refractor2345
Members-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
18 GoodProfile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
283 profile views
-
Best small refractor!
refractor2345 replied to refractor2345's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Also, I said: Which means (With now corrected first post!) anything up to 6 inch. -
Best small refractor!
refractor2345 replied to refractor2345's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Ok, sorry for the contradictory sentences, but what I meant was portable, (It is corrected!) but for a 21 inch refractor user (They exist, I am not one) A 6 inch is portable, and for me it definitely is, (Cause I own a 12 inch dob, solid tube, and the zerochromat are really light weight I hear!) Uh, yeah I am not perfect in English, but I commented with other stuff on my brain, so missed I commented 60-80mm refractor so, sorry I have a 70mm achromat, 66mm apochromat, 80mm apochromat, 150mm apochromat (f/8!), 12 and 16 inch dobsonian, 6 and 8 inch newtonian I will observe from home, still doesn't hurt to take to a star party I didn't understand this: Did you mean, what will you mount it on? And yes, I am going to buy it. Umm, I will like high power observing with gobular clusters and planetary nebulae! -
Awesome, I love Long focus for this job, you need wide exit pupil to pull out the color, and widefields don't magnify much, so get a narrow telescope, use a widefield eyepiece and boom! I just love the view through it!
-
Also, if you know, please tell me suitable eyepiece for the job!
-
Hmm, I was wondering if I cold see a planetary nebulae in color, using a let's say a 18 inch dobsonian, with filter of course, what about Abell 21, The Medusa Nebulae or The Butterfly Nebulae (NGC 6302) More tough, without filter, is it possible? What are your thoughts, and are there any examples through the eyepiece?
-
Best small refractor!
refractor2345 replied to refractor2345's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
Strict Visual, kind of portable, widefield with planetary nebulae and general deep sky, TBH I think a 6 inch to 8 inch might be the top -
Best small refractor!
refractor2345 replied to refractor2345's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
As I said I'm not considering buying now, but the budget can be anything, ANYTHING, under, 10,000 quid's, yes, you heard me right budgets 10,000 quid's FOR OTA ONLY although I might love to spend less, you know buy some other replacement stuff for my broken filters etc. -
Ok, I need some help, I might not buy it now, but will consider it. By far, what is your favorite small refractor(Any size you think is small!) up till now. I won't consider, you know, telescopes that are stopped manufactured, long waiting list ones, so don't comment those!
-
Terrible advertising and false claims, nothing new.
refractor2345 replied to bomberbaz's topic in The Astro Lounge
Yeah, I remember reading in a book "No telescope is trash, They are still better than Galileo's telescope -
Terrible advertising and false claims, nothing new.
refractor2345 replied to bomberbaz's topic in The Astro Lounge
It's just the fact most people haven't saw through a real telescope (6 inch Dobsonian) and they watch moon and they are in the review section "OMG!!!! I love this scope!! It shows moon super clearly!!!" After they actually get to know a real telescope, they will be wondering "Wait....I thought that scope was good..." -
Terrible advertising and false claims, nothing new.
refractor2345 replied to bomberbaz's topic in The Astro Lounge
Woah! Can this telescope match the power of a old celestron/vixen fluorite refractor, for 100 dollars? Jokes aside, I love this ad! -
So, not meaning that don't put satellite into earth's orbit, we don't want to say that we don't want any progress or something, it is, just like I say interfering with our already polluted night sky, Simple measures such as covering them with Black 3.0 and/or place them in higher than 700 kilometers in space can improve things a lot, there will be problems with the thermal management, but we can deal with it can't we we have surely deal with worse situations before.
-
It is really bad, it mostly interferes with astrophotography, a brilliant picture with a bunch of symmetrical trails all of satellites, I even found a petition on change.org, That's what I am linking it here Link: https://www.change.org/p/stop-spacex-starlink-from-spoiling-outer-space-for-humanity Link 2: https://www.change.org/p/spacex-starlink-stop-the-pollution-of-night-sky