Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Opportunity's final messsage.


barkis

Recommended Posts

According to Nasa the last message from Opportunity set emotions running riot.It simply read, My Batteries are running low, and it is getting dark.

Sounds like something HAL might have said in.        2001, A Space Odyssey.

Ron.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd probably get the sack if I worked for NASA as a programmer.  I think I'd be unavoidably tempted to sneak some code in for an amusing or mysterious message when a vehicle was about to shut down irretrievably.

Following barkis's theme it could have sent "My God!  It's full of stars!" or just have it start on "Daisy, Daisy...".  Or transmit a message back in Klingon.  Or, in fact, given the actual message, I'd probably have it as:

"My batteries are running low and it is getting dark.  Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into!"

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NASA has gone a bit weird IMO regarding the first person perspective tweets issued on some missions (Not in this instance I appreciate)  I personally find these FPP tweets quite odd and somewhat banal.  Though to be fair it must be quite emotional when a long duration mission such as this finally comes to an end.  Anyhow, I greatly respect NASA and the work they do,  it is one of humanity's more noble endeavors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Demonperformer said:

Went for eight months and continued working for fifteen years ... definitely one of the more successful Mars missions, methinks.

Didn't they only go for 90 days to start with? Pretty amazing engineering to last so long. I guess if you build it to survive at all then it is likely to last a while longer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the solar panel got covered in dust, what'll happen if it suddenly gets uncovered again?

Assuming of course that the batteries aren't totally kaput (and so on) I can just see people getting freaked out by "Oi! I'm 'ere!!"! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stu said:

Didn't they only go for 90 days to start with? Pretty amazing engineering to last so long. I guess if you build it to survive at all then it is likely to last a while longer?

You may be right, Stu. I just got the "8 months" figure off a news broadcast and haven't checked it. In which case, the mission cost them only 1/60 (in terms of $$$/day of data) than they expected. Surely no one can complain at that rate of return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I did read it was planned for 90 days and if my grey matter is functioning for 1 km of travel. 

When they thought dust on the SP''s along would come a clean wind and they were back in business.

It far exceeded that.

My question is, if you budgeted payroll for double that, 180 days, just to cover the chance of it lasting longer, where did the money come from for all these years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.