Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Kiraw

what should i use of eyepieces for celestron 130mm?

Recommended Posts

hey guys, im reallly new to this, and ive bought a celesron astro fi 130mm newtonian telescope. but i really dont know what should i buy next for making the observation more clear? any advices? thank you so much. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does your scope have 10mm and 25mm KE eyepieces as shown on celestron webpage?
I don't know anything about those, someone surely will, those may be actually usable eyepieces.

What do you want to view? What are your issues with observation? Short eye relief, narrow field of view, lack of clarity along the edges, small magnification, trouble with focus? What bothers you with current eyepieces? And, what is your budget?

Maybe buying an OKish barlow lens, like the celestron omni 2x barlow would be enough for now and would make you happy for months.

Edited by kilix
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, kilix said:

does your scope have 10mm and 25mm KE eyepieces as shown on celestron webpage?
I don't know anything about those, someone surely will, those may be actually usable eyepieces.

What do you want to view? What are your issues with observation? Short eye relief, narrow field of view, lack of clarity along the edges, small magnification, trouble with focus? What bothers you with current eyepieces? And, what is your budget?

Maybe buying an OKish barlow lens, like the celestron omni 2x barlow would be enough for now and would make you happy for months.

 

thank you so much! yes it comes with 10mm and 25mm eye pieces. but id like to maximaz the magnification, but im troubling to find suitable eye pieces after i read the top of "Eyepieces - the very least you need"( very useful indeed) i ve tested my magnification vis the tools which gives me the maximaiz of 2mm, but the topic suggested a 3.75-4mm epc, so i dont really know which one to buy. my budget is around £20-50 for epc and same range of barlows. thx!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would advise that you start by using the eyepieces you've got to try to get an idea of what they are lacking for the targets that you want to observe. 

With regards to eyepieces it depends how much you are wanting to spend. The BST Starguiders at £49 each are a good upgrade and well worth the money. For an f5 scope like yours I would be inclined to start with the 12mm for DSOs and the 5mm for planets. The 25mm you got with the scope is probably better quality than the 10mm, or at least disguise its weaknesses better, and so won't be as critical to upgrade. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Ricochet said:

I would advise that you start by using the eyepieces you've got to try to get an idea of what they are lacking for the targets that you want to observe. 

With regards to eyepieces it depends how much you are wanting to spend. The BST Starguiders at £49 each are a good upgrade and well worth the money. For an f5 scope like yours I would be inclined to start with the 12mm for DSOs and the 5mm for planets. The 25mm you got with the scope is probably better quality than the 10mm, or at least disguise its weaknesses better, and so won't be as critical to upgrade. 

 

thx alot, yeah i think i should get along with the scope first, haha!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Vixen NPL plossls are decent eyepieces for the money and not far below the more expensive Televue plossls in terms of sharpness and quality.  A 25, 15 and 10mm combined with a 2X barlow will give you plenty of options (it will be like having 6 eyepieces with the barlow).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a 130mm newt and went for the BST Explorer/Starguider. Only got the 8mm at the moment but will be buying more soon. A Barlow is worth getting. Revelation do a 2x that can also be used as a 1.5x which will help with getting a good range of focal lengths from a small number of eyepieces. 

https://www.telescopehouse.com/revelation-astro-2x-barlow-lens.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first eyepiece I bought to replace my original supplied 10mm was the 8mm BST Starguider. You won't be disappointed with the build and quality of the eyepiece, but a lot also depends on the quality of the scope, its setup and the conditions your viewing through, also your ability to look long enough and get your eyes properly accustomed to the dark, get away from any light source.

Your scope is an f/5 ratio, a 5mm eyepiece would provide a reasonable  maximum power  for looking at the Moon and maybe the planets, but an 8mm or 12mm will give you more detail, but with a smaller image, this is always the case, either side of any chosen eyepiece.

I owned their 127EQ and better eyepieces made not a lot of difference to the observation you desire tbh. 

Getting the scope collimated, cooled and aligned, and having good seeing conditions all go to help your viewing sessions that much bigger. 

You would also probably  find that a larger apertured telescope, even using the same eyepieces ( and they would be the same, its almost a standard as to what they provide ) would improve the image  quality. This is the effect I noted when I upgraded my scope to the present one in my signature block.

But for know, just try the any method to get you and the scope in as dark a place as possible, and try and get the best from what you already have. I'm fixed for a few Years now with the 8" and my BST's. the only scope upgrade I would consider now is something like an ED80+ for imaging, but as my skies are cloudy most of the winter and twilight through the Summer, even an astro-photography setup is a far away dream?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Charic said:

The first eyepiece I bought to replace my original supplied 10mm was the 8mm BST Starguider. You won't be disappointed with the build and quality of the eyepiece, but a lot also depends on the quality of the scope, its setup and the conditions your viewing through, also your ability to look long enough and get your eyes properly accustomed to the dark, get away from any light source.

