Louis D
Members-
Posts
9,262 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Louis D last won the day on September 8 2022
Louis D had the most liked content!
Reputation
7,173 ExcellentProfile Information
-
Location
Texas, USA
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
You might want to pick up a 45 or 90 degree correct image diagonal for terrestrial viewing to avoid image reversal. They're really cheap on the secondary market because they are packaged with so many department store scopes, so they're resale prices are very suppressed. I've got a few collecting dust that were tossed in with scopes I've bought over the years.
-
I don’t know what telescope I have
Louis D replied to Replayy's topic in Getting Started General Help and Advice
Spherical mirrors at f/8 and slower tend to be very close in figure to a true parabola, so the images can still be quite good if the price is right. -
A Dob That Won't Give Me a Hernia
Louis D replied to LukeTheNuke's topic in Discussions - Scopes / Whole setups
ChatGPT seems skewed toward commercial offerings. It never once mentioned Hubble Optics, Obsession, or any of the European custom Dob makers. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
I really like its long eye relief, easy to hold FOV, and seemingly complete lack of SAEP. I will keep an eye out for EOFB in the APM. It is really bad in my 12mm NT4. One night, it was decreasingly hazy edge to center. I swapped it with the 12mm ES-92 and the haziness disappeared. I'm not much of a faint fuzzy hunter under dark skies, so I'm pretty insensitive to EOFB. I'm much more sensitive to SAEP because my pupils rarely dilate very far due to the increasingly severe light pollution around my backyard where I observe from. I'm hoping once the wife and I retire that we can move to a darker site not too close to any major cities. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
I've yet to notice the EOFB in the APM. Of course, I'm generally not under dark skies like Mt. Pinos where I might be able to detect it. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
I recomposited my 12mm to 14m UWA eyepiece ruler images together so it's easier to see the differences in presentation. It's also obvious which have objectionable SAEP. All are sharp to the edge at f/6. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
I have the Morpheus 14mn rather than the 12.5mm. I haven't done that much head to head competition between them. They have very different distortion characteristics, so are a bit hard to compare. The Morpheus stretches objects close to the edge like 98% of well corrected astro eyepieces while the APM squashes them. As a result, the APM actually has the wider true field of view of the two. It's even a little wider than my ES-92 12mm due to it also stretching objects. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
It's unlikely to have much impact on a 14mm 80 degree eyepiece since the 13mm Ethos is a 1.25" eyepiece (with 2" skirt), the 14mm Morpheus (measured 78 degrees) is a 1.25" eyepiece, and the 16mm Nagler T5 is a 1.25" eyepiece. I think they put it in a 2" housing to ease the design slightly. It really depends on the diameter of its field lens. Even then, I doubt it much exceeds 27mm in diameter. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
Try sliding your glasses down your nose slightly to increase the distance until resting them on the flipped down eye cup is at the proper standoff distance. -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
You could fit a 2" to 1.25" step ring into the eyepiece to allow for 1.25" filter use: -
Siebert Optics Ultra 13mm/15mm and APM 12.5mm HI-FW
Louis D replied to DAT's topic in Discussions - Eyepieces
I have the APM Hi-FW 12.5mm and really enjoy using it. It's better in every respect than my Nagler T4 12mm (eye relief, lack of SAEP, etc.). Personally, I have never noticed EOFB in the APM. It's really bad in the 12mm NT4 by way of comparison. You might also check into the Founder Optics Marvel / StellaLyra LER UWA 14mm 80 degree. It is 2" only, but it gets great reviews. -
Among affordable eyepiece pairs with near max true field of view for affordable binoviewers, I've used the 23mm Aspherics with my Arcturus binoviewer (made by Norin Optech), but much prefer the Svbony 20mm 68 degree UWAs for their much better clarity, contrast, and sharpness. They're best at f/12 and slower. I use the optical nosepiece of a vintage Meade 140 2x Barlow to reach focus. I just screw it into the insertion barrel of the BV.
-
Well, it's like having a minimum of 6 eyepieces in one, perhaps more if you dabble in half-mm focal lengths. So, that makes just over 2 pages per covered focal length! That doesn't seem so excessive then.😁
-
First light with the Starfield 102 ED
Louis D replied to quasar117's topic in Getting Started Equipment Help and Advice
How long did you allow for acclimation? I see spiking with my 90mm triplet APO that looks like pinched optics for up to about 30 minutes. It eventually disappears after acclimation. Give your scope an hour to acclimate and check again.