Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_lunar_landings.thumb.jpg.b50378d0845690d8a03305a49923eb40.jpg

Recommended Posts

Hello!

I bought a GSO 2 inch Coma Corrector for my 8inch Newtonian. I'm still having terrible coma on one of the corners which is actually worse than without the coma. The rest of the corners look fine with proper guiding.

Here are some details and what I've done to try and solve the issue:

1- Spacing is 75 mm just as recommended.

2- Used a Cheshire, laser collimator, and a webcam to check collimation.

3- Squared the focuser so that it's orthogonal to the optical axis.

4- Tried another DSLR

Note that once I collimate and double check that I'm collimated with all the tools, I always try to do a star test and collimation appears off (the dark spot isn't in the middle). Last time I tried to collimate the primary using a star but it's really tough to fine tune since due to the focuser's sag, I can't be sure that the star is in the middle of the fov.

My take on the problem is that when I'm using the DSLR with the coma corrector, the weight is moving the focuser away from the center of the optical axis but I'm not sure this if this is the case. I've tried everything and I'm out of ideas.

Below is a test image I took for Lagoon Nebula. Notice the coma on the left top side mostly, while the right side usually appear to have no coma (not the case in the attached image though for some reason, but usually the right side is fine). One more thing I've noticed, the stars on the left corner appear to be out of focus while the rest of the image appears well in focus (used a Bahtinov mask with APT bahitnov focus tool)

There's also another image I took for a distant light to check collimation (since clouds covered the sky as soon as I decided to do a star test). It appears to be fine and I was able to center it better but didn't capture the image.

Please let me know if you have any idea what's causing this. My number one suspect is the focuser's sag preventing me from doing accurate collimation although everything appears to be normal while collimating. I'm giving this another 2 weeks of my time, if it doesn't work I might quit astrophotography till I'm able to afford  an APO.

One more thing that needs to be added, when using the GSO CC I had to move the primary mirror up the scope by around 2 cm to be able to achieve focus.

 

Clear Skies!

M8 Test.jpg

star collimation test.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, david_taurus83 said:

What scope exactly are you using and what focuser has it got?

It's a Celestron AVX 8 inch. 8 inch newtonian, f5. The focuser is the one that came with the scope. It's a Celestron AVX 8 inch.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Anthony RS said:

the weight is moving the focuser

Not sure; post a photo of it.

Is it the old fat 2 1/2" single speed rack and pinion focuser? If so, there are two grub screws (you don't normally noice them) on the opposite side of the focuser to the focus knobs that can be used to take up the slack. Loosen the pinion (4 screws which hold the knobs) and tighten the grub screws until there's a firm grip and you can't wobble the focus tube. Tighten the pinion back to just take up the backlash. Re-collimate and you should be good to go.

I've some photo somewhere if you get stuck.

HTH and clear skies

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it the standard Crayford focuser? If so, tbh, they ain't the best and their certainly not designed to take the weight of a DSLR. I upgraded mins to the low profile one to achieve focus but even then I struggled with tilt in the system. I bought a Baader MPCC and it certainly helped but I still had coma on one side of the image but maybe not as bad as yours. Your coma still points to the centre whereas mine all pointed in the same direction. I'd take the 75mm spacing with a pinch of salt and experiment with more and less. I have a refractor now for imaging and the flattener and camera all screw together so more or less eliminate tilt issues but the quoted spacing I needed to use was no where near right so I had to experiment. You may find a sweet spot but at the same time you may have to accept that it might not completely eliminate it right to the edges. DSLR chips are quite big when you compare them to 'proper' astro CCD's. It's a frustrating hobby indeed! But the challenge is also what makes it so interesting!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, david_taurus83 said:

Is it the standard Crayford focuser? If so, tbh, they ain't the best and their certainly not designed to take the weight of a DSLR. I upgraded mins to the low profile one to achieve focus but even then I struggled with tilt in the system. I bought a Baader MPCC and it certainly helped but I still had coma on one side of the image but maybe not as bad as yours. Your coma still points to the centre whereas mine all pointed in the same direction. I'd take the 75mm spacing with a pinch of salt and experiment with more and less. I have a refractor now for imaging and the flattener and camera all screw together so more or less eliminate tilt issues but the quoted spacing I needed to use was no where near right so I had to experiment. You may find a sweet spot but at the same time you may have to accept that it might not completely eliminate it right to the edges. DSLR chips are quite big when you compare them to 'proper' astro CCD's. It's a frustrating hobby indeed! But the challenge is also what makes it so interesting!

I'm sure it's not from the spacing since I'm having the same issue even without the CC. i know it won't be perfect and I'd expect some Coma to remain near the edges but this is far from acceptable. The left corner actually looks worse than not using the CC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, alacant said:

Not sure; post a photo of it.