Your scope is an f/5 ratio, a 5mm eyepiece would provide a reasonable  maximum power  for looking at the Moon and maybe the planets, but an 8mm or 12mm will give you more detail, but with a smaller image, this is always the case, either side of any chosen eyepiece.

I owned their 127EQ and better eyepieces made not a lot of difference to the observation you desire tbh. 

Getting the scope collimated, cooled and aligned, and having good seeing conditions all go to help your viewing sessions that much bigger. 

You would also probably  find that a larger apertured telescope, even using the same eyepieces ( and they would be the same, its almost a standard as to what they provide ) would improve the image  quality. This is the effect I noted when I upgraded my scope to the present one in my signature block.

But for know, just try the any method to get you and the scope in as dark a place as possible, and try and get the best from what you already have. I'm fixed for a few Years now with the 8" and my BST's. the only scope upgrade I would consider now is something like an ED80+ for imaging, but as my skies are cloudy most of the winter and twilight through the Summer, even an astro-photography setup is a far away dream?

 

thx pal, its really useful and im now considering to buy a 8mm BST Starguider first and maybe 5mm later. but i saw the barlows of Starguider are short barlows, are there any diferences? thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Starpaw said:

The Vixen NPL plossls are decent eyepieces for the money and not far below the more expensive Televue plossls in terms of sharpness and quality.  A 25, 15 and 10mm combined with a 2X barlow will give you plenty of options (it will be like having 6 eyepieces with the barlow).

 

yeah, barlows are definete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A short, shorty or small Barlow allows you some benefit if/when used in conjunction with other kit, such as a filter wheel, and there is a general feeling from various forums that folk prefer a longer Barlow?

I have two Barlow’s, a Sky-Watcher Deluxe and a Meade Tele-negative.
As  full units, neither Barlow gets much use, however  with the Sky-watcher De-luxe, I often just remove the Barlow lens, and attach the lens only (without the body/extension tube) directly to the eyepiece in use offering roughly 1.6x factor!

Many folk also choose not to use a Barlow, due to the extra amount of glass surfaces in the optical train, but some of the most expensive eyepieces out there have inbuilt barrows, and work very well. There's no simple cheap solution?

A Barlow also maintains most of the eye-relief, so if using say an 6mm Plossl with its very short eye-relief, the 12mm Plossl with Barlow combination would offer the same power, with more eye-relief. more comfortable for the end user.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot depends what you want to spend. Prices can range from about 25 pounds for a basic but reasonable quality Plossl to several hundred for a top of the range EP!

In addition to the magnification that an EP will give, it's worth considering two other factors: field of view and eye relief. Field of view, measured in degrees, is how wide you can see while eye relief is how close your eyeball needs to be to the EP glass. Many people find extended viewing with their eye very close to the EP can become uncomfortable. Plossls are an excellent EP design but higher magnification versions (with a focal length number lower than 8 or 10 mm) suffer from poor eye relief and also have a narrow field of view. Orthoscopic EPs such as the Baader Classic are also very good indeed but again have the same problems as Plossls. An additional advantage of using a Barlow is that it will keep the original eye-relief of the EP - thus you will get better eye relief using a Plossl 10mm with a x2 Barlow than using a 5mm Plossl on its own. Beware however, a poor Barlow with a poor EP will only double up poor viewing. Celestron Omni, Revelation and Antares all make very acceptable Barlows at about 30-40 pounds.

The BST Explorer or Starguider (both are brands of the same EP, along with Paradigm and one or two other names!) is a step up with both better field of view and eye relief - and although a little more expensive, it is still an excellent value entry level eyepiece.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kiraw, since you did not specify what bothers you with your current eyepieces (maybe nothing?), I advice you to just use the kit you have and find out what you want/need. If it is only magnification that you require now, buying a barlow lens with removable optical element bay be a good, fast and cheap solution.

In your budget:

SkyWatcher deluxe 2x barlow has a removable optical part, which - when used by itself -  will give you an additional 1.5x mag. This, with your scope and your current eyepieces will give you 130x, 97x, 65x, 52x, 39x, 26x magnifications, which are anice selection.

58f5afe5b767b_148206157281contain.jpg.61cf2fb11ab46d961d95f7f12dcce52a.jpg

Celestron omni barlow is the same thing only with a different sticker.

