Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Sky at Night, 14th Nov


DaveS

Recommended Posts

I enjoyed that. They crammed in four times the amount of interesting info in half an hour than Universe did in a whole hour.

I hadn’t realised that Herstmonceux started as recently as 1946. It didn’t have a long life did it? Do I gather it’s used by amateurs now? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, callisto said:

I thought that was somewhere in France?...just kidding 🤣

😀 Well …. Sussex is ‘near’ France.  I’m in good company anyway. Patric Moore pronounces it Herstmon So as least three times to my reckoning in this video. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Ouroboros said:

I enjoyed that. They crammed in four times the amount of interesting info in half an hour than Universe did in a whole hour.

I hadn’t realised that Herstmonceux started as recently as 1946. It didn’t have a long life did it? Do I gather it’s used by amateurs now? 

It`s a great place to visit, I`ve been to their Astronomy Festival many times with the family. The web site is here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Ian McCallum said:

I first read that as Herriot, as in the fictional vet.🤣

Strictly speaking, Herriot is a real vet's nom-de-plume :)

 

I really enjoyed this month's programme - watched last night on the iplayer not 3 hours after December's  mag landed on the mat (we have a very erratic post guy).  I was quite surprised at the quality of the images Pete showed of Jupiter and Saturn taken through that massive refractor. They didn't seem anywhere as good as some of the images we see on this forum taken with much smaller amatuer scopes.

Graeme

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jacko61 said:

Strictly speaking, Herriot is a real vet's nom-de-plume :)

 

I really enjoyed this month's programme - watched last night on the iplayer not 3 hours after December's  mag landed on the mat (we have a very erratic post guy).  I was quite surprised at the quality of the images Pete showed of Jupiter and Saturn taken through that massive refractor. They didn't seem anywhere as good as some of the images we see on this forum taken with much smaller amatuer scopes.

Graeme

Not entirely surprised as there was a lot of atmospheric dispersion and "boiling" from the low altitude plus chromatic aberration from the old objective, no ED glasses then. Lucky imaging from a video might have produced a sharper image, but this was 25 fps live video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.