Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements

    sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_nb_dso.jpg.eb6cd158659331fd13e71470af6da381.jpg

Northernlight

Age old Question of MN190 Vs 10" CF Quatto

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

I'm now residing to the fact that the second hand RC i bought was a lemon, and i need to move on instead of pulling my hear out.  So i'm looking at the Skywatcher MN190 Vs CF Quattro 10" and just wanted to get peoples views on the 2 scopes. I know everone will have their own views and i probably wont get a resourding answer either way, but still interested to get peoples feedback.

Weight is not an issues as i have an EQ8, so weight can be discounted in the argument.  Also cool down is not an issues as it will live permanently in my obs.

 

What i Like about MN190   : Flat field and no need for coma corrector or flattner,  Pretty Fast at F5,   Easy to fit a direct replacement Feather touch Focuser without opening the tube, good optics providing sharp refractor like perfoamance. Good for visual as well as imaging.

What I Like about the 10" Quattro :  Very Fast @ F4 so great for Fickle british weather,  Larger Aperture (10")

 

 

So i guess it comes down how much more detail would the 10" Quatto resolve over the MN190 for a given exposure length, lets say 600 secs.  Is the 10" & F4 optics of the Quattro going to make a huge difference or will it be marginal ?

Also, when itcomes to collimation of the 2, which is likely to holid it collimation better ?   Is the MN190 colllimated in the same way as a normal Netwtonian ?

 

Many Thanks,

Rich.

 

 

                                 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billyharris72    319

I'm not the best to advise, not having owned either scope, but I've read a few reviews on here and elsewhere and if it were me I'd probably go for the Mak.

On the plus side for the Quattro.

  • The faster F ratio of the Quattro is equivalent to gathering about 1.5 times as much light, so you would need about 2/3 the exposure time (relative exposure scales with the square of the ratios between the two F ratios, so 4/5^2)
  • The larger aperture means a smaller Dawes limit and theoretically higher resolution. Great if you often image from a mountain in the Atacama desert, probbaly means nothing in the UK.

Against:

  • Collimation will be extremely critical, and quite prone to getting out of whack. I get the impression there is a big difference between F5 and F4 in this regard, but others will know better.
  • I've read reports about this one being tricky to collimate and not holding it well (though at F4 even the tiniest shift will put you out).

By contrast:

  • The Mak-Newt seems to get consistently good reviews
  • Collimation should be relatively easy
  • Pretty much coma free due to the corrector plate
  • No diffraction spikes

I'd go for the Mak personally, but not any kind of expert. Be interested to see what others think.

Billy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Billy,

you just made a very good point about the resolution and the fickle british weather, which i had never even considered. Which i guess renders the extra aperture almost irrelevant. This makes my decision a lot easier.

Deep down in my heart i've always leaned towards to the MN190, as i like the idea of not needing any sort of corrector, which just means extra glass which can potentially fog up, which i have personally experienced.  Going to Give my 8" RC one last try, and if i'm still not happy with it, i'll be dumping the RC and pulling the trriger on the MN190 with an upgraded feather touch focuser as it fit's directly into the skywatcher base plate without needing to open the scope up.

 

Rich.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Freddie    1,763

Always been happy with my 190 and no spikes was a real bonus for me. I fitted a Moonlite to mine and opening it up to fit the new base plate was easy. The feathertouch will be a nice unit but I wouldn' restrict your options because some may need you to remove the corrector to fit them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Freddie, 

the feathertouch focuser bolts directly onto the Skywatcher base plate, so no need to open the tube :-) 

guess I'm just worried about mucking up the scope by opening it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skyline    207

The MN190 is a nice imaging scope, the corrector plate shows round stars to the edge even with a APC-S size chip. Hence the reason I never changed to focuser as most of my imaging with the scope was with a dslr.

If I had the cash now and had to choose just one scope over what I have now, it would be another MN190.

Edited by Skyline

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ollypenrice    17,033

You've not had much fun trying to get the RC into collimation. (Neither did I when I was trying to help one of our robotic shed clients with his. We knew the theory and had the Glatter tools but one adjustment always threw another out.) This being so, how keen are you to risk another struggle with the Quattro? F4 does make a big difference to collimation and tilt as compared with F5. (The depth of field is so much shallower.) It really isn't easy to make an F4 system and trying to do it at a budget price is even harder.

I don't think you can expect the Mak Newt to be necessarily plug and play either but it might be less of a trial than the Quattro. Singlin wrote an excellent and detailed account of fettling a Quattro a couple of years back on here. If you can find it I think it would be very instructive.

Not tempted by the 12 inch F5 Newt?

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ollypenrice    17,033
23 minutes ago, Northernlight said:

Olly, a 12" newt is just too much of a big beast, the MN190 is the biggest wind sail I would want in my obs.

