Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

5mm Eyepiece suggestions


Mr Spock

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a new eyepiece which must be 5mm. The purpose of this eyepiece is for use in an f12 Rumak for high power double stars. Ideal characteristics would be:

  • sharp central image
  • freedom from flare or any other reflections
  • comfortable eye relief
  • FOV unimportant

I've had a good look at all the options, from inexpensive to mega expensive, new or used. But as usual, can't decide what to do. I wonder what other people are using or have had experience of. All suggestions welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I find the Nagler zoom an outstanding eyepiece for double stars. Currently I use the 2mm-4mm with my refractors and the ability to instantly rack up or down the power is very, very useful when pushing the scope / conditions / observer on tight double stars.

The 3-6mm is still in production. Expensive when new but can be bought for somewhat less used.

If it's a 5mm fixed then the XW or SLV would be my suggestion.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have Not used the Vixen SLV but I believe they are amongst the best in the £100 bracket, a little higher in price up you get the delites which again are well reported upon but there is a lot to be said for pushing the budget that little further as per @John suggestion and going for the nagler zoom at 3-6. That's 4 eyepieces in one and I personally use a zoom in my star splitter scope due to the versatility it offers in the main.  And lets be honest, you can never really go wrong with a TV eyepiece. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on how much you want to spend, the Televue Nagler 5mm would most likley be the best choice as my Televue optics are excellent, but if you want a cheaper option than the Celestron X-Cel 5mm has given me some of the best and sharpest views of Jupiter and Saturn during those nights of exceptional seeing in my 8" SCT... but the seeing had to be perfect otherwise it was not a performer... mind you I am talking a magnification of 406X.

My next recommendation is a LV... the 7mm LV I own is also excellent.

 

 

Edited by MarsG76
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to get a 5mm LVW used, but, no-one seems to want to part with them - no surprise there. With my C9.25 I used a TMB 6mm, but you can't get them either.

The short list is:

Pentax XW - £269
TeleVue Delite - £243
Takahashi LE - £189
Vixen SLV - £104

I have three NLVs which are excellent, so that draws me closer to the SLV. But I would like to try something else at some stage.

I previously had a 10mm Radian which I compared side by side to the 10mm NLV - the Radian got sold :wink2: Kinda makes me wonder about the Delite.
The Pentax would be similar to the LVW in terms of comfort and field size.
I've never looked through a Takahashi LE, so I have no clue about that one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have yet to use a Delite but the reports I'm reading here and elsewhere seem to be very encouraging indeed. 

I've not used a Morpheus either - I wonder what the 4.5mm is like ?

I've only owned and used one Tak LE and that was the 30mm. It was decent but not really outstanding. The shorter focal length ones might be better ?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using a 5.2mm Pentax XL for 20+ years.  It's very comfortable to use with eyeglasses, is absolutely sharp to the edge, and has very good contrast and transmission.  It works very well to resolve globular clusters, for instance.  The image of them is unchanged as they drift across the FOV.  I've had no incentive to replace it.

The 4.5mm HD-60 and 5mm Paradigm (Starguider) are a bit less sharp and contrasty, but good for those on a budget.  It comes down to quality of lens polish and coatings as well as internal stray light control.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the 5mm BST and it’s given me some great views of Mars and the moon in my 8” dob but have yet to really test it with some tight doubles. 
 

Seems you are narrowing it down to more premium EPs however. Look forward to seeing what you plump for and a first light review.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The XW5  is absolutely superb, I simply cannot fault it, but the SLV 5mm I have in my travel/solar kit is every bit as good, it just has the smaller FOV. I have looked through a TMB clone, which was very good, but not quite as good as the XW5 and SLV 5mm. I understand the Delites are similar to the Delos in performance, and the Delos EPs I have are every bit as good as the XWs. I have never looked through the Takahashi LEs. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the SLV camp, very sharp and comfortable EP to use, yes only 50deg but I have a tracking eq mount, quite accurate pa, so I can keep most objects I view for well over 5mins.. and that's with a 2x Telextender in play... 

Very neutral cool colour tone as well.. 

ES do a 52 LER at 5.5mm for £70 ish.. fairly new EP.. another in the mix for you..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the Tak has dropped out of the race, I'll see if I can sum up the negatives as the rest mostly seem to be equal on image quality.

  • XW - expensive, big and heavy
  • Delite - expensive
  • SLV - 45° FOV

Both the XW and Delite are two and a half times more expensive than the SLV. But the SLV only has a 45° FOV - does that really matter? I'll have to have a think about this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr Spock said:

Assuming the Tak has dropped out of the race, I'll see if I can sum up the negatives as the rest mostly seem to be equal on image quality.

  • XW - expensive, big and heavy
  • Delite - expensive
  • SLV - 45° FOV

Both the XW and Delite are two and a half times more expensive than the SLV. But the SLV only has a 45° FOV - does that really matter? I'll have to have a think about this.

Being as your using it to split doubles i would have thought the fov has less bearing on your choice than price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr Spock said:

Assuming the Tak has dropped out of the race, I'll see if I can sum up the negatives as the rest mostly seem to be equal on image quality.

  • XW - expensive, big and heavy
  • Delite - expensive
  • SLV - 45° FOV

Both the XW and Delite are two and a half times more expensive than the SLV. But the SLV only has a 45° FOV - does that really matter? I'll have to have a think about this.

If your mount is undriven, I'd go for a wide field like the Pentax or Nagler. Otherwise you have more choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The SLV 5 does have a slightly smaller FOV than the SLV 9 and 15 I have. I have never found that to be a big issue, especially on a tracking mount, but also on my mini-giro for solar observing. I have never found the weight of the XW 5 a problem, I should say, but then it is dwarfed by the Nagler 31T5 "Panzerfaust"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.