Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

MarsG76

Members
  • Content Count

    6,360
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

MarsG76 last won the day on December 11 2019

MarsG76 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,628 Excellent

7 Followers

About MarsG76

  • Rank
    Main Sequence

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Astronomy... Observing and Imaging.
    Gym, Down to Earth Video and Photography.
    Tinkering with, modding and engineering electronic devices.
  • Location
    Sydney, Australia
  1. Both are great for viewing nebulae, but personally (if I'd only be getting one filter) than I'd be getting the UHC filter. I own the 2" Astronomic and a 1.25" Lumicon UHC as well as both the 1.25" & 2" Celestron OIII filters and the UHC filters are used much more than the OIII, simply because I get much nicer views of nebulae through it than when comparing the view through the OIII filter.
  2. Yup.. amazing how much difference a dark sky makes to imaging and observing DSO.
  3. Very nice, the collection is almost complete.
  4. That would be the Celestron C8 OTA... essentially it's the same scope except that it's black as opposed to orange.... I didn't find the 8SE mount that wobbly, it's quite good for a single arm mount and a 8" SCT... I used worse... but it's noticeably not as stable as my CGEM...
  5. The 8SE comes with a Alt-Az GOTO mount.... and a decent quality eyepiece...
  6. Of course... I know that its more expensive but I find that it's worth it and it is a one of expense for... well possibly ever.... perhaps a 2nd hand one would be much cheaper.
  7. From my experience, I had a 60mm Tasco as a kid/teenager before getting a "serious" telescope in my adulthood... I had the same type of scope now for 11 years and have never regretted getting it... the scope I recommend for observing is the celestron 8SE, perfect scope for observing. This scope has a big 8" mirror and has given me some great views of DSO, the moon and planets and it all comes in a very compact package. The GOTO is very accurate and as a bonus it is easily later upgradable for some imaging with the change of the mount as I have done.
  8. Superb image, love the detail.... well done.
  9. Way to go NASA... you've joined the separate and create more hate in the world mob...
  10. They will look sharp because your eye is not picking up the drift like your camera... if you cant see polaris that you need to drift align after the rough polar alignment, to have a chance of getting your scope ready for longer sub exposures.
  11. In that case your trailing problem is definitely due to poor polar alignment... you need to have a very accurate polar alignment to get drift free long exposures, (not to mention guiding, especially at high focal lengths and depending on exactly how long you want to expose your subs)... just using a compass will not even be close to what you need, and with your stars trailing at 4 seconds, tell me that your polar alignment is way off... this is what you need to get right first to progress in your astro imaging.
  12. What about your polar alignment accuracy?
  13. You need to give us more information about your setup.. how are you guiding?? ... although first thing I would do in your situation is check and triple check your polar alignment... and get it as close to perfect as possible..
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.