Good answer.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Grrrrrr, so sick of those BBC baboons, once again they forecast clear sky all night, and surprise surprise half way through collimating testing thick cloud cover rolls in. They couldn't get the weather right if their life depended upon it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Olly,

I gave the RC collimation one last bash last night whilst waiting for the clouds to clear.  I gave my best effort with the Tak Scope, which when adding lots of extra lighting in the room was a lot easier to read.  finally the clouds cleared enough at 2am to do some collimation testing. The conditoins were less than ideal as it was really murky, so i couldn't get the best focus.

This was the best i could get with the Rc last night.  it's not the best, but it's also not the worst and i'm attributing the slightly elongated stars at the edge being down to my AstroPhysics .667 Reducer.   On the next clear night i'll try a test at the Native F8 and see if i still have the elongated stars or not, and if they still persist i'll pull the trigger on the MN190.

Have a look and let me know your thoughts.   Attached image was taken at F5.3 with the AstroPhysiscs .667 reducer and the FL was approx 1050mm.  Please excuse the unprocessed single image taken through thick murky conditions, but at least it still gives an idea on the state of collimation.

Rich.

 

test_300sec_1x1_L__frame1_-20C.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ollypenrice    17,033
2 hours ago, Northernlight said:

Well Olly,

I gave the RC collimation one last bash last night whilst waiting for the clouds to clear.  I gave my best effort with the Tak Scope, which when adding lots of extra lighting in the room was a lot easier to read.  finally the clouds cleared enough at 2am to do some collimation testing. The conditoins were less than ideal as it was really murky, so i couldn't get the best focus.

This was the best i could get with the Rc last night.  it's not the best, but it's also not the worst and i'm attributing the slightly elongated stars at the edge being down to my AstroPhysics .667 Reducer.   On the next clear night i'll try a test at the Native F8 and see if i still have the elongated stars or not, and if they still persist i'll pull the trigger on the MN190.

Have a look and let me know your thoughts.   Attached image was taken at F5.3 with the AstroPhysiscs .667 reducer and the FL was approx 1050mm.  Please excuse the unprocessed single image taken through thick murky conditions, but at least it still gives an idea on the state of collimation.

Rich.

 

test_300sec_1x1_L__frame1_-20C.jpg

Well that looks pretty darned good to me. I could live with it as is, though I'm not of the pixel peeping mindset. A few dabs with a recorded 'star rounder' action in two of the corners would sort it completely. It might just be the disance to the reducer, anyway.  I'd call that nailed to within a gnat's crotchet, as Humphrey Littleton would have put it.

Olly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billyharris72    319

Not too shabby at all is my opinion; the stars in the centre look quite good to my (albeit uncultured) eye.

I can't see from the image but are the elongated stars at the edge of the image comatic or are they symmetrical around 2 axes? If the later then is this not likely to be the RC itself? I thought that was the point in the RC design, trading off increased (but symmmetrical) astigmatism against coma.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
johnrt    2,178

If you're at approx 1050mm focal length then you're right at the limit of the focal reducer, the CCDT67 is very forgiving up to it's maximum reduction of a spacing (of I think 85mm) from chip to reducer. I would just reduce the spacing and I think you'll find those corners will be just fine. I have mine set to reduce about x0.7 on my 6" RC, just a little under the maximum tolerance.

But like Olly, I'd be happy with that, don't forget you'll lose the edges anyway cropping the RGB channel overlaps.

Edited by johnrt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks All,

It's nice to make some progress with the RC as i was ready to throw it out of the window.  One other factor that may have helped was that i completely stripped it down and rebuit it, which may have resolved issues like pinched optics etc.

John, thanks for the heads up on the focal reducer spacing. I set it to exactly 85mm as that was the quoted spacing distance to use on the Teleskop Express website where i bought it from. On the next clear night, i'll reduce the spacing down maybe 5mm and see how i get on with that,whilst it would be slightly slower, i would welcome a little bit of extra focal length.

I'll post another image after i reducing the spacing on the next clear night i get.

 

Cheers,

Rich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alan potts    3,606

I have a M.N 190mm and have always been very happy with it, purely for visual use I find it realy does almost offer APO views. I am not sure about your claim that it is easy to change the focuser, I remember reading a sizeable thread on this and then thought I will stick with what I have. I have seen some first class images taken with them too and although I don't know much about AP it does just come into Olly's a meter or less F/L is best quote that he made a long time ago. My AZ EQ 6 handles it with ease, I even had it on a HEQ 5 Pro before but only for visual you understand.