Is it the old fat 2 1/2" single speed rack and pinion focuser? If so, there are two grub screws (you don't normally noice them) on the opposite side of the focuser to the focus knobs that can be used to take up the slack. Loosen the pinion (4 screws which hold the knobs) and tighten the grub screws until there's a firm grip and you can't wobble the focus tube. Tighten the pinion back to just take up the backlash. Re-collimate and you should be good to go.

I've some photo somewhere if you get stuck.

HTH and clear skies

 

Yep that's the focuser. I already tried to tighten the grub screws but without loosening the pinion (4 screws on the bottom). I'll try that. Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Anthony RS said:

I'm sure it's not from the spacing since I'm having the same issue even without the CC. i know it won't be perfect and I'd expect some Coma to remain near the edges but this is far from acceptable. The left corner actually looks worse than not using the CC.

Have you bought the GSO new? Can you send it back and swap for the Baader MPCC or the Skywatcher 0.9? These 2 seem to be popular? Failing that it may need an upgraded focuser. Some have the ability to adjust the tilt out of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, david_taurus83 said:

Have you bought the GSO new? Can you send it back and swap for the Baader MPCC or the Skywatcher 0.9? These 2 seem to be popular? Failing that it may need an upgraded focuser. Some have the ability to adjust the tilt out of them.

Ye I bought it new and that was a while ago so I don't think I can send it back. The thing is that if I get 100% sure that the problem is the focuser, I'll invest in a good focuser but I can't afford spending more money now without actually fixing the issue ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Anthony RS said:

without loosening the pinion

Ah, ok. That's probably it then as if not, the pinion prevents the focus tube moving and mating against the two Teflon strips. It is also fully adjustable for tilt but collimating should take care of that anyway; simply make sure the three sets of push-pull tilt screws are adjusted fully home against the baseplate.

 I have the same focuser on my sw250 and -foolishly- swapped it for the dual speed Crayford having been persuaded that for ap I needed fine focus. What a waste of time and money that was. 

The other item you need (essential) is the compression collar and in so doing, the ability to move your primary mirror back to where it should be. Attached is my rebuild...

HTH

image.thumb.jpeg.960b46545101b3910c76479bbffbc487.jpeg

Edited by alacant
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The image shows some elongation of he stars pointing to the center which tells your spacing is too short.
Baader's delrin rings (https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-t-2-adjustmentspacer-rings.html) provide a possibillity to go longer  bit by bit, by adding more thin rings between the CC and the camera.

Often this is just a matter of tenths of a millimeter. To do the spacing right means you will have to experiment. What the producers say is just an average.
The best way to get it exactly right is with an adjustable spacer like this: 
https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-varilock-29-lockable-t-2-extensiontube-20-29mm-with-spanner-tool-(t-2-part-25y).html
But there is also an issue with sagging, for the elongation is not the same in all corners. On the right side it is definetly less, but still visible.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Waldemar said:

The image shows some elongation of he stars pointing to the center which tells your spacing is too short.
Baader's delrin rings (https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-t-2-adjustmentspacer-rings.html) provide a possibillity to go longer  bit by bit, by adding more thin rings between the CC and the camera.

Often this is just a matter of tenths of a millimeter. To do the spacing right means you will have to experiment. What the producers say is just an average.
The best way to get it exactly right is with an adjustable spacer like this: 
https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/baader-varilock-29-lockable-t-2-extensiontube-20-29mm-with-spanner-tool-(t-2-part-25y).html
But there is also an issue with sagging, for the elongation is not the same in all corners. On the right side it is definetly less, but still visible.

 

I'm having the same issue without using the CC so I don't think spacing is the problem however I will try to experiment more with the spacing maybe that works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, alacant said:

Ah, ok. That's probably it then as if not, the pinion prevents the focus tube moving and mating against the two Teflon strips. It is also fully adjustable for tilt but collimating should take care of that anyway; simply make sure the three sets of push-pull tilt screws are adjusted fully home against the baseplate.

 I have the same focuser on my sw250 and -foolishly- swapped it for the dual speed Crayford having been persuaded that for ap I needed fine focus. What a waste of time and money that was. 

The other item you need (essential) is the compression collar and in so doing, the ability to move your primary mirror back to where it should be. Attached is my rebuild...

HTH

image.thumb.jpeg.960b46545101b3910c76479bbffbc487.jpeg

The compression ring is a great idea actually! I will be able to get the primary back where it was since I'd have enough inward focus then, and it should center the Collimation tools and the DSLR perfectly as opposed to what I currently have. I guess I'll try that although it's going to be hard to find it where I live so I'm going to have to order it and wait for the shipping ? Hopefully that would solve my problem.

