Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements

    sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_lunar.thumb.jpg.ef4882eb5fb3610f8a68e5e6913de0e3.jpg

Steve Ward

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    8,859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4,875 Excellent

About Steve Ward

  • Rank
    Sub Giant
  • Birthday 02/02/62

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    nr Newmarket
  1. Film or herschel

    Wedge is marginally better , but the improvement over Baader film is in no way proportional to the difference in price ... Given that our star is virtually asleep at the moment (as far as whitelight observing/imaging is concerned) I'd recommend Baader Solar film for starters ...
  2. And it's 299,792,458 in a vacuum ...
  3. International Astronomy show 2017

    I was looking forward to a day out and a catch-up , unfortunately work commitments have scuppered that idea so I shan't be there this year ...
  4. Baader vs Solarix film

    None of the black polymer films come anywhere near Baader film in terms of clarity of view or detail observable/imageable ...
  5. Solar Sunglasses question

    You can ask the question wherever you like , you will still receive the very same answers and you will continue to ignore them ... We could quite easily direct you to other forums where the question could be asked but it would be like passing on a virus and completely unfair to those sites.
  6. Solar Sunglasses question

    The same answers apply as they did when you asked on Cloudy Nights ..... before you flatly refused to accept any advice given by those who know and just persisted in repeating the question ad nauseum ... which as you recall resulted in the thread being deleted .....
  7. Insight Astronomy Photographer of the Year - Our Sun

    My sincerest apologies for not mentioning Michael's award too ...
  8. Congratulations to Alexandra (Montana) on winning the award of Astronomy Photographer of the Year - Our Sun section yet again ... Well deserved recognition for the incredible standard of images that she produces ...
  9. Something pretty enormous sprouted up overnight and is pointing straight this way ... Rain here all day but hope some of you can get a view of the action. https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/assets/img/latest/latest_4096_HMII.jpg
  10. Sun in Whitelight , 31st August 2017 , 09:30 BST.

    Don't know what 'scope you're using but it's worth having a play with Barlows to get the disc as big as you can on the sensor , I run the Tal with a "tweaked" Barlow that gives me about 1.4x (FL about 1400mm ) leaving just a small margin top and bottom on the 1000D.
  11. Sun in Whitelight , 31st August 2017 , 09:30 BST.

    Forgot to say that shooting .mov from the camera is pointless as it's little more than a set of jpegs captured from the Livescreen feed and little or no detail is to be had from such a compressed format . Tried it with the output from an 1100D during my very short time with one , very quickly swapped it in for another 1000D ... And the 1100D could never reproduce the same quality of image that it's predecessor can , no matter what I tried settings-wise , there was a processor change from the 450/1000D line to the 1100D which ruined it for my particular needs .
  12. Sun in Whitelight , 31st August 2017 , 09:30 BST.

    Hi Steve , I shoot sets (usually three) of 100 single RAW frames and batch convert to TIFFs (converting one set as shooting the next) using Canon's DPP. I then go through each set and use my eyes to select the best quality ( crisply detailed ) frames ... have found that the eye is way better than any software for determining the best frames . Then I run the best frames through PIPP to centre and crop the frames and output as a 1fps AVI , could probably make it quicker but why rush these things ... (I output as AVI as AS!2 sometimes gets a bit 'sniffy' about a set of individual TIFFs ) Then feed AS!2 the video for stacking , these are still 2650 x 2650 frames so I use an alignment box of 300 (around 100 alignment points) so as not to sit twiddling my thumbs for ages which occurs if you use a small box of say 40-50 which will throw up about 4000 or more points . It's not the stacking procedure that takes the time but the final Map Recombination so fewer boxes to align the better ... and for no loss of quality in the stack. N.B. I still use AS!2 V2.3.0.21 which requires you to adjust the frame size in the config. file from the 2000 x 2000 default in order to use bigger frames as those from a DSLR. Easily done though , just open the config. file , scroll down to the Max Width/Max Height lines , delete the 2000 x 2000 and enter an appropriate number to cover your needs. Then it's over to Reg 5.1 for Wavelets and other tweaks before a final fine-tune in Gimp ..... those parts of the process along with the camera setting are a closely guarded secret though ...
  13. Sun in Whitelight , 31st August 2017 , 09:30 BST.

    Thank you mate , have to admit there were a few minor headscratches , especially when it came to remembering where I'd hidden the focus controller box and the HEQ5 handset ... I can add quite a few layers to a "pile of stuff" over the course of six months ...
  14. Sun in Whitelight , 31st August 2017 , 09:30 BST.

    Edited now Stu , Photobucket playing money-grabbing games , it let me link on Cloudy Nights but not here ... ! Have now linked to the Astrobin gallery images but you'll have to click on the thumbnails to go to the bigguns ...
  15. I'm back ... Seeing as there is something to focus on again I thought it rude not to point something Sunwards ... Please click on thumbnails for full size. Canon 1000D + Tal 100RS + ND3.8 + OIII. 1/160s @ ISO 100 , 30/300 , PIPP , AS!2 , Reg 5.1 , Gimp 2.8.
×