Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Halil

Is that Venus?

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I took this picture by coincidence while trying to take photo of a single cloud on the sky.

Is this Venus?

Thanks.

 

HalVanus11.thumb.jpg.426fb86c7c74077751e8b0c2f306f410.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Halil said:

Hi All,

I took this picture by coincidence while trying to take photo of a single cloud on the sky.

Is this Venus?

Thanks.

 

HalVanus11.thumb.jpg.426fb86c7c74077751e8b0c2f306f410.jpg

 

That’s a nice photo of a cloud.  Firstly that isn’t Venus but a lens flare from the Sun, light reflecting off the glass. Secondly be careful imaging directly at the sun like that 👍🏼

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

thank you for the quick answer, however if it is a lens flare, why in the photo taken a few minutes later it ise half visible behind the cloud?

BehindTheCloud.thumb.jpg.05d3956d9d10804ec0fe99cc221cdba4.jpg

LessVisible.thumb.jpg.d03fade1d83da86ae5928bf58445bdf0.jpg

Thanks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

definitely a lens flare, possibly caused by something semi transparent on the lens?... one thing for sure is that it's not Venus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the last picture, the ball shape is so visible. The picture was taken around 11:30 in Sunny Beach ,Burgas, Bulgaria. Can someone sent a sky map for that time and location?

We can compare the position of Sun and Venus.

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its really not venus mate,even if it was it would'nt show up like that,it would'nt be a disc it would be a point of light,it is a reflection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Stellarium, Venus is well to the left of the Sun at 11.30am from Sofia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is definitely a lens flare.

Even if it was Venus, it would not appear as a disc, unless it is at superior conjuction, (i.e. far side of the Sun). Also it would not be that big when viewed with a camera lens. I have seen Venus during the day, oddly enough it was about 11:30am too, years ago when my local astro society had an open day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree with all off you. It can't be Venus.

In the sky map for that time and location Venus is almost on the same spot with Sun.

SkyMapBurgas1130.thumb.jpg.25a8221401a8c83a13560d8bb42e5005.jpg

 

However what about the globe in last picture. It is on the same place with Mercury.

LessVisible2.thumb.jpeg.7b0ac1d1fe2974b3da0f540ad8e9f54f.jpeg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercury is even smaller than Venus and difficult enough to see when  it is dark let alone during the daytime and you normally need a telescope or binoculars to see it unless you have VERY good eye sight.  I have seen Venus through a very powerful telescope during the daytime, but it was impossible to see with the naked eye. 

I can understand why you are trying to work it out, but take it from experienced amateur astronomers.  It does look like lens flare in the first one, but not so much the second one.  Maybe you got a balloon flying in the sky as it is getting smaller in each photo, and in front of the cloud in the 2nd photo. 

Carole 

Edited by carastro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More lens flare.

Mercury is/was further to the right of the as viewed from Sofia, BG @11:30:00EEST...

405550719_Screenshot(8).thumb.png.e88dc85c6f4b6b3f3d873cfa0ba07920.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so disappointed, they really don't look like lens flares.

There is still one question, if it is a lens flare why in this picture most of it is behind the cloud.

BehindTheCloud.thumb.jpg.d2b5c346074f1120c2225686dd68e183.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One question which we all seem to be forgetting to ask is... what camera/lens are you using?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologize everybody for this. Now I took another picture and reproduced the same spot.

SunFlake.thumb.jpg.5b81022f96e3dc543fefff6f7e17dee5.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still lens flare.

At that image scale the "object" is probably many tens or even hundreds of times larger than Venus would appear.

Venus would also be a solid white colour and crescent shaped. You'd need a good telescope to see Venus that size and it would be the only thing in the frame at the required magnification.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Halil said:

I apologize everybody for this. Now I took another picture and reproduced the same spot.

SunFlake.thumb.jpg.5b81022f96e3dc543fefff6f7e17dee5.jpg

No need to appologise,i have been at this for over 40 years and am still learning things everyday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some iPhones obviously have a flare for this sort of thing. :smile:

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, carastro said:

Mercury is even smaller than Venus and difficult enough to see when  it is dark let alone during the daytime and you normally need a telescope or binoculars to see it unless you have VERY good eye sight.  I have seen Venus through a very powerful telescope during the daytime, but it was impossible to see with the naked eye. 

I can understand why you are trying to work it out, but take it from experienced amateur astronomers.  It does look like lens flare in the first one, but not so much the second one.  Maybe you got a balloon flying in the sky as it is getting smaller in each photo, and in front of the cloud in the 2nd photo. 

Carole 

Carole, 

It is actually easy to see Venus with the naked eye in full daylight, as long as you know where and when to look.

The way I first did it was when Venus was close to maximum elongation rising before the Sun (i.e. "morning star"). The trick was to stand in the same place and remember where it was in relation to a building or tree. I did this every hour or so and could see the planet from dawn through to past 1400 GMT.

I've also heard that it's possible to see Jupiter in the daytime, but I've not managed it yet! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Rusted said:

Some iPhones obviously have a flare for this sort of thing. :smile:

Apologies for de-railing the OP's topic, but I do think @Rusted comment, as shown above, belongs here... 

