Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

Padraic M

APT connect to the correct camera

Recommended Posts

How can I set up APT so that it always connects by default to my imaging camera? I have an irritating problem that APT will regularly connect to my guide camera, even though that camera is already connected in Phd2.

I have created two APT shortcuts on the desktop, one specifying camera 2 (which usually is the guidecam) and the other specifying camera 1 (which is usually the imaging camera), but it looks like cameras 1 and 2 are not absolutely assigned to the ASI1600mm (imaging) and ASI290MC (guiding).

At APT startup, in the log it will say 'Connected to ASI1600mm' and then imediately say 'sensor size 5.6mmx3.2mm'. Then I know I have a problem as it's obviously not the 1600! I can usually sort it out by disconnecting, Shift-Connecting (to get the camera selection dialog), and selecting cameras 1 and 2 until I get the correct sensor size.

There must be a better way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @bottletopburly I may well do that. 

Gathered the necessary evidence today - it's definitely happening intermittently but more often than not; and it doesn't depend on which camera is attached first. I thought that perhaps camera 1 is the first connected but not so.

I wonder where the camera numbers are applied? See the screenshot - latest APT version; 1600MM was attached when APT was started; 290MC attached afterwards. APT connected to the 290MC and correctly detected the sensor size, but incorrectly identified it as the 1600MM. 

The biggest hint that something is wrong is that the cooling aid isn't available, but otherwise it will happily let me use the 290mc. Causes lots of head-scratching especially if it's also connected to phd2.

image.thumb.png.dab1fc591f56b372e87a48f346a79ff7.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Padraic M said:

Thanks @bottletopburly I may well do that. 

Gathered the necessary evidence today - it's definitely happening intermittently but more often than not; and it doesn't depend on which camera is attached first. I thought that perhaps camera 1 is the first connected but not so.

I wonder where the camera numbers are applied? See the screenshot - latest APT version; 1600MM was attached when APT was started; 290MC attached afterwards. APT connected to the 290MC and correctly detected the sensor size, but incorrectly identified it as the 1600MM. 

The biggest hint that something is wrong is that the cooling aid isn't available, but otherwise it will happily let me use the 290mc. Causes lots of head-scratching especially if it's also connected to phd2.

image.thumb.png.dab1fc591f56b372e87a48f346a79ff7.png

Definetley one for ivo

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, this is just a guess as i don't have two cameras to try. 

Have you tried holding shift and clicking on the connect button? It will show the select camera type window. You can then select the third option and choose zwo camera,  on the right you can select the camera number that you want to use. 

Hope it helps. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Frank @Atreta, yes I've tried that. Once you select the correct camera, there's no issue. It will connect and work correctly. However, there's no indication which camera is #1 and which is #2, and the numbers are not consistently assigned. You can tell APT to connect to #1 or #2 automatically, but there's no indication which physical camera is connected except for the sensor dimensions. If I had two identical cameras, there would be no way to know other than to shine a lamp down the OTA and see if the camera sees it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the camera name not be changed in the driver? Sorry not able to access my gear at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@spillage camera name can be changed in the APT settings, but only one camera name per APT instance. This name seems to be applied to whatever CCD camera is connected. So, regardless of whether I connect to CCD #1 or #2, it will call it whatever is set in APT settings.

I believe that's why the APT log says 'Connected to camera ZWO ASI1600MM' and then shows the sensor dimensions for the ASI290. Funny that when you disconnect, it uses the actual camera model name e.g. ZWO ASI290MC, not the name from settings.

@newbie alert using ZWO drivers for the cameras. ASCOM for everything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Padraic M said:

 

@newbie alert using ZWO drivers for the cameras. ASCOM for everything else.

