Jump to content

SkySurveyBanner.jpg.21855908fce40597655603b6c9af720d.jpg

AdityaR

New Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    India

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey anyways could somebody please tell me out of my light frames which are the best ones, I would use those frames as a target quality for my next time yk. Basically it would help me set a standard for me achieve.
  2. Wow! never thought the collimation of the telescope would come into play, would see if I can do somethin' also I just made a batinov mask today, lol. Anyways these are some very helpful tips you gave me - would try them. Thanks William!
  3. Here in india the equatorial mounts costs more than the full setup itself and as mentioned I have blown my budget out. However in half a year or so I would be getting the wedge which I think would help - and I would try again on this setup until I get a result (sorry, I am persistent) But thanks!
  4. Yo thanks for doing that, I was not expecting someone to actually fiddle and experiment with the data and here you are! Well as you said it a learning experience and but I would be sticking to this trial and error for a while tho(I blew my budget lol). However, I am persistent so I would be trying again until I get a showable result! Thanks again!
  5. So basically the current lights can't do me any good? that about right? - then I should probably pass it as a learning experience and just try again, lol. Tbh, I was questioning the tracking of the scope too - and you confirmed it. Next time would double check the tracking. I wont get a chance this week but I will try again and surely post the results here. Thanks!
  6. Equipment: Telescope - Celestron Nexstar 8SE with f/6.3 SCT Focal Reducer on an Alt-Az Mount Alignment - Standard Three Star Align Camera - Canon EOS 600D/ T3i (used a Canon T-Ring and T-Adapter to mount it to the OTA.) Software Used to Capture - APT LIght Frames - 10s x 60 decent frames at ISO800 Dark Frames - 10s x 60 decent frames at ISO800 (The Dark Frames were taken after dismounting the camera from the OTA and covering the camera sensor with its Black Cover.) Problem: *This is my first time taking a Deep Sky Image So Correct Me If You Can In Anyway, Thanks!* So, I recently took around 60 light/ 60 dark frames of Andromeda Galaxy (Bortle Scale of my area is usually 5). But when I tried to process(stack) the images the next morning with DeepSkyStacker - It wasn't able to detect the Stars in the images(I set the threshold to 2% but then it started detecting noise too.). However, I somehow solved that and got the star count to 50 at 20% threshold but when I proceeded to stack the images it gave me warning sayin "Only three out 60 frames would be stacked". Me being a dumb brain proceeded with this anyways, and the resulting image was NOT aligned and was with an Exposure of only 30s, and now The star count problem has also come back. Moreover, when I tried the same process with Sequater (WHICH I THINK I READ SOMEWHERE IS NOT SUITED FOR DSO's) gave a decent aligned result but not much data for processing. I can't seem to get around these problems with DSS, So any help would be appreciated. Please! for those who might say the 8se is not suited for DSO imaging, refer to here - https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/826723-nexstar-8se-imaging/ Here are the images if you might want to take a look - https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1VTqSG77R2kvuEKq1cQvcXFhS72FHF6rW?usp=drive_link I have also attached some light and dark frames and the image I got from Sequater and SIRIL. Pardon my english (am not a native speaker)! IMG_6470.CR2 IMG_6492.CR2 IMG_6493.CR2 IMG_6494.CR2 Andromeda-Proccessed.tif
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.