😜

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Balage
      Hi guys,
      I am a newbie on this forum, this is my first topic here but I would like to show you my recent planetary imaging results. I started to catch the planets with a dedicated planetary camera last month but never thought that a small 4" Maksutov can show such small details. The equpment I used:
      SW 102/1300 Maksutov 2.25x Q-turret Barlow lens QHY5L-II color camera EQ-3 GOTO mount All the images were taken on differend countrysides in Hungary. I hope you will like it
      Also, please share your images taken with similar OTA, I'd like to learn some tricks from others as well  
       
      Jupiter's 15 minutes of rotation. Captured with Firecapture, processed in AS!3, Registax and WinJUPOS (2020.08.21)
                                                                          
       
      Saturn, 1 hours stacked with AS!3, processed in Registax (2020.09.05)

       
      Mars, 3 hours of rotation. Captured with Firecapture, stacked with AS!3, processed in Registax. (2020.08.22)

       
      Mars again, 5 minutes stacked in AS!3, processed in Registax. You can see also Olympus Mons and Arsia Mons next to the terminator  (2020.09.05)
       
       
      Finally, a result of a Hungarian star party where I learned how to use properly my equipment  This time I borrowed an ADC for Saturn.

       
    • By lenscap
      Sunday 24th May, from 7:30pm BST, 200p F/5, EQ3-2, diy Onstep Goto.
      I've enjoyed watching Venus wane to a thinner & thinner crescent recently, but have never observed Mercury. Having the 2 planets & the Moon only a few degrees apart this week was an opportunity not to be missed. But the gap between the trees & the hill to my West is only about 1 "fist" wide - maybe 40 minutes of observing time. And the late sunset time means Venus would have moved behind the hill before becoming naked-eye visible.
      I don't have a permanent setup & can't see Polaris from my patio so I observe from  a very rough "polar alignment" & have marked the tripod leg positions on the patio so I don't need to Polar, or Star align every session.
      So, having made sure to "Park" the scope at the end of the previous night's session I could just plonk the setup on the marks, "Unpark", "Goto Venus" & lo and behold a tiny crescent Venus appeared about 1 degree from the centre of the  the  9x50 Finder in a sky that was clear of cloud but still pure white from the solar glow !  Isn't Goto wonderful ?
      Venus was such a beautiful thin 4% crescent with "horns" stretching to the meridian. At first it was shimmering  but that must have been a heat plume because a tiny tweak of the focus steadied the image. The seeing was surprisingly good for the low altitude. I enjoyed the view at up to X250 (4mm TMB), before a Goto to Mercury.
      Mercury was not visible in the Finder but was a tiny  dot in the 32mm Plossl. At higher powers I saw it as a 45% crescent. I know it was about 62% illuminated  so the sky must have been too bright for me to see its full extent. I don't claim to have seen any detail - the brightness just reduced steadily from the limb towards the terminator.
      I still couldn't see the Moon naked eye so did another Goto & looked in the Finder. Nothing !  But the bright sky must have been fooling my eye because when I forced myself to focus at infinity it popped in sight. The visible crescent was about half the thickness of a crosshair !  In a 20mm Plossl I could see about 6 medium sized faint, ghostly craters along the limb of a 4% crescent.
      So in about half an hour I had my first sight of Mercury, & seen my thinnest crescents of Venus & Luna. Isn't this hobby fantastic ? 😀
    • By spaceman_spiff
      A two image sequence of Venus taken on 16/04/2020 and 24/04/2020. I plan on adding more images to capture the changing crescent. Telescope: SW Skymax 150 with a TelVue 2x Barlow lens. Camera: Canon 550D with a Baader Fringe Killer filter. Images taken on 640x480 movie crop mode at 60fps. ISO 200 exposure 1/100. Processing: Movies were centred and quality filtered using Pipp and then stacked with Registax. The Giff image was created using GIMP.
    • By spaceman_spiff
      Stacked image of Venus taken on 16/04/2020. Image generated from 2000 640x480 frames taken at 60fps. Telescope: Skymax 150 Maksutov Telescope with a TeleView 2x barlow giving a focal length of about 3600mm Camera: Canon 550D in 640x480 center crop mode. ISO 800 and 1/800s exposure. Video converted and processed using Pipp and then Registax.
    • By Socram
      Hi everyone,
      This is my first post in SGL and I must say I'm really excited about joining this wonderful community and I must thank you all for all the help and advice provided here.
      I recently bought a Skywatcher Heritage 130 as my first scope. I have a couple of (weird) questions and I would really appreciate if you could answer them:
      First of all, is there a correct way of handling this telescope (rotating and tilting) while looking at the sky? I'm asking this because sometimes I find myself grabbing it from the back of the tube where the screws are to tilt it, and I'm afraid this can move the adjusting screws and make me collimate the mirrors more frequently. Also is it OK to rotate it by grabbing the extension frame or can this also misalign the secondary mirror? Sorry for this questions but since the design of this scope is so "open" it got me thinking; The scope came with the locking screws really loose. When I say loose I mean that whenever I touch them accidentally they move a lot and when I move the scope from one place to another I can feel them shaking. Is this OK? I've been observing Venus quite a lot, but I find it really difficult to clearly see it's phases and disc without fuzziness. I'm observing from my balcony with clear skies but I live in a very light polluted area. Also I've been mainly observing it between 28º and 20º altitude (used Stellarium to get these values), except for one time when I tried to observe it before being completely dark and I was able to see it at ~38º altitude. This was actually the time where I could see the disc with more detail and very little fuzziness. Under these conditions is this normal or am I doing something wrong? During my observation sessions, I can occasionally see some objects moving fast on my field of view but I can follow them when using my 25mm eyepiece. They are like faint stars (some brighter than others) moving in a straight line trajectory. What could they be? Satellites? Is there any good source of satellite information so I can confirm these sightings when I have them? I will leave here my first photos of the moon taken a couple of weeks ago with the telescope using the 25mm and 10mm pieces that came with it, a lunar filter and my Nokia 7 plus (handheld). I know they suck but it was an achievement for me that made me really happy


      Sorry for the long boring questions.
      Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.