Alan 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alan,

on the MN190 focuser side of things, you can get a feather touch focuser with adapter that fits directly onto the Skywatcher base plate, no opening the tube or removing any base plates, literally swap out the Skywatcher focuser with the feather touch and the associated adapter and it's perfectly aligned, no faffing and no worries about positioning it correctly, just a direct swap.

you can get them directly from FLO

 

Rich.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i managed to get a 15m break in the clouds so rushed to power up the obs and test RC again. I reduced the recommended 85mm spacing down to 75mm for the AP CCDT 667 reducer, which has added approx 100mm to the focal length. scope has went from approx 1050mm @ F5.3 to  1150mm f/l @ F5.75

so gained a bit of extra focal length and speed still acceptable, but now has now greatly improved the corners and reduced the vignetting significantly.

 

Rich

 

test1.jpg

Edited by Northernlight
correct spelling mistakes
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not 100% happy as there stars are now slightly elongated to the left side of the image, and looking at CCD inspector i can see that i'm slightly off, so i'll keep plugging away, but at least it show that the image is fairly flat.

 

 

ccd_Inspector.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The hard bit now it trying to interprate what ccd inspector is showing me. Is that pink area due to primary or secondary, who knows. Guess I'll just have to try with trial and error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MikeODay
      A new High Dynamic Range image of the Sculptor Galaxy ( NGC 253 ) captured over a number of nights in mid-September 2017 and processed with PixInsight using the DrizzleIntegration and PhotometricColorCalibration tools.

      The Silver Coin or Sculptor Galaxy ( NGC 253 ) in the Sculptor constellation.
      ( please click / tap on image to see larger and sharper ) 
      On the 23rd of September 1783, sitting before her telescope in the field behind the house she shared with her brother William at Datchet, near Slough in the south of England, Miss Caroline Herschel "swept" the sky searching for new comets and never before seen star clusters and nebulae.   On this occasion, way down in the sky, not far above the Southern horizon, in an area of the southern sky that Nicolas de Lacaille had called the “Apparatus Sculptoris” or “the sculptor’s studio", Miss Herschel saw and noted down a very bright and large nebula where one had never before been recorded.  This event was later recognised by her brother, Sir William Herschel, as the discovery, by Caroline Herschel, of the nebula he listed in his catalogue as H V.1.   In later years, her 'beloved nephew', Sir John Herschel, William's son, would record this 'nebula' as entry # 138 in his General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars ( eventually becoming the 253th entry in the New General Catalogue, NGC 253 ).
      Whilst relatively close to us compared to the billions of far more distant galaxies in the Universe, the great size of the “Sculptor Galaxy” and the huge distances involved are still hard to comprehend.  To put this into some perspective, the light that is just now reaching one edge of the great disc left the opposite edge when the Earth was in the grip of last great Ice Age 70,000 years ago and the light we now see has been travelling towards us for over 11 million years.
      ........
      More information on the discovery of the Sculptor Galaxy by Miss Caroline Herschel, as well as the later observations by both Sir William and Sir John Herschel, can be found in my  Stargazerslounge blog, “The Sculptor Galaxy ( NGC 253 )”
      .........
      This image was captured over a number of nights in the middle of September 2017 and processed on the 23rd; exactly 234 years from the day of its discovery by Caroline Herschel.  
      With over 18 hours of total exposure, this HDR image attempts to capture the huge range of brightness levels; from the brightest stars and the core of the galaxy through to the numerous 'tiny' galaxies scattered throughout the image ( the total magnitude range is from around mag 8.8, for the brightest star, to 22+ for the faintest stars and galaxies visible in the image).
      Mike O'Day
      ......................
      Capture Details:
      Telescope: 
      Orion Optics CT12 Newtonian ( mirror 300mm, fl 1200mm, f4 )
      Corrector: ASA 2" Coma Corrector Quattro 1.175x
      Effective Focal Length / Aperture : 1410mm f4.7
      Mount: Skywatcher EQ8
      Guiding: 
      TSOAG9 Off-Axis-Guider, Starlight Xpress Lodestar X2, PHD2
      Camera:Nikon D5300 (unmodified) (sensor 23.5 x 15.6mm, 6016x4016 3.9um pixels)
      Location: Blue Mountains, Australia 
      Moderate light pollution ( pale green zone on darksitefinder.com map )..
      Capture ( 16, 17, 19,20,22 Sept. 2017 )
      8 sets of sub-images with exposure duration for each set doubling ( 2s to 240s ) all at ISO800
      273 x 240s + 10 each @ 2s to 120s
      total around 18hrs 
      Processing
      Calibration: master bias, master flat and no darks.
      Drizzle Integration in 8 sets.
      HDR combination 
      PhotometricColorCalibration
      Pixinsight & Photoshop
      23 Sept. & 8 Oct 2017
      Image Plate Solution ( this cropped image )
      ===============================================
      Resolution ........ 1.324 arcsec/px
      Rotation .......... -180.00 deg ( South ^, East > )
      Field of view ..... 57' 57.5" x 38' 40.1"
      Image center ...... RA: 00 47 32.809  Dec: -25 17 04.48
      ===============================================
      ....................
      Designations and alternative names for the Sculptor Galaxy:

