Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

assasincz

Baader Hyperion Zoom Mk.III

Recommended Posts

OK, as soon as I posted this I plucked up the courage and twisted something and the whole top bit came off, I can see where it would go now, gaaah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not obvious! Neither is swapping between the 2" and 1.25" nosepieces ;)

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome review. Certainly got me thinking........ And saving!

Sent from my SGP321 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a great bit of kit, even more so when coupled with the zoom barlow. My only slight gripe is that for someone like myself who's just starting out some sort of instructions, or guide to what the numerous extra bits in the box are, would certainly have helped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The combined zoom and barlow deal, if you can still find it, is well worth it.

The barlow just threads into other eyepieces as well, so is very versatile. It's of very good optical quality...I am not a big fan of barlows normally but this one does what it's supposed to without degrading the image.

The only other consideration is your focal length of the scope: for short fl scopes the barlow is perfect, as it will give you access to much higher powers than without or with better eye relief than for instance a 4mm plossl or ortho. 

If you scope has a long fl however, like an SCT, Mak or long refractor, you might just not need the barlow to get the high mags you need...for example in my F15 refractor an 8.5mm ep gives x225 which is a high power, and barlowing it to double that would rarely if ever be useable..

HTH

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this great review assasincz.

I bought mine some eight months ago and am very happy with it.

One additional drawback I find though, is that when assembled to my GSO RC8, focus

needs a tube extension which contributes mechanical instabilities to the OTA and

may cause some pretty high sensitivity to winds (in open field).

Other than this, it it a lovely component.

Romi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After a lot of agonizing over how to upgrade my stock eyepieces for Skymax 127 I opted for Hyperion Zoom. Clouds are bound to clear in the next day or two. Looks nice and hefty.

Bought it with Teleskop Austria, their price is really alright, 215 euros...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And some first impressions...am not sure that the declared FOV is the real one...or I might give up on twisting up the eyecup up...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I remember seeing a thread on cloudy nights about FOV being less than advertised, and it is correct. Compared it with stock EPs and it is apparent that 24mm starts at around 40 deg, and not at 50 deg as promoted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And some first impressions...am not sure that the declared FOV is the real one...or I might give up on twisting up the eyecup up...

As you have seen, the Hyperion Zoom has an AFoV at the 24mm end of around 42 degrees but you do get nearly 70 degrees at 8mm. Personally I treated it as a 20mm - 8mm zoom when I had one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have seen, the Hyperion Zoom has an AFoV at the 24mm end of around 42 degrees but you do get nearly 70 degrees at 8mm. Personally I treated it as a 20mm - 8mm zoom when I had one.

Spot on. Checked with my other EPs and that is it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are going to make my wife cry, every night when we have had rain I have a read here and spend more money. Being a novice at having a big Newtonian 200pds after keeping myself in check with a small cheap refractor in a month I have bought a new scope, mount and eyepeices. I am now looking at this as an option as the guy I bought my mount off praised this optic no end and his collection of scopes and astrographs made me seek out better eps etc.

Tonight as the sky deposits more rain this thread is reinforcing my want of decent eps and a zoom would be lovely as it will save faffing around in the dark churchyard which has become our astrodome. When the local constabulary don't annoy us asking why we're there, and I respond astronomy homework sir, as my 14yr old son is viewing for his course work project.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a temporary measure until we can stump up the dosh for one of theses I have bought a cheap 1.25 zoom as we have so much in our wish list that unless I can find a reasonably cheap second hand oneit will have to wait a few months. However having played with one on a night with others looking at the lovely dark skies this weekend its still on my list of really desperate wants. Why oh why do I live in Sussex where the bonfire season is 3months long tonights been ruined by the light of yet another bonfire societies festivities yesterday I had to go 20miles in search of a clean sky.

Geoff

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally had a proper night to put the zoom to work. Here are some thoughts.

First, it is great for star alignment on the GoTo, as it allows zeroing and then defocusing for the maximum precision. This is true even though by using it i sacrifice about 10 deg off my plossl and about 16 deg off my ES 24mm piece.

Very convenient for watching Moon and planets and trying to figure out the proper magnification as the seeing deteriorates or improves during the course of the night.

