Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_christmas_presents.thumb.jpg.587637e0d01baf4b6d21b73610610bbb.jpg

Recommended Posts

The Cat's Paw Nebula ( NGC 6334 ) in Scorpius 

updated ( slight tweak to colour balance, a little brighter and tad more contrast )  

EFF0DE9F-B3B8-4DB9-B893-3B42F22F1932.thumb.jpeg.7623bdad86af26989ed5a4453e0bc4c1.jpeg

please click / tap on image to see larger and sharper - a full size image can be seen here )

......

original:

991242490_NGC6334-CatsPawNebula(2732x1857px)-compressed.thumb.jpg.dc78de62313119ceab07df14d5a71e34.jpg

( please click / tap on image to see larger and sharper - a full size image can be seen here )

……………………...

Also known as the Bear Claw Nebula, NGC 6334 is an emission nebula near the scorpion's tail in the Scorpius constellation. 

Image details:

Image centre ...... RA: 17 20 08.185  Dec: -35 52 30.91
Field of view ..... 57' 37.8" x 38' 51.8"
Rotation .......... 0.00 deg ( North is up )
Resolution ........ 0.586 arcsec/px

Telescope: Orion Optics CT12 Newtonian ( mirror 300mm, fl 1200mm, f4 ).
Corrector: ASA 2" Coma Corrector Quattro 1.175x.
Effective Focal Length / Aperture : 1470mm f4.7

Mount: Skywatcher EQ8
Guiding: TSOAG9 Off-Axis-Guider, Starlight Xpress Lodestar X2, PHD2 

Camera:
Nikon D5300 (unmodified) (sensor 23.5 x 15.6mm, 6016x4016 3.9um pixels)

Location:
Blue Mountains, Australia 
Moderate light pollution ( pale green zone on darksitefinder.com map )

Capture ( July 2018 )
6 sets of sub-images with exposure duration for each set doubling ( 4s to 240s ) all at ISO 250.
168 x 4 min frames plus ~10 frames each for the shorter exposures  

Processing:
Calibration: bias, dark and flat
Integration in 8 sets
HDR combination 

Pixinsight July 2018

Edited by MikeODay
Image updated
  • Like 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice.  For obvious reasons am not intimately acquainted with this target.

Carole 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Carole - yes I imagine that it is quite low in the sky for you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonderful.  I am wondering if a slight drop in black point would bring out the details a bit.  Its great as is though.

Rodd

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/07/2018 at 01:30, Rodd said:

Wonderful.  I am wondering if a slight drop in black point would bring out the details a bit.  Its great as is though.

Rodd

Thanks Rodd

Here is a further tweak.  What do you think, better or have I over done it?

E27746AC-9EE4-4021-861E-D6328CB0ED1C.thumb.jpeg.2199bbf1181901c4d01c9bb202efaf0f.jpeg

Cheers

Mike

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, MikeODay said:

Here is a further tweak.  What do you think, better or have I over done it?

I think it looks good.  You did not over do it at all.  The structures stand out a bit.  Nice.

Rodd

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

15 minutes ago, Rodd said:

I think it looks good.  You did not over do it at all.  The structures stand out a bit.  Nice.

Rodd

Thanks Rodd.

I find it hard sometimes to set the right contrast - I calibrate my monitor for colour but the contrast is very different between my monitor and IPAD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, MikeODay said:

 

Thanks Rodd.

I find it hard sometimes to set the right contrast - I calibrate my monitor for colour but the contrast is very different between my monitor and IPAD.

I know what you mean.  I find the im ages look their best on iphones and ipads.  Something about the screens.  Maybe being smaller helps too.

Rodd

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

updated ( slight tweak to colour balance, a little brighter and tad more contrast )  

E91E9D12-0263-42A2-9649-E4C2DC2E43EE.thumb.jpeg.c7a850b01ae07089d1c36ba66f3ce355.jpeg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats look heaps good.. WAY WAY better than what I ended up with last time I tried imaging this nebula.... well done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 31/07/2018 at 20:03, MarsG76 said:

Thats look heaps good.. WAY WAY better than what I ended up with last time I tried imaging this nebula.... well done.

Thanks for that!  I am quite pleased with the way it turned out.   

Although ...

The colour balance was a challenge and I'm still not sure it is "correct" - the problem I had is that there is no neutral area that I could use as a reference to remove the light pollution.  Even the dark areas are really red!

Also, looking at other deep images, I think that the blue tint at the far left  is not due to reflection of blue star light from interstellar material :) - I think it is probably due to the very strong stretch of the dark tones bringing out atmospheric flare from the bright star just out of frame - there must have been more dust/vapour in the air than I thought; it looked clear!

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, MikeODay said:

Thanks for that!  I am quite pleased with the way it turned out.   

Although ...

The colour balance was a challenge and I'm still not sure it is "correct" - the problem I had is that there is no neutral area that I could use as a reference to remove the light pollution.  Even the dark areas are really red!

Also, looking at other deep images, I think that the blue tint at the far left  is not due to reflection of blue star light from interstellar material :) - I think it is probably due to the very strong stretch of the dark tones bringing out atmospheric flare from the bright star just out of frame - there must have been more dust/vapour in the air than I thought; it looked clear!

