Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

My 'Happy Christmas' dataset's here.


ollypenrice

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, gorann said:

Realized that there was a bit more to do on my version of the image, so here it is with a somewhat darker sky, more dust and subdued red stars.

Definitely more of the faint interaction dust in in this latest version, without pushing the noise. But you have a dark ring around that small needle galaxy below ngc 5195. Maybe a result of blending layers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, wimvb said:

Definitely more of the faint interaction dust in in this latest version, without pushing the noise. But you have a dark ring around that small needle galaxy below ngc 5195. Maybe a result of blending layers?

You got really sharp eyes Wim @wimvb(or mine are rather weak). Yes, it probably happened when I blended in a HiPass layer a bit too fast. But anything broken can also be fixed with layers, so I hope it now looks ok. The dust really extends much further than this but it then becomes a compromise with how much noise is acceptable, as you indicate.

PS. I hope you did not make me distroy the first photographic evidence for dark matter.....

M51 LesGranges HaLRGB PS27.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, gorann said:

The dust really extends much further than this but it then becomes a compromise with how much noise is acceptable, as you indicate

@ollypenrice's post shows how far the dust extends. (Btw, more data in that pic)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/12/2018 at 14:58, wimvb said:

I always keep the dark deringing setting as low as possible, starting at 0, then increase from there. I hardly ever use the bright deringing settings, and usually keep iterations below 50 - 75. Then I use deregularization to control the background. With finetuning, I sometimes succeed without using a mask. 

Ok cool, I'll have another go as my result is nowhere near what it could be. The learning curve is infinite!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well here's another go using a mixture of Pixinsight and Photoshop. Followed Steve Richards advice in 'Dark Art or Magic Bullet' for adding the Ha and the colour saturation and layering techniques that Olly outlined earlier in the thread and this time avoided destroying all the colour with the sort of PI noise reduction the I'm used to doing on my own data! Looks a lot better to me.  Learnt a fair bit from this exercise so once again thanks Olly for the opportunity to process some excellent data.

Dave

 

M51_LesGranges_db_crop.thumb.png.c37d0f0748041aed7024c188ac40fc9a.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brilliant data Olly.

Ive never ever tried using Mono Data before as ive only had my QHY8L for a year so not even thought about the move to mono until now.

Had a play anyway and this is what ive got. Not sure if ive done things properly or not?

Happy New Year

Clear Skies.

Stu

M51usingollydata.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stu Wilson said:

Brilliant data Olly.

Ive never ever tried using Mono Data before as ive only had my QHY8L for a year so not even thought about the move to mono until now.

Had a play anyway and this is what ive got. Not sure if ive done things properly or not?

Happy New Year

Clear Skies.

Stu

M51usingollydata.jpg

Looks good Stu. I'd just have a glance at the colour balance. Background's looking rather green to my eye.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

Looks good Stu. I'd just have a glance at the colour balance. Background's looking rather green to my eye.

Olly

I tried again. I Think this versions better.

Turns out my day wasn't wasted waiting for a delivery that's not coming, ive learned something ?

Stu

OllyData2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit later getting to do this but here is my go. I tried a background extraction on the Ha file and layer blended it in but I did not like that so no Ha in mine. Processed entirely in StarTools and saved as PNG using IrFanView. 

1434182023_NewLRGBCompositev1.4.thumb.png.6b507664252da2774c0120340845a9f2.png

@Stu Wilson Did a quick reprocess with a slightly harder stretch which brought out more of the outer spiral. Also a softer approach to the spirals. Same as before StarTools start to finish and IrFanView for png save.

414598613_NewLRGBCompositev2.1.thumb.png.93076c2c274c5c8094ab32d5f90d62fa.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of goes shared of processing Ollie's data and with differences like colour and softness, and I gather there may be no right or wrong way, but is there a process for this target considered the more right way? Was there something we were aiming at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.