Edited by Anthony RS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Anthony RS said:

The compression ring is a great idea actually! I will be able to get the primary back where it was since I'd have enough inward focus then, and it should center the Collimation tools and the DSLR perfectly as opposed to what I currently have. I guess I'll try that although it's going to be hard to find it where I live so I'm going to have to order it and wait for the shipping ? Hopefully that would solve my problem.

one question, would the TS Optics 2" Adapter with compression Ring work with this focuser and which brand did you use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scopestuff have it: M60x1 male to 2". They've a few left but have taken it from their listings. Send them a photo of the focuser to nail it with them. I'm sure TS ** have it too, at a price;) HTH.

** This one I think

Edited by alacant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Anthony RS said:

I'm having the same issue without using the CC so I don't think spacing is the problem however I will try to experiment more with the spacing maybe that works.

That is why you use the CC... if the CC does not work as it should, the spacing is wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Waldemar said:

That is why you use the CC... if the CC does not work as it should, the spacing is wrong

I tried different spacings. The best one was the one I'm already using ? The CC is working fine on the right side of the image but not the left side which is why I'm suspecting that's it's something wrong with the optical axis. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right about the optical axis. probably some sagging in your focusser, or a bad spacer or adapter. Could also be play in your camera T2 adapter.
You say you tried different spacings, but the difference between good and bad or not so good is just tenths of millimeters, not millimeters.

Normal spacers go in steps of 5 mm or so and that are far too big steps, that is why I advised the Baader Varilock.
To get things really right in AP costs a lot of effort and money...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Try  rotating the camera and also shooting straight up to see if the effect alters.

Dave

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Davey-T said:

Try  rotating the camera and also shooting straight up to see if the effect alters.

Dave

I've tried rotating the camera with no effect. I also tried another DSLR without any effect. I'll try to shoot straight up though and check if anything changes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Waldemar said:

You are right about the optical axis. probably some sagging in your focusser, or a bad spacer or adapter. Could also be play in your camera T2 adapter.
You say you tried different spacings, but the difference between good and bad or not so good is just tenths of millimeters, not millimeters.

Normal spacers go in steps of 5 mm or so and that are far too big steps, that is why I advised the Baader Varilock.
To get things really right in AP costs a lot of effort and money...

619498067_M8TestCenter.thumb.jpg.ab649e0b9e115a0e8b97a66d7481a821.jpgThe image attached is why I'm quite sure it has something to do with the optical axis. I've traced the direction of the coma from all corners which should lead me to the center of the axis if I'm not mistaken; and the result is that it's way off the center of the image which should imply that my collimation is way off, but according to all my collimation tools, collimation is spot on.  This is frustrating ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Anthony RS said:

619498067_M8TestCenter.thumb.jpg.ab649e0b9e115a0e8b97a66d7481a821.jpgThe image attached is why I'm quite sure it has something to do with the optical axis. I've traced the direction of the coma from all corners which should lead me to the center of the axis if I'm not mistaken; and the result is that it's way off the center of the image which should imply that my collimation is way off, but according to all my collimation tools, collimation is spot on.  This is frustrating ?

Plus the excess vignetting on the left side kinda confirms it's the optical axis that's the issue. Am I making sense? ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 20/08/2018 at 02:13, alacant said:

Scopestuff have it: M60x1 male to 2". They've a few left but have taken it from their listings. Send them a photo of the focuser to nail it with them. I'm sure TS ** have it too, at a price;) HTH.

** This one I think

I could only find this compression ring https://www.amazon.co.uk/TS-Optics-compression-Skywatcher-TSM54-2/dp/B00EE2CJ86 on amazon. All the other sellers don't ship to my country. Will this one fit my Celestron drawtube is it specifically made for a Skywatcher? Are they different?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Anthony RS said:

Plus the excess vignetting on the left side kinda confirms it's the optical axis that's the issue. Am I making sense? ?

 

I think you've pretty much figured out the issue. A small tilt shouldn't put you that far off centre. I know you've said you've centred and collimated the optical path but something is clearly not right. I think you need to remove the focuser and start again from scratch. I followed the below tutorial and it got me pretty close, as much as my patience would allow!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

I think you've pretty much figured out the issue. A small tilt shouldn't put you that far off centre. I know you've said you've centred and collimated the optical path but something is clearly not right. I think you need to remove the focuser and start again from scratch. I followed the below tutorial and it got me pretty close, as much as my patience would allow!