Unlike ES 24mm, it is a bit clunky getting it past my Lacerta diaelectric diagonal, i always have to give it some extra push.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks promising.. what i like about the zoom approach is that it is easier to frame a pic doing AP. And as i only have two good eyepiecese so far ( doing mosty AP so far), i guess i'll bite the bullet and spend the cash...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... did it. I will post a few comparison pictures when they arrive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone ... I find this Review awesome assasincz  .

I just bought a SkyWatcher 127mm Maksutov Telescope  and I'm aiming to purchase the  Baader Hyperion Zoom Mark III, 8-24mm eyepiece .

I would like to know if its worth buying the Baader Hyperion Zoom Mark III, 8-24mm eyepiece or individual Baader Hyperion Eyepieces ?

Is the End result in IMAGE QUALITY the same in between the Baader Hyperion Zoom Mark III, 8-24mm eyepiece and individual Baader Hyperion Eyepieces ?

Does the Baader Hyperion Zoom Mark III, 8-24mm eyepiece works great with Maksutov Cassegrain Telescopes ?

Please , I would really appreciate to have your opinions and share your experiences from those who are using or used it on a Maksutov Cassegrain Telescope .

Thank You .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By AstroRuz
      As new condition ultra narrowband 1.25" Baader filter. 3.5nm bandpass for nice small stars.
      Bought and loved it, but using a DSLR again and have no use for this filter.
      £140, can post.







    • By chaxastro
      IAS 2019 Review - Friday 15 November
       
      My second show (first was last year), as before got there on Friday 15th, soon after 0900hrs.
       
      Despite the weather, seemed to be fairly busy in the main hall. Had a few good discussions with different vendors, 365 Astronomy in particular. Even the guy on the Vixen stand near the entrance, remembered me from last year!
       
      RVO had a whole hall to themselves, not really sure why? They did seem a bit 'lost' in there. All that space and not much kit...
       
      Again, there to 'window shop' only, but still managed to spend £90! Got a good price on a WO 1.25" Dura-Bright Dielectric diagonal.
      (Thanks Widescreen) Best online price I'd found, prior to the show, was about £100 inc. postage/delivery, so saved a tenner!
       
      Restaurant was a big improvement over last year. Coffee was OK, lunch was pretty good too. Choice of Fish 'n' Chips or Cottage Pie.
      All gone by 1345hrs...
       
      All in all a good day. Looking ahead to 2020, might make three in a row!
       
      Chaxastro
       
      "Humour is reason gone mad" Groucho Marx







    • By Viktorious
      Time for yet another cry for help when it comes to choosing diagonal. I have read the many similar threads and gathered some knowledge (too many to start linking). I have come some way in my process and now that it is coming to final decisions I would like to hear from the experts. Not many of threads I have read end with the OP returning to deliver some review/verdict of his/her final decision. While I wait for response on some thread where I asked about the result, the eagerness in me forces me to write my own thread. Perhaps some of the people asking these questions before can now answer in my thread as experts!

      I have the Nexstar Evolution 9.25 and am currently using the stock diagonal. My eyepieces are the Baader 8-24 mm zoom and the stock 40 mm Plössl. I would also like to upgrade EPs and there I'm looking at something better in 24 mm range, as well some nice low power for more FOV. I'm following threads about EPs and SCTs with great interest for this (on CN). Can say that I'm currently leaning towards the 1.25" 24 mm ES 68° and 2" 36 mm Hyperion aspheric (if going 2" route).

