HunterHarling Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 This is a work in progress, at least as far as processing goes. This is only RGB, as I ran out of time to get L. 🙄 Not too sure about my processing at this point, I also have collimation issues, which can be seen.😟 I need a refractor... 30 hours of 300 sec R,G, and B images. All in all, I'm pretty happy with it, but I'm definitely going to reprocess. How can I improve? Thanks for looking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanelly Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 No tips, no critiques, just admiration for a job well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RugbyRene Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 I would be extremely happy with this. I think you're being too hard on yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demonperformer Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Beats my best attempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Maurer Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Very nice, I’ve never had much luck with this target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Hancock Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Very nice, can't see what you mean about needing a new refractor ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHarling Posted June 21, 2019 Author Share Posted June 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Ivan Hancock said: Very nice, can't see what you mean about needing a new refractor ? Thanks everyone. Ivan- my C8 is always needing collimation, and it gives the stars a weird half-blue half-red color... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AltAzAstro Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Excellent image, can't help but praise and congratulate. Do you know what is the magnitude of the small galaxy that can be barely perceived as an elongated disk on the right of M81 and a bit to the bottom? I could not find it of any of my planetarium apps ... hence I guess it is pretty dim ... 15-16? ADD-ON By the way, I now notice there is another one, even slightly fainter on the other side of M81, almost symmetrical to the first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antariksha Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Outstanding work.. Image is really good. Congratulations.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gina Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Great image nicely processed IMO - can't see that it could be improved. Lovely! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
souls33k3r Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Absolutely brilliant. Really love what you've done there. Mind if i ask what gear did you use to capture this and also what are you skies like on the bortle scale? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam J Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 11 hours ago, HunterHarling said: I need a refractor... You might get nice round stars but you may also find the galaxy will not have the same detail, your stars are not that bad anyhow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHarling Posted June 21, 2019 Author Share Posted June 21, 2019 10 hours ago, AltAzAstro said: Excellent image, can't help but praise and congratulate. Do you know what is the magnitude of the small galaxy that can be barely perceived as an elongated disk on the right of M81 and a bit to the bottom? I could not find it of any of my planetarium apps ... hence I guess it is pretty dim ... 15-16? ADD-ON By the way, I now notice there is another one, even slightly fainter on the other side of M81, almost symmetrical to the first. I'll have to check it out. My images usually get around 16-17 mag dim, so it's probably around there. 8 hours ago, souls33k3r said: Absolutely brilliant. Really love what you've done there. Mind if i ask what gear did you use to capture this and also what are you skies like on the bortle scale? Thanks. I used an Edge 8" SCT, ZWO asi1600mm, and Orion Atlas Pro az-eq g mount. My bortal scale is about 5 and I can see to 5.5 magnitude on a clear night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan potts Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 An outstanding capture and one of the best I have seen of this. Alan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev M Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 15 hours ago, HunterHarling said: How can I improve? Short of buying Hubble....don't think you can That is spectacular Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomato Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 30 hrs, and it’s all in there, great M81.👍 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 I think you should have more faint stuff. The background doesn't look clipped and seems to be at a reasonable level but Holmberg is struggling and there is no sign of Arp's loop. OK, the L layer is the one for finding these so why spend so long on the colour? What you have of the galaxy is very good, for sure, but do you need 10 hours per channel? I've never gone anywhere near that. You won't need 10 hours in L to take this to another level. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHarling Posted June 21, 2019 Author Share Posted June 21, 2019 20 minutes ago, ollypenrice said: I think you should have more faint stuff. The background doesn't look clipped and seems to be at a reasonable level but Holmberg is struggling and there is no sign of Arp's loop. OK, the L layer is the one for finding these so why spend so long on the colour? What you have of the galaxy is very good, for sure, but do you need 10 hours per channel? I've never gone anywhere near that. You won't need 10 hours in L to take this to another level. Olly I was trying not to over stretch the image... but I do have about 10 hours of L. Would about 10 hours of L be worth it to add? I assumed that I would need 20-30 hours to make a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 Great image. 1 hour ago, HunterHarling said: I assumed that I would need 20-30 hours to make a difference. Not necessarily. Just process the L to the best of your ability and blend it into the colour (lrgb combination). If you want more L, you can combine the r, g, and b masters into a synthetic luminance. Then combine that with the captured L master. It may improve the overall quality of the luminance, but I'm not concinced that you need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 Your L will have about three times the signal of any individual colour layer so it should make a huge difference. In fact equal amounts of exposure in all four filters is in many ways ideal because the L won't bleach out the colour. It's possible to shoot much more L in search of the very faint but this makes processing harder. When stretching L in Curves you can get the background up to, say, 23, then pin it at that and stretch a little more above that to find the faint tidal (or IFN) loops and Holmberg. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarsG76 Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 What a fantastic looking image... this is definitely something to be proud of.... if you collect some luma subs and create a luma channel, than that should take care of your obvious miss collimation visible on the stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 For data you already have, the stars can be given a dodgy 😁 cosmetic tweak if you have Photoshop. Choose Magic Wand, click on a star and save the following as an action with a function key shortcut: Select-Modify-Expand . Try 5 but experiment. Select-Modify-Feather. Try 3 but experiment. Filter-Blur-Radial Blur-Spin-Best. Repeat this (CtrlF). Deselect. Now you can 'roundify' a star by choosing it with the wand and hitting the function key. Very quick. You can make two versions of the action, one for small stars and one for large, by using greater or lesser values for Expand and Feather. Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wimvb Posted June 22, 2019 Share Posted June 22, 2019 There is a very simple test you can do to see how much real information there is in an image, such as your L master. Make a copy of the image. Stretch that copy using histogram transform (pixinsight) or levels (ps) by bringing in the white point slider so far that you start showing details in the background. This will clip stars and the main galaxy, but it will reveal anything in the background. You may need to also bring in the black point, but do so without clipping. If you see the remains of dust motes, or a fixed pattern caused by your camera, you've gone too far. But you should definitely see the small satellite galaxy Holmberg IX, and maybe also Arp's loop before this. It may be easier to see those details if you first invert the image, in which case of course, you move in the black point slider. This test will help you once you start working on the original image. You can keep it as a reference to do side by side comparisons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHarling Posted June 23, 2019 Author Share Posted June 23, 2019 I'm working on the L data now... On 22/06/2019 at 01:07, ollypenrice said: For data you already have, the stars can be given a dodgy 😁 cosmetic tweak if you have Photoshop. Choose Magic Wand, click on a star and save the following as an action with a function key shortcut: Select-Modify-Expand . Try 5 but experiment. Select-Modify-Feather. Try 3 but experiment. Filter-Blur-Radial Blur-Spin-Best. Repeat this (CtrlF). Deselect. Now you can 'roundify' a star by choosing it with the wand and hitting the function key. Very quick. You can make two versions of the action, one for small stars and one for large, by using greater or lesser values for Expand and Feather. Olly Thanks, I'll give this a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterHarling Posted June 24, 2019 Author Share Posted June 24, 2019 I finally added the L data. I made a super luminance using all 40 hours of data. I think it looks better... there is definitely more ifn. How does it look? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.