Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Show us your Cat


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, garryblueboy said:

My last one it was a beast 

040544F6-BD65-4674-970C-080F671FC4B5.jpeg

83631FF3-56AE-43EB-B27C-C8F9636A7865.jpeg

247B5491-C999-4F94-B45C-CD0BFD487720.jpeg

 

My first cat was this beast, as well, circa 2000. I don't have any scanned photos of it, currently. Ran it on a G-11, and kept it through the 2003 Mars opposition, but I'm not an imager and without an observatory it became just too much to deal with. Sold it to a guy up in Anchorage, Alaska.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After selling my C-14 I downsized to the C-Nine-Two-Five in April 2004 (a little dusty just now).

1745180509_IMGP5490-Copy.thumb.JPG.0b04bfa56c679c26cb1f57bf4a24aa83.JPG

 

I use it primarily for planetary observing, so it doesn't get out as much as some other scopes I have.1682138222_IMGP5488-Copy.thumb.JPG.21004b4e6d1b1464ffc7c73f5aa6151c.JPG

 

Denkmeier binoviewer along with their SCT locking diagonal attachment completes it.925992935_IMGP5486-Copy.thumb.JPG.be1dea7bdbf2caca82f68bdf09a2237f.JPG

 

Close-up of the interface:974784085_IMGP5480-Copy.thumb.JPG.15ae1869a79489b439adf3fa3dd20953.JPG

 

I really like this size instrument, it seems the sweet-spot for SCTs.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Paul M said:

@Nakedgun I understand these scopes weigh an awful lot. But that doesn't look like a lot of counterweight!  Was the scope just posing in minimalist mode? 

 

83631FF3-56AE-43EB-B27C-C8F9636A7865.jpeg

 

 

Paul M, 

That is garryblueboy's rig.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sloz1664 said:

Can I throw this in the mix. TAL 200K Klevtsov f8.5.

20170611_124318.thumb.jpg.c59636eb56f53d61cd2e68884a20eac0.jpg

 

Steve

 

 

Looks to be a robust mount you have, there. First I've seen one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks Philip ,im sorry i had humor lapse 😉, i get them more and more as the world gos mad 😀. some nice scopes in this post i hope to own one one day. yes stay safe everyone, ive been in lockdown 3 weeks today and im still not bored. clear skys. charl.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Nakedgun said:

 

Looks to be a robust mount you have, there. First I've seen one.

Yes it's the Avalon Linear Reverse Mount, fully belt driven and no play in both axis whatsoever. The mount has never lost a sub. But I've lost countless..... :)

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my first real scope, Meade ETX-125. I really enjoyed this little scope, but ended up selling it about a year ago. It just wasn't getting as much use since I added a couple other scopes to my arsenal.

 

etx125.jpg.7f8a61e7c00ad30bce6bc6a36ba1eeba.jpg

 

etx1.thumb.jpg.04da5946b38c15a8ed4a1667a05cdb63.jpg

etx2.thumb.jpg.6a1b4ade758462cf3d9dbc5fe738a801.jpg

Edited by rkelley8493
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I dug through some old photos and found this 20-year-old snap of my C-14, along with my wife, who accompanied me on an observing trip to the Kofa Wildlife Refuge in western Arizona. Sold this beast sometime after the 2003 Mars apparition.

373174169_Scan0003(1).jpg.78c5af02362b57c9b46ed04e241d3d34.jpg

 

Bought my C-9.25 soon after, and had a C-5 also, which I held onto till around 2007, I think, and then sold to a colleague whom I introduced to astronomy . Never took any pictures of the C-5.

I always wondered whether a C-11 would give enough boost over the 9.25 to make it worth having so I bought one to compare. It did not make me want to unload the 9.25 and was heavy enough to push it into the "for sale" category. I did not own it long, and this was another scope I never took any photo of. Sold it to a guy in Australia. So, the 9.25 was my only SCT until I thought I should have a smaller, more agile unit of the same type for use on a smaller mount and began to look at the C-8. They went on discount in April '13 and that was all the encouragement I needed.

 

1317174194_IMGP5472-Copy.thumb.JPG.3a6300849ba09da3369a95b71723b488.JPG

 

This unit was made in China (I think my first SCT to come from there, can't remember where the C-11 was made), and I have no complaints about the views produced by it.

1706322735_IMGP5478-Copy.thumb.JPG.b7370774a510f2b84f0421d73fd1b742.JPG

 

Added an 8x40 finder as the 6x30 factory finder was not adequate for my visual needs, along with a Rigel.

437350990_IMGP5474-Copy.thumb.JPG.67f12a51534d5210f269b6ec2a471c1a.JPG

 

Pretty sure I won't be buying any more SCTs, but I sort of wish I'd kept the whole Celestron lineup - that's the collector in me talking, now.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Clear

32 minutes ago, ScouseSpaceCadet said:

The pocket rocket Skymax 102 had it's first proper run out tonight. Happily splitting the Double Double pairs at 325x with a cheap Ebay special 4mm 'TMB II' eyepiece and still sharp. 

427471145_IMG_20200424_1801225613.thumb.jpg.037ccea2f674d0213880e79a4dafb6fb.jpg

IMG_20200425_015633979.thumb.jpg.83f3467d9eb8b8a45ea2137411cc67c7.jpg

Clear skies? Was clear here, this week, now the weekend is a humbug.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Nakedgun said:

Clear

Clear skies? Was clear here, this week, now the weekend is a humbug.

Yes last night was clear, but as usual hampered by city light pollution lighting up the sky, and the phone camera night vision mode highlights on the conservatory and fencing, the effect of a council LED lamp 20 metres behind behind me. 🙄

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two cats. In the background you can see th Trusty old Celestron C8 on Vixen Great Polaris mount. I usually have a 14x70 finder scope attached to it as well. It is my main visual and planetary imaging scope. I have had it for nearly 25 years, so it must be doing something right. In foreground you can see my Meade SN6 6"F/5 Schmidt-Newton on a Vixen GP-DX mount. It has become my main comet sweeper and DSO imaging scope. Got this OTA for just €165 second-hand in January 2020. IMG_20200331_195838.thumb.jpg.4c7eb48c6542f098aaea1d60ca1241d3.jpg

Just some imaging results: Jupiter with the C8

post-5655-0-72307500-1423604369.jpgJupiter_231427_lapl4_ap35.png.0540ba8c4f845a8e646856dd15e6ff19.png

DSOs with the SN6

Leo Triplet

M65M66-5h4.thumb.jpg.ad1df576bfbae141454e5d8d3b1a7c0d.jpg

M101

M101-14560.0s-c.thumb.jpg.e96e75c8c6e01a64ed207ca18804c4d6.jpg

M13

M13-5910_0s.thumb.jpg.20f5ae24099e0d01cfb03871e1660843.jpg

I think I will hang on to these scopes for a while. 

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the schmidt-newtonian counts as a cat then does the mak-newtonian ?. I used to have this Intes MK61 150mm F/6 mak-newt but Orion (USA) branded. Superb planetary and lunar scope with a tiny central obstruction:

orionmn61.jpg.f6e9bf710b65df370c3693dea4f57f9b.jpg

I've also owned a range of other CAT's in the past, eg: Nexstar 5, Nexstar 8SE, Celestron C5 (pictured below), Skymax 127 and 180 at some point. One of the nicest was this older Celestron C8 Plus which is also pictured below. No CATS in my scope fleet currently though :dontknow:

c5az3.jpg.93ca5cf90ffba49622c60b4cdd504ffd.jpg

 

https://cdn2.skiesunlimited.com/images/D/IMG_1088_hi.jpg

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.