      I'm thinking 2 alternatives (including a budget alternative for one of them). I'm looking at Baader mainly for ClickLock (and expect good optics):
      Baader T2 Zeiss prism with a 1.25" ClickLock EP (T2 part #08) -OR- the 2" prism with 2" ClickLock (splurging that is). The budget alternative would be to get the non-Zeiss T2 prism instead for the 1.25". Worth noting that I would like to get the Celestron f/6.3 Reducer/Corrector. This would be for future purposes of delving into EAA but of course I would use it visually as well (especially if choosing the T2 route). The reasoning for my alternatives:
      Go for the 2" Zeiss prism to theoretically get the best of the best in visual terms. I would make better use of the 46 mm baffle tube opening. Theoretically possible to combine with the R/C thanks to relative short light path (although not necessarily needed with 2" EPs). Downside of going to 2" accessories would be the cost, EPs, filters etc., on top of diagonal. Would not be able to spend all these costs at once. Cheaper route with T2 prism (especially the non-Zeiss), not only diagonal but also the other accessories. Cost of the R/C would be comparable to e.g. the 36 mm aspheric and give similar power and FOV with the 24 mm ES, i.e. the 24 mm would act as both. Extra plus is the ClickLock clamp for 1.25" with built in fine focusing not involving the mirror. Downside of knowing that not all light coming out of baffle tube is used. To get the wide FOV (24 mm + R/C) I'm adding glass to the optical train (theoretically not a good thing). I'm leaning towards the T2 as it would be a cheaper diagonal and for EPs I would only need the 24 mm and then the reducer instead of a 30-40 mm, so saving the expense of one EP. Then I would already have the reducer for continuing into EAA. The questions I hope the experts here can help with:
      The old reducer vs 2" diagonal question. With R/C and the 24 mm I can get roughly the same mag and FOV as e.g. the 36 mm Hyperion (technically 38 mm vs 36 mm and 68° vs 72°). Also reading good things about the ES 68° and with R/C the EP should behave the same. Am I missing something here? The logics say that the I would lose some contrast with the R/C (not using full opening + adding elements), correct? Possibly flatter fields though (not important now, hopefully the EP threads might tell soon enough). The Zeiss vs non-Zeiss T2? Big differences? I have read a few posts on this so most to get some updated views here (have read that Baader has changed some things over the years). Using the R/C (f/6.3) with these prisms. I know f/7 is mentioned as "the limit" but also remember BillP's test where he was happy down to f/6 with the prisms (in 2014 at least). Perhaps most important: have I missed some other obvious alternative here? Maybe I have forgotten some question here but perhaps for the best as I assume those who have gotten this far are tired of reading now. Thanks for getting here though!

      Thanks,
      Viktor
    • By tooth_dr
      I scrapped all the Oiii and Sii data I previously took during a full moon (about 15 hours worth) and retook it all when the moon was a bit smaller at 76%.  Ha was taken during 98% and 67% moon.  All the lights were taken on the following nights: 12th, 19th and 20th September 2019.
      Integration times, all in 600s subs unbinned:
      Ha = 28.33 hours
      Oiii= = 5.67 hours
      Sii = 5.67 hours
       
      The Ha data is really nice, and unsurprisingly the Oiii and Sii is not as strong (or nice).
      I'm missing that (vital) step in my processing routine of getting the Sii and Oiii properly stretched to match the Ha, before combining.  I dont really know how to deal with the weaker data properly.  Any pointers would be appreciated.
      What I do currently:
      All the data is loaded into APP into separate channels/sessions.
      The data is stacked and registered against the best Ha sub
      This produces individual stacks of Ha, Sii and Oiii that are all registered
      Each channel is processed with DPP in APP and then saved as a 16bit TIFF
      Each is opened in PS
      Stars removed with AA and any remnants removed and tidied up
      I then open a blank RGB document in PS
      I paste Ha into Green, Sii into Red and Oiii into Blue
      Adjust the selective colour settings to get 'Hubble palette'
      Adjust levels, curves, saturation until looks ok
      All the Ha Sii Oiii data is then combined together in a single 'super' stack in APP using quality weighted algorithm to create a 'luminance'
      That luminance layer is adjusted using levels, curves, and NC tools such as local contrast enhancement and deep space noise reduction (using masks to apply as required)
      The luminance is pasted onto the above colour layer, and incrementally added using gaussian blur
      Cropped and saved.
       
       
      Here it is anyway   I haven't intended on any more exposure time for this one, but will consider it, if the expert opinion dictates otherwise!
       
      CS
      Adam
       


    • By Ewan
      Not many chances of Solar Imaging this year so far but caught this one.
      AR2741 from the 12th late afternoon
      AZEQ6-GT
      152mm Technosky Refractor @ f5.9
      135mm Baader D-ERF
      Daystar Quark Chromosphere + Eliminator
      PG IMX174
      5862 Frames, 4Ms 30 second capture @ 195Fps 1024 x 768 Mono16
      Best 45% Frames stacked in AS!3, ImPPG then tweaked in PS
      Atb


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.