Pig Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I see the James Webb telescope launch has been delayed again until 2020 ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabeoo1 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Well they have to get it right first time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shelster1973 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 My prediction......Space X will do a few more Heavy launches to fully prove and validate the system, then as a 'cost saving measure' NASA jump ship from the Ariane launch platform and then move over to Elon who will offer the launch for free. That will then cause a few more delays as they now have to integrate with a new launch vehicle, so expect JWST to be launched sometime around 2023. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piero Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 On these things, I'd say that it is better a bit of delay, even if expensive, than a failure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shelster1973 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Piero said: On these things, I'd say that it is better a bit of delay, even if expensive, than a failure. Agree....one $8 billion firework is not a good thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pig Posted March 28, 2018 Author Share Posted March 28, 2018 2023 ..... that’s way too long to wait ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabeoo1 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 The statistic on the James Webb are jaw dropping. The pillars of creation alone from Hubble is a lifetime of intrigue. God only knows what the James Webb will show us. Its a pleasure that its just around the corner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daz Posted March 29, 2018 Share Posted March 29, 2018 Of course, the danger is that Congress will not agree any more money above the $8bn, in which case then what happens? I know POTUS has declared support for NASA's programme for human expansion, but I think it could still be stopped by Congress... I agree on the right first time principle though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringz Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 I have given up on this project ever being completed in my lifetime. Northrup Grumman should be replaced by a competent company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pig Posted March 30, 2018 Author Share Posted March 30, 2018 2 hours ago, ringz said: I have given up on this project ever being completed in my lifetime. Northrup Grumman should be replaced by a competent company. It’s a complex and challenging operation and I agree it has to completed properly... but the anticipation is a killer ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRM Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 So long as it gets up there in my life time, it is worth the wait to get it right, I still remember H.S.T. first light, not that anything will be wrong with the mirrors just it has to make it to its prescribed placement first. We saw the sized down mock up of the James Web Telescope at Kennedy space center, along with the full size Hubble, its huge but James Webb is bigger Rick M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davey-T Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 It'll be too far away to go and fix it so needs to be right first time but the Universe is expanding ever faster so stuff we can see now will be outa sight by 2023 Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barkis Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 There are so many complicated, and sequential operations that are required to work flawlessly for this huge instrument to ever become operational, one has to wonder if the story will have a happy ending. I'm not a Doubting Thomas, but Sod's Law will be lurking. Be one Hell of a Challenge getting a repair mission out there. Might be prudent to unfold the thing in low earth orbit, then if all's well, tow it out to where it needs to be. Not sure if that is feasable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 On 2018-03-28 at 10:25, Shelster1973 said: Agree....one $8 billion firework is not a good thing teetering on the 10 billion US mark i read recently, unreal! but i cannot wait until it is finally commissioned for use, i will bid for some time on it and show all you fancy imagers here a lesson BWAHAHAHA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnfosteruk Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 2023 isn't so bad but don't forget that deployment, cool-down, orbital insertion and commissioning will require about an additional six months from launch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 Here's a great video covering Webb's launch and deployment sequence, nicely detailed train of events, beautifully animated, i've watched it a few times, far more entertaining than most movies out of Hollywood these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
impactcrater Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 the scientist just knew he shouldn't have put his lunch box on the solar flaps..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ringz Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 I kept thinking that someone was going to jump out and shout "April Fool!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pig Posted April 2, 2018 Author Share Posted April 2, 2018 It looks a little more complex than the mars landings...... fingers crossed ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Posted April 3, 2018 Share Posted April 3, 2018 One of my fav Webb pics, was my desktop background for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.