Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_solar_25_winners.thumb.jpg.fe4e711c64054f3c9486c752d0bcd6f2.jpg

chris-32

Star Adventurer and PHD2 guiding

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am using the SA with a Canon 650D and a 300/4.0 L USM for some months now. In order to get longer exposure times (>30 sec) I just got a little guiding cam (TSGM120M: https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p8963_TS-Optics-Mono-Planetenkamera-und-Guidingkamera-mit-Aptina-CMOS-Chip.html).

Stand alone guiding like the M-GEN II is way to expensive from my point of view, so I decided to use PHD(2) on a laptop to do the guiding. I use the Orion 50 mm Guide-Scope mounted on the second port of the L-Mount. But I don't know how to set up PHD2 to work with the SA. The guider-cam will be connected over USB to the laptop and over the ST-4 cable to the ST-4 port of the SA - now question about that.

There are some users in the forum, who already work with PHD and the SA as far, as I have seen. So maybe someone could help me about what "Mount" and "Aux Mount" do I have to choose in the connection dialogue of PHD? How do I switch off DEC-guiding, as the SA doesn't provide it?

Any experience with the dither function BackyardEOS provides with PHD2 connectivity?

Many thanks in advance!

Chris

 

Edited by chris-32

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can’t help with BYE and PHD2 - I use APT, which just sees it and connects to it and dithers. Presume BYE will do the same if PHD2 is running before BYE is launched.

If you’re using ST4 from camera to mount, just select "On Camera" as the mount. Ignore aux mount. ST4 is a standardised protocol that isn’t dependant on mount-specific drivers.
Disabling Dec: https://openphdguiding.org/man-dev/Advanced_settings.htm#Algorithms_Tab and set Declination dropdown to 'none'.

Edited by Marci

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, 'on camera' for the mount. You can only guide in RA with the SA so DEC guiding has to be disabled in PHD2. You will have to do a fresh calibration if you move to another target in a different part of the sky. Make sure the guide cam is set to 8-bit mode for ST4 operation.

Hth

Louise

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Marci and Louise,

thanks for your help! I hope I will have the chance to setup guiding this night (at -14°C)...

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, knobby said:

Slightly off topic but will dithering only in RA be of any benefit ?

I hope so cos I only dither in RA, too much Dec backlash. But having said that I've recently been Dec guiding in one direction and I imagine that should cope with Dec dithering better.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Marci said:

Can’t help with BYE and PHD2 - I use APT, which just sees it and connects to it and dithers. 

Forgive my stupidity; Does that mean you don't use PHD2 at all? IE: APT does it all, imaging plans, guiding etc?

3 hours ago, ChrisEll said:

I hope so cos I only dither in RA

Again, forgive my stupidity; What does dithering do/mean in astro terms?
(I know what the word dither means, just can't relate it to the mechanics of the mount :iamwithstupid:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Redscouse said:

Again, forgive my stupidity; What does dithering do/mean in astro terms?

Dithering randomly nudges the scope position very slightly inbetween exposures... this means the sensor is not sitting over the same bit of sky all the time and so sensor noise can be removed more effectively. I use DigicamControl and you can tell it to dither between shots, handy!

Edited by ChrisEll

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, knobby said:

Slightly off topic but will dithering only in RA be of any benefit ?

I guess, dithering on one axis is better than no dither. And using the Star Adventurer, you will not completely stop DEC drift, so you get movement on the second axis, too.

I don't use dithering so far and I am quite new to astro-photography, please tell me, if I am wrong!

Chris

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds sensible, I guess half a dither is better than no dither .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, chris-32 said:

I don't use dithering so far and I am quite new to astro-photography, please tell me, if I am wrong!

Me too. I'll be watching for replies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Redscouse said:

Forgive my stupidity; Does that mean you don't use PHD2 at all? IE: APT does it all, imaging plans, guiding etc?

APT and BYE are just different flavours of imaging control software with pretty much similar feature-set. Both link to PHD2 for guiding.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Marci said:

Both link to PHD2 for guiding.

I see. Thanks for clearing that up. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 19/04/2018 at 21:47, penguin_a_geek said:

Sir,

stumbled into your post while searchin for a solution to make that TSGM120M work with INDI. Have you been successful?

 

Stefan

Hi Stefan,

no, I was not able to get the drivers running and decided to switch to a ZWO ASI cam, where the drivers are widely available.

 

CS,

Chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Nikolas74
      From AST Optics selling my mini guiding system that i used for my Redcat51 , i have used it also with my Esprit 100 and had excellent guiding results.
      There is a nice review here if someone wants to read :
      https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/575047-ast-mini-guide-kit-any-comments/
      Lens:    f=100mm F3.5 CCTV objective - made in Japan
      Adjustment:    by ballhead - with reliable clamping
      Dovetail:    compatible with most finder shoes
      True field of view:    2.9° x 3.8°
      Maximum guidable focal length:    1000 mm
      Focusing:    via lens cell
      Connection to camera:    C-Mount
      Lens filter thread:    M30.5mm P=0.5
      Weight:    79 grams
      Length of the objective:    44 mm
       
      PRICE : £100 (selling the mount and the CCTV lens not the camera)
      Paypal accepted buyer pays the fees
      I will cover the postage expenses
      Thank you,
      Nikolas




    • By FileraBe
      Hi,
      sorry if this was already posted, i'm looking for a flattener/reducer for my William Optics Zenithstar 66 SD (already asked WO by email) they reply me that since this product is discontinued over 10 years ago, i need to look for 
      FlatII, FlatIII - with 2"sct thread
      Flat6a with 2"SCT adapter
      and i saw this one https://www.firstlightoptics.com/reducersflatteners/william-optics-adjustable-flat6a-iii-08x-reducer-flattener.html
      and this one https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32917167365.html but i'm not very sure, so i'll ask before buying anything
      i will use it on my recently buyed star adventurer classic (buyed on FLO)

      Thanks in advance
    • By BUDA
      Hi All!