 

 

I've tried it more than 5 times. I followed the same tutorial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Cosmic Geoff
      With reluctance I am looking to sell my 200mm aperture f5 Helios Newtonian OTA. (Helios is a brand that became incorporated into Skywatcher - this closely resembles Skywatcher OTAs)
      The Helios is offered with single speed rack & pinion focuser, tube rings, 22 to 1.25" adaptor, dovetail bar and grab handle for £90 o.n.o.  In good condition except that the dovetail bar appears to be discoloured by exposure to sunlight.
      I have not used the telescope for many months and with a persistent problem in my right arm my enthusiasm for moving heavy kit around has diminished.
      Buyer to collect from North Bucks.
      Offered as option with the OTA: EQ5 mount with RA drive + 6 volt sealed lead-acid battery +charger + standard and extra long Dec slow motion manual shafts. £150. Condition - used but working.
       
      If I sell the OTA I will be looking to dispose of its accessories:
      9x50 Skywatcher straight finder - in excellent condition except that the small plastic dust cap is missing.
      Cheshire collimator, boxed, as new.
      Helical fine focuser, range 10mm, ID 1.25", screws into 2"adapter.
      3x Datysun Barlow, as new, boxed.
      Widefield eyepiece, 22mm f.l., 30mm body (note not 1.25")  with built in focus, works well with this telescope.
      Plastic collimation cap (no cost).
      This bundle would cost around £114 new - offered if bought with scope at £75 o.n.o.
       
       





    • By DJastrzebski
      Hey,
      For sale is Baader Rowe Coma Corrector (RCC I) in a perfect condition (used max. 2 times). £90 including delivery in EU. PP preferred. Thanks for looking!


    • By floastro
      Hi guys,
      This is the first lights of my ASA 12"N f/3.62 (purchased in 2007) with my Moravian G4-16000 CCD camera using one KAF-16803 chip of 36mm x 36mm (4K x 4K).
      The adjustments, collimation, ASA OK3-Z pression screws, asked a lot of attention.
      For a precise collimation, i use the CATSEYE XL & XLKP kit.
      This is the first 3hrs of exposures taken the last weekend in one night. The second night was too windy unfortunately.
       

       
      Full Resolution image in 4K x 4K here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/integration_NGC4438_DBE_3HDR_CompositeAplatie2_Spikes2-Modifier-Modifier-Modifier.jpg
       
      Full Resolution Annotated image here :
      http://www.poigetdigitalpics.com/Fichiers_Divers/NGC4438_new_image_Annotated.jpg
       
       
      All the information below :
       

       

       
       

       
      Enjoy !
      Florent ?
    • By Kronos831
      Hey guys,im currently on a school trip and brought my celestron firstscope with, tonight we ll  be trying some dsos and maybe saturn and jupiter,the telescope itself is not collimated and dirty (on the mirrors)So I wanted to ask.in the scope, there is no primary adjustment screws,only the ones to take it off .Does that mean that its set , allowing me to take it off wash it and back on without having to recollimate the primary?
      Thanks
      Kronos
    • By Demonperformer
      To put this in perspective, I bought my first SCT nearly ten years ago. And in all that time, there has been one word that has scared me witless (no, that's not a spelling mistake ) ... collimation!!!!
      There are so many horror strories around of people scratching corrector plates and simply messing it up completely and making a scope unusable, that I have always avoided it like the plague ... once even preferring to sell the scope I had and buy another one to avoid having to do it [don't you just love the logic of that one?particularly when there is no guarantee they will arrive collimated!]. I've always belonged to the "I don't care about winning, I just don't want to lose" brigade.
      Six months ago, I bought an RC6 and recently picked-up a cheshire eyepiece. No corrector plate ("But don't drop the allen key into the tube," the websites warn!). If I'm ever going to do this, now is the time. A quick look earlier this week showed the dot well out of position, so yesterday ... I procrastinated ... o come on, you didn't think it was going to be that easy, did you? But there are clear skies predicted for tonight, so this morning I went outside, set up my NEQ6, plonked the RC6 onto it, pointed it slightly downwards and went and made a cup of coffee. Returning to the scope I started to have a play.
      I kid you not. In less time than it had taken me to set up (excluding the coffee), I had the black dot slap-bang in the middle of my white circle. The allen bolts were tight, yes, but not "wheel-nut" tight; not "you need three feet of metal bar wrapped around the allen key to lean on in order to loosen it" tight. And yes, my first move was in the wrong direction ... so what??? It was so monumentally, stupidly easy ... why all the horror stories on the internet?
      Am I pleased I set it up outside where there was plenty of space, rather than struggling in the lounge? Yes. Am I pleased I got a cheshire so I could do it in daylight? Yes. Were the ten years of worry that I had endured dreading this day a waste of energy? You bet!
      So my message is to anyone who looks at the word "collimation" and immediately becomes a rabbit in headlights ... Action Cures Fear ... seriously, just do it ... if I can do it, ANYONE can.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.