Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Alien 13

Members
  • Posts

    6,593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Alien 13

  1. I used to set up and image from my garden with my dog and cat in attendance and felt perfectly safe... Alan
  2. The only way I know of changing this sort of thing is by changing the screen resolution... Alan
  3. As a rough guide the Canon 1100D works best with an ISO of 800 or 1600, the exposure time will depend on a few factors but the histogram readout that is available on the camera will tell you if you need to increase the time or reduce it, aim for a main histogram peak around 1/3 the way from the left hand side. Most DSLR cameras seem to work better in terms of noise with max exposures no longer than 2-3 minutes, also allow a cool down time (10-20 seconds) between shots. Alan
  4. The later Canon cameras in the mid range like the 650/700/750D can suffer banding issues due to the use of their hybrid pixel AF which was introduced to give better AF performance with video shooting. The slightly older 600D is fine though as are the 60/70/80D models, you might get hold of a used 60D or 70D within your budget so worth looking around at places like MPB and Wex. Alan
  5. I have never been a fan of Bat masks (hate them) when used with a DSLR, the liveview screen on camera (not a PC) will tell you all you need to know about focus. Alan
  6. I actually bought an SCT to T adapter by mistake thinking it might fit a year ago and have noticed it is a good 50mm longer than the original so that would put the focus point at a similar position to that if you used a diagonal. I guess the Mak might also be optimized for a certain focus point but not realy tried any comparison tests. Alan
  7. I do have another question regarding alternative visual backs, the Mak has a huge range of back-focus so is it better to use a short adapter meaning the main mirror is further down the tube or a much longer one that puts the sensor position at a similar point to that obtained if you were using a diagonal and eyepiece? Alan
  8. Thanks folks, looks like it is 45.4mm and as far as I know from looking online its the same for all the small Maks up to the 127mm. The reason I am looking for a swap is that the internal diameter of the original is 1.25 inch and is fairly long so wondered if it contributed to vignetting with a DSLR fitted.... I cant think why they chose such a daft size on these instruments? Alan
  9. I am looking to replace the visual back on my C90 with something of better quality, there is no requirement for eyepiece fitting so a straight ?????? to T thread would be ideal. The problem is that I cant find any info on the thread size of the original and there seems to be a number of different sizes depending on the age of the scope (mine is a new one), a quick measurement across the threads reads a 45.4mm. Has anyone got any thoughts? Alan
  10. My biggest problem is finding cases for my projects, the audio ones especially as I like them to be machined out of a block of aluminium... the extruded cases are a reasonable second best for some less critical builds. Alan
  11. When we used to make in house test equipment the front panel was printed onto self adhesive white plastic sheets (cant remember the name but it was tough material) then stuck onto aluminium, this formed not only the identifiers for switches etc but a drilling template. Alan P.S. I think it was these http://www.simpsondonald.co.uk/downloads/identification/rmkA4.pdf
  12. I have never been bothered by exit pupil size, my best ever views have been with military spotting scopes with EPs over 15mm. Alan
  13. Brilliant, that moment where the Moon passes the earth is surreal... Alan
  14. It will hit either the Earth or the Moon but the results will be similar.. Alan
  15. Thats a cracking shot, I like lots of space around an image, far too many crop the life out of a good composition. Alan
  16. I would love a printer that could produce Bakelite parts, odd that the very first "plastic" is still the best Alan
  17. Me too, I need a second LIFX bulb, not cheap...... Alan
  18. I think this one has our name on it, eastern Europe is my prediction but its a planet killer so dont matter................. Alan
  19. Whats wrong with imaging the Moon, its by far the best target out there..................................................... Alan
  20. It is, my last one cost £2200 nearly 4 years ago and still going strong but just starting to get a bit leggy so will need an upgrade in a couple of years time. Alan
  21. Saving for new laptop, only £3500 to go...... Alan
  22. I quite fancy a monocle and a pair of trousers where the waist comes up to my armpits, would also like a bowler hat to top things off. Alan
  23. The 600D needs an ISO of 800 or 1600, as to focusing use the flip out screen and get rough focus on a bright star then use the zoom X10 to finalize focus by getting a very dim star to blink on/off with the slightest movement of the focus ring.................during focusing set the ISO high and shutter to 20 seconds (not bulb) then change them back for shooting. Another thing is dont use the camera tethered to a larger screen for focusing, the camera screen is much much much better. Alan
  24. I am sure you had 1...................................2.....................................or maybe 3 before, I would never let mine go Alan
  25. It all depends on the focal length of the lens/scope, a 50 mm lens for example could go for hours.. Alan
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.