Another beast in your budget may be Baader Q Barlow, which will give you 2.25x and an additional 1.3x when using only optical part. That will give you magnifications (with current EPs) 146x, 84x, 65x, 58x, 33x, 26x.

baader_qbarlow.jpg.cb0016fe7b321d6efafde17a4cd9bb56.jpg

Everything is nice, but with your current scope you may want to go to mags at about 200x. So, buying a 6-7mm eyepiece (one of the suggested above) in addition to the barlow lens will solve this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MrGuGuZai
      Hi, my current telescope is Celestron ExploraScope 70AZ, thinking upgrade to skywatcher heritage 130P(came with 25mm ajd 10mm EP) ,  if i do, can i use the eyepiece (4mm) and x3 barlow from my old celestron on the 130P?
      One more question, i ordered a eyepiece camera Svbony SV105, i wonder what is magnification of this camera and how it work to change magnification. 
       
    • By Fo_Cuss
      The scope spec is firming up to be d93/f1000.
      I'll either use flocking material or create a trillion indentations in the surfaces (with peening machine), and use matt barbeque paint.
      A laser calibrator is on the aquisition list.
      Consequently, everything should ultimately be at 'best possible'.
      I will likely need some guidance on the doublet air gap.
      Other than that ... with trembling anticipation...
      May I ask for views on suitable eyepieces?
      I've read a few of the threads on this forum.
      It seems that many eyepieces fall short of expectations.
      Also, Ive noted that people have talked about the effect of long focal lengths on specific designs.
      Either way, I have an initial list, made up from what seems available at reasonable cost.
      I intend to carry out both terrestrial, and extra-terrestrial viewing.
      Perhaps these different fields require different eyepieces?
      ***
      TMB/Burgess Planetary II
      I've read the 'touchy subject' thread.
      I understand the issues, but I'm not in any position to take sides.
      The design seems to offer a 'free lunch', with remarkable 58 deg viewing.
      However, I've read reviews on this forum, talking of ghosting, and scattered light.
      My intention is to blacken the scope internals as much as is possible - perhaps this will be enough?
      Kson Super Abbe
      4 lenses - apparently popular for over a hundred years.
      Celestron 1.25" Omni Plossl
      4 lenses - apparently popular for a longer period than the Abbe.
      In the same Omni range, Celestron offer a 2x Barlow (2 lens).
      ***
      They all purport to be good lenses.
      The Celestron range is cheaper, but hey, they might be just fine.
      Are any of them good for both day and night viewing, or should I be looking for specific day and night eyepieces?
      ... and which eyepieces are better suited to a 93/1000 refractor scope?

       
    • By Lozscott1971
      Hi there people, 
      Firstly can I say what a joy it has been reading and learning from some great posts by your community. 
      My question (as a complete newbie) has probably been asked and answered many times before but some posts are quite old so I hope that you don't mind me re-asking in case there are more upto date answers.
      Ok, I am looking at purchasing the SkyWatcher heritage 130p as I want a portable telescope to take to South Africa with me and after reading the forums it seems like a good option. I will be there for a few months including being next to the Kruger National Park where light pollution will be at an absolute minimum so I am hoping for good results . 
      I have read that a 150mm would obviously be preferable but is there one that is portable  ?? I carry very little luggage so I can accommodate a reasonable size perhaps upto around 10 kilos or so if such a scope exists and would fit into a case that can go into cargo or would this be a no-no ?
      If there are any options please can someone advise. 
      If I do end up with the 130p then I will have a budget of upto £150 to get any additional equipment (ie :- eyepieces) that may be required or would I be better of spending £300(approx) on a different scope with little to no budget for extras ? My intention initially and perhaps ultimately with a travel-scope would be observing the planets only and would obviously like as much planetary detail as feasibly possible but I certainly don't expect Hubble like images !
      I have intentions of purchasing a larger scope at a later date for home use so it really is just about a portable telescope at this stage. 
      Can I say many thanks already in anticipation of some quality feedback from you lovely people !!
      Laurence 
    • By Joaquim Q
      Hi, i..m on Stargazers Lounge for long time ago, but now i have a new scope at last!!! The scope is a Skywatcher classic200p dobsonian, and i received it just one month ago. I.m really happy with it. For now, i.m using the stock eyepieces that come with the scope, a 25mm and 10mm super plossl 52. Yesterday i was received a Celestron Omni barlow, and that expands my magnification range. I posted some pics with my set. 
      Congratulations to Stargazers lounge team, this is one of the best sites to learn about astronomy and equipment. 
      Besf regards to everybody 




    • By Kronos831
      So, i have settled between 2 eyepieces for my scopes.
      The explore scientific 6,5 mm 52degree 
       
      and the Skywatcher UWA Planetary 6mm
       
      I have read that the explore scientific gives better contrast and views.
      The explore scientific will give me 184x and barlowed 369x So should i trade less magnification for more detail?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.