      CH10  ( Caroline Herschel # 10 )
      H V.1  ( William Herschel,  Class V ( very large Nebulae ) # 1  )
      H 61, H 2345  ( John Herschel observations identifiers )
      GC 138.   ( John Herschel’s - A General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars # 138 )
      NGC 253  ( John Herschel’s catalogue updated by Dreyer - The New General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars # 253 )
      Caldwell 65
      Leda 2789
      ESO 479-29
      Sculptor Galaxy
      Silver Coin Galaxy
      Silver Dollar Galaxy
      ..................
       

      Annotated image of the Sculptor Galaxy ( NGC 253 ) - showing the brighter stars ( from the Tycho-2 catalogue ) as well the galaxies recorded in the Principal Galaxies Catalogue ( PGC ).  I have yet to complete identifying and annotating the very large number of ‘tiny’ galaxies in the image.
      ( please click / tap on image to see larger and sharper )
       
      .........
    • By Astro Buer
      Hi all! 
      I'm looking for any recommendations for a good little refractor as a companion for my Star Adventurer for astrophotography. 
      Little (in weight) being the operative word given the 5kg payload capacity of the mount! 
      Currently I am shooting with an Sony A7S and guiding with an Orion Starshoot and Orion 50mm guide scope. So there's a little bit of weight on there already. 
      Looking at refractors with a focal length of 400-600mm which are proven performers for imaging. 
      So far contenders are:
      Stellarvue 80mm ED
      TS-Optics ED 70mm f/6
      William Optics Gran Turismo 71 APO Refractor
      Any advice/images of rigs/example images/etc would be greatly appreciated! 
      Thanks in advance :-) 
       
    • By dan_19991
      Hi all,
      Im living in a fairly light polluted area, and have a Skywatcher 200p on an eq5 pro mount. I've been using my phone to take pictures of varies objects with varying degrees of success ( mainly due to mounting my phone to the telescope) but ive decided id like to take imaging a little more seriously and am looking to get a DSLR with the interest of deep sky astrophotography. having said that i dont have £5k for blow on a camera and am looking to spend around the £100 mark, but dont know cameras and dont know what the best camera in my price range would be. I realize i wont be able to do too long a exposure because of my mount being unguided and it being a eq5 pro not a Heq5. any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. 
      Daniel  
    • By Horatio
      Just purchased a Skywatcher ED80 refractor and apart from the supplied 2" 28mm LES eyepiece I have the Ultrawide 6mm Skywatcher 1.25" and the Skywatcher Super Plossl 40mm.
      I am looking at purchasing a 2x or 2.5x Barlow and was after any recommendations?   Also have I read somewhere that I have to have a certain 'type' for the supplied 2" star diagonal?  Would I better be off purchasing one that can fit both 2" and 1.25" eyepieces or for optical quality sticking with just a 1.25" (does it affect optical quality even?)  Celestron Luminos for example
      My other question is can this scope take (visually acceptable) a 2.5mm eyepiece and take it to the max possible magnification if I required max even.
      Last question is Sky-Watcher SWA 70° Eyepieces on offer at FLO at the moment, anybody have any thoughts or feed back as I was thinking about an Hyperion to add to the eyepiece collection.  (thinking about 13mm-17mm)
      Sorry, a load of questions but I live in West Wales and have no local suppliers within 100 miles, I'm happen to be going past FLO at the end of the week and I've a credit card .....gulp!
    • By willjohnsnow
      Hi! 
       
      SO - for a while now I've been interested in trying my hand at night-sky photography. I'm actually planning a trip to Namibia next year, around the new moon on 9th Sept. 2018. (Not just for night-sky, but wildlife, sand-dunes and local culture too.)
      For now I'm immersing myself in online articles, books, videos etc. I shoot Micro-Four Thirds, and so the newly released Laowa 7.5mm f/2 seems perfect timing.
      HOWEVER, I am aware I will probably need the SkyWatcher Star Adventurer bundle to get the most out of the skies.
      All the articles etc are fine for theoretical what-to-do's, but I was wondering if anyone knows of people who run demonstrations, or even workshops, for how to practically use and get-to-grips with the gear?
      I'm not that keen on going the whole hog and buying a Sw SA before trying one first.
      Any help or leads people can offer would be greatly appreciated.
      Many thanks! 
×