Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Does this need cleaning? Photos attached


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, Alien 13 said:

Looks like there is some life growing on the mirrors, I would clean but I used to wash my Newt mirror at least once a month..

Alan

Thanks Alan. Im sure I've had it about 10 years, and was in storage for 6-7 years unused which can't have helped. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those white patches is dry residue from when the cold mirror collects condensate from the moist air. I stored my telescope outside for a few years (in a waterproof shed!) and it used to 'fog up' very often. You'd probably have to factor in spider poo, cobwebs, as well as dust and other detrius...

I guess you'd want to give it a clean anyway but it will still perform well, even when it looks that dirty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok thanks everyone! I guess in my eyes it looks dirty enough to clean, but how much it's affecting imaging I don't know. I don't do any visual stuff with this scope, it's used for deep sky and planetary imaging. 

 

Im just worried about not getting it refitted/adjusted when it goes in again.  I can collimate a scope but is there other problems to consider when removing it completely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

Ok thanks everyone! I guess in my eyes it looks dirty enough to clean, but how much it's affecting imaging I don't know. I don't do any visual stuff with this scope, it's used for deep sky and planetary imaging. 

 

Im just worried about not getting it refitted/adjusted when it goes in again.  I can collimate a scope but is there other problems to consider when removing it completely?

From the pictures it looks like the scope could do with some flocking too so it would be a good time to do both..

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Alien 13 said:

From the pictures it looks like the scope could do with some flocking too so it would be a good time to do both..

Alan

I'll have to look into that, does it look shiny inside? My dob is partially flocked opposite the eyepiece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

Popped the dust cap earlier off today. I knew it was a bit dusty, but spotted a few animal hairs in there now too. Is it time to clean?

 

IMG_6746.JPG

IMG_6747.JPG

IMG_6749.JPG

IMG_6751.JPG

Not bad for a cell phone shot of a wide field reflected Milky Way just by looking down the tube!

You've got stars, planets, nebulae, DSO's and the odd comet all in one low resolution image.

Kudos, Rich. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your mirror needs an emergency cleanup; looks like fungi are growing on residue, and their waste slowly corrodes the coatings if you give it enough time. What you call animal hair is really threads of fungi cells spreading wherever they hope to find something to feed from. This "hair" does affect imaging by diffusing (as well as absorbing a little) light; after the cleaning you'll see tighter halos around your stars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ben the Ignorant said:

Your mirror needs an emergency cleanup; looks like fungi are growing on residue, and their waste slowly corrodes the coatings if you give it enough time. What you call animal hair is really threads of fungi cells spreading wherever they hope to find something to feed from. This "hair" does affect imaging by diffusing (as well as absorbing a little) light; after the cleaning you'll see tighter halos around your stars.

Thanks Ben, I agree with the fungi bit. However it is actual ginger cat hair sitting on the mirror. I have a ginger cat and somehow he's managed to get hair in there ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2017 at 21:06, tooth_dr said:

I have a ginger cat and somehow he's managed to get hair in there ??

Having had a ginger cat, I've learnt that they can do this kind of thing just by being in the same room. Seems that the slightest draft will pick their hair when they shed and deposit in on everything

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
7 minutes ago, Waldemar said:

makes quite a difference, I would say ...

Cheers!  I'm tempted to sell my 300 and just keep this 250.  The 300 is just so big to use on the EQ mount, the 250 is so much smaller. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Waldemar said:

Your 300 gathers 44% more light than your 250, though... Kind of depends on your mount as well how easy it is to use that big one
Probably quite heavy to get it mounted...

It's awkward to get it on, but seems ok once on, certainly at the limit.  Think I'll give it another year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.