Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Jupiter transit with Io


Barv

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

Not posted much on here lately due to losing my account credentials.

I thought I'd share with you an image of Jupiter taken with the 11" Mak under steady seeing/transparency on the night of the 15/16th October. much has been said on here about correct sampling, - my ideal f ratio for sampling is around F15. The live view was that good that I decided to put on a 2.5X TV power-mate  which would give me around F22. I personally have found that I get my best images in good seeing when oversampled. 

I had originally set up for mono imaging, but had the settings wrong on the new camera, so couldn't obtain a frame rate of more than 1.5 fps. I transferred over to the ASI 462 coloured cam at the last minute, so pleased that the session wasn't a disaster!

Regards

Harvey

45-downsized-JupiterandIO-23.31.1.png

  • Like 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/10/2023 at 13:15, knobby said:

That's lovely, how long does the 11“ take to reach thermal equilibrium?

It's pretty quick actually, I generally put a fan on at the bottom of the OTA. What makes a huge difference is that I have the whole tube wrapped in silver foil.

Thanks for your comment

Regards

Harvey

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said the the CN forum this is a fabulous capture Harvey! One of the best UK shots this year for sure.

On this particular image I can see some artifacts on Jupiter, possibly image compression as the text is distorted?

Edited by Space Cowboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Space Cowboy said:

As I said the the CN forum this is a fabulous capture Harvey! One of the best UK shots this year for sure.

On this particular image I can see some artifacts on Jupiter, possibly image compression as the text is distorted?

Thanks Stuart. That's interesting. I think I did some minor denoising after posting on CN. That's probably why the text is distorted, - I was just too lazy to write it up again, - LOL. 

This particular image was just 5 no 40 second captures combined in Winjupos. So, I think the artifact you are mentioning is slight edge distortion due to stretching. I did try to remove it using the deringing function in Registax, but couldn't. I do have another 5 captures that I could still combine in Winjupos, but am still working and have been time short. I will get round to doing it soon though.

Best wishes

Harvey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.