-
Posts
188 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
224 ExcellentProfile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Hertfordshire
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
-
Brian May would be pleased to see all that dust! Really excellent reprocessing. I must look into getting PI and these plug ins at some point!
-
That’s a great image. I had to zoom in as it didn’t look real. Very Eskimo looking! 👍🏻
-
Hi Alan. That's some light reading I will be doing. I love to be educated and gain (excuse the pun) knowledge especially in this hobby that I enjoy maybe too much! So thanks again for your time. I will have a look at the exposure times next time it's clear, whenever that will be. I do have a Pro Licence for SharpCap that I mainly use for PA. I recently did a Sensor Analysis which, to be honest put me on this road in the first place. But come out the other side with more understanding, so was definitely worth it! 👍 Indeed, I will check out the Smart Histogram function now I have done the SA. I live in Bortle 5/6 which is why I have never ventured further than 3 min subs for the very reason you gave. The camera side I get instinctively. Re the RedCat. Sounds like you had an awful time with it but pleased the distributor was good enough to help you! Yes agreed, I actually deleted it from this post and started it on a new one as there seemed to be an issue reinserting it as I decided to reprocessed it again.. Many thanks for your comment. 😇
-
Hi All, Finally got to reprocess the Soul Nebula over the weekend. I think I have tamed the noise levels in the high gain setting I used...
-
Alan. Thank you so very much for your time and patience. I think it has now gelled. It seems an absolute mine field, but an enjoyable learning curve especially with good people like yourself shedding light on things clearly and thoughtfully. I thought I had an understanding of sensors and how they worked but never realised how different manufacturers use different scales to describe the same thing. Almost like using imperial and metric units I guess! Either way thanks again 👍. Being an ex-pro photographer with an understanding I assume as the gain levels have risen, I take it that the exposures would need to decrease or should I continue with 3 mins subs for example? On a side note from looking at your impressive equipment list, I noticed you have WO RedCat-51. I was considering it as a possible next purchase as the Evoguide 50 I repurposed has got me into wide field captures.
-
So the auto switch over from LCG TO HCG on the Zwo is at 100 where it’s done manually on the Altair. So I thought I was right in using a gain value of 300 and switching it into HGC mode. As it’s a rough equivalent value? Better to use 100 in HCG which brings it up to 300 in brightness/sensitivity at a lower read noise level? Sorry about this.
-
Thanks again for your time Alan. Crazy. I don’t understand why the scale values are different from various manufacturers and aren’t just standardized across the board! Oh well. I use APT for image capture rather than Altair’s own software. I loaded that software up for the first time and indeed it starts at 100 (ZWO 0). Also checked APT and confirms that too, it reverts to 100 if I enter a value <100. So I’ve been using the camera at its base line. Or in ZWO terms Gain 0 in LCH mode all this time.
-
Hi Alan. Okay thanks for that. I think I have worked it out in my head now 🙄. Looking at the graphs and of my Sensor Analysis from SharpCap, it’s seems best to have it set at 100 using HCG mode. I will give it a try next time out and hopefully I get a better result?! Let’s face it, either way it will not be as noisy as the shot from last night!
-
Hi Alan. Thank you very much for your info and help. Really do appreciate it. Ah. That explains why I have a noisy image. So I was using a Gain value of 900! Blast. APT has a manual switch over for the conversion modes. So would I be right in saying that LCG at 300 is equivalent to 100 HCG. If so then the later should give better read noise results but a loss in Dynamic range and well depth? I found the graphs for the 26c and have attached them. thanks again
-
Hi All. Took this last night and quickly processed it in Siril and PhotoLab. Trying to work out different settings for the camera. Using HCG mode, higher gain and offset values in APT. 54 x 3 min subs, gain 300, offset 200. Switched over from LCG to HCG. Although brighter and higher SNR, I think it looks noisier than when I was shooting at gain 100 with an offset of 50 in LCH mode. I assumed it would be less noisier, maybe shorter exposures and more subs? Appreciate any advice. Can I still use LCG at 300 as the switch over is done manually? Also, It didn’t help that my EAF was slightly out of focus, something I need to have a look at. I will be looking at processing it in the Hubble Pallet this weekend for fun.
- 11 replies
-
- 10
-
HI all. I hope someone can help me out? I have an Altair 26c that I have been using for a while now and been very happy with it as per previous images/posts I have shared. However, I think I could be doing better with regards to its settings in APT and Read Noise levels. Currently, I have been using it by and large at Gain 120, Offset 50 with about 3 Min exposures in Ultra Low noise mode and in LCG mode. I have now got a SharpCap Pro licence and ran the Sensor Analysis routine and came up this info (see attached). It would seem running the Gain level at 300 would be most beneficial. As I understand at Gain 300 is the switch over from LCG to HCG? So should I be running APT in HCG or just keep it in LCG at Gain 300? If I do change it to HCG at 300 does that correspond to '300' in both apps as I have seen that these values can change EG 300 in one app means 150 in another?? Confused! Also the Offsets in SharpCap started off with 794 should I keep to that? Hope this makes sense and appreciate any help.
-
Hi Happy-Kat. And if The Lazy Astronomer sees this post. Just wanted to thank you for your help in December re EvoFF. I’m very pleased with the results it produced! 👍🏻
-
Thanks. Yup, I had the SW FF that came as a deal kit when I bought the scope but never used it so sold it in favour of the EvoFF. Primarily because I couldn’t add filters due to the tight back focus requirements. I was surprised at the amount of vignetting the EvoFF produced on my APS size sensor but the calibration frames and background extraction made light work of it! The EvoFF has a T2 thread which makes adding extension tubes etc very easy. Shame the Evoguide doesn’t have a compression ring just three screw to hold everything in place! Re the clamshell. - lovely piece of kit and Starizona were great. Shipped from the US to the UK in 3days! I didn’t want to use the standard mount that came with it as I wanted it to a true to the mount as possible without it being off centre. Maybe my OCD takes over sometimes!! 😂
-
Hi all. Another project of mine that’s been simmering in the background since I modified the SkyMax150 for DSO AP. Repurposing my rather excellent guidescope! I decided to pull the trigger a Starizona Evo clamshell and an EvoFF v2 for my EvoGuide50. Looked at the forecast, clear for the second night running!!!! Whoa! After some time setting the whole thing up from scratch I got it all working! Then the blasted clouds rolled in!!! So I only managed to get 21 x3mins subs in. I’m quite happy to say the results weren’t half bad for a first attempt at my wide field setup! Yes. The dodgy DIY dew shields actually worked. 😂