Great post, one dark site I used to observe was on a hill in Derbyshire. You could watch the fog roll down the hill fill up the valley then creep upwards. Cold in winter but ace! Once had a complete layer of ice over my SCT.

Posted

You know that you are at a dark site when the clouds are black rather than lit up by light reflecting off their undersides.

Great post Acey.

Paul

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Sky quality meter helps, but poor transparency can still leave you with a dark sky and fewer stars than I see from london. Can someone invent a transparency meter, otherwise you need to look at known objects and Jude how well you can see them.

Cheers

PeterW

  • Like 1
Posted

> most galaxies are of about the same surface brightness as the Milky Way. So if you want to see galaxies well, you need to be able to see the Milky Way with the naked eye.

That comment has saved me an awful lot of chasing my own tail!

  • Like 4
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

> most galaxies are of about the same surface brightness as the Milky Way. So if you want to see galaxies well, you need to be able to see the Milky Way with the naked eye.

That comment has saved me an awful lot of chasing my own tail!

srsly me too.  I keep going outside and trying to find M31 because it seems such an easy target to find and coming up empty.  The sky in my area is so damn bright it's really hard to see much of anything.  I guess I was expecting it to be much brighter and easier to see.  

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Another good, easy test for evaluating a dark sky site is to look at the night time clouds. If they are illuminated from underneath by local light pollution sources then the sky will not be as dark as it could be.

In the ideal situation clouds will appear as black shapes against a fairly bright night sky. This video from my observing site sort of illustrates the point- the clouds are noticably darker than the sky behind them, indicating low local light pollution.

From the same site really high clouds (~35,000 feet) actually pick up light pollution from towns 60-80 miles further south.

This contrail drifting through M8 and M20 in Sagitarius is clearly illuminated by distant sodium street lights.

LagoonLPmontage_1024.jpg

Edited by laser_jock99
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Another good, easy test for evaluating a dark sky site is to look at the night time clouds. If they are illuminated from underneath by local light pollution sources then the sky will not be as dark as it could be.

In the ideal situation clouds will appear as black shapes against a fairly bright night sky. This video from my observing site sort of illustrates the point- the clouds are noticably darker than the sky behind them, indicating low local light pollution.

From the same site really high clouds (~35,000 feet) actually pick up light pollution from towns 60-80 miles further south.

This contrail drifting through M8 and M20 in Sagitarius is clearly illuminated by distant sodium street lights.

LagoonLPmontage_1024.jpg

Thanks for the video it was better than a thousand words!

Posted

I spent a few nights camping a week ago. It was heavily overcast but there was still enough moonlight that I didn't need a torch.

I remember one night at a true dark site  camping by a lake in snowdonia. The only time I have ever seen the stars reflected in water, and I was able to read teh label of a baked bean can by starlight alone. Didn't need a scope to appreciate the stars that night!

  • Like 7
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

A really Ace(y) post.

As a beginner simple information helps a lot.

I took a quick look at the reference paper and thought TMI squared.

8/8ths cover is not helping me see anything (10 days new scope 2 days observing! Including day 1) much less the Milky Way.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

My best local dark area is Derbyshire the Peak District I've been up several times to capture the Milky Way but nothing like yours laser jock, there's a place called hathersage a little further out but it's been awarded a dark site I've been there 3 times in the last 3 month when the moons not been out.... Twice it started slinging it down on the way and the other was very very cloudy after 5 mins on being there so hopefully I will get to see what a truly dark sky should look like and then can compare it against my local site where I go, so thank you for your information acey.

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Our eyes, as humans, are weak, compared to an animal of the night equipped with tapetum lucida.  For them, the same dark site as described must appear as an overcast day does to ourselves, and at high noon even.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Light pollution scales are confusing i think. Im allegedly in an orange zone. So shouldnt see that much. Although with my 130mm reflector i can see stars of the 13th mag and galaxies of 10th mag.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

Hi all

great post, I am new to this, and I want to find a good area to view the skies with the naked eye, I'm in Essex near Southend on sea, looking on the map bradwell seems a good area, would this be ideal for seeing stars, or can u suggest a better area, ? 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Excellent.

I find myself trapped at what I can find with where I am. Seems where ever I am is what I must work with.

So I filter... :undecided:

And when an airplane flies through, I shamefully delete the image.

I'm not worthy! :embarassed:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.