Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, JeremyS said:

No AZ 75 for you then Dave

🤣

Actually, I did see both the AZ100 and 75 at the recent show in Kettering, and the Rowan guys seem very approachable.. @Saganite (aka Steve) was chatting to them about his AZ100. The build on both mounts looks superb..and made in the UK too!👍👍

I didn't mention the AZ75 on stand, as I wouldn't be likely to buy one anyway (I'm very happy with my Vixen SP in Altaz mode and my Tak mount for EQ mode)..

Much as I like long slow motion cables, they don't of course have to be long - or cables..they can be simple rotary knurled knobs closely affixed to the mount body, and can work very effectively so long as the scope in use isn't too long a tube..so not suitable for many of the scopes in this thread, then!

Dave

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 30/03/2022 at 19:46, Franklin said:

Great looking scope and the mount is made for carrying such a beast. You've got to get a set of rings with double bolts at the base, I wouldn't be able to sleep at night with the scope not in line with the bar.

 

On 30/03/2022 at 19:29, mikeDnight said:

Here's my contribution to the long refractor thread. It's a 6" F10 achromatic objective, allegedly by Edmund Scientific, though I only have the seller's claim to that. All i can really say about it is that it has remarkable colour correction for a 6" F10 achro. The lens has a small scratch on the rear lens, which was facing forward when I bought it, and although it was said to be coated, I can detect no coatings on the objective. The lens may have some age to it, but I'm only guessing at this point. Hopefully the person who built the tube assembly will see this and shed some light on the mystery of this loveley objective.  The tube assembly itself is a heavy affair, and to carry it well I needed to acquire a substantial mount. The mount, which has zero vibration and glides at the touch of a finger, is a vintage equatorial by H. N. Irving and as solid as a rock - quite literally! My head can attest to that fact!!

It's all still a work in progress, but here are some pic's.

IMG_20220327_135827.thumb.jpg.0b27999d1deb3a700592bee11b1c3b52.jpgIMG_20220327_140031.thumb.jpg.3d1bbc1eac16345dc77e64b4ce9cc257.jpgIMG_20220326_110529.thumb.jpg.541b25358418ae7c9ae0660c2fcf23ff.jpgIMG_20220321_131426.thumb.jpg.611aa18297c42a609d3072d400a59b74.jpg

 

Just as I'd posted the above, I received an e-mail from the gentleman who bought the lens and built the tube assembly. The lens is old stock from Edmund Scientific and was bought from the USA, but rather than rewrite what was in the e-mail, I've included the relevant snippet below. I have to say I'm ever pleased!! :biggrin:

1917379900_2022-03-3020_33_44.png.d1bd93f3ad2413cb2853436e3ee65cd4.png

I paid a visit to Mike yesterday and had the pleasure of seeing this scope.  Here's a link to  a post I put on another forum.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
4 minutes ago, catburglar said:

I’m not sure that belongs in a “Long refractor” thread- it’s only F/9 after all…that should be in a “Big refractor “ thread- it certainly is a beast

In this day and age of f5,6,7 etc imaging apos the f9 is a oddity that’s for sure , it is a great imaging platform with reducers etc.. but it is primarily a visual instrument for the solar system  my main  interest 👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikeDnight said:

That's gorgeous Stuy. I'd be pretty content with that in my observatory. No carry handle? :laugh2:

No handles as i ain’t taking it off again !!!!😂

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi everyone, 

I began my adventure with longer scopes (and my first refractors) totally accidentally thanks to @Franklin, who sold me his Vixen A80M Japan (F/11.4) in June this year. It is wonderful achromatic refractor allowing me to see even 4 biggest craterlets of the Plato with negligible CA, while the seeing was average. Less than three months later I bought a new Starwave Ascent 102ED F/11, which is just enough for me at this moment. They are only two, but the two make a collection now. :)

I'm preparing to test of general performance and comparison of both thanks to doubled every eyepiece, as I use binoviewer. This is how I'll do the live comparison:

IMG_20220923_192656__01.thumb.jpg.a9af8822b2eae5bf403b2ed4562a5c32.jpg

The 102ED doesn't have extended dew shield, so it looks similar to the Vixen, but it's much longer.

I'll add pictures of single slopes soon. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Vroobel said:

Hi everyone, 

I began my adventure with longer scopes (and my first refractors) totally accidentally thanks to @Franklin, who sold me his Vixen A80M Japan (F/11.4) in June this year. It is wonderful achromatic refractor allowing me to see even 4 biggest craterlets of the Plato with negligible CA, while the seeing was average. Less than three months later I bought a new Starwave Ascent 102ED F/11, which is just enough for me at this moment. They are only two, but the two make a collection now. :)

I'm preparing to test of general performance and comparison of both thanks to doubled every eyepiece, as I use binoviewer. This is how I'll do the live comparison:

IMG_20220923_192656__01.thumb.jpg.a9af8822b2eae5bf403b2ed4562a5c32.jpg

The 102ED doesn't have extended dew shield, so it looks similar to the Vixen, but it's much longer.

I'll add pictures of single slopes soon. 

Not looked through a Vixen A80M, but the views in my AA 102ED are excellent, so you should get great doubles observations and lunar and planetary views too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I already checked what I can see through the 102ED, a BV with x2 OCS and 9mm Abbe Orthos (249x) on Jupiter surface. It was of course more than through the Vixen using the same configuration (202x). Seeing wasn't good then, so I couldn't use Fujiyama Ortho 7mm (321x) for Jupiter, but I did it for the Moon. It was unbelievably sharp view, lot of black darkness and detailed surface, with the same average seeing. And everything with no CA at all! Unfortunately I was sick, so didn't look at the Moon too long. :(

Edited by Vroobel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.