Jump to content

Dwarf II Smart Telescope


Recommended Posts

This popped into my Indiegogo feed today - haven’t searched properly on here to be honest but curious as to views on this from an EAA standpoint, and if anyone has been involved or experienced the original model. Not looking to acquire one at all but  just for pure interest in the tech.  

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/dwarf-ii-smart-telescope-astro-nature-photography--2?utm_content=campaigns_one_column_hero1_title&utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=bck-07152022friday&gs_variant=2021_Friday#/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really had to scroll down to find out the specs, which are: 100mm FL and 24mm aperture. Id say it will be very underpowered for anything other than the handful of bright big objects out there. I cant help but feel it should be a bit bigger even if the price doubled.

The pictures shown in the site are from bortle 4, which is much, much better than the average sky condition for most so those examples are more of an upper limit than your average consumers shot.

Its not looking great IMO, but i dont think the target audience is the amateur astronomer but instead the tech enthusiast social media person or something like that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the price, it may well be a solid starter kit, in the same that a £100 telescope might not satisfy the needs of people here, but will amaze a lot of other people.

But it's ALT-AZ and I can't imagine it will work well on anything other than a few select targets.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have opened this thread while it was only kickstarter but thread was deleted for some reason... 

I backed this invention and I beleive it will be something if they make it properly. It is basically cheapest goto setup. Perfect for introduction to astronomy and perfect travel device. If results as bellow are possible it could be top item! 

Small lens does not mean bad performance, this has been imaged with  Meopta Anaret 20/90mm, f4,5 @f5,6 which is effectively 16mm...  with EOS500D

https://flic.kr/p/2i7sSmr

and

jednorog copy

 

Edited by Vulisha
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it, and they only image without infrared filter, that kicks colors out bit it is good for low quality skies. I am interested in real color imaging for galaxies. 

Luckly they will add 1.55 filter adapter, so you can add any filter you want. 

Also neat trick will be putting it oj tripod so it acts partially as eq mount to reduce field rotation, hopefully :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
On 15/07/2022 at 19:39, ONIKKINEN said:

Really had to scroll down to find out the specs, which are: 100mm FL and 24mm aperture. Id say it will be very underpowered for anything other than the handful of bright big objects out there. I cant help but feel it should be a bit bigger even if the price doubled.

The pictures shown in the site are from bortle 4, which is much, much better than the average sky condition for most so those examples are more of an upper limit than your average consumers shot.

It's not look great IMO, but I don't think the target audience is the amateur astronomer but instead the tech enthusiast social media person or something like 

they shot it in 7 and 8 class skys but I do agree on the rest am going to buy it since I want to take it to different countries and field trips 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Another under sky review, looking interesting, especially if the company keep listening and adding features to make it more out the box impressive for newbies and with enough pro features to satisfy the EEA community. Low cost and satisfying the newbie and pro community would be good. Could also be very good for outreach events too?!


Plenty of improvements and good suggestions going in. 

Not sure there is an iOS version yet 😞

Peter

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a decent product actually, ill have to eat my words from my previous comment where i just bashed the product based on the numbers alone. From Tokyo the image Cuiv got seems pretty good for the price and i cant think of anything that competes in the price category.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You come up with lens hoods, plastic to do flat frames and other bits and pieces for it. Would be good to see how it handles filters, especially narrower band ones. Maybe that pixel binning could help avoid wierd colour issues. They need to improve the object finding and maybe add the ability to provide coordinates or links to other planetarium programmes. The existing products seem well received, though costly, this could provide an alternative.

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, michael.h.f.wilkinson said:

Interesting, especially for large targets, but for smaller targets there is no replacement for aperture.

Sort of but even a modest 3 inch refractor with a CMOS camera can easily out perform the Palomar 200 inch scope with its photographic plates, who knows what technology will come next..

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Alien 13 said:

Sort of but even a modest 3 inch refractor with a CMOS camera can easily out perform the Palomar 200 inch scope with its photographic plates, who knows what technology will come next..

Alan

That's a wrong comparison, because it suggests a big scope cannot be equipped with a modern sensor.  Besides, to quote Scotty: Ye cannae change the laws of physics, captain". A big instrument captures more photons and has a higher resolution than a smaller. My APM 80 mm F/6 triplet is optically outstanding, but cannot match the resolution the 8" C8 has on planets. There is simply no contest. A 30mm scope will not show as much detail as, and will capture 4 times fewer photons from the same area in the sky than a 60 mm, this means the S/N is half as good. Resolution-wise, a little 30 mm lens will not be able to capture the moon like this:

Moon_224739_lapl4_ap775_stitch_LR_2c2.thumb.jpg.8b3629a67356022692599edd8b7a5134.jpg

Click for full resolution.

No amount of AI-driven enhancement will change that, simply because the information isn't contained in the data. A colleague of mine showed a paper in which it was shown that a deep-learning-based sharpening method on astronomical data hallucinated several objects (i.e. created objects out of noise). Whilst adding some freckles, or misplacing hairs in AI super-resolution applications to old portraits is quite tolerable, in scientific or medical imaging this kind of creativity is unacceptable.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to put things in perspective, the Rayleigh limit for a 24mm aperture is 5.75 arc seconds (way worse than the seeing disk), my 80mm boasts a 1.73 arc second limit, and the C8 0.68 arc seconds (only ever achievable with lucky imaging, of course). Stars will hardly be pinpricks in the 24 mm. Using the Dawes limit we get 4.83", 1.45" and 0.57" respectively 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm intrigued by this product.  

It most certainly has a market. It's simple enough for a beginner to operate but requires some astronomical insight so maybe good for a young, budding astronomer?

I agree, it is the future! Robotic scopes that is. Never mind all this nefarious kit hanging off a complex mount, dripping with cables. None of it wanting to cooperate any other part!

The only choice you'll have is sensor spec and perhaps some aspect of the optical train. Fixed physical housing but interchangeable lenses.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I own the eVscope and compared to that it is vastly underpowered. If I was just buying one for night time viewing then I would probably not buy this. 

However I think there is a good market for it as it is both terrestrial and night time, extremely portable and overall very ubiquitous. It would be great for astronomy clubs for outreach, schools and college for similar, there is definately a market out there for it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.