Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

stargazine_ep25_banner.thumb.jpg.9e57eee22cad68fd6b67a87befeaa79b.jpg

ollypenrice

My 'Happy Christmas' dataset's here.

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, gorann said:

Realized that there was a bit more to do on my version of the image, so here it is with a somewhat darker sky, more dust and subdued red stars.

Definitely more of the faint interaction dust in in this latest version, without pushing the noise. But you have a dark ring around that small needle galaxy below ngc 5195. Maybe a result of blending layers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, wimvb said:

Definitely more of the faint interaction dust in in this latest version, without pushing the noise. But you have a dark ring around that small needle galaxy below ngc 5195. Maybe a result of blending layers?

You got really sharp eyes Wim @wimvb(or mine are rather weak). Yes, it probably happened when I blended in a HiPass layer a bit too fast. But anything broken can also be fixed with layers, so I hope it now looks ok. The dust really extends much further than this but it then becomes a compromise with how much noise is acceptable, as you indicate.

PS. I hope you did not make me distroy the first photographic evidence for dark matter.....

M51 LesGranges HaLRGB PS27.jpg

Edited by gorann

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, gorann said:

The dust really extends much further than this but it then becomes a compromise with how much noise is acceptable, as you indicate

@ollypenrice's post shows how far the dust extends. (Btw, more data in that pic)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 29/12/2018 at 14:58, wimvb said:

I always keep the dark deringing setting as low as possible, starting at 0, then increase from there. I hardly ever use the bright deringing settings, and usually keep iterations below 50 - 75. Then I use deregularization to control the background. With finetuning, I sometimes succeed without using a mask. 

Ok cool, I'll have another go as my result is nowhere near what it could be. The learning curve is infinite!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well here's another go using a mixture of Pixinsight and Photoshop. Followed Steve Richards advice in 'Dark Art or Magic Bullet' for adding the Ha and the colour saturation and layering techniques that Olly outlined earlier in the thread and this time avoided destroying all the colour with the sort of PI noise reduction the I'm used to doing on my own data! Looks a lot better to me.  Learnt a fair bit from this exercise so once again thanks Olly for the opportunity to process some excellent data.

Dave

 

M51_LesGranges_db_crop.thumb.png.c37d0f0748041aed7024c188ac40fc9a.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant data Olly.

Ive never ever tried using Mono Data before as ive only had my QHY8L for a year so not even thought about the move to mono until now.

Had a play anyway and this is what ive got. Not sure if ive done things properly or not?

Happy New Year

Clear Skies.

Stu

M51usingollydata.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stu Wilson said:

Brilliant data Olly.

Ive never ever tried using Mono Data before as ive only had my QHY8L for a year so not even thought about the move to mono until now.

Had a play anyway and this is what ive got. Not sure if ive done things properly or not?

Happy New Year

Clear Skies.

Stu

M51usingollydata.jpg

Looks good Stu. I'd just have a glance at the colour balance. Background's looking rather green to my eye.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

Looks good Stu. I'd just have a glance at the colour balance. Background's looking rather green to my eye.

Olly

I tried again. I Think this versions better.

Turns out my day wasn't wasted waiting for a delivery that's not coming, ive learned something ?

Stu

OllyData2.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit later getting to do this but here is my go. I tried a background extraction on the Ha file and layer blended it in but I did not like that so no Ha in mine. Processed entirely in StarTools and saved as PNG using IrFanView. 

1434182023_NewLRGBCompositev1.4.thumb.png.6b507664252da2774c0120340845a9f2.png

@Stu Wilson Did a quick reprocess with a slightly harder stretch which brought out more of the outer spiral. Also a softer approach to the spirals. Same as before StarTools start to finish and IrFanView for png save.

414598613_NewLRGBCompositev2.1.thumb.png.93076c2c274c5c8094ab32d5f90d62fa.png

Edited by happy-kat
added a second go at processing
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could/might redo it and give it a sightly harder initial stretch so the final background is a couple points lighter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all

So, I invested some more time in this and did a reprocess. Dropped the background a bit, sharpened things up, brightened M51, and did a soft process on star color.

- Andy -

LHaRGB brighter2.png

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of goes shared of processing Ollie's data and with differences like colour and softness, and I gather there may be no right or wrong way, but is there a process for this target considered the more right way? Was there something we were aiming at.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just picked up my belated Christmas present? having returned from a wonderful Caribbean cruise. Thank you Olly and have a wonderful New Year.

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By chriscoles
      Hi, I have taken mono LRGB images of M51 with my new ASI1600mm-PRO.
      I have a mix of 30s, 60s, 120s subs. 100 darks, and 100 flats for each filter. About 4 hours total.
      I Used DSS for alignment and stacking, then Pixinsight for LRGB combination.
      My issue is that i'm not happy with the colours, the stars all appear white and the background is strange.
      I have attached the Aligned LRGB images.
      Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks!

      Green.TIF red.TIF Lum.TIF B.TIF
    • By EyeGuy
      This is from a couple of nights ago.
      It clouded in quickly, so I didn't get much data. The temp was 2C, and I'm self-isolating - so that was also a factor! I only took 5 darks before I gave up and went to bed. I'll take more when the temp is right.
      This is 140 min integration time on a new Canon EOS Ra with 17x500s exposures, and no filter (from the city).
      Processed in PI and Photoshop - I should have used more star masks but the data aren't good enough to warrant the effort I think. I also had difficulty with flats - I tried a range of exposures with a Gerd Neumann panel, but I think they were all too short. Will go longer than 0.3s next time - very hard to figure out flat exposure on DSLRs, and APT's tool doesn't work for DSLRs yet.
      I think I'm obsessed with M51 - and I know I'll be back to it again.
      Stay safe everyone,
      Barry
       


    • By knobby
      First attempt at any DSO other than the brighter stuff like M42 or Andromeda.
      Learning to use the AZ-Gti /Sharpcap polar align / windows synscan app / APT platesolving ... And guiding ! all in one night ?
      all went well so had a quick 30 mins on M51 (first time I'd ever managed to actually frame it ... Plate solving is amazing)
      90 second subs gain 420 and 5 darks and synthetic flat for dust bunnies / gradients
      Wish I'd have gone longer now as tried a 5 minute sub once guiding was working which looked good .
      Very noisy but only 30 mins .

    • By alan4908
      I decided to try to maximize detail by collecting a large quantity of Luminescence data and then applying strong deconvolution to the areas of high signal to noise.  I also decided to try out Mure denoise, a Pixinsight routine that reduces camera noise.  The final result is an LRGB and represents just over 17 hours integration time. 
      I hadn't noticed before the rather strangely shaped fuzzies in the backgroud - have a look at the annotated version for IC4278 and the triangular shaped galaxy PC2292105. 
    • By alan4908
      Yet another attempt at the Whirlpool galaxy (M51).
      This time, I decided to try to maximize detail by collecting a large quantity of Luminescence data and then applying strong deconvolution to the areas of high signal to noise.  I also decided to try out Mure denoise, a Pixinsight routine that reduces camera noise.  The final result of this LRGB processing approach is shown below and represents just over 17 hours integration time. 
      I hadn't noticed before the rather strangely shaped fuzzies in the backgroud - have a look at the annotated version for IC4278 and the triangular shaped galaxy PC2292105. 
      Alan
      LIGHTS: L:46, R:20, G:23, B: 15 x 600s; DARKS:30, BIAS:100, FLATS:40 all at -20C. 

       

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.