Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Metric meets imperial


Ken82

Recommended Posts

One of the biggest offenders is B&Q.

I have some of their replacement tap heads fitted to my kitchen taps. Last week I bought their replacement tap washers.

Guess what? The tap washers are 1/2" and the taps are 12mm... :blink:

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MarkAR said:

Alas we are forgetting machinists real life measurements, a Gnats Whisker, a Fannies Hair, the ubiquitous Tad and Smidgeon, all the way up to a Chunk.

When measuring for DIY if it's small I use mm but large ft/ in. 

No idea why .

Regards Andrew 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the older guys here must be masters in using fractions.

When I was younger, even using metric units, I often would grab the wrong wrench for a certain hex-bolt I needed to fasten. After 'a few' years now I know what wrench to grab for any bolt.
Let's say you're working on a project assembled using Imperial hex bolts, different sizes. How do you know what wrench to grab when you took the wrong one in the first place.

Another thing, I do have a well equipped workshop. Among the many tools I have, also many drills. The smallest drill is 0.1mm. It goes up by 0.1mm per step, ending at 10mm. After that it continues to go up with 0.5mm per drill.
An example drill 5.0mm, next 5.1mm, next 5.2mm, next 5.3.....until 5.9, next 6.0....etc...
How do you(did you?) name these set of drills if it were imperial sizes only differ 0.1mm(equivalent)....?

I know you have that numerical system, but I'm talking before that system was used.
When I was at school we had to learn all about Imperial, The smallest we could measure with our calliper at the time was 1/128". There were even questions during exam about it....😡. At the time we all hated you....🤭   To be clear that was looooong before digital callipers existed.!

image.jpeg.da65737b7e9339987ccdf3380f2134cd.jpeg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yes, I remember that 😟  Hated fractions.  Much prefer metric but I do also still think in feet and inches.

And yes, when I was at school we had conversion tables on the backs of our exercise books.  With gear based on American standards I find myself needing to remember the conversion factors.  Inch = 25.4mm.  Foot = 305mm.  1/4" = 6.35mm (scope rings etc.).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Corncrake said:

They are not SI base units, but they can be derived, I dont think they are named derived units though are they ?

(OT) I dont like named SI units. You can feel lbs/sq.in or kg/cm2 but whats a Newton when its spread out ?

ducks

(/ot)

and dont get me started on cycles/sec, they just hertz.

I may have used the wrong terminology... I think they are recognised as being "metric" units - mensuration is not a speciality of mine so apologies if terminology is incorrect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Chriske said:

How do you(did you?) name these set of drills if it were imperial sizes only differ 0.1mm(equivalent)....?

At the time we all hated you....🤭   To be clear that was looooong before digital callipers existed.!

You really dont want to know, , , trust me , ,

Oh well if you insist - we used letters ! and would you believe even the sizes of the differences differed

A, B, C, D, differed by 4thou, all looks good, , , until you find that F is 7thou bigger than E. A few more 4thou intervals and then L is 9thou bigger than K

argh even we hated us !

Actually, "at the time" is good news ! I thought y'all still did ! lol!

 

 

Edited by Corncrake
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tenor Viol said:

I may have used the wrong terminology... I think they are recognised as being "metric" units - mensuration is not a speciality of mine so apologies if terminology is incorrect

No worries, all good for a giggle ! (unless one is trying to land on Mars, gulp )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only visible thing we still buy here is wood.
Buying a sheet of plywood, 95% we buy is still 1220x2440 mm, that is 8'x4' if I'm not mistaken.  Meaning, at a bigger scale lots of wood is lost because nobody works with Imperial sizes at this side of the channel...😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was at (primary?) school, we had the delightful mixture of imperial weights and £/s/d.  This would lead to delightful questions along the lines of:

If X costs £1, 2shillings & tuppence halfpenny a pound, how much would 3 stone, 2 lbs and 5 oz cost?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Oldfort said:

When I was at (primary?) school, we had the delightful mixture of imperial weights and £/s/d.  This would lead to delightful questions along the lines of:

If X costs £1, 2shillings & tuppence halfpenny a pound, how much would 3 stone, 2 lbs and 5 oz cost?

Nooooo, I hated arithmetic love maths. (68 yrs going on 6 yrs mental age)

Regards Andrew 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chriske said:

Buying a sheet of plywood, 95% we buy is still 1220x2440 mm, that is 8'x4' if I'm not mistaken.  Meaning, at a bigger scale lots of wood is lost because nobody works with Imperial sizes at this side of the channel...😁

Lots of sheet materials are sold here in 2440x1220mm sizes, but then others have been changed to 2400x1200mm.  For example when I was building the observatory I had a couple of sheets of 2440x1200  OSB left over from another project that I used for the roof, but I needed four so I ordered a couple more.  The new ones were 2400x1200.  A full sheet of plywood however still comes as 2440x1220.

James

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chriske said:

I

Another thing, I do have a well equipped workshop. Among the many tools I have, also many drills. The smallest drill is 0.1mm. It goes up by 0.1mm per step, ending at 10mm. After that it continues to go up with 0.5mm per drill.

 

I can't imagine a drill bit as small as 0.1 mm, what does it look like, and what is it used for, my smallest drill bit is 1.5 mm, and that is very delicate.

John 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These very small drill-bits need a Dremel of course.
0.7 and 0.8 are in use right now.

Drillbit 0.1mm is not visible because it is right above one of the tape measure's black marking.

image.jpeg.d521f87bc20db4cf3adeda0aac996080.jpeg

Getting a bit closer....

Damn...!!! Making this picture I notice 0.2mm is broke..

But 0.1 is still ok. Using these small drillbits you need a Dremel it needs about 35.000 rpm. I made a special tool to hold my Dremel around the tailstock's barrel. Works perfect.
Why do I need these small drill bits...? : to make holes for 3D-printing nozzles.
The one I use the most is 0.25, 0.3, 0.35 and 0.4mm. But that is for friends. Except for the 0.4mm I never use these small drill bits myself because mostly I use very big nozzles. The biggest I use very often is the 1.5mm.  Busy building a bigger printer(on hold right now) to make very large parts using a 2.5(!)mm nozzle. But that's another story.

image.jpeg.adb98e76dcc20620ee35751a8a77b752.jpeg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Oldfort said:

If X costs £1, 2shillings & tuppence halfpenny a pound, how much would 3 stone, 2 lbs and 5 oz cost?

You can have that stone that broke my knee cap last winter, for free. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imaging a lot of miniature drills must have broken!  My little cheapo Chinese clone of a lathe would not be accurate enough! 

Edited by Gina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the veracity of this, but allegedly the "Japanese inch" at 0.96" which used to be common for eyepieces was caused by inadvertently transposing 25.4mm to 24.5mm for the conversion from Imperial to metric....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.