Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Sign in to follow this  
King

Coronado PST full disc, no barlow: 19th July 2016

Recommended Posts

  sun1-16-07-19-2_zpsswtppif0.jpg

 

London is in a cloudless heatwave at the moment so I took this opportunity.  I did take some barlow shots but I didn't consider those up to much.

Tried a slightly different image blend.  Should have shrunk the prom layer slightly really but we'll see how this goes...

Edited by King
  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

great shot mate lovely detail. its 87f he in south wales, but the seeing been good. thanks  charl.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nicely done, Sun in London eh, you'll be telling me next that man has walked on the Moon :grin:

Dave

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent PST image.  I kinda like that glow around the limb... enhances the prom activity in my opinion.

Thanks for the share.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really nice. Particularly the prom!

-Charles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By han59
      Probably an old discussion but lets review it with some measurements:


       
      The dark noise should only have a small influence on the total noise of the final image. Most noise is generated by the sky background. Under good conditions SQM = 20.4, I measure using my ASI1600MM-Cool the following noise (standard deviation) in a dark and in a light for an area where no stars are visible (local measurement using ASTAP):

      Dark 1 x 200sec, σ = 15 (range 0..65535)
      Light 1 x 200sec, σ = 130

      The noise in the dark is roughly 12% of the light, which seems acceptable to me. That would argue for about the same amount of darks as lights. With a worse SQM, you can probably do 2.5 times less darks for each (magnitude) step. So under light polluted sky you can do with much less darks than lights.
      If you are going to photograph with the H-alpha filter, it will be super dark. In a single H-alpha (7nm) light I measure a σ = 25r. Of these, 15 are self-noise and 10 of the incoming light. In good conditions and using an H-alpha filter, this is an argument to make much more darks than lights

      Above for a monochrome camera. To measure with an OSC (color) sensor I think it is better to first split the 4 Bayer pixels into 4 files and then measure them separately.

      Some measurements with my ASI1600MM-Cool, monochrome:
      DARKS noise:
      1 x 200 seconds, σ = 16
      1 x 200 seconds - master dark, σ = 15
      4 x 200 seconds combined - master dark, σ = 6.8    This is approximately 15 / square root (4)
      41 x 200 seconds combined, σ = 5
      90 x 200 seconds combined, σ = 3.8   This is a limit value that arises mainly from unevenness of the pixels. The noise will be smaller, approximately 15 / square root (90) is 1.6


       
      STACKED LIGHTS noise (lights corrected with darks and flats):
      11x200 seconds, σ = 70   (measured at a star free area, standard deviation in 0..65535 range, sky conditions could have been different)
      18x200 seconds, σ = 36
      18x200 seconds, σ = 40
      40x200 seconds, σ = 26
      42x200 seconds, σ = 30
      44x200 seconds, σ = 25
      58x200 seconds, σ = 20
      95x200 seconds, σ = 16

      Apparently the light noise decreases considerably while stacking more lights and I reach σ values up to 16 a 20. You do not want to stack these images with a single dark having a σ = 15. If you want to keep the dark noise added below 10% of σ = 16 then you need 100 darks because they give: 15 / square root (100) = 1.5 noise.

      So this confirms for a good suburban site (SQM=20.4) you will need about the same amount (or more) darks then lights. For a more light polluted area you can take less darks since the noise from the skybackground will be abundant. For H-alpha work you better take more darks then lights.
      Han
    • By astrosathya
      Finally I processed the Comet Neowise captured from Bangalore.
      Simple Set-up:
      Canon80D, Sigma 70-300 DG APOII @100mm F/4.
      ISO2000, 50x5s
      Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker
      Processed in Pixinsight.
      Lots of noise as I wanted to pull out both tails

    • By Kitsunegari
      this little active region put on quite a show and i captured till i ran out of drive space.
      160 frames x 40ms delay.   (220 frames in each stack)  (8 seconds per video capture) (160 captures)
      Animated with https://gifmaker.org/   
      Cropped with avidub.  Logo applied with avidub . Levels adjusted with avidub.
      Files converted with PIPP and registax 5.1
      Three pass Processing done in ImPPG (.xml files attached)
      127mm x 1200mm explore scientific first-light achromat with Meade 2x tele-negative barlow.  Basler aca720-520um camera. 
      Baader planetarium 36mm B-BCCD filter for energy rejection 
      1 angstrom calcium filter from Apollo Lasky @ http://calcium.solar
       
      https://explorescientificusa.com/products/fl-ar1271200maz01?_pos=8&_sid=9637d7ccc&_ss=r
      https://www.meade.com/meade-series-4000-126-2x-short-focus-barlow-lens-1-25.html
      https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-b-ccd-filter-(blue).html
      https://www.baslerweb.com/en/products/cameras/area-scan-cameras/ace/aca720-520um/
      http://virtualdub.sourceforge.net/
      https://greatattractor.github.io/imppg/
      http://www.astronomie.be/registax/download.html
      https://sites.google.com/site/astropipp/downloads
      http://www.firecapture.de/
       
      Thanks for watching!
       
       
       
      1.xml 2.xml 3.xml
    • By Kitsunegari
      200 frames total.  (this one gave me a bit of trouble aligning!)
       

       
    • By Abhinav
      Which one should I get I am little bit confused please help me out
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.