I've heard that the drivers latch onto the wrong camera's quite often, sure people just use the ascom asi drivers to rectify it.. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Padraic M
      I spent the full night out last night and got 6 hours of Ha lights on the Bubble and the Horsehead. Reasonably pleased with the results, but even though I followed my usual process and got good focus statistics in APT, I am slightly out of focus with roundy stars and some are even slightly donutty. Samples are attached below.
      Problem:
      - After getting close to spot-on focus, the APT Bahtinov Aid showed a focus distance oscillating from -0.02 to +0.02. Seeing seemed good to the inexpert eye. Not so sure about transparency as there was some thin, wispy cloud throughout the night. So, I started the night's imaging with focus 'Close' rather than 'On' focus.
      - Different subs show different quality stars, ranging from small donuts to circles.
      Background information:
      - HEQ5 Pro Rowan; SW Esprit 80 with field flattener, SW stock manual Crayford focuser; ZWO EFW Mini; Baader 1.25" 3.5nm Ha filter; ZWO ASI1600MM Pro binned 1x1 @ -20c.
      - AA Starwave 50mm guidescope with ZWO ASI290mm Mini guidecam binned 2x2.
      - All subs are 300s, gain 139, offset 10.
      - Polar alignment with Sharpcap to 17 arcsec ("Excellent"); capture with APT; guiding with Phd2. Focus with Bahtinov mask and APT Bahtinov Aid. Stacked in DSS with Darks, Flats and Dark Flats.
      - Mount is well balanced in RA, but is very camera-heavy in Dec.
      - PHD2 guiding was around 2"/px. Imaging pixel scale is 1.9"/px.
      Questions:
      - Do I put the round stars down to seeing, given that the Bahtinov Aid focus distance was bouncing equally above and below zero?
      - Can poor seeing cause the donut stars?
      - Would an electronic auto-focuser do any better in this situation?
      - Would the Seeing Monitor in Sharpcap give useful information? I didn't think to use it last night.
      - Could my guiding performance, and possibly the Dec balance, have affected the image quality in this way?
      - What are my options in future - abandon imaging for the night? Bin all images in software 2x2 or 4x4 to sharpen the stars at the expense of lower resolution?
      - Other suggestions?
      Sample 1: Detail from a single 5-min sub of Bubble nebula at 100% showing round stars, and a blurred bubble.

      Sample 2: Detail from a different sub of the Bubble nebula at 400% showing donuts

       
      Sample 3: Detail from a 5-min sub of the Horsehead nebula at 100%, showing both round and donut stars

       
      Finally, both images stacked, calibrated and stretched, scaled to 4x4 in Gimp. 28x300s Ha on bubble, 22*300s Ha on horsehead.


    • By Nikolas74
      As I am ready to invest in this new CMOS camera from ZWO the Asi2600mc pro , I am trying to understand why this camera will be better than a DSLR with a filter Infront....
      How this camera will give me better images ?
      I have used DSLR camera some years ago , when I was starting this hobby but after that I have been through mono ccd's , since the time I realized that unfortunately due to lack of time I can not continue with mono imaging and filters....
      So I am thinking to give it a try with a brand new, let's say technology of Color CMOS and see what I can get out of it....
      I see some really nice examples on the net but am I going to achieve them ?
      The Zwo Asi294mc pro widely used around the world is also very promising...Discontinued already as I hear...Amp glow issues....is it really so annoying ?cheaper than the new asi2600 MC pro by half price....
      So can someone persuade me that the Zwo Asi2600mc pro is better than the others ? 🤔
    • By KEJ
      Hi
      Can I please ask, is there anyone out there with the following or a similar setup to this:
       
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + ZWO ASI533MC Pro (or other ZWO Camera) ?  
      Currently,  I have been using the following setup:
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + Nikon DSLR
        However, by the end of the week I am hoping to have this new setup:
      William Optics Z61 Scope + WO 61A Flattener + ZWO ASI533MC Pro
        I was really just wondering how the more experienced out there had configured/connected their equipment together?
      How people connect their ZWO cameras to the flatteners?
      Are the flatteners still required with the smaller sensor cameras ?
      I was just wondering if anyone has any pictures of similar setups to above please (equipment trains)?
       
      Thanks in advance for any comments or advice.
    • By johnnyvmass
      Question, is my pier out of level if I'm trying to PA (with asiair pro) and both directions are moving when I adjust the alt bolts? I can't get the mount polar aligned.
      Mount neq6 pro
      Pier mounted on a concrete slab
      OTA c8 with .63 reducer
      Camera asi294mc pro
      Zwo OAG
      Thanks in advance
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.