Cheers

Mike

Very dense in Nebulosity, that's for sure, although with the blue, it looks like it convexes into a point so I doubt that it's atmospheric haze dispersion, I this that it's the result of star light... 

Either way, it looks great.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/08/2018 at 15:37, MarsG76 said:

Very dense in Nebulosity, that's for sure, although with the blue, it looks like it convexes into a point so I doubt that it's atmospheric haze dispersion, I this that it's the result of star light... 

Either way, it looks great.

Thanks for that.

Cheers

Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By tasheeya
      Leo Triplet (M65, M66, and NGC 3628), The Leo Triplet is a small group of galaxies about 35 million light-years away in the constellation Leo.
      large version at astrobin
      https://www.astrobin.com/391520/

      Date: 4th January and 2nd February 2019
      Mount: Skywatcher EQ6-R Pro
      Telescope: Orion 10" f/3.9 Newtonian Astrograph
      Camera: Nikon D5300 self modded full spectrum
      Total exposure: ~3 hours
      Subs : 300sx36, Flats, Bias, Darks
      ISO: 400
      Guide Scope: Orion 50mm
      Guide Cam: ASI120MM
      Filter: Optolong UV/IR cut
      Corrector: Baader MPCC Mark III Coma Corrector
      Capturing: digiCamControl
      Guiding: PHD2
      Stacking: Deep Sky Stacker
      Processing: Pixinsight/Photoshop
      Location: Ridiyagama, Sri Lanka

      thank you and clear skies.

    • By Xiga
      I wasn't going to share this, but what the heck. The winter of discontent continues, so i guess even this little data has to constitute an image these days. 
      After what seemed like an age of night after night of clouds, we had a rare few hrs of clear skies one night last week. So i managed to grab a whopping 9 x 7 mins of the Horsehead Nebula before it disappeared behind the neighbor's house. I then needed something else to aim for, so i brought up the Leo Triplet Sequence in SGP and managed to nab about 2.75 hrs in total, before the clouds returned. It really, really needs double, if not triple this amount, so i wasn't really intending on processing this tbh. I was really just messing about in APP and PS testing several things out, so there was no proper workflow being adhered to. I took an Auto DDP stretch out of APP and quickly processed it in PS, without much care. I noticed it was lacking in colour, so i thought this would actually be a good candidate to try out some ArcSinh Colour-Preserving stretches, so i took another linear stack and used Mark Shelley's excellent PS method for doing the colour-preserving stretches. Lo and behold, i ended up with a stack that was very rich in colour, so much so in fact that the sky background had also mottled up pretty bad. So i used a mask to only apply the rich colours to the stars and galaxies of the original image, and it made a HUGE difference. It was only at this stage that i suddenly thought i might as well actually go ahead and make an image out of it.
      I really want to stretch it more, but it just can't take it. There's just not enough data, end of story. In fact i may have already stretched it too far as it is. The background is a tad lower than i would have liked as well, but it was needed to help suppress the noise. I've ran quite a bit of NR too, more than i'm usually comfortable with, and it's still noisy. I know what the answer to that is of course, more data! 😆 (not likely). I do quite like the colours though 😃
      Feedback welcome.
      24 x 420s (2.75 hrs)
      80ED (x0.85), D5300, HEQ5-Pro, IDAS-D1. 
      Resized to 66% to help hide some of the warts! 

    • By stepping beyond
      I started getting better skies , getting my old mount problems are an ongoing thing that I deal with nightly . I ran tests in the frigid temps. on ngc1977 and IC434 and the Flame to get a handle on it  and get my Moonlite mini v2 control setup in SGP. I've been reading the Astronomical handbook on imaging and processing and I think my images are making improvements , 1977 is out of focus on my  colored channels due to trying to do it by eye. I didn't get sgp to run a sequence until 3 nights later and now I've got rain. This is the 1st time running on these targets, colors aren't correct but, they're improvement. I would add the # of frames but, they're all different and good enough to get my settings set and they're going to pop when I make a run on them . I'm really excited that I could get this and to have a test like this after being beat to death for months trying to get the PO'MAN rig working like this. 



    • By stepping beyond
      This is the 1st test night for this disabled AA with my new moonlite auto focer mini v2 control ,1st time collecting data on the Horsehead nebula with any camera that I've owned , {30s } 25 frames luminous and 10 red channel combined in AIP4win and  PScs2 , astronomy tools . I used an  asi 174MM cooled -20c Zwo mini 5 efw , 8 in  astrograph , lxd55 mount guided with Orion 50mm  mini w/ helical . Captured in Sharpcap live stacking ,  I'm 0n my way finally got my autofocus set up correctly in Sgp to run a sequence later that week . It's a great feeling when everything is working together.

    • By Dinglem
      I've upgraded my focuser so have a Skywatcher Dual-Speed Low Profile 1.25/2" Crayford focuser for sale £70 delivered to UK only.
      Bank transfer or Paypal F&F preferred.
       
       

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.