Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

RASA 8 is back: Iris Nebula chased by some dark nebulosity


gorann

Recommended Posts

After being clouded in forever, it finally cleared and I got as much going as I could (barely) handle. So as I was shooting away on NGC6914 with my double Esprit rig in obsy 1 (posted earlier today), I got the RASA 8 up and running again on my old NEQ6 in obsy 3, aimed at some dark nebulosity near the Iris nebula. Had the ASI2600MC set at gain 100 and -10°C. Got 235 x 2 min so 7.8 hours, which is a lot of photons at f/2. Took a few hours to stack in PI. Most processing done in PS.

I think there is same drama in the image where dark forces appear to head toward the loverly Iris. I believe that nasty bunch are also known as LDN1152, LDN1148, LDN1158 and LBN468

 

20201013-14 Iris WF PS29smallSign.jpg

  • Like 38
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, andrew s said:

Beautiful image @gorann, fantastic colour. Regards Andrew 

Thanks a lot Andrew! Yes I am pleased about how it turned out. Maybe it is the amount of photons the RASA collects (7.8 hours at f/2 corresponds theoretically to 96 hours af f/7) that makes the "dark" nebulosity look quite bright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pryce said:

This part of the image really captured my attention.  Its absolutely beautiful.  Do you know it's designation?

20201016_031648.jpg

Thanks Pryce! Yes it is the Iris Nebula and it is always nice to see but also often imaged. So I am actually this time most proud of the other structures captured in this image. They are much fainter and relatively rarely imaged. To bring them out I had to selectively enhance them (in curves in PS) while protecting the Iris from being blown out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, gorann said:

After being clouded in forever, it finally cleared and I got as much going as I could (barely) handle. So as I was shooting away on NGC6914 with my double Esprit rig in obsy 1 (posted earlier today), I got the RASA 8 up and running again on my old NEQ6 in obsy 3, aimed at some dark nebulosity near the Iris nebula. Had the ASI2600MC set at gain 100 and -10°C. Got 235 x 2 min so 7.8 hours, which is a lot of photons at f/2. Took a few hours to stack in PI. Most processing done in PS.

I think there is same drama in the image where dark forces appear to head toward the loverly Iris. I believe that nasty bunch are also known as LDN1152, LDN1148, LDN1158 and LBN468

Absolutely stunning! There's no doubt that photon count is king (so long as they're not from light pollution of course :wink2:)

Ian

Edited by The Admiral
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tomato said:

A stunning result, the RASA 8 and the IMX571 OSC is really delivering. Mine is sitting in the box waiting for my dual rig mosaic to be finished...:clouds1:

 

Thanks! You are in for a treat!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Skipper Billy said:

That's a cracker. Rather you than me focusing at f2 !!  

Chapeau - well done.

Thanks! Actually focussing on the RASA 8 is dead easy and it has so far kept it all night. No need whatsoever to buy any fancy Feather Touch for electronic focuser. I think that they put the system of the super expensive (15,000 GBP)  RASA 14 into it and the mirror is not weighing that much so it was easily done. The problem child is the RASA 11 which at least in its original version had a very floppy mirrior design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Admiral said:

Absolutely stunning! There's no doubt that photon count is king (so long as they're not from light pollution of course :wink2:)

Ian

Yes, I was extremely surprised how bright what supposedly should be dark nebulosity turned out. I think it may have to do with the amout of photons this scope is collecting in relation to the chip (24 x 18 mm) I am using. My 7.8 hours at f/2 corresponds theoretically to 95 hours at f/7! And yes, equally important, I have a Bortle 2 sky.

Edited by gorann
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, The Admiral said:

One can only dream!

Ian

Hurry up Admiral - you have two month left to move to wherever you like in Europe😁

Edited by gorann
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think your orientation is north-down? Is that right? (No reason why it shouldn't be!)

What struck me about this image, which is a very striking one, is the intensity of the contrasts. The background sky is held down and the reflecting and scattering dust is relatively bright, which emphasizes the shapes in the dusty structures. It really is very forceful and impressive in that way. The blue components in the Iris also extend more widely than we usually see. Both the imaging system and the processing have, I think, brought something new to the target.

I have a couple of reservations, which I only mention because this is such a memorable image. The resolution into the core of the Iris could be better at this image scale. The progenitor star is saturating the area around it. And there are some faint pinks near the core, probably from Ha, which we are not seeing.

What I take away from this image, and what I don't know how you achieved, is the intensity of contrast in the low brightness regions. That is spectacular.

20 hours ago, gorann said:

Thanks a lot Andrew! Yes I am pleased about how it turned out. Maybe it is the amount of photons the RASA collects (7.8 hours at f/2 corresponds theoretically to 96 hours af f/7) that makes the "dark" nebulosity look quite bright.

Now you know what I'm going to say to that! 🤣  How did the photons entering your objective know the focal length of the system that followed? What matters is aperture and pixel size. F ratio is hot air. You proved this with your Liverpool Telescope images!

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

I think your orientation is north-down? Is that right? (No reason why it shouldn't be!)

What struck me about this image, which is a very striking one, is the intensity of the contrasts. The background sky is held down and the reflecting and scattering dust is relatively bright, which emphasizes the shapes in the dusty structures. It really is very forceful and impressive in that way. The blue components in the Iris also extend more widely than we usually see. Both the imaging system and the processing have, I think, brought something new to the target.

I have a couple of reservations, which I only mention because this is such a memorable image. The resolution into the core of the Iris could be better at this image scale. The progenitor star is saturating the area around it. And there are some faint pinks near the core, probably from Ha, which we are not seeing.

What I take away from this image, and what I don't know how you achieved, is the intensity of contrast in the low brightness regions. That is spectacular.

Now you know what I'm going to say to that! 🤣  How did the photons entering your objective know the focal length of the system that followed? What matters is aperture and pixel size. F ratio is hot air. You proved this with your Liverpool Telescope images!

Olly

Hi Olly,

I am in the middle of the Friday night dinner so this is a short response. The 400 mm FL does not give super resolution to the Iris so I could allways add that later from old data I have. And seeing was not the best and the scope is not on my Mesu but on a NEQ6, so I was tempted to add old data to the Iris. But what I think is amazing is how deep you can ho with this sytem in just 8 hours. I really had to suppress some of the faint stuff not to overwhelm the image with dust - it could have been so much more dusty.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.