      I have guiding problem with the following guider setup: 9x50 finder + ZWO ASI 120mm mini + PHD2.
      The imaging scope is a 6' newtonian + canon dslr on a HEQ5, driven by a laptop via diy EQDIR cable.
      When the mount is set up and running correctly, polar aligned and all... I connect the guider camera
      and mount with phd2. All nice and easy, I run a calibration, then it starts to guide. All seems ok.

      Then I am starting to take pictures. The first seems OK, then the second have the star trails...
      I check phd2 and there is a message: the camera (ASI) did not take a picture for "xy" seconds so it is disconnected.
      Grrr.... I reconnect try to set up a longer period for "xy" in the settings as mentioned in the message.
      And all the same again and again. Whatever I add for connection timeout for the camera, it just reaches that
      and disconnect the camera.
      PHD + philips toucam has worked for me flowlessly. I changed to PHD2 because I gave myself a birthday present,
      the little ZWO camera. (and PHD did not recognize it)
      Do you have any idea what can be the problem? I will contact PHD2 help also, but maybe somebody had already
      the same problem and figured out how to overcome. I am almost sure I make some dumb mistake in the PHD2
      software settings, however I tried to change only what was needed.
    • By Ken Mitchell
      As the title says
      I've finally, after owning a 7nm Baader Ha filter for more than a half year, did my first imaging session in Ha.  My target was the Lagoon Nebula because the weekend before I captured 4.5 hours on it and wanted to see what difference it would make. It's also very bright so easy to locate and it helped my getting focus as well.
      Focus was kind of a challenge as I had to locate the nebula without the filter first ( the Star Adventurer has no GoTo), screw on the filter and take numerous amounts of test shots (max iso at 30sec) to finally get the focus right. Though I still think the focus was a bit off. For some reasons I had problems with the B-mask and focusing will have to do more tests in the future on this.
      That said and done I was ready to start clicking, used settings of iso 1600 and 180sec subs. This was what I saw on the back of the camera after 3 minutes.

      Pretty exited! Just the fact that I had something showing up amazed me. Decided to keep the exposure at 3minutes and planned on getting 1 hour of data at least before calling it a night.
       
      Quick info on the gear used here: 
      -Camera: self modded Nikon d90(Ha data), Nikon d610(RGb data)
      -Optics: TS-Optics Photoline 72mm f/6 FPL53+TSflat72
      -Mount: Skywatcher Star Adventurer
      -Guidescope: TS-Optics Optics 50 mm DeLuxe Mini 
      -Guidecamera:  ZWO ASI120MC-S
      -Filters: Baader 7nm 2" Ha 
       
      Back on imaging. After 1hour and 18min I stopped the session, took 10 flats, 10 darks and 20 bias frames and called it a night.
      The day after loaded everything in DSS, imported the stack in Photoshop and did a little stretch on the red channel. This was the result (1hr 18min at iso 1600).

      First there is so so much more data than I'd captured the weekend before with my unmodded Nikon d610 and almost x4 as much integration. That was a real excitement!
      Second is a question(s), the diagonal pattern you see is this walking noise? Will dithering remove these lines? and is it even possible to dither with the SA? I've seen the dithering option in PHD2 but not sure if the combination with the Sa works.
      So I've left the noise ,to be hopefully resolved in the future, and tried to combine the Ha with the previous captured RGB.
      The RGB data ,as said before, was captured using a full frame Nikon d610. Aligning the two was kind of a challenge but eventually with all the twisting and turning managed to get it almost perfect.
      This is the fully processed image from ONLY the RGB data the week before. 4.5hrs of data with the unmodded d610.
       
       
      Combining the datasets I decided to re-edit the RGB set with just a curves and levels stretch and some minor tweaks in Adobe raw. Followed a simple tutorial of changing the red channel of the RGB set with the red channel of the Ha set and adding another Ha layer on top to use as a luminance layer. The result was a bit weird to be honest, green in the background and pretty ugly colors in the nebula. ( I didn't had the original to show so just now I made a quick alignment just to show more or less the results. 

      Should it look like this? Hope to find out what caused this.
      Made some tweaks in the channel color mixer in Ps to get rid of the odd colors(in my eyes at least) and did more editing to get a final image. Besides some tweaks here and there I added an extra layer from the RGB set and used 'color' as blending mode.
      This is the result I came up with.

      Apart from perfect alignment of both data sets and maybe a better color balance I'd have to say the image itself looks a lot cleaner and more pleasant to the eye.
      Though it seems the image is not as sharp as just the RGB image, maybe that's because it has less stars and it only appears to be more fuzzy?
      Hope to get some input and cc on my workflow and/or the images to improve my results.
       
      Thank you,
      Ken Mitchell
       
       
      PS. For those interested I've also did some imaging with the unmodded d610 + Ha filter to show the differences and if it is worth it to use a Ha filter with an unmodded dslr. 
      I'll see if I can make a separate thread for this.
       
       
       
       
    • By Tom Shinal
      Can Nebulosity and Ph.D operate simultaneously and share a single camera. Running Win 10.
       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.