Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

swag72

IC1318 (Butterfly nebula) in mono

Recommended Posts

This may be a work in progress as I may capture another pane underneath this one to capture the butterfly totally. As this wasn't what I was going for, I didn't know what I was missing and would have framed it differently if only I'd realised!!

My first thoughts with the combination I am using at the moment is that it's frankly creating some great data. The 3nm Ha filter is really pulling out the detail and it's extremely noise free. It takes so little processing it's frankly amazing me.

I think this one seems to be quite deep compared to others I have seen. Would welcome your thoughts on this. Do you think it's too much?

Details

M: HEQ5

T: Takahashi FSQ85 0.73x

C: Atik 460EX mono and 3nm Ha filter

11x1800s calibrated with flats

post-5681-0-14209600-1371463439_thumb.jp

Edited by swag72
  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sara - that is superb. Lovely tonal range and very tight stars right across the frame, even the bright one hasn't burnt out! Could be a tad lighter but that may be more my monitor

Super. Look forward the the next installment...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great data and great image Sara,

How do you feel when there is not a lot of efforts to process required?

Mark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Sara,

You have a winning combo right there, that's absolutelly superb!!!

Congrats on such a fine image ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you imagine what the heavens would look like at night if our eyes were also as sensitive to Ha as this 3nm filter :rolleyes:? It's almost unbelievable how much signal there is in this... and those stars are SO tight - I'm very much looking forward to the next one :smiley:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your comments.

@Mark - It's very nice to be able to not have to process it to death! There's a significant noise reduction compared to what I was experiencing with the 7nm Baader.

@Andy - The next one is on the post-it-note ready for the next clear night!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a super image Sara. I may have to stop looking at your images - they could prove to be rather expensive :grin:

Dave

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dave!!! Sadly they have just become a little more expensive for me too! Placed an order with IKI for the 3nm OIII and SII filters *ouch*

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another excellent image Sara :). If funds allowed I would go straight for a Tak FSQ85 and skip the ED80 ;).

+1 for Dave's comment, this could get expensive quickly if I keep looking at your images, but I can't help it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is the best you've ever posted, Sara.

I've just peered at it next to mine of the same region, mine using the FSQ106 rather than the FSQ85, but with bigger pixels. You have finer detail and better contrast, not a shadow of a doubt. You have a lot more data, too, but your setup of 460/Astrodon and a rather familiar FSQ85 is really singing now. I'd be a little softer on clipping back the black point (easy does it) but , holy smoke, I think I might retire and let you get on with it!!

This really is a fine image - and do go for the whole butterfly. It's a super object, rarely examinied on its own.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Utterly incredible image. Astonishing - many congratulations :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Olly and Steve.

@Olly - I was really quite careful with that black point and I don't think I've clipped it, certainly the points were above 0 in the curves window. I did think it looked perhaps a little too dark though. I will try and get the pane below - I was planning on doing it last night, but couldn't locate a single star in my guide scope (First time that's ever happened) so I need to misalign it a little to find a guide star. I really do appreciate your comments, but don't hang up your hat yet as I often have lucky flukes early on! :smiley:

Edited by swag72

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are details here that I have not seen before in this object, superb work indeed. I think you have set the black point a little too dark for me but I'm splitting hairs here it is a first class image, I may have to sell a limb or two for a Tak!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some fluke! Don't believe a word of it. Good 'luck' with the second pane

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks John, Francis and Epicycle - When I collect the data for the second pane, I'll reprocess the lot and keep the black point a little higher!

Get saving John!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is something special, Sara ........ what a treat to look at!

FSQ85 + 460EX + SWAG72 = killer combo.

:icon_salut: Adrian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tkank you very much Adrian - You've forgotten the 3nm Ha filter which I think is a factor too!!

Thanks for looking and commenting Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderful image with great detail and contrast :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.